do you think it is morally acceptable to turn in someone else's work as your own for academic credit?
Maybe its time to start reading, before you answer. What I said was:
'I reflect upon myself and I know now that what I did was wrong and I wish to turn back time, but I can't'
But I'm sure you are here to say what you want to say without giving any attention of what I say. That gives an inside as to why writers provide such a poor papers. You never read students instructions.
the way this question is phrased is evidence of the general failure of our higher education system
Obviously English is not my native language, and I am dyslectic. Education doesn't need judgmental academic arrogant like yourself. Education needs people who are willing to look into peoples problems, and help them be better.
the reason I feel no guilt whatsoever for the service I provide
Congratulation you live in denial.
Anymore, higher education is all about buying a piece of paper, not about developing academic or intellectual skills
Can't agree more. I got myself into higher education to learn and become a better person. Not to get a better job, had already 2 successful businesses. Maybe you should try the same rather than just pulling fingers.
why not help people buy that diploma and get a piece of the pie while I'm at it?
An inside of how writers think. Not surprised anymore why the papers are so terrible. You have a very obvious dislike for your work and the people that you are called to help.
To answer this question though, yes, the companies I work for are both more "morally oriented" and legally permissible than the scummy ones.
The word 'more' doesn't say much. Does it? But I don't know the site you working for, so I would probably be the same judgmental with you If I was to judge before I see. Though, I find it hard to believe that a site would state with big letters that they provide model essays and not final ones, and still get customers.
In a perfect world, intelligence and communication skills would be more marketable.
First there is something that is called exams. You need to pass exams before you end up giving papers. So buying 2-3 papers in your 5-6 years of academic career doesn't exactly making you incompetent. Yet again it's not morally or legally right, I agree. Second there is something called marking. Someone like you (superior skills writer and researcher) will end up with a very respectable high degree when some1 like me most probably would end up with just a pass. It doesn't matter how many people have degrees. If you are a good one, you are a good one, and no matter what, academics or market will pick you out from the 'crowd'. I know it is easier to blame others for your own faults but I'm afraid you can't blame other but yourself here mate.
In an imperfect world, I help the incompetent gain mediocrity, and I make an imperfect living doing it.
I can't help noticing a frustration. Again none to blame but yourself.
Closing, I would once more like to say that YES I did cheat, and yes it was wrong. Though, this forum and my intentions were to let the rest students know that using those sites is not the best possible solution and not to pick an argument with you. So overall we are saying the exact same thing, but you just had to let some steam come out, din't you?