See? It's a lot better when were all talking sense instead of talking bull. ^_^
As I explained earlier, lower prices at the same quality equates to more customers. Even if I didn't work for EW and just advertised here as a freelance writer, I'd still have the capacity to charge folks for lower wages than what someone in the U.S. would charge simply because my upkeep costs are much less. Call it comparative advantage.
Not all discrimination is bad. you've abandoned the accusation of racism and moved into the more nuanced consideration of discriminating against individuals based upon their qualifications. that is a norm in the business world and will not change b/c of your posts. some examples:
Not at all. Is getting to say "dadda" instead of "papa" a qualification? Although I did substantiate that ESL writers can be as qualified or even more so than native English speakers, I stand by what I said that WB is a nothing but a bigot against people whose racial background placed them in environments where English wasn't the first language. Sure it might not be under your strict definition of racism, but the fact is it is still an unjustified, uncivilized, and frankly cruel display.
a. Depends on who I can afford. ^_^
b. Depends on the fresh grad's skill. I mean, if I'm picking out a Doogie Howser of evolution, why not, right?
c. The one who does better in an interview. If they both do well, then yes I'll have to go with Harvard
The thing is, none of these examples accurately parallel to the discrimination that I'm talking about. You may be a non-English speaker at birth but a fluent speaker by senior prom. Still, you'd always have English as a second language because it's not the language you grew up with. Do you see what I mean?
therefore, this debate really becomes a question of whether being a native English speaker trained within an American or British institution provides a demonstrable business advantage for essay companies and their clients.
Correct!
if enough qualified, ESL writers were available to work for the different essay writing companies and were capable of producing high quality work, then American and British writers would have to take a pay cut or be replaced.
If ESL writers in general wrote so badly, then no one would patronize the sites that let them work. I mean, why would you even pay $8/page for junk that you could've just written yourself? There has to be a strong base of writers working for such companies as ew for them to stay in business. Furthermore, if sites like ew only generated minimal sales, lanchaw bin would be out of the job since his/her employers wouldn't need to hire bashers.
See? Two can play that game. However neither of our statements directly support nor refute the thesis of the debate, which is being native to a language that is universally used automatically equates to superior writing skills in that language over individuals who are not native to the said language.
@WB
What's the advantage to Yuri, owner of EW? What not openly state, "We proudly hire ESL writers! Place your order now"?
Because of ******** bigots like you. ^_^
