There have been cases ( and you can look this up in various universities and colleges rather than asking me to prove it) where the students actually use the "lent paper" by the professor ... written up by someone else, using the same source material.
As I tried to explain to you the other day, this is just not the way that rational intelligent people have conversations or make arguments about points of disagreement. You're the one claiming to know of cases where students have tried to submit rewrites of sample essays provided, in the first place, by their professors, as guidance. If someone else says that he doubts that's true, a rational intelligent person responds by simply providing whatever evidence he can that backs his original claim. He doesn't challenge the person who doubts his claim to "find" the evidence of his own claim instead of simply backing up his own claim with whatever evidence he implied that there is.
It is a business the other academic writing companies call "paraphrasing services" and these are all based on previously written papers "borrowed" from the professors.
I'm very familiar with project requests to rewrite essays so that they will pass any plagiarism scan and I've previously mentioned that I handle these types of projects once in a while. Usually, these clients provide no information at all about where they got the original paper. On what basis do you conclude that any of these original projects, much less "all" of them are, necessarily, samples provided by professors rather than essays simply written by other students? Someone would have to be pretty stupid to try to rewrite the samples provided by the course professor. Do you happen to have any evidence of this ever having happened even once that you can share?
I am out of the academic business totally so you should not consider me a threat to you and your mode of work at all. Which is how you seem to eventually view any other active person on this board.
I don't view you as a "threat" and I don't have any problem with anybody just for being "active" on this board. Going all the way back to the years when Professor Verb and Pheelyks were very active contributors, both of them were direct competitors of mine, at the same essay company for which we all wrote, as well as for prospective clients looking for writers on this forum. I have always maintained professional relationships with my legitimate competitors and, in many cases, we have referred clients to one another and backed one another up when we were too booked up to handle projects for our respective clients. In fact, when someone attacked Pheelyks by creating this thread here, I specifically defended him against accusations that I knew couldn't be true, even though it would have been much more beneficial to me to simply ignore that thread to let a very "active" competitor absorb as much negative press as possible:
https://essayscam.org/forum/es/pheelyks-versus-freelance-writer-comparative-analysis-3051/On the other hand, I don't believe that you're "totally" "out of the academic business" because I don't believe that any person who doesn't depend, quite substantially, on income from providing academic essays would ever spend as much time here as you do. That's especially true, because you obviously spend even more time researching the history and current status of dozens and dozens of companies in this business than you spend typing out the information that you collect on them.
For the record, I have never, even once, attacked or insulted you personally. I have only responded to the substance of some of your posts, because some of your proclamations, conclusions, and bits of advice that you post are patently ridiculous. For just a few examples, you have posted that: (1) Some professors now make "allowances" for ghostwritten essays because they understand the pressures facing students; (2) Writers shouldn't stay with any one company for more than 1-2 years to avoid problems getting paid; and (3) Writers working for foreign companies (including companies whose whereabouts aren't known) should protect themselves by making sure they have solid "contracts" with those companies. I pointed out, respectively, that: (1)I don't believe that ANY professors anywhere "allow" students to submit essays that they know those students didn't write; (2)There's no benefit, whatsoever, from continually changing companies, except, perhaps, for bad writers, because legit companies don't suddenly stop paying their writers whatever they owe them after 1-2 years; and (3) No "contract" provides any "protection" if you don't know where the company is actually located or if the company is so far away that the cost of actually pursuing (even valid) contractual claims against them would cost 10-100X the amount of money in dispute.
Those are all conversations about substantive disagreements, not "attacks" of any kind and they aren't motivated even slightly by how "active" you are on this forum or by the fact that you're (obviously, to me) someone working for a "competitor." On that matter, all you have to do is check the many dozens of threads about the history and status of various essay companies that you started or in which you've been "active." I have never, even once, invaded those threads to challenge you, because researching essay companies just isn't something in which I'm involved. However, the amount of time and effort that you spend doing this strongly suggests to any logical reader that it's inconceivable that you don't still earn a living in this industry, because there's just no other explanation for why anybody would ever spend that kind of time researching (other) essay companies if they weren't
his competitors.
Scared because you cannot keep up with the modern way the business is done I guess? You must be too old to be in the business already which is why you are no longer relevant and familiar with how the students ... cheat the system.
Nothing I've ever posted, especially in response to your posts, has ever been motivated by my being "scared." Again, as between the two of us, you're the only one who has insulted the other on a personal level. My responses are strictly limited to the substance of your claims with which I often disagree; and one the occasion that you post something with which I actually agree, I have said so.
Modern way of doing things? Not really your style is it? Hence your defiance at any explanation that proves you to be wrong.
Presumably, you're referencing the original topic of this particular disagreement: namely, projects consisting of requests to rewrite essays to pass plagiarism detection. I've said, more than once, that I provide this type of service on request. So far, you have yet to even provide a single iota of evidence for your own claims after they're challenged, let alone "proving" that anything I've said is incorrect. I'm the one trying to have an intelligent conversation about topics of obvious disagreement, and you've taken offenses at that and said various deliberately insulting and nasty things about me instead of trying to establish your original point with any evidence supporting what you've posted.
I do still enjoy discussing the business though. Which is why I am explaining the method by which these "accidents" occur to you. I hope you don't get an aneurysm reading my posts. My disclaimer stands.
Yes, forum discussions can be enjoyable; but that doesn't explain why someone "totally out of the business" would spend so much time researching the history and current status of essay companies. On the matter of your disclaimer, since you bring it up, why would you take such offense and respond so personally and so angrily at my suggestion that some of the things that you post just don't make sense to me? Your own "disclaimer" in your signature implies that much of what you post might be inaccurate and erroneous.
I'm a Masters student and throughout my studies, I've bought many pre-written papers. I have used several companies but after comparing the quality of the papers I purchased one company seemed better than the others and chose to use them.