Can I have a pre-written paper "unplagiarized"?

Well I tried to get one essay written from a poster on Craigslist and I got scammed but it wasn't that big of a loss ($50USD) then through more searching I found a website named "never do homework again which has prewriten essays for sale so again I gave a random person a shot and she came through but I only received a C for her paper which was riddled with errors. I fixed what I could see out right. Are there any sites that provide this service that I will at least get a B and nothing plagiarized? or are they few and far between?

As a newbie, I will say that if you research the site, you will most likely find which ones are not thoroughly trashed on here.

That being said, this site does not allow the promotion of any site. In this type of industry, the concept of buyer beware should be exercised vigorously. Plus, are you sure who would be promoting a site. Would it be a true client or someone astroturfing for a devious organization?

I know these were not direct answers to your questions, but I hope that it informed you enough to make wise decisions.

Thanks for your advice. I was also hoping to hear from writers that work for these websites floating around.

If you have tried 2 essay writing services and both provided you with an inferior paper, but you were able to revise these into something usable, I do not see the necessity of you trying to get it written by someone else a third time. For all intents and purposes, the essays that you paid for are not for actual submission. Those are model papers meant for you to use as a basis for your own essay. So what you did, revising the essay outright in the parts that you see as mistakes in the essay, is exactly how you were supposed the essays. Actually, if I were the one in your situation, I would have probably rewritten the whole paper myself since I am sure that, at the very least, the research portion was accurately accomplished by the writer. Revising the content to make it plagiarism free will be simple enough to do from that point. You could have a more proper essay written for yourself by a true ENL writer, but it is going to cost you more than $50. As my mother is always telling me, you pay for quality.

I get requests to "un-plagiarize" writing fairly regularly. Sometimes, they send me a thesis that received a high grade in the same course and ask me to rewrite it to make it all original; other times, they send me an entire essay of copied & pasted material and ask me to rewrite it all to make the same points in all-original writing. The former is harder than the latter, because the former requires replacing all (or most) of the sources, whereas the latter can actually cite most of the sources from which they copied & pasted the material.

The problem in this scenario is that the paper already has existing sources and citations in write. The original writer did the work which, although messed up, finalized the paper in a certain form.

As you said, there are loopholes that needed to be plugged and additional information to be included. So trying to unplagiarize a paper will be extremely difficult for the new writer. It would be easier for both sides if a new paper is ordered so that the writer will have the freedom to develop a more appropriate paper rather than having to rework an inferior version of the text.

BTW, the OP never indicated that there was any plagiarism involved in the writing of the paper. Just that he got a low grade on it. Which does not necessarily mean a paper was plagiarized. I think that the unplagiarism being referenced here is the actual paper and the desire of the student to use the same paper but with improvements. I believe that qualifies more as an editing job or a rewriting job rather than plagiarism. The correct term is also "plagiarism removal" not "unplagiarize".

I am wondering if by stating "unplagiarized," the OP meant a version that would show as original in a checker such as Turnitin, since the original was already submitted. Maybe he/she was wanting to recycle the paper? Or they are wanting to purchase a pre-written paper and have another writer revise to make it more "original." It is really unclear exactly what they mean. Either scenario would be better handled by the individual versus having a writer "unplagiarize" it. If they are set on using a writer, an entirely new paper would be best. Often times, writers can produce a brand new paper quicker and cheaper.

I've done a lot of "revisions" on other peoples' work and it takes more time than if I'd researched and wrote a new paper on the topic myself. Since time is money, the OP would have to pay for the "complexities" and would be better off getting something fresh and new!

If the plagiarized sections are highlighted in the pre-written paper, a writer could technically "unplagiarize" it by paraphrasing the affected content, and possibly even going as far as finding other sources that make the same claims as the content rewritten. However, as a writer, I'd prefer just starting from scratch rather than such "unplagiarizing." The latter sounds quite tedious.

Editing is far, far more complicated and in the end more costly than writing from scratch. Rewriting is rarely as straightforward as simple rewording of the text. It is not a simple task to re-write someone else's ideas in the same voice and still maintain the integrity of the argument. In most cases the work is so bad that there are no cogent arguments whatsoever, and then you have to explain to the student why the price is so high. I just tell my clients outright that it would be simpler, faster, and cheaper to write it anew. When they persist, I make sure it's worth my time to do the edit/rewrite.

I also agree that rewritten papers are often more complex than writing from scratch. I've had my fair share of cases wherein students would ask for rewritten versions of their draft. However, once I start reading through the bulk of texts provided, I would find myself confused with what the student was trying to say in his initial draft. In these cases, I often just ask the student for clarification on the main thought behind certain parts of the writing. Still, it can be daunting and dragging to have students who are still adamant that they are to be followed. Oftentimes, it takes so much longer to complete these papers, especially if the student doesn't maintain constant communication with me and cannot answer in a rightful amount of time what certain portions actually mean.

That's a totally different situation than this thread topic. When a client asks me to "un-plagiarize" a project, it's either: (1) an essay that someone else wrote for the same course previously that got an A, or (2) material that the student mostly copied and pasted directly from sources that needs to be paraphrased and cited properly. Neither of those is a problem or particularly "complex" and usually requires little if any time to do the usual research. If a client sends me a draft of a project with a request to upgrade the writing, that's no problem, either, provided it already makes sense, substantively. What you're talking about is a draft that doesn't make substantive sense in the first place, which would be a futile endeavor. If I don't think the original draft makes sense, I'll refuse to do anything but write the whole project from scratch, because I just don't have the time to waste figuring out (or asking) what every nonsensical point is supposed to mean and I definitely don't want to be blamed for the inevitable poor results attributable to the major flaws in the original draft after rewriting a bunch of nonsense, just in much better English. I'd rather tell that client to let me redo the entire project or just contact me before trying to write the draft next time.

This is actually a good writing practice that I should perhaps also integrate into my work.
I think I might have misunderstood the first parts of the thread. In that case, I do agree that merely changing up the citations/sources that were previously used is quite a relatively easy task and requires minimal effort. Although, I have personally only experienced this a handful of times (could be a given - I haven't been an academic writer for that long of a time period). I have previously spoken with clients who approach me once more for projects after encountering a negative experience from a writer who misused sources. Once, I have been told by someone that he simply just edited it on his own rather than hire an academic writer to fix it for him. Afterward, the client just made sure to hire the right writer for the work to make it less stressful of a situation.

You're still totally misunderstanding. Nobody would ever request "merely changing" the citations and sources, because that would be a total waste of effort with absolutely no sensible purpose. Any plagiarized text and/or any material being reused from an earlier project that has already been scanned would immediately get flagged and whatever sources (or project) that material came from identified and linked in that scan. When clients order these types of projects, the whole point of the project is to rewrite all of the text in completely different words so that it will pass a plagiarism scan as original writing.

There is no way a pre-written paper can be unplagiarized. Simply paraphrasing an existing piece of research and keeping the original sources will still flag your paper. Sure it will get past a plagiarism checking tool, but it won't get past the human eye of a teacher, professor, or instructor. The human factor is a consideration that software can't get around. Believe me, these professionals can spot a plagiarized paper, regardless of how well it was paraphrased. It all boils down to the paraphrased keywords. The tendency of writers who paraphrase is to keep certain keywords in the same position within a paragraph intact. Specially since most students instruct that the paraphrasing be done in such a manner for some reason. Paraphrasing doesn't work. It is always safest to have a fresh paper written, with more up to date sources and original formatting. That is the only way to get a plagiarism free paper.

Only bad writers (and students) exhibit that tendency. While I always prefer to write all of my projects from scratch, I don't refuse to rewrite a project if the client insists on that instead of a brand new paper. On those occasions, I don't retain any of the original wording at all, let alone in its original place within any sentence or paragraph. My vocabulary, grammar, and sentence structure will always be much better than the writing in the original paper, so in addition to just being entirely different -- and, therefore, unidentifiable as the original paper -- the new paper that I provide is also, invariably, written much better than the original. Once the citations and references are changed to appropriate alternate citations and references, it is completely unrecognizable, whether to software or to any human eye. To a reader, the new paper is nothing more than a totally different project on the same topic as the original and not any more connected to the original than projects authored by different students on the same topic in different semesters, which occurs routinely, especially at the undergraduate level.