EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Posts by WannabeWriter / Posting Activity: 1
I am: Unspecified
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Last Post: Aug 17, 2009
Threads: 1
Posts: 3  
Displayed posts: 4
sort: Oldest first   Latest first   |
WannabeWriter   
Aug 16, 2009

Evening all,

I stumbled across this site whilst looking for reviews from writers who have worked for different online essay companies, in the hopes of finding a decent one to whom I might provide my services. I'm soon to graduate with my MA and would cherish the opportunity to earn by doing what I do (and love) best - writing essays.

Concerned WriterWhat better place to learn - about which companies are legitimate, which pay their writers the best rates, which have dedicated customer services teams accessible to both the customer and writer - I thought, than a site populated by those who have first-hand experience of working for these companies? It certainly is difficult to avoid being scammed these days, and second-hand experience is almost better in this respect than first.

I am shocked (and a little saddened) about what I found instead: people who purport to be high-class writers who cannot even write a simple grammatically correct sentence; personal slanging matches between delusional, paranoid bullies; shameless self-promoting and libellous claims against companies, without a shred of real proof ('I can show you all the proof you need' <but, for some reason refuse to do so here, just my saying so must mean that such proof exists!>).

I fully understand that the purpose of the site is not to promote your own company (although there seems to be plenty of that around, shrouded in the guise of 'helping you good folk to avoid scams!') and that this is expressly forbidden by site moderators (who appear to be particularly biased in the posts they do allow) but I do not understand why making a genuine list of each of the companies that exist out there, and allowing people (anyone, whoever they are) to comment on their experiences of said company should constitute promotion. There will always be some people on these types of sites that abuse the system - surely this is what the moderators are for? - but I don't see the point in the site at all if genuine attempts by satisfied or dissatisfied customers or writers are viciously attacked by those who happen to disagree.

All some of us want is to read the various comments made and make up our own minds as to which companies we want to give a go, and which we should steer clear of. We are not all imbeciles. We do not need the likes of ...............<insert any number of regular posters here> aggressively disallowing anybody to have an opinion that happens to differ from their own. All posts on forums like this comprise opinions; nothing more, nothing less. I and, I'm sure, most people who purport to be university graduates capable of writing for such companies in the first place are very aware of this fact and would probably take most comments with a pinch of salt, regardless of whether they are good or bad. I understand that most posters have very noble intentions when they flag potential scams, but the aggressive language and claims verging on libel seriously undermine your credibility - just so you know! Also, it is generally accepted (both in academic practice and by common sense) that the burden of proof lies with the person making the accusation (or bizarre claim, or proposed revision to an established scientific theory) not on others to disprove an accusation which is presented with no proof...

So basically, whilst I found the whole thing thoroughly entertaining, I'm just disappointed that I didn't find what I was looking for on this site. Sorry for the long rambling that was borne out of this disappointment! It's a shame that such a good idea was perverted by those whose egos and self-interests cannot be contained. Who knows, maybe I'll start up my own forum while I'm waiting to get some work!
WannabeWriter   
Aug 17, 2009

Hi asif,

It's so good to hear a rational, sane voice on here! Thanks for making yourself known; I was starting to think the world had gone mad!

And thanks for the advice. I will gladly take it, and urge anybody else serious about their endeavours to do the same. Better to get burned by your own trial and error, than be led blind into disaster by another!
WannabeWriter   
Aug 17, 2009

I don't agree that it makes the entire site useless. it's like boycotting my local library because I don't like some of the magazines it carries. maybe that's logical to you...

I understand what you're getting at rusty, but it's not really the same thing - you can see quite clearly just from looking at the magazine covers which ones you don't like and can thus avoid them at will, whereas you can't tell a poster's credibility if they are often actively trying to deceive you. I'm certainly not saying that all posters do, but because some do, that, unfortunately, casts a shadow of doubt over everyone.

The only reason I wrote the post in the first place was to warn those perhaps less cautious than myself against taking anything on the site as gospel, and to urge to, as you say, 'do their own research.'

Anyway, I'm sorry to have stirred such emotion here, as I seem to have, and thank everyone for their reasoned responses!
WannabeWriter   
Aug 17, 2009

Wow, ok...firstly, when I first responed to asif, his response was actually very level-headed and rational. If you notice, his first post (the one to which I actually responed with this quote of mine you've picked)

My advice: only write for company who is Limited Company and which is not fining writers for late submissions etc.

contained no such unhelpful nonsense. Further, I have not replied to any rants (from anybody on the thread) as I don't like to allow myself to get dragged into petty name-calling and mud-slinging exercises.

I believe I've actually been quite fair to everybody on here in my responses, have neither insulted nor dismissed the opinions of anybody, and have thanked all of those who have contributed in a similar fashion.

So please be a little bit more cautious before falsely attributing beliefs and assertions to me that were clearly not intended. I have responded to everyone in an unbiased manner based solely on what they have said in this thread (this is the only thread I've posted in, and so I'm not aware of the apparant 'histories' or 'hostilities' that appear to exist between certain members of the forum) and would appreciate the same level of respect from anybody else.