Oooh, nice. Here's WB trying to pass off documents submitted by SNR against ***** as the entire court proceedings of the case. ^_^ No cigar, loser.. not even a 5 cent cigarette. ;p


The judge would not have mentioned anything in his or her ruling that was trivial to the case. If the judge found that there was anything illegal about ***** masquerading as a U.S. company on its website, he or she would have written so in the final ruling. Is there any mention of even the word "American" is this [docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/new-jersey/njdce/3:2007cv05491/208337/31/0.pdf] - > court document? :p

So once again:

Has there ever been an essay mill that was brought to court and successfully convicted for its fudging of its location? The answer is NO.

So many quotes, not one of them about ***** masquerading as an American company. Don't you ever get tired of losing? :P I'm actually willing to bet that if we view the entire proceedings of case, little to no mention of the "American" issue would be found. That's your a** handed to you right there.


Haha... trying to wiggle out of another whammy? Let's not forget the quote that led to this entire discussion:


The discussion was simple: has there ever been an essay mill that was brought to court and successfully convicted for its fudging of its location. The answer is NO.

You lose.

So where in the entire post that you placed there, is it ever mentioned specifically that ***** was found guilty of posing as an American company when it is not? NOWHERE. :) The main thrust of the ruling was


***** may have been found guilty of many, many things by an American court, but it was not found guilty of masquerading as an American company. Anyone here wanna answer why that is? :)

Have them announce an erratum then. :p Oh, and blah blah on your false parallelisms that I'm not even going to bother to quote anymore. You're a joke.


Riiiiight... What was ***** found guilty of again? :P C'mon.. paste the exact ruling here so we can all see why you're wrong.

That may be so but your first "if" is the big IF. >.<


Never said it was.


You should watch the CNN report. Homework peddling is illegal across many American states.


Dirty income? You mean what I earn from providing clients with excellent yet reasonably priced work? Ok... I'm sure my clients would be happy to see me gone. >.<

But there are laws against peddling homework too, so even in that regard, the issue is a tie. However my opinions (and everyone elses') on the matter have little value on this forum. I say we all just wait for charges to actually be filed and for foreign essay mill companies to actually be proven guilty of misrepresentation.


But have absolutely no teeth to enforce such prohibitions, right?


Talk about false parallelisms. Did I mix illegal with unethical anywhere in my post? Nope. Go back to sucking those eggs and please continue to consider my offer on those courses that you desperately need to take.

Note: Msg 26 was posted in response to msg 23.


If you meant the quotes from msg 22, you can go right ahead and click the first two links to read the posts of some of the writers who I was referring to as "hacks". As for the last three quotes, I stand by them but have no problems with you disagreeing with them.

Thanks.


1.) I agree.
2.) I don't know for certain 'coz I've never taken an order from them.
3.) I agree. It affects the industry negatively.
4.) I disagree, on the grounds that this entire industry is unethical and so unethically doing other things besides supplying students their homework really doesn't matter much in my book.


This I gotta see. :D

Haha! So now that I corrected what WRT and Manunulat should be replying to, you go uinto full gear trying to divert the topic. :) The quotes that you posted don't mean a thing. The first two were made in threads where some unqualified writers were complaining against EW and were obviously made in the context of those threads. The last three clearly do not state that ALL writers who get fined by ew deserved it.

Now, let's wait for WRT and Manunulat's response, shall we? Or would you rather muddle things even further?

The question stands:

Nice try.

Blah blah blah...


Why don't you ask WRT or Manunulat if they believe everything that you're saying against me? :P

Single-spaced pages pay double


Give it up, egg-sucker. I never said that EVERYONE who was ever fined or fired by EW DESERVED it. "Kiss-ass"? Try quoting the entire post, moron.


So I kissed WRT's ass because I what? Agreed with him that ew is a cruddy company? So that I can do what? Defend ew? Ha! You're hopeless.

Hey.. I checked that reading comprehension class and found that I can get you enrolled in it for only US$89.25. How about this, I'll pay for both that and your critical thinking lessons? :P

Oh please, you know nothing about me. :)


Ha! So when I called boom a hypocrite, was I kissing her a**? I only retracted my statement when she said she wasn't ever going to write homework for students anymore. Try again, egg-sucker.

I agree. I haven't taken any orders from them for quite sometime now because of the ridiculous prices. I've tried to talk some sense into them about it but it's pointless. They would REALLY get so much more business if they start treating their writers better. :(

Did I claim to have proof? Yes.

Do you have proof that I don't have proof? Nope.

Does this mean that I do have proof? Of course not, but until you do have proof that I don't have proof, your claim that I'm lying about having proof is invalid.

Btw, I just checked. I can enroll you in a course on logical thinking for only US$110.34. I really think that you'd be doing all of us a favor by taking me up on my offer. Pretty please? :D

There were hardly any arguments in it. It's just a thread where you tried calling on other members for support against me and instead got rotten tomatoes thrown at you. Did OR, Freelance Writer, or anybody else heed your call? Nope. The only person who didn't directly rejected you was exwriter, and he didn't support you either.

Face it, egg-sucker. While many people here hate essay writers, only you (and maybe the now missing in action, MAK) have ill feelings towards me. :p

What? I already tried to get people to sympathize with you and post in your thread. What more do you want from me? :p Oh and yeah, on the subject of ignoring things, let's not forget that once again,

C'mon people... the egg-sucker needs to be affirmed so she won't lose what little wits she has left. Post in her new thread... please. :P ROFLMAO!

Why? Does my refusal prove that I'm lying? :p C'mon.. say "yes" so I can humiliate you all over again, egg-sucker. :P

Ignored? Oh... should I post in every thread you make? ROFLMAO! Gee.. somebody's just craving for attention. Don't you get that from those eggs that you suck all day?


So you're response to this:


is:

FreelanceWriter! Come to my aid.. phulEEEAAASEE!!!

Pathetic. :P

You mean like this survey? Oh wait.. that was YOUR thread, where you got YOUR butt kicked. :D Looks like I'm not the one with something to prove. :)

As usual, when backed into a corner with absolutely no way out, the pathetic creature we all call WB resorts to unsubstantiated bragging to get readers' attention off the fact that she just had her a** handed to her again. ^_^

See you all again tomorrow. :D


I got nothing against him. He writers for Research Topic, I write for EW. We're competitors, not enemies. Plus, I actually agree with his statements regarding max999.

As usual, when backed into a corner with absolutely no way out, the pathetic creature we all call WB resorts to unsubstantiated bragging to get readers' attention off the fact that she just had her a** handed to her again. ^_^

See you all again tomorrow. :D

LOL! Oh, I'm certainly not lying. Of course, people here don't have to take my word for it. :p I'm confident that many of them have come to the obvious conclusion easily enough on their own. :)

Oh please, your reading comprehension skills suck and you have time and again shown that you are unable to comprehend the logic behind the use of the most basic words in the language. You're just a glorified spelling and grammar checker. >.< LOL! You actually come free with any contemporary word processing software. :)

Did I say that my clients' beliefs were proof? Hell, no. I did say though that their beliefs are all that matter to me. :P C'mon WB... Reading Comprehension class... I'll spring for it. Please.. do us all a favor and take me up on my offer. >.<


Hahaha.. if I was at liberty to expose it, I'd have done so a looooong time ago. :D

People, just read the thread linked and see for yourselves. :)


See? We can all quote quotes here. Read the thread and be enlightened. ^_^


Sigh... you lose the word game again:


EW would use anything to cheat you out of some (or all) of your pay. Anything from a missed deadline due to a system glitch to a client paying with a stolen credit card can cost you. An excuse doesn't translate to a writer doing anything wrong.

Round 3? :)

Once again, I never lied about my qualifications to ANYONE. I do have excellent communication skills in the English language that could rival ANY American and I do have a Master's degree. Had enough? :P

Sure. Your defense of Carly and Jennifer are all over the place. Sheesh... :D


I'm glad you did. Don't mind our resident egg-sucker, she gets like that with anyone who says something even remotely negative about her employers.

Hey WB, how about I pay for that English language comprehension course? Only catch is that you'll have to take it in my country. But hey, seeing as you can't even understand the use of "or" in a sentence, I'd say our local schools are more than good enough for you


See how that smacks right back in your face, egg-sucker? :)

But hey... nice thread. Once again, you've done me a favor. :) Those who click the link that WB just posted would see that in that same thread, our li'l egg-sucker here got her sorry arse kicked by Lavinia, who throughout the thread exposed WB's numerous lies on this message board.

Ta-daaaahhhhh!!! I was wondering when damage control would be ordered. Oh but if this was some student from bestessays or some British company like AA, you can bet your a** that the li'l egg-sucker quoted above won't raise a hint of doubt as to the validity of the complaint.

Citizenship is not a "qualification," period. Excellent proficiency in the English language is that qualification that you say students are looking for. Had enough?

Is she? I don't think she claims to be so.


I didn't forget, the rest of your sentence just seemed trivial.


Oh, please:


I don't need to. Nearly all of the direct clients that I've acquired from this message board have directly told me that they believe that you are an agent of ET without me even needing to ask them about it. Aside from that, I have proof on the matter that would probably make you gouge your eyes out. :D

Right.. and see my response in the thread linked above. :)

Earth to ashis1990:


But hey, "cook" away. :D I'm actually interested to know what you meant by that sentence. o.O

See? I'm fine with people bashing ew. Bash away, complain away, close it down, blow it up. While they do pay me on time, I never claimed that ew was a good company. While, I do believe that they have the most user-friendly site interface I've used so far, their business model is unfair to both customers and writers.

Wow.. aren't you craving for attention, li'l egg-sucker. :D

Err.. so basically you're saying that bestessays is racist and since you claim that essaywriters owns bestessays then essaywriters is racist as well. Worse, it's a traitor to its writers who it discriminates against publicly. Right?

Ok.. let's assume that all of those are true. Here it is:

The Ukrainian, ESL owner (Yuri) of BestEssays.com and EssayWriters.net is a self-loathing, reverse-racist bigot against foreign writers.

Happy? Great.

Oh.. does that change the fact that WritersBeware, the dimwitted agent of ET is a self-loathing, racist bigot against foreign writers?

Does that change the fact that essaywriters still does pay competent writers on time all the time?

Does that change the fact that essaywriters' competent writers (such as myself) still deliver excellent essays to clients?

No.... no.... and.... no.

You really should take up Critical Thinking 101... or at least the part of the course on logical fallacies. Have a nice lunch... or should I say midnight snack? :P

Again, if by fraudulent you mean "not American, British, or Canadian" then whoop-dee-doo, of course 100% (not just 99%) of all foreign sites would be considered fraudulent. I think everyone in this forum can see the flaw of your bigoted claim.

I have no problem with you stating which sites you believe aren't American. Go right ahead. The problem that I have with you has nothing to do with your evidences of fake addresses and fire drills (although I still do find it quite peculiar that the company you work for doesn't even post its address on its site).


Riight... should the people reading this thread take egg-sucker's word for it? Nahhh... go on, click the links and see what I mean. :)

Oh I'm sorry, I didn't know that "American" now counts as a qualification.

ROFLMAO!

So because I openly tell my clients that I'm from Burundi rather than some other third world country, I'm stealing their ability to make "informed purchasing decisions"? Right... ROFLMAO! And for the record, I never lied about my qualifications to any client.


How? By writing excellent papers for my clients? You're a riot. :D

Any observer can clearly see what this is all about for characters like WritersBeware. Americans have enjoyed the ability to charge exorbitantly for essays before competent foreign writers showed up. Now that we're around, some of them would rather treat us as thieves rather than competition. What I'm happy about is that on this message board, WB seems to be the only person who has this bitter attitude.

That's all for me for now. Gotta go finish some stat projects before I hit the sack. Goodnight folks.

Well if your definition of "fraudulent" is "not American, British, or Canadian" then whoop-dee-doo, of course 100% (not just 99%) of all foreign sites would be considered fraudulent. This is completely irrelevant to the fraudulence that customers are concerned with, which includes not delivering orders or giving them up to university authorities. Now, take your foot out of your mouth and go back to sucking those eggs.