New crime by essaywriters.net & bestessays.com - Reselling papers, false advertising

That is a statement of fact, NOT an "opinion." You are wrong.


Sorry, still wrong. There is absolutely NOTHING fraudulent about selling one's own writings. What makes EW_writer's employer fraudulent is the vast assortment of illegal and/or deceptive acts in which an investigator has proven that it engages in order to fool customers, writers, and governments.

Oh, but that's not answer to my question at all.


You don't make the laws, but you claim to KNOW them perfectly, right? So answer the questions.

Deception is the very basis of this business. When papers are bought and sold to be submitted to get a higher or better grade, isn't that deception? Aren't both parties equally responsible for the fraud?

How can the act be ethical when conducted by an American company/writer and unethical when an ESL writer/company engages in such acts?

Revelation about the identity of writers is a secondary issue. Its like debating that an act of theft conducted by an American is acceptable but the same act when conducted by an individual of some other nationality is not.

Obvioulsy, when the very nature of a business is based on extremely shaky grounds, the debate about morality seems absurd to me.

WB, should I assume that if a writing company operating on the web, does not reveal its true location or the identity of its writers, you would affirm the company to be legitimate?

In such a case, would there would be no issues about legitamcy of such a business?

I'm sorry, but that question is a tad confusing.

This is a focused thread concerning specific, verifiable evidence about a particular entity. Let's keep it that way, please.


You clearly don't get the point, even though it has been explained quite nicely in this forum by at least three different members-Lavinia, FreelanceWriter, and me. I'm sure that OxbridgeResearchers could educate you on the stark differences, as well. I will not waste my time when all you need to do is read old posts.

You may also want to [voirdireveritas.blogspot.com] - read this blog to get an idea of exactly who/what you are defending.


Oh, but it is, criminal. Don't blame me because you are a shameless deceiver and admitted fraud who breaks laws and regulations as the very backbone of his business model. Again-since you refuse to grasp/admit the simple concept-ANY essay company that operates in or through the US is legally bound by the EXACT SAME laws. Any answer that I give to your irrelevant question would apply to YOUR fraudulent employer, as well. Understand, or do you still need more help?

Look, EW_fraudster, I've been holding this back for a while because I wanted to lure you in even further, as I always do, but I just can't wait to prove that your dirty arguments are borderline-retarded.

The following text appears on the Terms and Conditions page of EW_writer's employer's main site for customers:

----------------------------
The research material that we provide to you is available as a unique reference that is designed to assist you in the completion of your [own] assignments and or academic obligations.

It is also understood that we do not make any guarantees regarding your grades and that our agreement is strictly to provide you with an original reference document

Intellectual property is owned by the company and the customer has the exclusive permission and right to use the paper however they wish for 6 months. After the 6 month term period has passed the company retains all rights of the paper [and the company may resell the paper through EssayMill.com, MightyStudents.com, or any one of its other ESSAY DATABASE sites]

The products we provide are reference materials are not intended to be submitted as completed works and are to be used strictly for the purpose of assistance in writing your own assignments.

SOURCE:
bestessays.com/disclaimer.php
----------------------------

EW_writer, you got OWNED, as usual!

You're confusing two very different issues: 1. Academic Dishonesty and 2. Commercial Fraud.

Yes, it is dishonest to submit our work for academic credit. Reputable companies try to discourage that use of their work but cannot possibly police what students choose to do once our work is in their hands. That issue is obviously the same regardless of where a paper company is located or whether ESL or native English speakers write the paper.

The fraud charge has to do with ripping off customers by providing plagiarized work when you promise them all-original material and with making claims about being located in the U.S. and/or about using only American writers when you're actualy located elsewhere and use ESL writers.

The fact that you continually confuse those two very simple issues suggests either that you're an idiot or that you're simply a resentful competitor of the companies whose success you envy. I'm not discounting the possibility that both are true, either.

LMAO!

Crushing evidence ... debate over

Cool, so in that case, the company DOES warn the students that it will resell in 6 months... which is exactly the way ET does it. So what's your problem? o.O


Oh, and one is not as bad as the other? :p Look like I said, feel free to try to close us down. Do your best! I'll even cheer you on! Hip-hip! ^__^

But at the end of the year, I'll be here still...
to tell you, your crops, weren't worth their till.

Hoohahh! ^___^

It is easy to make such claims. However merely providing screenshots of evidence is not enough to convince me. I need the name of the investigating committee. the agent on the case or, if an actual case has been filed as a part of the investigation, the case number. The name of the actual plaintiff would be even better. One thing the internet has done is allow anonymity to protect bullies. Such is the case here. My own investigations leads me to believe that when this person was still active here, all this person did was make up complaints and evidence. Why? I guess we will never know since this person has now gone dark at this forum.

Reselling papers is not exactly a violation of trust as it was first percieved to be. Seeing as how more and more students are being made to understand that they are purchasing model papers, even when they paid for an original paper, the ability of the company to resell the paper in the future is obvious. All the student is paying for in the original paper relates to updated information and sources. They are not sold the rights to claim a glade for the work. Students who wish to do that should ask first. That is, if they don't have the time to read the TOS.