1. That you applied several years ago (at that time $8 or $9 per page was today's equivalent of $13-$15 per page).
At most this was about two years ago, and prices haven't gone up that dramatically.
2. That the average was on the low end (not mentioning the fact their writers bid per page and are given no upfront rates).
I have no way of knowing this, as I never signed up to work for your company. Again, I am repeating exactly what I was told by a company representative via email, after having told your company how much I typically earned per page and seeing if it would be worth my while to sign on.
3. That the part about '50 pages a day' was in fact: "Our writers tend to produce between 0 and 50 pages a day, depending on how fast they work and which projects they are willing to take and if it's a research+writing or editing only project."
Again, that is not what I was told in a direct, personal email that responded to my employment inquiry, which included my expectations regarding pay. Either someone was trying to discourage me from applying (have a field day, stu4) or were themselves selecting the most extreme information for some other reason.
If I had been told "$9 is the lowest we pay and opportunities to earn two or three times that exist" and "we'll let you take up to fifty pages if you can get it done, but usually writers produce about half that during the busy season," my interest in the company definitely wouldn't have been cut so abruptly short.
If you want to go by the extreme examples when describing a company, we can play this game, but you probably wouldn't like to see the results.
Knock yourself out. My knowledge of how your company treats its writers comes solely from an email I was sent by one of your employees (or possibly an owner). If you want to get butt hurt about it, go cry to them.