To Writers Beware: Ferociously defending Research Paper Company ultimately hurts the company

WB:

I have gone through some of your more recent threads and I quickly noticed that you still ferociously and insanely defend the Research Paper Company even when students have genuine complaints and fears. Your lurking of this forum clearly indicates your roving eyes are forever trying to notice anywhere where the company is mentioned and when this happens , you proceed with your toxic posts against the scammed student, threatening them with dire consequences and demanding that the mod remove the post.

Whilst as a company whr, I believe you have all the rights to defend it, I equally believe that in the process , you hurt the company more than you help it. With the $300/month you are paid to protect the interests of the company, you rarely do anything that can help the company and, indeed, you are a liability to the company.

Students have long discovered that you are employed by the company and any defense you make in favour of the company is at the very best treated as yet another output from a spammer and ,consequently, students have learnt to ignore your posts/threads.

For example, your crooked aide- pheelkys- is employed by the company yet as an independent writer, he constantly scams students. Don't you think he is able to sneak in his scamming tendencies right through Research systems and thus one can hypothesis that the complaints from students about Research are actually as a result of shoddy work by the likes of pheleaks? Plus of course other writers.

If I owned Research Paper Company, I would sack you yesterday.

You have made the site look like a shady outfit protected by venom breathing, rotten, shadowy, dopey, irresponsible and depressed shills like you.

1) No one brings up the Research Paper Company more than you.

2) You keep starting new threads then running away instead of actually continuing "conversations."

3) You're a c* nt.

Because i get angry when you and your conniving commander(WB) want everyone to believe it is the only genuine company. This is a ridiculous position.


I 'run away' when i discover my debaters are intellectually challenged. Like you, of course.

Neither of us have ever claimed anything remotely like this.


You run away when you realize that all you manage to do is create more publicity for the people you attack.

Wow! This is the longest you've stuck to a thread you've started in some time! Those new meds must be working, huh?

Look, unlike you, i have a fantastic life, free of stress. Right now, i am in a hotel, readying myself to address a group of intellectuals who constantly seek my wise counsel.

What of you?. You are just trawling a horrible forum, waiting for gullible students to fall into your stinking cesspit.

Uh huh. I'm sitting on a golden litter carried by a flock of adoring elves who feed my strawberries from long, slender forks flecked with gold.

ooooh.....can i sense a tinge of the old, ugly monster we call jealousy.
If you work hard, you will likewise be like me and enjoy all the glory that come along with being famous.

No. You can sense my utter disbelief that anyone considers you "wise."


Thanks, but I really don't have any desire to be a vindictive, lying, irrational poser with delusions of grandeur. I'll stick to my life of upward mobility and personal satisfaction, if it's all the same to you.

I guess an idiot would still have considered Einstein stupid.


Upward mobility= trapping more students into your rotten sump.
Personal satisfaction= lying to students that you are competent.
Once more, i win.

That's terrible logic, and entirely inapplicable here.


Actually, it refers to the fact that I'm able to save some of what I earn, affording me a stable lifestyle of sufficient luxury that promises greater returns in the future. My growing customer base is part of this success, but this customer base is growing due to repeat business and referrals, not "traps."


Whether or not I am competent is a matter for my customers to determine. They have overwhelmingly affirmed my competency.

What I was actually referring to in terms of "personal satisfaction" has nothing whatsoever to do with my work as a writer and researcher, however.


Sure. If telling yourself that makes you happy, who am I to tread on such a precious flower?

I hate to cut in uninvited, but I couldn't resist drawing attention to this little bit of whimsy. tell me, Pheelyks, in this fantasy of yours, do you realize what a fag you are?

No you don't, and that's how public forums work, anyway.


I know you're not big on reading, but context really helps.

I also know that you're insecure professionally, personally, and sexually, but you should try not to let that color your perception of the world. There is nothing "faggy" about elves, as a lot of Lord of the Rings fans (of which I am not one) will vehemently attest to.

priceless.

but granted, wide load, let's say that elves are actually bad, tough mfs. I'm confused-- so, you're saying that these bad-ss Legolas type elves are carrying you on the palanquin?

if so, I think you should change "forks" to "swords." if you know what I mean.

As I said, I'm not a big Lord of the Rings fan. I'm not sure what you've described above. My post was a creation of spur-of-the-moment fantasy, as an analog to queenie's claim that some counsel was waiting for her to address them with words of wisdom.

Context, m'boy. Reading threads before replying to them is really useful stuff.