But no can deny that your other contributions have been a great help to enlighten others. So please help us out--perhaps not with this P.R. issue but with the other websites.

Let me take this opportunity to say that you are doing a good job, WB. Thanks!

You are entitled to your own lay opinions. But you see, the nationality of corporations and LLCs are not determined by the nationality of the individual incorporators/members. They are determined by law.

Now, as determined by law and reflected in their appropriate incorporation/registration before the proper state or federal government body, these entities still need to comply with legal requirements regularly while their respective corporations or LLCs are in existence.

So, I believe that you are both not privy to the compliance and therefore you cannot accurately and with certainty, conclude that it is genuine and in faithful compliance with the law.

Your conclusions are merely based on your limited experiences with the entity (This is a statement of fact and not intended to belittle your personal conclusions). If both of you feel that your rights are not injured in any way, then we are all happy for you. But it does not mean that others' rights are not violated.

You cannot DENY the other group consisting of those writers like you and who were deprived of what lawfully they should receive, as NON EXISTENT.


IT DOES MATTER, sorry to oppose you on that. We live in a society of laws. Laws exist to put order in the society and afford a safeguard to protect the general public against abuse. It affords a means to seek redress for those rights which were injured. It encourages businesses to flourish and prosper based on guidelines which the law sets forth for compliance.

You see, we do not live in an ideal society where, as you said "as long as writers are paid and customers get what they paid for" BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED/IS NEVER HAPPENING THAT WAY.

So if you want to deny the existence of non-payment of fees to writers and low quality of products from certain essay writing websites--then, it is your prerogative to live your writing career in a LIE.

@Serene
I read about Tarangita and the previous posts made abt P.R. You may not have written for P.R. but you were accepted and only decided not to write for him later on. You have a friend who was allegedly duped by P.R.--that is sufficient to establish 'interest' and affiliation (past) in helping out other past writers who are similarly situated with your victimised friend (Perhaps, you can use the email feature of this forum to contact those writers based on their previous posts here).

I am referring to 'interest' to help out other writers who had been affiliated with P.R. just like yourself and your friend. I was not referring to 'interest' in filing your own complaint as you may not have sustained any "injury" pecuniary or otherwise.

WB is not/was not affiliated with any of the websites managed/operated by P.R. so the other writers who may have been victimised by P.R. may feel a certain hesitancy in coordinating with WB. But personally, I have no opposition to his/her helping out. Then again, I think that what I personally feel and think may not be controlling at this moment. We have to think or speculate about how the duped writers of P.R. may feel.

Besides, whatever evidence WB had unearthed about this P.R. guy or will unearth, will be included in the complaints. Moreover, I think everyone will fully agree that WB will be a good contact person doing whatever we are doing anent the Ukrainian essay writing websites. I and perhaps, MAK are willing to pitch in also with a similar move to be initiated by WB. She has greatly contributed in producing and bringing forth evidence against the fraud of the essay writing websites. Her contribution cannot be paralleled.

You have posted your email address here, thus duped writers of P.R. who are not members of this forum may send their summaries straight to you. I am not sure if WB has posted his/her email address here. Nevertheless, you may if you please, coordinate with WB but for purposes of this task--MAK and I will coordinate with you. Nothing personal, I am just trying to simplify--points of origin/source and contact.

And by the way, the proposed flow of how complaints can be brought forth to proper authorities is not intended solely for P.R. complaints. It may used by others for other essay writing websites.

I am sure there are quite a number of writers duped of their fees by P.R. websites--some may not even be members of this forum while some may have thought that the fees deprived of them may be minimal as not being worth complaining about. For me, just 2 writers who allege being duped of their fees is FORCE IN NUMBERS already. I am encouraging everyone, whether members of this forum or not--bring forth your summaries and send it to serene.

Let me underscore the fact that we have the following purposes in doing this:
a) To claim the fees that the complaining writers were allegedly duped/ or the fees which were unlawfully withheld; AND/OR,
b) To establish a pattern or a regular business practice of the P.R. managed/operated essay writing websites in taking advantage of its writers.

So regardless of prescription (which you may think) or length of time, the (ancient) duped writers may be able also to help out the writers who were recently deprived of their fees. Please help us out.

Serene, thanks for the compliment.

AND, if WB is being identified as one affiliated with a U.S. essay writing website as against the identified fraudulent Ukrainian websites : Let me reiterate to everyone what I earlier posted in another thread:

The American-owned and the other foreign-owned essay entities which are legitimately created and legitimately managed/operated although not free from flaws, violations, and mistakes are NOT your competitors because they conduct business on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. A level playing field where all of them fairly compete with each other based on the legal rudiments of fair competition--where government regulation and oversight agencies exist to afford a venue as a means to vindicate and redress the trampled rights of their employees, the consumers and their writers.

@WB
Perhaps it is also time to do the same for those victimised by the other essay writing websites/Ukrainian websites, etc.
We can file a complaint before
a) the State of Virginia anent those websites that claim to be located in that state;
b) the State of New York anent websites that claim to be located in that state; and so forth.
And since you are a consumer advocate, WB:
c) the FTC.

The above complaints, if filed with the above authorities will ADD to the other complaints which I "personally know" about.

FINALLY, there may be people who would venture on threatening us for whatever we are doing here: Please be informed that--
a) we are not doing something ILLEGAL here;
b) MAK and I, and the others are NOT COLLECTING ANY FEES FOR ANY HELP THAT WE EXTEND TO EVERYONE; and,
c) we are just EXERCISING OUR RIGHTS TO VINDICATE AND SEEK REDRESS.

So please, do not allow them to threaten you anymore.

@MAK

There is a danger that if we become too general and broad--the petition before the IWF and the money claim to be filed online before the HMCS may be dismissed or denied on certain legal grounds. MAK, we do not only need evidence--we need to draft the individual complaints and refer to each evidence that each respective aggrieved writer has. After filing it before the HMCS, then a copy can be saved and forwarded to IWF--all of each of said complaints as evidence to the general petition.

Here is my suggestion:
1. No offence meant to WB (as I am aware of her efforts to expose the scams and the injustice), I would strongly suggest that SERENE be made the '"facilitator." Serene is one of the aggrieved writers who used to write for the entity/entities managed by P. Richardson. She has inside information which none of us may know of and the other writers similarly situated would feel more comfortable because Serene IS one of them. WB is quite "controversial" considering that some of the members here have been trying to associate her with another essay writing website (not that I believe it) but the "move" to vindicate the rights of the aggrieved writers may be read and interpreted to be tainted by "other" considerations.

2. Everyone make the call and appeal (including Serene) to forward all evidence to be attached with each of the aggrieved writers email to Serene. Each of the email should contain a summary of their personal and material allegations/statements relative to their OWN experience while writing for the entity/entities managed by P. Richardson.

Let me stress, OWN because any allegation outside of the personal experience of the aggrieved writer would be stricken out as hearsay.

3. For Serene to collate all evidence and statements of all these writers including herself as complainants. Let us designate a cut off deadline specified in our appeal and call for evidence--as 28 February 2009.

4. Serene will then prepare a general email to you and me: The GENERAL EMAIL shall contain all the material allegations of each writer including the summary of what appears in each of the evidence of this writer. The email need not attach each of the evidence as it may contain the name of the writer.

For example:

"Dear MAK and Voir,
Complainant A:
1. She applied at Project1st class on 01 June 2006 and was accepted on 15 June 2006;
2. After working for 6 months, on 18 December 2006 and while writing the order no. 2345--she received and email from P. Richardson to the effect that: (here Serene copies and pastes the body of the evidence).

AND SO FORTH . . ."

After preparing this for each: Serene, you may send it via email--using the email feature of this forum--by sending it to each of us-MAK and I.

5. Then you and I MAK can coordinate with each other through the email feature of this forum/site. I am sure that the owner/Admin of this site would even welcome such an idea as he or she would be truly accomplishing the very purporse for which this forum was created--to help those who had been duped by the unscrupulous essay writing websites.

We coordinate the drafting of each of the complaint for each complainant and after finalisation, we post separetely here. For example: we finalise complaint for complainant A --you and I post here at the forum our assent and agreement to the final form for complaint A by saying " serene, we agree on the final form of the drafted complaint A for complainant A--" (we would not post the complaint here)then you and I (separately) send through the email feature of this site, the complaint for A to serene. In this case, we also not only protect the identities of each of the complaining writer and our identities but also the integrity of this "process."

6. We follow #5 until we finally accomplish and finalise the last complaint. We both need to apprise ourselves of the guidelines for collating evidence and drafting complaints for money claim under HMCS website.

7. As soon as the last draft of complaint is sent (by you and myself separately)to serene through the email feature of this forum/site, Serene sends individually the draft complaint for each of the complainant--to each and respective email addresses of the complainants. WITH a date specified to be the date when each of them would file their individual complaints before the HMCS website.

8. Each of this complaining writers who just have sent their individual complaints online HMCS will save the filing number designating their complaint including their respective complaints (saving this by using web screenshots (keyboard of their pc) and designating the saved web screenshots with their names, for example: Serene Harris A; Serene Harris B (if the complaint web screen shots of the complaint consists in 2 webscreen shots); otherwise, Serene Harris A. This shall be attached to their email to be sent to Serene. Their email shall contain for example: "Serene, Please find attached web screen shots of my complaint before the HMCS filed on ____ and designated by filing number/case no./ whatever no. HMCS assigned to the complaint. Please file before the IWF."

9. Since both us already know the extent of each of the writers' complaints--we can both coordinate about writing the petition. I would suggest you take the lead role in doing this because you are more knowledgeable in IWF petitions.

10. As soon as we both finalise the draft of the petition, we signify our assent here at the forum. Then you and I separately send via email feature of this site the final form of the petition. With the specified details as to where Serene would file this.

11. Serene now will copy and paste the petition we both drafted and underneath the same, she shall type all the names of the petitioners--or the complaining writers. Before sending this, she shall attach the webscreen shots of all the complaining writers.

12. Then we all wait and pray.

I know how cumbersome it is but there is no other way of doing it--taking into consideration the following important elements: a) protecting the identities of the complainants; b) protecting our own identities; c) protecting and safeguarding the INTEGRITY of the entire process; and d) and seeing the realisation of the basic purpose of this website, that is to help those writers who had been taken advantage of by unscrupulous essay writing websites.

The process herein outlined may be used by the others who may also improve and "fine tune" other details in the future. This is a BIG small step to clean the industry and vindicate the rights of the aggrieved writers.

MAK, if you have any suggestions, modification, etc. please feel free to let us all know.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *
Let me take this opportunity to make the first call:
TO ALL THE WRITERS OF ENTITIES MANAGED/OPERATED BY A CERTAIN PETER RICHARDSON:
May we ask you to forward all your statements/summary of what transpired during your "work" as a writer for P.R. Please cite all the details like you are telling a story to someone who has to hear it for the first time. Please include dates, i.e. when you applied; when you were accepted as a writer; orders you took(details such as Order no., titles, etc.) Be truthful and do not exaggerate.

It is suggested that you follow the above summary, the way I posted my message--include everything to the smallest detail.
Please do not be hesitant and scared. Assert your rights. Please show that the writers are not a bunch of cry-babies who are merely satisfied in posting their experiences in this forum. Take positive action. Be responsible to rid the industry of these unscrupulous essay writing websites. What have we got to lose! If we keep silent . . .this practice will go on for years and years--vicitimising not only ourselves but also our friends and others. Make the first small but difficult step.

TRUTH will always prevail.
Please send all of your summaries and attached evidence to Serene. Thereafter, check you mail regularly for the final draft of your respective complaints and further instructions. Please do not worry the lapse of time or prescription, your complaint no matter how remote in time it is--IS VERY IMPORTANT because it establishes A PRACTICE DONE TO ALMOST EVERY WRITER.

Have a good day!

@MAK here are the links:

https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/stclassprojects-projectstclass-qualityresult-370/
https://essayscam.org/forum/es/stclassprojects-qualityresultsltd-28/

I would agree with one of the members at that time--bring a money claim online and in addition a petition with the IWF.
By bringing individual money claims online before moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco/index.jsp - Her Majesty's Court Service Money Claim per writer duped by this Richardson, these writers will be able to recover what has not been paid to them in terms of fees for the projects/orders which they have accomplished. The HMCS Money Claim Online only requires that the individual who makes the claim must be certain of the amount he is claiming. There are ways in collating evidence before one files his claim, I would suggest that those who would prefer taking this legal recourse to apprise themselves of the guidelines of the website and the procedure. The website offers very good suggestions on how to prepare a money claim.

Finally, I would suggest that all the affected writers file this claim (individually) but if possible within the same day or week with their complaints specifying (in each of their complaints/claims) that this Richardson has been unlawfully withholding what should be paid to writers as a usual practice in the conduct of his business.

Should there be questions anent how to prepare the complaint, you may email the customerservice.mcol@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk--(customer service) or call their numbers as indicated at the website.

Should there be further inquiries and issues, MAK and I are here to help out. We need to look out for each other--getting back what you have rightfully worked for is ONE thing but for me, the most important step would be to alert the authorities that this has been going on so that others would no longer be further victimised. There is "force" in numbers--singly or individually, may not create the impact.

This Richardson has been allegedly identified to be a citizen and a resident of Greece and therefor, he is not in UK. The companies identified operating these websites including dissertationsandassignments are all PLCs or private limited companies which means that the monetary liabilities against the companies are to a certain extent the liabilities of the members thereof.

But we need to be certain that when each of you were deprived of your fees, it was this Richardson who was operating and managing the respective website/s where you rendered your services as a writer. It looks like at different points/period of time there may have been changes in management.

Another important issue that we need to be certain of, are the provisions of the Terms of Work (TOW)--there is a provision there that requires the writers to bring any issue relating to their services or "work" before the management thereafter, before an Arbitration body. We need to analyse whether the emails of Richardson (not his true name) are sufficient bases for not exhausting the remedies as provided in the TOW.

After the aggrieved writers have filed their claims online, you may desire to print or save all of them (including your supporting evidence) and attach it as evidence to the complaint before the IWF. This way--all of your respective statements and supporting evidence are also incorporated and included in the complaint/petition before the IWF. It saves our time to be drafting each complaint for each authoritative body.

It is so easy to register a PLC in UK because there are firms doing business there similar to eastbiz.com (U.S. counterpart) relative to electronic filings. The U.S. counterpart--eastbiz.com has been clearly discussed and explained by WB in his/her earlier posts. I have personally investigated/inquired about certain (essay writing websites) "companies" which have been allegedly engaged in these unscrupulous practices.

There is no self organised group or body of freelance writers solely for freelance writers to protect themselves against these practices and I feel that all of you need to start thinking about it. This forum can be a start to organise. It does not matter whether you do freelance writing as a full time work or as a part time work to augment your allowance or matriculation. All of you still render service as a writer.

There is FORCE in numbers. Sometimes, you feel ashamed if you were duped of a small amount of let us say, 50 or 80 USD as fees. The initial reaction is, "it is relatively a small claim, so why do I need to even complain about it." BUT, how many are there similar to you with a "50 USD or 80 USD" fees who have not been paid--there is a multiplier effect. Altogether, if you do not complain or make your voice be heard--YOUR INDIFFERENCE, if I may say so--create an environment to pave a good way to dupe other writers in the future. If you go through the posts anent this Richardson, it dates back to 2006--and now we have another/or a series of complaints again. One would think, if the the previous incidents were justly brought forth and resolved--this matter NOW, would not have transpired anymore. Shall we wait for 1 or 2 years more, to ACT?

There is FORCE in numbers; singly or individually, it may not create an impact.
You/We are a major part in this industry so you/we need to be responsible to shape and mold it so that it can be an industry where injustice can no longer prevail.

The website/persons concerned, as soon as they hear about this--may offer payment of what was owed or your fees--I would suggest that you still file your complaints because should you accept settlement at this early point, there still is a great risk that incidents of abuse and injustice similar to this would still occur to the other writers in the future.

I am not here to advance the interests of any essay writing website or company nor discriminate against a few companies/websites. My offer for help and assitance does not come with strings attached nor do I proclaim to be an expert. I am only here to help out and suggest direction or various methods that you are still at liberty to accept or refuse.

It really is TIME to do something about all of these.

@MAK

Happy New Year!
Great New Year's Resolution! Should you need help, I am just around :)

By the way, I read the terms of work (TOW)--the writers and researchers are not considered employees. Under UK law, they are deemed 'workers.'

I quote verbatim: 'you do not have tax and National Insurance deducted from what is probably called a payment or fee rather than wages (though some workers do have deductions)'

I also have been reading about the conditons of visa for international students. I would need to know a few details to be able to apply the law i.e., period of course (6 months or over 6 months), etc.

@Serene--Please do not let this Richardson guy scare all of you--it is a mere scare tactic that he has been employing because you are not so clear on your rights and privileges.

project1stclass.com is unregistered and was a refunded domain on 6 Februrary 2007.

The domain dossier of dissertationsandassignments revealed that its Administrative Contact and its Registrant are NOT AVAILABLE.

Happy New Year to Everyone! Have a wonderful new year serene!

I skimmed through the earlier (older) posts. I shall look forward to the 4th or so then.

@serene
Now I do understand better your plight. But do not lose hope, we will get justice.
Are we saying that the writers are actually employees? I asked this because majority of the essay writing websites consider their writers as mere agents and not employees.

Personally, I do not know much of the background of Project1stClass, if you be kind enough to give me a few details through the email feature of this site or if you feel uncomfortable doing that, you can give me a background here at the forum. I may be able to "pull something out" of a few leads.

Academia-research? allegedly an affiliate of masterpapers. Most of the respective(U.S.) state laws on corporations and LLCs contain clear provisions on resident agent and being physically present within the state where they conduct business/and are registered or incorporated. I have my reservations about the physical presence of masterpapers business in N.Y.

By the way Serene, I am not affiliated with any essay writing websites.
Rest assured that something is being done. 'Moving mountains' can be a difficult task but let us hope :)


Anyone who brings forth a case will not be sure of anything--there are no guarantees of success but if party litigants keep their faith on the credibility of their evidence then there is a great fighting chance. Moreover, there are a thousand and one ways to "attack." ;)

There are blogs I came across: writers beware blog; poewar or write articles about it; and write a press release (there are pr websites-you can google search that).

If the Ukrainian-owned websites can issue press releases containing lies, what is there to fear when you speak of the truth.
If this man threatens legal action then call his bluff. There is this legal strategy: if you and the other wronged writers cannot file a case against your opponent then solicit the legal action to be filed by him. You are spared then from the costs of filing fees. The other writers now who were vicitmised can come out and join the force in repelling his cause of action and in ferreting the truth.

Besides what will he file--defamation? Truth is a defence in a defamation lawsuit.

@MAK
You are welcome!

@Serene
You can perhaps write about your or your friend's experience in other websites for writers. I think it is high time that freelance writers have their own union/collective organisation, albeit there is the National Writers Union--for writers working in U.S. markets.

@ MAK
Re:Quality Results Ltd
is a PLC

Company No. 05693852
Date of Incorporation: 01/02/2006
Name & Registered Office:
QUALITY RESULTS LTD
WINTON HOUSE, WINTON SQUARE
BASINGSTOKE
HAMPSHIRE
RG21 8EN

Former Office Address:(30 Apr 2007)
UNIT 150, IMPERIAL COURT
EXCHANGE STREET EAST
LIVERPOOL
L2 3AB
transferred to:(21 May 2007)
24 FINNS BUSINESS PARK
MILL LANE CRONDALL
FARNHAM
SURREY GU10 5RX

While,
Anagram Ltd --no such company registered. But there are:
Anagram Web solutions Ltd.
Anagram Text Solutions Ltd.
Anagram Systems Ltd.
Anagram Production Services Ltd.
Anagram People Ltd.
etc
There are about 20 registered under Anagram.

If we can be certain that it is Quality Results Ltd. we can easily secure a list of its members as of 2 January 2007.

I am just trying to help MAK. I am also bothered by this exploitation of writers.

@ MAK

Here is a link for: newyork.bbb.org/wwwroot/SitePage.aspx?site=24&id=fd1f73b4-7f3b-4e64-abd1-a9c7e26bba38

It does not have the authority to act in behalf of consumers/customers. It can only seek to resolve problems without litigation.

I think the Law School is located in a different campus--University of San Diego School of Law
The press release may be referring to San Diego City College. Please note, the City College's website contains its own sdcity.edu/pressrelease/default.asp - Press Releases and Media Stories for the entire school year 2008. I do not see any event covered by the City College's press releases or media stories which may be considered remotely similar to a 'freelance training seminar' referred to in the PR article of bestessays dated 23 December 2008.

Please note further that - siva-ph1.jobstreet.com/_profile/previewProfile.asp?advertiser_id= 36030 -writers.ph[DND*] which is a part of Uniwork, Inc., [/url]has an in-house group of writers as well as other staff who may have been assigned to write the press releases (which may also explain the writing style used in a few of the PR articles).

There were advertisements posted by the company for various positions:

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - Customer support representative - customer Relations representative

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - customer relations agent

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - support representative

resumepromo.com/view.php?company_id=4591 - web developers

And recently (22 December 2008)

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - customer relations agent/customer service representative

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - sales representatives/account representatives

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - web copywriter -

jobsdb.com.my/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork%2C+Inc.%22 (advert also in)

And in bestjobsindia.in/bt-empd-uniwork.htm - India

bestjobs.ph/bt-empd-uniwork1577.htm- also,

getafreelancer.com/users/680800.html - SEO link builder for internet marketing

linkedin.com/in/cherylestorgio - Some of the employees have also skills in writing articles, content and blogs

To all these websites, stop trying to fool the public and the consumers. By flooding the web with these PR articles, a perspicacious person would only arrive at a foul conclusion.

Another theobserver.ca/Community/NewsDisplay.aspx?c=10028 - press release this time from essaywriters.net[DND*]

She wrote: "Since essaywriters.net[DND*] is serious in their pledge of delivering service that exceeds expectation, the hiring will be no less than the standard of previous hiring. Among the requirements are MA diploma in History, extensive experience in writing and ability to communicate well.

The company is limiting the opportunity only those who are native speakers of English language. That is, only American and Europeans are able to submit their resumes. Otherwise, it will only be removed from the application bank.

The ruling of European-American Exclusivity in hiring is not to demean other races but to strictly implement the demands of clients. According to research, some problems causing closure of several companies operating in this niche is rooted on the professors' effortless detection of Eastern thought."

So are we saying that during the previous hiring there were no ESLs hired? (And I am not arguing in terms of inferior and sub-quality ESLs or qualified and superior ESL writers. I am just arguing from a point of fact, ESL as against EFL). Don't we have posters here who have admitted that they are writers for essaywriters.net[DND*] and are ESLs?

If ESL writers now are already avoiding Essaywriters because of the numerous complaints of non-payment and/or delay in the payment of their fees, how in world can Essaywriters attract Americans and Europeans in applying as writers when there is no forex to speak of. The only reason why ESLs who live in India, Pakistan and the Philippines apply as writers before was because they can exchange/convert the fees in USD into their own currency at a higher rate.

The problems causing closure of several companies operating in the same niche (and believe me, this does not need research!) is due to the observance and use of the very same practices which Essaywriters and its group have been employing.

Hey, ESLs of essaywriters.net[DND*] you are not 'needed' anymore. Do not feel bad, it should come to you as good news. They got tired of exploiting you.

Essaywriters can you please get someone better to write your PR materials. This one obviously contradicts herself.

It is hog wash.

San Diego City College TAKING POSITIVE ACTION AGAINST THE UNTRUTHFUL FABRICATED STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE PR ARTICLE OF bestessays.com[DND*]

Please recall a PR article entitled "San Diego City College concluded freelance writing seminar" was written for the benefit of bestessays.com[DND*] and was released on 23 December 2008, part of which I reproduce herein verbatim"

"The participants - mostly writers and recent graduates - learned a great deal about the benefits of writing travel articles. Another speaker was a professor from Sacramento who wrote film reviews and other lifestyle articles. She encouraged the participants not to limit their writing to topics that interest them, as it was the only way to be a freelance writer for a long time. The other highlight of the seminar was on essay writing. Two magazine writers shared their insights about some of their published essays. It gave the participants a hint on what topics to write about. A refresher course on essay writing was included in the program. At the end of the seminar, San Diego College acknowledged the valuable partnership of bestessays.com[DND*] by helping promote the site to the participants."

As appearing per link: malebits.com/article24912.html

And shown in these webscreen shots:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/SDCC_1.jpg

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/SDCC_2.jpg

San Diego City College President, Terence J. Burgess, Ph.D. wrote (after bringing the issue to his attention) and hereunder reproduced verbatim:

"Please be assured that San Diego City College does not endorse the use of term paper mills. I am referring your email to our district legal department with a request that they contact bestessays.com[DND*] and demand that references to City College be removed. Thank you for bringing this to my attention."

And as shown in the webscreen shot:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/San_Diego_City_college.jp g

Nothing personal, bestessays.com[DND*]. I just do not like the way you, your ghost PR writers and other affiliates MISLEAD AND LIE to the public. Is the above not one of THE MATERIAL, SUBSTANTIAL AND DIRECT EVIDENCE to prove an alleged FALSE ADVERTISING as defined and prohibited by the Lanham Act, the Consumer Protection Act and other pertinent and related laws?

It is only ONE OF THE MANY EVIDENCE that is in my possession. All of which "had been used and will be used LEGALLY."

I join the others here in CONDEMNING YOUR ACTS ALLEGED TO MISLEAD, FOOL, LIE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE CONSUMERS/PUBLIC.

I join the legitimate companies/LLCs and other entities (lawfully engaged in the business of essay writing, research and consulting) in CONDEMNING YOUR ACTS ALLEGED TO BE CONSTITUTING FALSE ADVERTISING AND FURTHER, WHEN TAKEN WITH THE OTHER EVIDENCE AS ONE ALLEGEDLY CONSTITUTING FALSE COMPETITION AND DECEPTION within the purview of the provisions of the Lanham Act, the Consumer Protection Act and other related laws.

I am very much aware of the steps that you would take or have taken to 'silence' me like the way you have tried to destroy others here by sending your 'cohorts' and by casting malice in the intentions of the other members.

Rest assured that I do not have any spectre in my closet.

Yes a good laugh! It must be the season . . It claims to be based in America but failed to specify an address. Perhaps, the owner has yet to receive a tutorial session from the owner of SuperiorPapers and its affiliates :-/

Domain Dossier:
Domain Name: SUPREMEESSAYS.COM
Registrar: ACTIVE REGISTRAR, INC.
Whois Server: whois.activeregistrar
Referral URL: activeregistrar.com
Name Server: NS100.WHBDNS
Name Server: NS101.WHBDNS
Status: ok
Updated Date: 01-sep-2008
Creation Date: 02-jul-2008
Expiration Date: 02-jul-2009
Registration Service Provided By: Active-Domain LLC
Contact: active-domain.com

Domain Name: supremeessays.com
Expiry Date: 02-Jul-2009
Creation Date: 02-Jul-2008

Registrant Name: Pavlo
Registrant Company: supremeessays.com
Registrant Email Address: infoessays@gmail
Registrant Address: Mashunobudivna
Registrant City: Kiev
Registrant State/Region/Province: AL
Registrant Postal Code: 33000
Registrant Country: UA
Registrant Tel No: +380.
Registrant Fax No:

I think he has not yet mastered the art of deception. He needs to be mentored by the master.

BTW, WB there is another pressreleasepoint.com/bestessayscom-gives-holiday-treat-outstanding-employe es-2008 - PR article written by a press contact with address at Morgan street, Bonifay, Fl 32425
There is no Morgan street in Bonifay. There is one in Queens, NY. Don't these people research anymore?

Only an imbecile can believe her statements, WB. Please allow me to quote part of what she said,
"So, If there is a complaint there is an investigation and if you plagiarize or have poor quality work, grammar etc, then surprise! You will not be paid for writing crap or stealing. I personally believe that these claims are likely false or that the writer simply did not fulfill their obligation to the assignment."

A. If there is a complaint? Where does the complaint originate? from essaywriters.net motu propio? or from a customer? Assuming arguendo it comes from either of the two sources, is the complaint presented to the writer? Are the issues identified so that the writer concerned can defend himself.

The answer is no.
B. Is the concerned writer given an opportunity to be heard during the 'investigation'?
The answer is no.
C. During investigation, are the issues on plagiarism, poor quality work, grammar, etc. identified?
The answer is no. There is just a sweeping accusation.
D. Who determines the 'guilt' of the concerned writer? essaywriters.net management/Quality Assurance?
The answer is yes.
E. Is the imposition of penalty/fines in accordance with its policy?
The answer is no.

The aforesaid questions above are the basic rudiments of DUE PROCESS. It is one of the pillars of a democracy. When there is an imposition of fines, it is considered punitive because you DEPRIVE the writer of what he LAWFULLY EARNED and therefore due process SHOULD be observed.

No complaint is ever presented. It is a mere claim and accusation of essaywriters.net. A sourcethat has been known not only as an entity which is profit-greedy but an entity with a track record of proven deception and lies!

Do you think that any claim or accusation proferred against a writer by this entity, is worthy of credence and belief?
Who determines 'guilt'?
Plagiarism--A software that identifies bibliographical entries as 'plagiarized'!!
Poor quality work and grammar--determined by people who cannot even construct (spoken or written) a proper sentence in English?
So finally, who determines guilt? An entity that has been known not only as an entity which is profit-greedy but an entity with a track record of proven deception and lies!It is axiomatic that in due process, the determination SHOULD be made by an independent, impartial, and fair tribunal--not one ridden by its own self-serving, self-aggrandizing, and greed-stricken motivations!

Of course, EW can issue press releases of alleged employees with PhDs and MAs and WITH adopted American names. Well, next time you do that please also attach the photocopies of the duplicate copy of the respective ITRs of these American employees with stamp-mark as 'received' by the IRS! Short of that, no one will believe anymore.

Imposition of fines--You DEPRIVE, WITHHOLD, and DELAY the receipt of fees already earned by writers. The fines are as much as or even more than the fees for the disputed order. And 'Jenna' spoke about 'stealing.' How can one steal something that already belongs to him! If there is anyone that steals, it is the entity that you are a part of.

Due proces exists in Ukraine. Walter Prochorenko, a well-known international business executive once wrote about Ukraine's observance of due process, "We have seen court decisions made even before the losing party was notified that a case was being heard. We have seen cases where the winning party presented no documents, no proof, no real witnesses, nothing, and still won. This is all while the losing party presented stacks of documents and even official witnesses. Due process of law in Ukraine has much to be desired. We have seen cases where there is official evidence of document falsification and yet the judges disregard such evidence." (ukraine-today.com/business/practical_guide/guide.htm)

Now, why does that NOT surprise me.

'On ne trompe point en bien'--We never deceive for a good purpose.

FRAUD is defined as trickery, an intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value.

Would you have parted with your money in payment of a paper, the source of which you do not know or that it is operated by people from Ukraine but hides such fact? Would you have parted with your services as a writer had you truly known that you are hired by someone so far away, such fact covered and shrouded by lies? Knowing that one may no longer have a legal recourse because the entity has no oversight body and is unregulated?

To all the writers who are reading this, make your choice. After reading and researching on your own and knowing all of this--would you still want to perpetuate fraud further?

Well of course for EW, comments against its profit-oriented agenda can easily be shrugged off as comments coming from COMPETITORS. But I do find that manner of thinking as delusional.

The American-owned and the other foreign-owned essay entities which are legitimately created and legitimately managed/operated although not free from flaws, violations, and mistakes, are NOT your competitors because they conduct business on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. A level playing field where all of them fairly compete with each other based on the legal rudiments of fair competition--where government regulation and oversight agencies exist to afford a venue as a means to vindicate and redress the trampled rights of their employees, the consumers, and their writers.

You see, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."

Another one? WiseTranslations

Located at: 1800 N. Kent Street #B1 Arlington, Virginia 22209
wisetranslations/staff

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/WT.jpg

But guess what? The given address is occupied by an Engineering Office of the Plaza East Office Building! I called their phone number and it was confirmed that there is no Wise Translations entity conducting business there.

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/WT2.jpg

Not only that--Wise Translations' office phone number is: 1 703-621-7264
and which happens to be the very same US phone number of KillerContent.

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC.jpg

KillerContent and WiseTranslations share the same US phone number 1 703-621-7264 BUT THEIR OFFICES are located in DIFFERENT LOCALITIES. How can that be?

KillerContent's US Corporate Address is: 4114 Hamlin Ave. Chantilly, Virginia 20151 while that of WiseTranslations is : 1800 N. Kent Street #B1 Arlington, Virginia 22209

Yeah, different localities that is why both have different zip codes. :)

And not only that--I will tie up everything for all of you:

*We discovered that Universal Research LLC's registration before the Va State Corporation Commission is cancelled as of 31 December 2007 as it appears below:

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/LLCcancelled.jpg

*We discovered that a newly incorporated corporation (not LLC) appears in the records of Va State Corporation Commission as it appears below:

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/URInc.jpg

(same Hamlin address)

*We also discovered that changes had been made on the website/s (other websites as well) from Universal Research LLC to Universal Research Incorporated (Limited).

BEFORE:
i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC-LLC.jpg

NOW:
i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC.jpg

You have been lying to all our faces. If you can lie this way, you also have lied in other ways.

Thanks WB! I am just trying to pitch in some little help. You did a lot of research and leg work too.

I have to beg everyone's indulgence because I am not as good as you are in posting the photos :) I am sorry about that.

I just have this feeling that they do enjoy the divisiveness in our (everyone) midst now. ESL vs. non-ESL (although I agree with you and I know where you are coming from) but there is a larger picture out there.

On one hand, ESL writers are duped of their earnings. On the other, Americans are fooled and deceived. Everyone is a victim.

Just my opinion, they are making a mockery of our respective governments.

If you would check the Virginia State Corporation Commission: s0302.vita.virginia.gov/servlet/resqportal/resqportal?&rqs_custom_dir=sccci sp1

--under Corporate Inquiry Menu (not the Limited Liabilty Company Inquiry Menu) there is a corporation newly incorporated with Corp ID 0701509 yet another name-I think you get the picture.

Let us encourage the victims to file their complaints online the IC3 website.
Continue your good work and goodluck!

I am confident that something will be done.

That is for Universal Research LLC at 11654 Plaza America Dr. #365
Reston VA 20190.

Maybe I can add a little bit more.

And for essaywriters.net at 1361 Icy Brook dr., Herndon, Va., 200170

Sold in 2003:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/2003SaleofIcy.jpg

great photograph

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/ICYregistered-owned.jpg

registered to:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/ICYregisteredbyFairfax.jpg

(actually they are relatives--two houses on a parcel of land)

And what about the former UK address:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAddressofEssayWriters.jpg

turns out to be the Senate House Library

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAdd-SenateHouseLibrary1.jpg

of the University of London. (must really be an old building)

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAdd-SenateHouseLibrary2.jpg

Let us go to some listings:



The phone number is registered under a different person in another locality.



Hmmmm . . .and



and the phone number again is registered under the name of another person in another locality



Perhaps these persons really exist but they are not involved in all of these. Probably their names were picked and placed in documents and lists. Someone must be tampering with the listings. Why all the trouble? It is more than what is seems.

By the way, an "LLC" is not similar to "incorporated." As it now appears on a few of the websites, Universal Research LLC has "switched" to Universal Research Incorporated. Wow! like magic.

Oh well as for the more substantial evidence--let us forward all the documents to the authorities. Let the authorities put a stop to this.

The Americans are not the only ones defrauded here.