You made the false accusations, so you have to prove them. If not, you've committed libel.
IF, as you claim, my accusations are false THEN it follows that the owners of Essayfraud WOULD be able to take action against me. However, they would have to prove that my accusations are false ie that they do not charge for verification. In a court of law the person claiming that the actions of another are libellous is placed under a duty to prove the accusations to be false. The person making the assertion HAS no such duty. That's how the law in relation to libel works.
The courts work on the principle of HE WHO ASSERTS MUST PROVE, which therefore means IF a plaintiff is ASSERTING that the accusations are FALSE THEY are under a duty to prove these accusations to be false. In law it is NOT the duty of the person making the accusation IN A LIBEL CASE to prove their accusations to be true.
In a criminal case the burden of proof lies with the prosecutor in proving the guilt of the defendant. The defendant is not required to prove their innocence.
SO if my accusation is FALSE them I challenge the owners of essay fraud to prove these to be false. I wai with bated breath :)
I
There are MANY different reasons to buy a domain, one of the more popular ones of which does NOT involve a "swift return."
I did say GOOD investors want a SWIFT return, especially in the present economic crisis.
Essayfraud is PR5 and has over 106,000 backlinks, making it extremely attractive to countless buyers.
Why are you so bothered about the value of essay fraud anyway?? What difference does it make to you? IF they are doing so well
Why are they selling and
Why would you be worried about my valuation of the site if others could prove this wrong.
Anyone truly interested in buying the site will do their own research into its value and will base their decision on that research.
Makes me wonder if the allegation that essay fraud and ET are linked IS true since you also so staunchily defend ET!!