"Our rates are competitive and are in-line with our competitors however; it is our firm belief that hard work shall be rewarded adequately. Our bonus system is unique and offers our writers a great chance to earn highest amount based on the number of positive feedbacks they receive from our customers. We will pay as bonus to our writers the highest amount earned by them in particular month provided they get highest ratings from our customers."
the lack of correct articles; the counting of non-countable nouns; the lack of correct punctuation; the perplexing, and somewhat sinister, use of "however" in the first sentence...
the lack of correct articles; the counting of non-countable nouns; the lack of correct punctuation; the perplexing, and somewhat sinister, use of "however" in the first sentence...
"The writers' panel area is currently undergoing scheduled maintenance work due to which you will not be able to access it for the next 6-12 hours. Sorry for the inconvenience."
The site did not stay up for long. It never managed to come back from maintenance mode. My guess is that there were no writer applicants since even the potential applicants could see the writing on the wall. The company owners had no idea howto get the business off the ground. That is where it stayed. They area warning to anyone who thinks itis easy to launch a writing website that works as writer employers.
Talk about direct writer recruitment. I never heard of launching a company without essential staff onboard before. Normally, the writer's pool is staffed with at least 12 writers before the launch. Then the company allows the SEO to work its magic in recruiting additional writers. These guys did it in reverse. Which is probably why nobody wanted to use their services. No writers on staff means no papers delivered on time. They tanked their oven business in the process. The wrong word of mouth information filtered to the students, and nobody bothered to correct the misinformation. Thatis the more believable reason for the company that never was.
Opinions are that of the author's alone based on an individual capacity. Opinions are provided "as is" and are not error-free.