"better then"
"a Expert"
"login into"
"you can be rest assured"

Incompetence . . . .

The evidence is in the linked thread, you fuc*ing neanderthal.

Ph0enix + zeta274 = the same, lying, fraudulent person

Isn't it an amazing coincidence that both "Ph0enix" and "zeta274" are from Macedonia?





Isn't it also an amazing coincidence that zeta274 found (out of billions of possible Internet destinations that he could have been visiting at the time) and responded to Ph0enix's thread only 9 minutes after it was published?

MOD, why did you remove the address and phone number when it is public information?

You just don't know when to quit, do you?


Yes, it is.


It was already public. You were/are just too stupid to properly cover your tracks.

By the way, thank you for admitting that the address and phone number belong to you because they are the exact same, verifiable address and phone number that countless, third-party organizations list as TitanPapers's owner's address and phone number. OOPS, you make boo-boo!


PUBLIC whois records clearly indicate that you are lying.




1. Are you KIDDING me? You just edited your LinkedIn page to remove all references to "TitanPapers" and "UVO Corp." Did you really think I wouldn't catch that? Did you really think that I would not be prepared to refute your bulls-i* with EVIDENCE? You think that just because Google has no cached version that you have free reign to lie your ass off? THINK AGAIN. Bing's cached version of the page from July 19, 2014 does not show the "Titan Papers" reference because you had not added that reference until very recently, but it does prove that you--just now--changed your picture/photo, deleted the entire "Experience" section, and changed your subheading from "Freelance Writer at Uvocorp" to "Writer at Custom Papers."

2. You can't keep your lies straight, scumbag. You're confused about which page you edited. My screenshot has absolutely nothing to do with LinkedIn. It is from your elance page. (Hurry, go edit your elance page, too, so that you can come back here to lie about it.)


Actually, I'm a vagina. That has some utility. You--on the other hand--are a worthless, lying scumbag.


LMAO! You're pathetic. I "added" that email address? REALLY? Look at the third-party evidence:




Poor, wittle victim . . . .

Um, no. You voluntarily put all of that information in the public domain. You then voluntarily chose to come here to lie, spam, and misrepresent. To top it all off, you continued to lie and question my character, forcing me to post the detailed evidence.

I forgot to post the screen capture of Bing's cached version of the Linkedin.com page. Here it is:

So you're just casually incompetent in grammar, style, and punctuation?

TitanPapers
Viktor
MK (Macedonia)

--------------------------------------

Hey, Viktor (zeta274 + Ph0enix), you're a liar, but not a very good one:

re: mk.linkedin.com/pub/viktor

Viktor
Manager at TitanPapers
Freelance Writer at Uvocorp

Stop pretending to be a customer, you lying sack of s-i*.

You don't hire clients, genius.

Try writing/typing in proper English.

Ph0enix + zeta274 = SAME SCAMMER from Titan Papers

Nice . . . .

re: "writer2beware"


That's not me, you fuc*ing idiot. It's another fraudster, like you.

For the fifth time:

For the fourth time:

For the third time:

Apparently, neither do you, "James":

Exactly. He is not a student. He is a dishonest rep.

He doesn't like information or evidence. He also thinks that everything is obvious to everyone.

When you post in this forum, who is watching your goats?

Hey, if I am here to "get business," how do you explain the following thread from 2011?

[essayscam/forum/ot/write-papers-students-stop-asking-2296/] - I do not write papers for students, so stop asking!


Wow, that sure is tempting! A whole $50? Where you are from (a slum in India), that's a lot of money. For me, it's a slightly above average tip that I leave the waiter/waitress on a Friday night.


No so fast, a*s hat. Of course, only a simpleton like you would make that comparison as a justification for misrepresentation. What you fail to mention/realize is that NONE of the "big companies" (or small companies) to which you refer are attempting to sell English-language writing services to native English speakers. You are a LIAR.

re: thecasesolutions.com/testimonials ("Adirana J." and "Tiffany P.")

Here is proof that thecasesolutions hires cheap actors to make fake video testimonials:

"Adirana J." (username is "pinkkoala" at fiverr)
fiverr/pinkkoala/record-a-spanish-or-english-testimonial-for-your-product

"Tiffany P." (username is "jaynesays" at fiverr)
fiverr/jaynesays/create-a-natural-looking-testimonial-video

Was this evidence also "obvious" to you and everyone else, graphie?

Gee, I wonder why they added the following to thecasesolutions.com/testimonials.

<meta name="robots" content="noindex, follow"/>

LMAO! Look at what appears on the thecasesolutions/testimonials page:

---------------------------
* The video testimonials are the real testimonies by real clients who wanted to protect their identities, hence we have used paid actors in testimonials after taking consent from the clients.

---------------------------

Once again, graphie eats his own words after making bogus accusations against me.

Hey, graphie, do you still want to claim that I am wrong about the site?

Notawriterrr, do you honestly think that anyone here believes your bulls-i* claim about being a customer of the site?

Oh, but they have such wonderful guarantees, don't they?

Notawriterrr, until you learn how to capitalize and punctuate properly, don't expect me to read beyond the first few words of your post. By the way, don't you have some yaks to shave?

Graphophobius, thank you for acknowledging (as much as it pained you to do so) that the site is unethical, misleading, and dishonest.


"Their" country's laws are irrelevant. Any foreign site that advertises in a particular state in the U.S. and/or completes a single transaction with a customer in a particular state in the U.S. is legally bound--almost automatically--to the jurisdiction of that particular state.


ALERT!

1) "Web site support agents" don't write the papers (at least that's the case in any worthwhile company that can keep the lights on).

2) An email address can be spoofed, faked, tossed out, and/or replaced in a matter of minutes. Fraudsters make a living with fraudulent email addresses.

3) PayPal is not a "safe" or guaranteed method of payment for customers who want to order writing/research/papers (i.e., virtual goods), so your claim is asinine. As clearly stated in Section 13.3 Ineligible Items of PayPal's service agreement, the following items are ineligible for buyer protection:

* Intangible items, including Digital Goods
* Services
* Custom-made items


"There is actually three questions there."

Really, Mr. Scholarly Scientist?

By the way, I admire you for being able to get any job you want but not accepting any of them. Never settle!

Sheer brilliance! All rude people are paid to be rude.


*k you and your advice.


OK, coward. I will re-write them just for you. (Hurry . . . come up with a new excuse!)

Graphophobius, for the sake of clarity, please number each one of your answers.

7. Since it is obvious, can you please tell everyone how/where I discovered the related sites that brought all of the evidence together?

Yet again, you're just avoiding my simple questions, coward.


What--no problem with his "investigation," graphie?


Am I supposed to be in any way scared or intimidated by your veiled threats? I once again invite you to come get me.

Just for the sake of argument, I will pretend that you are not a representative of the company. FYI, PayPal does not provide ANY buyer protections/guarantees for virtual goods.

Thanks for playing.

"Come one, come all: feast your eyes on graphophobius' cowardice!"

Why can't you answer each question sequentially, clearly, honestly, and in the same post? Why are you so scared? I'll tell you why: you know that I set a trap for you long ago. You're too much of a coward to put any official answers on record.

Hey, Spiderman65, where did you go? Why the sudden disappearance?

For clarity and focus (you're a big fan of "focus"), please number each one of your direct, clear answers.

1. OK, just so that I don't "misunderstand," your official position is that falsifying one's name/business address/business phone for the express purpose of fooling American customers into ordering one's product is neither illegal/unethical nor an indicator of the likelihood of other nefarious practices?

2. Why do you not condemn the FAKE video testimonials on thecasesolutions.com/testimonials?

3. Why do you continue to falsely claim that I only post addresses?

4. Why are you unable to find and duplicate my evidence if it is so "obvious" and available to all?

5. Do you think that I post evidence for the benefit of industry insiders and omniscient geniuses like you or for industry outsiders (students, consumers, ESL learners, teachers, etc.) who have no preexisting knowledge base?

6. Do you think that thecasesolutions.com is an honest, reputable, trustworthy site?


I have stated for years that I do not write papers for students. In fact, I have posted new threads warning people not to send me private messages asking me to write their papers or I will post their email address and word-for-word message in the forum. So much for your entire argument, nitwit.

Oh, yes, the fact that you stated such multiple times sets your credibility beyond reproach.

The lady doth protest too much, methinks.

OK, just so that I don't "misunderstand," your official position is that falsifying one's name/business address/business phone for the express purpose of fooling American customers into ordering one's product is neither illegal/unethical nor an indicator of the likelihood of other nefarious practices?

As you can see, I did not make a "presumption." You have implicitly and explicitly communicated that I do verify my evidence/claims and post fake addresses (which you ignorantly claim are irrelevant).

Now, answer the question, coward.

Graphie, you once again forgot to address my substantive questions and statements, preferring to post more propaganda and speculative nonsense. Convenient. For now, try answering the single question below.

It's cyclic in nature. Every so often, a guy comes along who--for whatever reason--thinks he's going to be the first to "out" me as having posted false information. Like all others before him, he fails. Tail tucked, he then begins to post a series of butt-hurt "opinions" about my purported intentions, which is senseless because my intentions are wholly irrelevant to the verifiable facts and evidence that I post.

I think it is pretty clear to everyone that you are delusional. You completely ignore all my substantive questions and statements that you know will lead to me further exposing your ignorance.


Why is spiderman not answering my questions?


So, you give the benefit of the doubt to proven deceivers? You "believe" their claims? How convenient. Why is it that you are not demanding any proof from them? They are, after all, the ones who are selling products/services based on questionable (at best) claims and representations that they make to the public.

By the way, why do you have no problem with their fake video testimonials (thecasesolutions.com/testimonials)?

I also find it amusing that graphie is doing the exact same thing that he did previously with essaythinker, et al: attacking me for exposing a site that he will ultimately admit is shady and will begin attacking himself. The dude is "off-kilter."

First of all, please quote where I made that statement about a specific site. You don't read very carefully, Mr. "Researcher." (This is a perfect example of why/how I will always be 10 steps ahead of you. You're slow. You're also quite ignorant.)

Secondly, I don't make any substantive claim that I can't prove. Just because I don't immediately post all of my evidence in relation to a particular claim/statement does not mean that I don't have it. If you don't think that's true, feel free to come get me.

By the way, I'm still waiting for the webslinger to address my questions and quotes.


I don't "go after" ESLers. I go after misrepresents, liars, scammers, and fraudsters of any native language, from any location.

Liar . . . multiple forum members saw your site before you edited it.


You couldn't afford a seat at my table.

So, graphie, is it your official position that blatant misrepresentation of skills, experience, location, native language, and education does not constitute a scam?

graphophobius + 2 = 3