AssignmentsHelp.com : verifiable background information

Since "Kim987" felt the need to dishonestly pose as a "delighted customer" and SPAM many threads in this forum with unsolicited links to AssignmentsHelp.com, I felt the need to shed some light on the site whose owners are trying to keep its background information hidden by making its Whois data "private." As luck would have it, I have other means of discovering historical truths.

AssignmentsHelp.com
Muhammad Arsalan
Karachi
Sind(en)
38000
Pakistan
+92.24555555
aalian_arsalan@hotmail

On the "Contact Us" page of AssignmentsHelp.com, the purported "UK" address is listed as follows (I s-i* you not):

Mail
AssignmentsHelp.com
United Kingdom

So, apparently, to contact the owner by postal mail, all you have to do is address your envelope to "AssignmentsHelp.com, United Kingdom." ;)

---------------------------------------------

The "Muhammad Arsalan" name is directly connected to the following sites:

assignmenthelpaustralia.com
assignmenthelpusa.com
assignmentshelp.ca
assignmentshelp.co.uk
assignmentshelp.com
cassignmenthelp.com
essayassignmenthelp.com
homeworkshelp.com
onlineassignmenthelp.com
programmingassignmentexpert.com
programmingassignmentshelp.com

• 
  assignmentshelp.png
  

Oooh, you are quite the information super tube wizard. Please, share with us your mystical secrets!

So much truthiness!

I'm not stalking. I'm here out of a selfless desire to expose the truth about W2B.

Yes, you're exposing the "truth" regarding your inferior reasoning, researching, and debating skills.

I really don't see how any of that is inferior. It's really simple. Scam sites can be identified almost immediately by noting just a few simple traits. However, you'd rather have everybody believe that identifying a site requires this weirdly complex thing you call research. That's both deceptive and weird.

If it was so obvious, can you tell everyone how WB got that list of sites?

New Spheelys, not yet tired of licking WB's a<s?
It's weird how an established fraud tries so desperately to identify with an established psychotic *****. But then, you aren't called Dolt75 for no reason.

If identifying scam sites are so obvious, then can I cite the sources for Warren2Buffet's list of site? Do you understand how ridiculous that sounds? Are you and W2B working down the same list of fallacious argument tactics and taking turns?

Not only does your if-then statement make no sense, but you are asking me to cite another persons source. I don't know how W2B compiled this list because she does not cite here sources (as per usual). This means that her information is useless and likely fabricated.

You're also missing the point: Identifying scam web sites can be accomplished without any sort of in-depth investigation. There's a basic formula to follow. This formula has not changed much since the days of EssayFraud (that's a cited source).

Your basic claim, doc, seems to be that you can "just tell" when a site is a scam. "It's obvious." Can you? Is it?

I once worked for a company that had a horribly-written web-page, and they were very good. The owner decided to save some $ by writing the web-copy and designing the page himself. It looked like a Geocities page, but it had a steady stream of clients and great WOM advertising.

I worked for another company that had a website written in very poor English-- the Chinese owner outsourced the web-copy to someone who also didn't know the language. However, it was a legit site that paid me on time and had a lot of repeat customers whom it treated very well.

According to your irresponsible and superficial rubric, both of these companies were "obvious scams."

You're an idiot.

Btw, doofus, do you remember when you had that ageist hissy-fit? You assumed blindly that I was some kind of senior citizen, and I asked you how old you were. You never answered, and I'm curious: how old are you? It's hard to tell on the internet; you seem about fourteen.

Nope. That still makes no sense. But thanks for the anecdotes. Here, I have some too. I have a ****** website, and I too work with a Chinese client that offers "editing" for scientific ESL manuscripts. The Chinese client is actually providing a ghostwriting service. The website is written in crappy Chinglish. No client has been ripped off.

Fact: Every single website that W2B has identified as an an ESL scam since I've been a member here could have been identified with much simpler means. You and her claim to have insider's knowledge about some larger and more complex clandestine operations that seek to steal money from unsuspecting walkers who double as college students. I call BS. Come on. Ten dollars a page? That's not a red flag. Really?

I don't need to know the life history of a politician's third cousin in order to identify a lie. You guys are effing spin doctors for no reason other than to feel self-important. Those are pretty low stakes.

Dave, you still made a nonsensical statement and asked me to cite the source of another's information.

I don't expect you to prove or cite anything, believe me. You've established enough precedent there.

You demand transparency because you're lazy, and then you claim, "It was all obvious, anyway." It's the latest in a long line of hypocritical tantrums you've been throwing from the sidelines.

Meanwhile, the questions are adding up: Who's Dave? How old are you? Wtf is an unsuspecting walker?

Keep driving off-topic, Dave. That argument tactic is getting a bit old, don't you think? You certainly did expect me to cite another person's sources. That is explicitly what you asked for.

Stay on topic: You seem to be asserting that AssignmentsHelp.com is a cite that is incredibly difficult to identify as a scam. You also seem to be saying that W2B is absolutely needed in this case.

Let me explain, very simply, so that you can have an outside shot at understanding, simpleton. I am the OP of this thread. I created the topic. You promptly posted off-topic, propagandistic nonsense. Subsequently, you hypocritically and psychotically accuse editor75 of "driving off-topic," which is another example of what you did here. Understand yet?

There you go again. A bit of brevity would help you greatly, if your intentions were truly selfless. Yes, I get it that you feel the need to shed some light on AssignmentsHelp.com, but in doing so you're managed to muddle it all up with a bunch of words. I am accusing you of doing this so as to maintain false air of legitimate authority. I am also accusing you of failing to cite your sources. You're failure on these two fronts indicates that you are hiding something and/or fabricating your evidence.