CUSTOMERS: Before you place an order for your essay -- Please Read

Rusty, F off, you classless, cowardly clown. You're just a little punk. You avoid all threads in which I force you to justify your baseless accusations. I'm still waiting for you to quote the text that you claim I "stole" from you. Just shut up already. Nobody gives a damn about your useless commentary. You are well-versed in the art of avoidance and duck-and-move tactics.

By the way, I'm also quite certain that all legitimate members of this forum would readily agree that I have no need to "steal" anything from you.

gett off your hi petar.

HOIST BY YOUR OWN PETARD!

Petard means firework is French and THAT is where the expression comes from. Rusty - learn to admit when you are wrong. And please do not be so vain as to think your intellectual superiors would EVER 'steal' any word you used. The same goes for:

WB, WRT, PHLEEKSIE - THE THREE LYING PIG SCUM FROM *********!

RUSTY seems unable to accept that he is wrong and obviously does not possess a dictionary. Still, perhaps that's better than using WEBSTER'S DIC - well know to be error-strewn and wrong, using the backward dialect of American English which no careful users of English - including educated Amercians - would use.

Oooo I see WB is posting picture again! This is the THIRD stage of an episode (after abuse, and asking questions in reply to honest questions from posters). So the retard can use a PC - well done you! You see, even illiterate morons have some little talents. You can work in WalMart now. Good for you!

The next stage in WB's paranoid mental episodes is crying and sobbing and appealing to the mods to ban everyone by the lying scum of WB and her gang of retarded scum!

Phleeksie also has a mental condition - he is obsessed with a girl called Melissa and her vagina! Probably never seen one before, though! Sad, really. But if you will keep your tongue permanently up WB's fanny crack, you won;t see much of the world, you LOSER!

SOOOOOOO FUNNNNYYYYY!

FOOLS!

LB ("Lanky B*$ch"), do you have any idea as to the extent of your illness?

WritersBeware = *********

BOY ARE YOU WORRIED SICK EH! SO SO VERY WORRIED AND ANNOYED AT HOW I HAVE DESTROYED YOU!

HA HA HA!

YOU MENTAL MORONIC RETARD OLD HAG!

NOW SHOO, VERMIN SCUM!

Don't mind, RustyIronChain. WB is sitting on my ten feet long pole. So she is screaming out of pain in the a$$.

Does this ugly wh0re have any shame? Totally shameless!!!

now I see the problem-- all along, you have been using a French dictionary.

we are speaking English here. you need to get an English dictionary. if you don't like Webster's, there are plenty of others...

Is there a thread that mentions which sites some of the writers here work with? Or is even mentioning that against the rules?

It seems to be OK when it comes up in conversations for purposes other than advertising. I've been suspended from here before for advertising (admittedly) but they haven't bothered me when I just mention the sites I write for to defend them against totally fake complaints by competitors pretending to be customers. As a writer for some of them for 7 years, I have first-hand knowledge of the way some of those companies do things and don't do things and when I see stuff posted here that I know can't be true, I do mention that I write for some of those companies in the context of explaining how I know what I say I know about their business practices.

In general, you can probably learn much more about anything having to do with this site and any information you hope to find here by just reading through old threads than you can by asking questions in threads first. There's not very much you're going to ask that hasn't been asked and answered extensively many times. And you don't have to wait for new replies in threads that already have 3 pages of responses on most of your questions.

It is unbelievable that potential customers come on to this site trying to find out about scams or find a good writer (at the very least get some useful info) but just about every post that appears to be useful is littered with never ending insults between writers...usually only the first 3 responses are related to the question posted. Wish you could leave your personal vendettas out of this public forum, leave us out of it. I personally will only commission a writer that comes across as dignified and not involved in these vile rants.

I agree. The student's don't seem to understand that the sources are optional for paper between 1-5 pages long. They always ask for sources and then, after the paper is submitted, ask for a revision because "I don't really need sources" or "This is a personal opinion paper" or some other explanation that should have told them they should have ticked the "No sources required" choice in the box for "Number of Sources".

I'm sorry, but the suggestion that the length of a project is what determines whether or not sources (not "the sources") are required is ridiculous and not at all what Phyleeks was saying. I've written (literally) thousands of 4-pg and 5-pg (and even shorter) projects and almost all of them required some sources; but the fact that certain types of projects may not need any outside sources is a totally different issue from the length of a project (and from whether clients make mistakes in the ordering process). Obviously, personal opinion projects don't usually require sources; but sometimes either their specs still require sourcing or clients simply ask for them. That's a decision for clients to make. What Pheelyks was saying is simply that the number of sources specified for projects can't be totally inappropriate in relation to the length of the project. His point was that thirty sources is a ridiculous number of sources to demand for 5 pages of writing; but 4 or 5 sources might be perfectly appropriate for a project of that length (and for even shorter projects) .

An independent writer can make this specific order requirement when negotiating the CPP with the student. Company writers do not have this liberty since it is the company that sets the price and often, do not inform the student that single spaced pages cost more. Oftentimes student clients inform the writer about this after the order has been accepted. Then the student refuses to adjust the CPP.


That is why the student should make sure to hire ENL writers each time. One may have atrocious spoken English skills but near perfect English written skills because there is time to perfect the witten language. Such situations do exist. In this case, hire someone with good grammar to help out at the start to help out with the student image.

In my experience, essay companies always disclose (somewhere) how many words they provide per ordered page. When customers order single-spacing, it's usually their attempt to "specify" their way around the company's word-per-page guarantee to get twice as much writing without paying for it. Whether it's ordered that way deliberately or because they genuinely don't realize that double-spacing is standard throughout the industry, the company will usually simply send a message explaining that a single-spaced 5-pg project is charged as a 10-pg project, but that formatting it in single-spacing is no problem. Then, the customer has the option of issuing supplemental payment, shortening the project, or canceling it.


I'm sorry, but I have to disagree. It's easier to speak a foreign language -- and, for that matter, even your own language -- than it is to write in it. However well one speaks any language, one usually writes less well in that language. Plenty of colloquialisms and idiomatic expressions that are fine in spoken English cannot be used (or are considered glaring mistakes) in writing. Writing also exposes all sorts of mistakes that don't really interfere with understandability in spoken conversations; and writing also exposes punctuation mistakes that aren't evident in spoken English.