Dear WritersBeware,
The URL you have given reveal only messages poste by six persons (tima1983, jjmarr, rav_London, moonlighthaze, celticless, and LawrenceOfArabia). To that effect where stand your claim of 'numersous' complaints against the essay agency?
Secondly, all of these six hid their name and contact numbers/address to verify the authenticity of their claims. Why it is so? Had they been genuine they should reveal who they are? Apparently, these are fictitous names to malign the essay agency. Isn't it?
Thirdly, even if it is acknowledged that these six are the genuine people to file complains, why don't you consider that out of hundreds who get their work done only six are dissatisfied? In other words, this is very low percentage, perhaps, the complaint ratio would be less than 1%. Had the number of complaints been in hundreds validating the word 'numerous,' I would have believed in your words.
Fourthly, you are needlessly banking on the statements given by other six people. That might be their experience, not yours. I think you need to be told that the word 'experience' is not meant for the purpose you have been using. You can say that it is your 'observation' based on the experience of others that you are hell bent upon to issue statements against the essay agency.
Fourthly, Joe Boll and the essay agency are not one person: both are different. No news item has been published that Joe Boll cannot write an essay or write faulty essays. These essays are written by writers and not by Joe Boll. Joe Boll is basically a middle man. So, personal character of Joe Boll, whether right or wrong, cannot affect the structure and function of the essay agency. If Joe Boll is such a wrong person, you need to speak to the telephone company as to why did it provide a line telephone to him to establish his credibility after such an offense?
Fifthly, Joe Boll is not my friend. But I condemn your attitude to tarnish his image. It is people like you who don't let a person rectify his past mistakes. It is people like you who keep society divided on the basis of history/past. I condemn you and your approach. If you have some personal vendetta with Joe Boll, you should settle it with him at some proper forum. This is cowardice on your part to hide your name and address and unleash a propaganda against anyone using the facility of the website.
Sixthly, just consult your lawyer. You have no right to unearth someone's past and advise others in this way and in public against some one. If law of this country is satisfied with him, you have no right to comment on his character or whatever happened in the past. If you think comments posted by others are your own 'observation', as you have stated (a proof against you) and that observation offers you an open opportunity to write against Joe Boll, you are mistaken. You will be held personally accountable for character assassination of Joe Boll causing him financial harm. So be ware.
At the end, if you are so bold and volunteer to save others with no malafide intention against Joe Boll, kindly provide your original name and address. Let us see how high moral pedestal you are standing on.
I expect your reply.
Regards,
Q.Rashid