Ain't No Such Thing as a 1-pg "Ph.D" Paper...

this isn't an advertising forum. why are you so thick-headed?

was there something you wanted to say about a particular company, now that you're muzzled? no? some kind of scam you wanted to expose?

no, you're just here to tell potential fish how wonderful you are. it's pathetic.

First, you're not a moderator here and it isn't your place to be worrying about preaching or enforcing forum rules. Second, there's not a single advertisement of any kind by anybody in this thread or in this other thread where you launched another totally unprovoked attack against me:

essayscam.org/forum/rt/sgt-wants-word-essay-tomorrow-3736/#msg606 13
Ironically, the only rule violations of any kind in this entire thread are the 3 or 4 instances where you violated the explicit DNM rule, prompting the forum Admin to edit it out of your post (#39) the last time. Meanwhile, I haven't violated any forum rule in about 2 years or had any recent problems with the real forum admin or moderators here.


I'm here to contribute to discussions, just the same as every other writer registered on this forum. Granted, it must be excruciating for someone like you to read posts by anybody who writes in complete, grammatically correct sentences, but that doesn't necessarily make it "advertising." Who are you to appoint yourself a forum god whose role it is to determine what the motives are in the minds of other forum members for contributing to discussions where they're not even breaking any rules, all while you are?

How do you manage to remain so blind to the obvious desperation and jealousy of your posts, editor75?

the last thing I'm jealous of is jughead here, aging dumbly and proudly with zip family and a go-nowhere career where the only fading respect he gets is here. I think he's funny (in a sad way), and I enjoy rattling his cage a bit.

believe it or not, I'm a published author with a pretty big house, although a better word may be stable. that's right: although I do moonlight in this cess-pit, I am normallly the kind of writer who is allowed to put his name on things, which are then sold to people, reviewed, put in the Library of Congress, etc. it's a little bit of a reach to assume that I'm jealous of an ex government hack's ability to churn out dreck for kids who can't do their homework, isn't it?

that's what you get when you assume, as they say.

as for you, though, John'sMom, you nosy biddy, I am sort of jealous of you-- I'd love to be able to just swoop in and have the last word in someone else's conversation.

Shall we get the fellow a cookie?

Got news for you: If you were anything, you wouldn't be "moonlighting" in an industry you detest.

yes; chocolate chip. and as for my self-loathing, you leave that to me. keep plugging them fish!

So, to summarize:

The person who hates me for having violated the no-advertising rules here 2 years ago is the only person to have violated any forum rules in this thread;

The person who hates me for "boasting" now needs everybody to know how big his house is and that he's supposedly a published author;

The person who has a moral problem, on "principle" with writers who ever advertised here has admitted to supposedly "attending grad school" for clients and "graduating" them for pay;

The person who considers this entire industry a cesspool still dabbles in it, despite the fact that he's already such a professional success that he doesn't even need to; and

The person who suggested that drunk driving is a "skill" and an "art" that can't be learned too soon and that anybody who disagrees must be "jealous" of that "skill" thinks I'm the mr-n who lacks integrity and is a delusional, blind, thick-headed hypocrite.

Got it.

keep at it, kids! and remember: if you see a roadblock coming, pull a U-ie!

It wasn't exactly the last word, was it? Nor did I expect that it would be.

Somehow, the idea of a fancy published author with a "big house" (or a "big stable," as you say you'd rather call it--is that because it's where you keep your nags?) still needing to "moonlight" in this industry is more depressing to me than the idea of doing this full-time for another decade.

Deny everything and demand proof.

= Editor75. :-D

Wait a minute. I was reading "stable" as in "stability." You mean Editor75 actually lives in a stable? He's not in there doing the horses, is he? That would explain a lot. That must be why he moonlights. Hay is not cheap ...

the peanut gallery is getting pretty deafening; it's always a good sign.

apparently I've also unearthed some secret insult comic talent. but wait, srandrews, you should perfect your material before you take it on the road. it's pretty cheesy, and although I know that blue stuff is easy, it doesn't always fly. you'll need to be careful with that material, especially in those regions where people still relate to barnyard bestiality. right, Meo?

as for your disappointment, John'sMom, it's unfortunate; it really is. all of the things we grow up believing...

"The peanut gallery" seems to be everyone that isn't you.

I never said I was disappointed. I said the idea of living in a large stable and boasting about my successful publications while being forced to work in an industry I despised sounded like a depressing prospect. I don't despise this industry, and I wouldn't boast about the size of my equine abode if I had to do something I loathed just to hold onto it.

it's not perfect, but you see a relationship where there isn't one; it's not pay to play. maybe you're thinking of vanity presses? to hold onto my "position," all I have to do is write more books.

also, just to clarify, most of you are missing the meaning of stable-- I'm talking about Superfly, not Seabiscuit.

This I don't understand--what does "one" refer to here?

The question remains why you "moonlight" in this "cesspit" if all you have to do to keep yourself in tremendous horsey wealth is write more of the books that you presumably hate less than you do this job.

I remember watching Howdy Doody when I was about 5 or 6 (God I'm old) and the Peanut Gallery:



Thanks for the trip-down-memory-lane reference.

Sometimes these students don't even bother to check if they are ticking off the right boxes when placing their orders. Or they carelessly check boxes just to make the gray turn clickable on the page. Even worse, some students try to get a lower price per page by choosing the options that would deliver an affordable computation for them. However, I do not think that PhD papers fall under the affordable column.

They probably just do it because they figure that they'll get the highest quality of work on their 1-pg projects by selecting "PhD Level." Meanwhile, (with the possible exception of the newest fledgling writers who might be afraid to take those projects), company writers usually pay almost no attention whatsoever to what "level" customers check on those screens.

The best way to explain this to a clueless student is this; "You will always pay more for a PhD level paper!" So why spend unnecessarily for a single page that is not suited to your needs. No, the professor will not appreciate the level of writing since it appears that the student grew a brain overnight. That is not how it works. College level writing will always be different and cheaper than a masters or PhD level paper, regardless of page count.