I have two students from Canadian Uni, 5 from USA including one Professional. I am sorry, I had to say 'no' to so many of you - just because you ask for work when I have too much work at hand.

No I am not cheap. I am rather straight in conveying my message. You are a writer, thats why you are trying to pull my leg. No worries - you are at large to write anything you want. It doesn't matter to me as long as I receive my work from here.

Those who think I am cheap - do not come to me, and also do not comment on my writing.

Best regards

Hello

I am a free-lancer academic writer. I write for UK, Canda, and US students. Most of my works are for business and management studies at bachelors and masters kevel. Try me for once. I will deliver works in time and will revise your work if your tutors prefer it. My prices are very reasonable. Anyone needing help - just try me. Thanks for reading (@gmail).

If you have courage, go back to the proofreading that I did. See my example how I replied to the proofreading which was done on my writing. I have explained, and given example. Do something in that line. Be logical, academic, professional, and show my mistakes. I will accept if I have any error in my proofreading.

Do not be abusive, forceful (like beasts without logic and reason), do not be emotional. Only then our discussion can lead to something conclusive and educative. But you are not doing this. You are simply supporting the FW and opposing me without explaining.

If you cannot do this, then stay away - you are not qualified to comment on proofreading. The fact that you do not "think" I am correct does not matter to me as long as I am grammartically correct and as long as I have been doing proofreading for the last 30 years of my life. I even have publications. English is not my native language, but I am 47 and I have been not only studying and writing in English medium for the last 33 years, but have also been teaching people in English medium in addition to doing research - not only in Business Studies - but also in Enlish Literature and Linguistics. Do its better not to teach a grandpa how to --ck!

If you truly feel so, then stay away from MarsVictor. If you do not understand someone's language, you need to acknowldge first that you do not know that language. There is no shy to learn. Anyone who does not understand my proofreading here is surely not educated to write for students.

You are a super idiot, mate. Here I am not saying that your writing is wrong. We were saying that the person whose writing I proofread, was wrong. God help - you are such a poor reader! What the hell you are talking about so long?

The point is not about what the uck you think he wanted to tell me, but about what the uck he wrote and whether or not non-native English speakers like me proofread. Come to the point - why are you moving to and fro - off the point? Have the courage to learn from his mistake. And do accept that he was wrong, and non-natives can proofread.


Of course, you will trust. Trust is sometimes blind. A fool like you, who does have no knowledge on/about grammar would rely on trust instead of showing it structurally as I did. If you are any worth of anything - c'on show me how I am wrong. If you cannot then just go away and sleep. If you have shame, you will never come up here to write again, at least againt me.

I told you it was not a point of comprehension, but error that he made. What a hole you are? You want to make me understand what he wrote to me - but you do not understand that:

If you suggested an alternative to his writing, it only means the sentence which I corrected needed correction. And this goes to say that non-native English speakers can proofread the writings of native English speakers?

We do not have a problem of comprehension in that sentence. It was only proofread for a superflous "that is". If you suggested an alternative, it only means the sentence which I corrected needed correction. This goes to say that non-native English speakers can proofread the writings of native English speakers. Right?


You may call me whatever. Thats your choice, cause the key board is with you. Its your liberty to call me anything. But do you agree that "nobody" is a singular noun, and the "learners" is plural. So the sentence is wrong? I am showing that I can proofread his English. If you sleep while you are awake, nobody can wake you up, right? So, don't say that he was right, and you do not understand what I write, and non-native speakers/writers cannot proofread.

I am always learning - I got no problem. But do you not know the sequence of tense - in which have had is present perfect tense and are (as has been used in that sentence) is present continuous? So, whats your point, mate?

I am sorry as well, Mate. You need to speak and write reasonably. If you are talking about proofreading, then show me one mistake in the proofreading that I did. Just do not hit around the bush (or speak "Gibbrish" as you say). Merely giving your comments without explaining as I did does not help. It only shows how unreasonable and biased you are.

Yes, I am too more of an ignorant fool, which is better than an "knowledggeable donkey" like you. If you understand anything of the correction that I have given, then you would have kept your mouth shut and would not have come here to show me the proofreading after I clearly have shown the error. It is only beasts which would attempt to do things by force. If you have any shame, then show me corrections on what I have explained in FW's sentences. Otherwise just keep your bloody mouth shut!


Come up with your proofreading on what I did on FW work, and if you want to beg - go and do it on the street, dude.

"fingers in a hand" - About 11,400 results (0.42 seconds)- Gooogle Book search results.
"fingers on your hands" - About 8,190 results (0.33 seconds)- Google Book search results.
"Control on" - About 3,220,000 results (0.51 seconds)- Google Book search results.
"control of" - About 81,400,000 results (0.81 seconds)- Google Book search results.

each of them has [a] distinct function - my error accepted.

what colour they have = on their colour = not accepted. It depends how you mean.

their language proficiency, not "how good or bad they might be in language proficiency"]. .... This is surely not wrong. It reflects the writer's style. An example of the use of the words as I did can be found in the following:

Marton, F (2007), "The tenth year of English: review of a project concerning second language learning at university level", Higher Education Quarterly, DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.1947.tb02072.x,

You and your colleagues can follow these, [these what?] - This question from you means that you fail to read. Read the texts before where I have said "these". You will definitely find that you are short-sighted, which I have indicated in my previous posts.

["make" is a word that a grade-school English writer would use here; you mean contribute to: Wrong dear. You can contribute when something exists. Here a community does not exist. Writers like you here pull others legs. So, we have to first make it.

Final advice: English language does not belong to any nation or country. It is the lingua franca and has varied forms. Furthermore, the language is not the only issue in writing; it must be able to communicate concepts, particularly at Masters and above levels.


This is again a failure for you to read my posts. I have never claimed that personally I am as good as a native English person. I have been writing professionally in English for the last 30 years.

Howevever, it does not mean that all native English speakers will be able to write with the same depth and breadth as a non-native English speakers would. When we talk about writing, we do not necessarily mean only the writing proficiency, we also mean the concepts, arguments, flow, etc.

About "proofreading" I have explained in depth previously with examples. Are you claiming that non-native English writers or speakers cannot proofread? That would be very naive of you - if you say "yes".


The gross error here is that I have never claimd that anywhere that personally I can proofread; but of course I have been doing a lot of proofreading. I have said that proofreading capability is not limitted to only native-English readers or writers. The way you proofread my writing in the post shows the limited language skills that you have - I have shown by reply previously. Please check out. Also, the question of proofreading arises when only someone submits a writing for proofreading, which implies that the writers has given enough care and attention while writing and it was meant to be proofread.

Example of my proofreading:


I hope now you can see that a non-native English speaker can proofread your writing. Please fall back to us (in this forum) if you have observations on my proofreading.

What do I need to reply mate?

Welcome Star

forumregulator, editor75, amnateeb, exact

I read all your posts.

Sorry, that should have been - "you will be okay" not "you will okay".

1


A. I know what "you wrote"

This is where the problem is: I do not think you understand English language. Or even if you do, you actually do not understand the meanings. You read words, but fail to understand the meaning of the sentence, or you manage to read the sentence but your comprehension is below the marks. I saw many teachers who fail to grab the meaning of paragraphs; and by the time they go to the next paragraph; they miss the link with the previous paragraph. In such case, the student becomes the sufferer (or the victim). To read is actually to read in between the lines.

I will examine the above with my first post in this thread, and show how the whole discussion has sidetracked the main issue.

On 27 Jan 2012, anakelson posted:

Can anyone tell if a writer that is not a native English speaker will be able to proof read essays?

The question seemed very catchy to me because throughout my life (I am 47), I have been seeing proof-reading. How many percent of the authors who proofread are actually native speakers? How many percent of the people who speak English are actually native English speakers?

Quoting the above question, I replied in the following way - and I began to watch the dilapidated level of comprehension of some of the native English speakers here. I replied:

"Of course. I find many teachers whose first language is English are so shabby in their language. Although generally a person who speaks English from birth is supposed to have better knowledge of English language, this isn't true always."

Surprisingly, the first person who put a comment after my writing there, posed the following comment:

you're from the Philippines, I presume?
take your spam to essaychat.

What impression shall I have about the person who placed the above remarks? Lets anlyse my reply first.

I stated - "of course", which means - obviously non-English speakers can do the proof-reading. The second sentence of my answer explains my experience with poor native English speakers in the role of teaching. Please understand that this is an experience. This experience has an assessment component. [Let me say, in the British universities - I would say - over 40 percent teachers teach MBA classes without having a Masters Degree. Education is simply a business here.] See the third sentence of my answer - in that I explain the natural supremacy of the native English speakers with a contrast at the end.

Now when I posted this answer - obviously I did not think much about it. I just wrote and posted. After I read the comment of the person (as above), I was both shocked and disgusted.

Forums are interesting because they provide avenues to express and at the same time avenues to discover contemporary concerns of others, and your memories get linked to issues. And that is how forums are learning places.

One may be a native speaker or ESL teacher, but what if - he is just a dull headed person, with poor analytical ability, or perhaps does not accommodate others' views, experiences, and fail to read in between the lines?

1


B. I know what ... what "I said",

If you want to say something in the forum, you have to understand what you read. What is 'reading'? Think about it. But let me give some instances. Shakespeare wrote about 400 years before. Till today his plays are read. There are many ways people read his works. But the way they were read 200 years before are not read 400 years later, and nor will be read 800 years after. One approach to reading in the context of present time in various contexts has come to be known as 'presentist reading'. The trans-textual name of Macbeth in Japan is Throne of Blood, and India is Maqbool. Hamlet was named The Banquet and Prince of the Himalayas in China. Taming of the Shrew was named Frivolous Wife in Korea, and Othello was named Omkara in India. You can see that Shakespeare's plays passed the boundaries of meanings attached within Europe, and are adapted, and appropriated for different meanings by many playwrights and for various audiences. Do you think understanding Shakespeare without understating the varied contexts in which they are being dramatised is possible?

If, therefore, you do not understand when you read, it is highly unlikely that what you will say (or said) was off the mark. [You can now review our previous dialogues to check back if you really understood what I wrote in the first place, and then re-claim if you knew what you said]

1


C. LMAO
Another obvious problem is that if you think that the top hole (i.e. mouth) and the bottom hole (i.e., as in LMAO) both have similar functions, then your brain does not function well. You cannot use the bottom hole for the same function as your mouth is supposed to perform. With this analogy, think about the location of your brain in the body. Is it in the skull? I do not find the answer - but I think it is not in your skull, rather somewhere near your bottom. [You might like to read this paragraph several times to understand].

... foreign to "marsvictor" or "amnateeb"?


More time, more education, more maturity, more diversity will help you. Don't worry - you will okay, if you remain positive.

I wrote:
There is no credit in insulting people. This kind of behaviour does not pay. It is easy to type the word 'idiot'. Once you type it in this post - it remains and it hurts. Everyone reads them, but that makes you silly. What is the meaning of education if what you write hurts others?

Respecting others will increase your self-respect.

You replied:


My reply: I am happy what you say. Cheer up! Thank you - you say you did not insult me, and apologies if I wrongly said you did; but in general there is a tendency among people here to insult. Sometimes, little words like "fool", or even "you racist fool" do not always mean insults; I understand that. But a good number of people have recurrently been using words that look down upon others - including me.

I wrote:
My friend, try to respect others, whether it is in the same or other industry. All fingers in your hands are not equal, and yet each of them has distinct function and place. All human beings on this earth are not same. Some are American, some are British, and some are Spanish. Human beings do not have control on what colour they have, what language the speak, and for cultural and other reasons how good or bad they might be in language proficiency.

You said:


My reply: The discussion in this threat clearly shows a divide between native-Americans and non-native speakers. I referred to that issue here. "What does writing ability of a person have to do with his/her race?" - the answer is: the example of fingers in a hand is a metaphor to explain how every writer in the industry, irrespective of their native-nonnative stance, has their own value.

I wrote: Please respect these differences.

You retorted:


My reply: You are at large to call anyone 'racist' or a 'fool' - it's your right; but you have to consider the impact of such utterances. We live in a world of diversity. A community that will accommodate diversity (including delusional fools, idiots, black, white, native, non-native etc) will work better. I asked readers to respect this diversity and differences.

My friend, try to respect others, whether it is in the same or other industry. All fingers in your hands are not equal, and yet each of them has distinct function and place. All human beings on this earth are not same. Some are American, some are British, and some are Spanish. Human beings do not have control on what colour they have, what language the speak, and for cultural and other reasons how good or bad they might be in language proficiency.

Please respect these differences.

There is no credit in insulting people. This kind of behaviour does not pay. It is easy to type the word 'idiot'. Once you type it in this post - it remains and it hurts. Everyone reads them, but that makes you silly. What is the meaning of education if what you write hurts others?

Respecting others will increase your self-respect.

The best way to develop your competitive advantage as a writer here is to cooperate with others, not to demonstrate fierce rivalry though unbecoming use of words. If you and your colleagues can follow these, we all can make a good community here. Each of us can serve others interests here. I hope these words will help you.

More precisely, the fact that you do not understand that
---- nobody can do a dissertation of 70 pages with $50 but you offered me so, makes you the biggest American (I think so) assH among the bunch of super idiots!

Furthermore, the fact that you do not know or understand that
---- academic dissertations have to be essentially based on primarily data for which data collection itself takes huge time and the subsequent offer of completing it within 3 days - should clearly indicate to everyone here that you neither know what a dissertation is or how it is done.

Such sarcasm also shows you lack any respect towards writers, and as such you have no self-respect, let alone your student-customers.

I just wanted to see how your behaviour develops from the point of your offer to your exit. If you read back the conversations between you and me until you resorted to "begging", you will definitely see that you are morally, ethically, academically, and personally a total bankrupt.

I thought that as I would go along developing my conversation with you, you would change your course or tone of conversation - but you were such a super idiot that you concluded that I did not understand your sarcasm. As I indicated in earlier conversation, fools like you live in such erroneously conclusive worlds - the frog holes (OOs)

Some writers like amnateeb and his/her supporters think that being an American is a status, which is a total rubbish! Most American teachers, when they come to the British universities, for visiting lectureship, fail to stand by the teachers who are either British and from other nationalities.

The fact that there are so much emphasis on the style of writing in this forum is also a misnomer.
People like amnateeb and others are very shallow in their reading and comprehension of wide variety of English that are used all over the academic world. These people simply live in frog holes and think that these OOs are their world - which is very pathetic.

Language is only one part of the whole process. Efficiency is language does not necessarily signify a writer's knowledge base, which is what is most sought in academic work.


Native Americans who are not educated beyond ESL level can hardly read (or understand) more than half the scholars in American Universities who are non-American. Native speakers who lack sufficient education fail to understand the diversity of language usage in America and elsewhere. You are totally confused with cohesion, consistency and diversity.

Dear forumregulator

What you say is 100% correct, and to me the only and the whole truth. I think this is the first time that I found someone (like you) speaking so clearly to support the 'truth'. Thank you for being here and for your input. By the by, is there any Forum Regulator or Administrator in this forum? I only see people bully here each other.

Well, I meant to say that such advantages were perceived by ESLs - which means they might not be real, whether it was for American or any other customers.

Customers (or the students) demands, which are the requirements for academic language/courses, prevails. FreelanceWriter, your statement supports this notion, if I did interpret your statement correctly. And therefore, although ESLs may have an upper edge but such advantage is less relevant for higher degree courses. ESLs pride is a kind of prejudice. It confines the self to a hard husk and ties the self to a particularly perverse relationship of self-immolation

? pull legs...

Like those words.

I also think that people here have a tendency to let others down. This is a battle field - the competitive rivalry is exposed shamelessly. Sad!

Thats the mistake you do editor75. A PhD is not about the efficiency of countable and non-countable nouns. It is much more than those silly things with which you boast everyday. Language is an important part of the whole process. There are more in a PhD degree than you can know without qualifying for it; and if by mistake if you have one, you need a second one to understand what I say.

Why in this forum people always talk about the country of origin (COO)? Is this not called "discrimination"?

I do gurantee results in business studies, Level 7 (i.e., masters degree minimum). Any challenges, please come with work. I will accept your challenge with very nominal fees as my service charge. And you are encouraged to post your feedback about my work here.

Sorry Johnmerit; I didn't know it. I began to write as soon as I found this treasure. When 24 hours will pass, I will PM someone (I believe the administrator) to delete my posts.

Hello Editor75

I am sorry that I posted my email address here. In fact I did write things in one seating before I knew the rules. I am sorry. You may try to delete my email addresses or even the posts; but please do not deactivate my account. I have been here only for a few hours. I didn't know this forum existed. I hope you will be understanding.

Its very impolite to ask anyone of his country just because he or she makes a mistake.

One may be good in a language but if it is used in impolite way, the goodness is lost. One needs to study on and learn manners and ettiquetes before speaking in a forum. It does not matter how good one is in a language rather what motives are expressed by the use of the language.

With due respect to the author of the above quote, I beg to differ. The reality is different. Masters and PhDs do not make more money working in the real world.

I am not hidden. I can meet anyone. If anyone wants a "masterful piece of work", please do come to me.

Please try it out with me. You will never regret. Please do contact.

Of course. I find many teachers whose first language is English are so shabby in their language. Although generally a person who speaks English from birth is supposed to have better knowledge of English language, this isn't true always.

If you are located in the UK, I can come to you, discuss your projects and do your work. I can assure you with 100% honesty that I do real work for people. Anyone here can give me a try please.