2 problems I have with the second website are:
- Unlimited rewrites/modifications until complete satisfaction.
This type of ruling tends to open the writer to the possibility of endless revisions in the guise of an "unsatisfied" client. There are times the student decides to go into the essay selling business by offering his paper to his classmates. He promises them original papers because the company offers exactly what is stated above. So the student can have 12 versions of the same paper, make money from it, while the writer ends up with penalties and deductions. Sometimes leaving him with no income as the cunning student decides that he is not satisfied even after countless revisions and demands a refund.
- College professors endorse a "learn from example" approach
This is the same as the professor's suggestion. The "learn from example" approach relates to previously written essays that are accessible to the student via the library database. An originally written paper for the student does not qualify under the same considerations. "Learn from example" suggest previously published / graded work. What the company is selling is an original paper, which has not been graded nor previously submitted, thereby not meeting the definition as set by the professors. These original essays are meant to be submitted for a grade.
The opinions are that of the author's alone based on an individual capacity. Opinions are provided "as is" and are not error-free.