Anyone used law-essay.com

Anyone tried these people?

I am thinking of trying them but would like to know if anyone has used them or had a bad experience with them. This is what another student sent me and the review is pretty bad:

i would advise every one to chop off their own hands rather than pay top money to law essay uk. i have used them twice. i wanted a 1st so i paid the money via debit card. the work was delivard on time but when i had it indepantly marked one paper was awarded a D (42%) and one F.

i have been in contact with the above company and have found them less than usefull. i also want to say i dont work for any other company and this is totally legit.

has any one got any good law essay sites. i am thinking of custompapers.com.
oh by the way uk law essays dont give refunds! so i am more than £500 out of pocket.

I have just used them.

The essay was well written, on time, and Susan was very helpful in explaining things on the phone, even though I bothered her on a Saturday morning!

Can only speak for myself but I would use them again.

Yeah, this thread doesn't seem fishy at all . . . . The OP - why did you use them twice? So you must have been satisfied with the first essay since you ordered a second one.

If you have been scammed by them then, fine.
If not, why bother commenting in the negative.

If someone has used them and is not happy then I am sure they will comment.
Then you can say "I told you so!.

I don't want to get involved in your feud with strugglingstudent.

However WritersBeware, you appear to be based in the States.
Law-Essay.com only write for the UK market.
I stand by my comments near the start of this thread.

She's the one with the feud. As you can see, she is the one who SPAMMED your thread with irrelevant content in pursuit of her personal grudge.

As for Law-Essay.com, the site was created only 6 months ago. At least the owners don't claim to have been online "since 1997," as falsely claimed by SuperiorPapers.com from Ukraine. One of the common signs that a company is fraudulent is a deceptive claim about the company's age and experience.

Just trying to say that they aren't a scam although they are a newish company. Glad you appreciate that point.

I took a chance with them and I just wanted to tell people that I had a good experience with them.

That's not at all what I communicated. I only stated that they do not lie about their age. They are too new to know anything else.


Your blatant promotion of this new, unknown site is not allowed.

By the way, the site IS fraudulent. I previously missed the first sentence on the home page:
"Law-Essay.com has years of writing essays . . . ."

That's a lie. The domain name wasn't even registered until January 1, 2008.

"Beverley" sets 'em up, and "Gordon" knocks 'em down! Good team.

Why are you so bitter about just about everyone on this site who has anything good to say about anyone?

For your information, the writers themselves on law-essay.com do have years of writing esays for other companies and by direct referrals and then they decided to start their own website last January.

Is that a bit difficult for you to comprehend?
Spit your venom at someone who deserves it.

I ordered an essay, it was written on time to a good standard and if you can't stomach that well that is your problem.

When I phoned law-essay.com and spoke to Susan, I obviously asked her several questions. One of which was how much experience do you and your writers have. She told me thay had years of experience as I stated above. OK she could have been lying, I didn't ask to see their CVs.

I just took a chance.

I will let the moderator decide which threads to delete. Your rudeness does nothing to enhance your credibility/motives.
Now calm down and think things through before you write.
Law-essay.com writes for the British market so why are you taking such a keen interest,

Aaaahhhh, now your story is perfectly credible.


Actually, I've been uncovering acts of deception--like yours--for quite some time, and I'm fairly good at it.

You have my sympathy there strugglingstudent!


Actually you're not because there is none.

I think strugglingstudent has got the measure of you and probably most of the other posters have too.

Right. You're just a customer who happened upon this NEW, BARELY-VISIBLE-IN-THE-SEARCH-ENGINES site, signed up in this forum, and has dedicated 100% of your posts to promoting and then defending this company against me after I posted evidence of its deception. Yeah, all customers do that!

Say "hi" to Beverley for me!


Yes, and you sure seem to know a lot about the months-old background of me, strugglingstudent, and other members of this forum. You sure are on informed "customer" of Law-Essay.com!

Just shows how ignorant you are.
Barely in the search-engines?
That is just rubbish.

I now hope that others type in the words in Google which is how I found it and look for themselves.

Give my regards to good old *********.

Really? This Google search link proves otherwise:
google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.law-essay. com&btnG=Google+Search

The following Yahoo search link proves that the only links are from YOUR own forum posts!

siteexplorer.search.yahoo/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.law-essay.co m&bwm=i&bwmf=u&bwms=p&fr=sfp&fr2=seo-rd-se


Don't worry, I'll make it easier for everyone:

"law essay"
google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=law+essay&btnG=Search
(0 results for law-essay.com; I stopped searching after 7 pages)

"law essays"
google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=law+essays&btnG=Search
(0 results for law-essay.com; I stopped searching after 7 pages)

Did you mean to state that you typed "law-essay.com" into Google? LMAO! A customer with zero knowledge of the site beforehand would SURELY search for "law-essay.com."

Susan, you're not fooling anyone.

I think I've proved who's ignorant.

I also find it funny that a person who doesn't have the first clue about how search engines work is accusing ME of being "ignorant" on the matter:

"Can anyone advise on the quickest and cheapest method of getting [law-essay.com] onto the Google search engine. I was thinking about buying Google ads but is it worth it, or is there a better way? I am a complete novice in case you hadn't guessed!"

Proof:
forums.digitalpoint.com/showthread.php?t=702613

"Gordon" is the name ********* promoter, whoops sorry WritersBeware.

How about if you type custom law essay uk or model law essay or something similar.
That is what most normal people do for a google search.

Anyway as people can see that you are reasonably good at uncovering Ukraine based web sites who profess to be based in the USA, I would stick to that.

Basically anyone who has a good thing to say about any website is shot down in flames by you.

When you actually order and pay for an essay from a site and they either don't deliver or it is riddled with plagiarisms then people may listen to you.

Unwittingly you are actually giving law-essay.com loads of publicity by perpetuating this thread. Do you think that people are going to be put off by your accusations when you don't know the truth? Talk about sour grapes.

I used to have a bombastic, insecure, bully for a boss so I can recognise the signs.

You think that you have the right to accuse everyone of deception and fail to appreciate that some people might think that you have a hidden agenda. I mean what do you actually do for a living apart from posting on this forum?

Carry on posting, Susan must be rubbing her hands together with glee!

At last some humour creeping into the Forum!!!?? High time too.

LOL enough said really.

I rest my case and refer you to my previous comment about an ex boss.
He could dish it out but couldn't take it.
He could make baseless allegations but no one else could.
Then when he got nowhere, he threw his toys out of the pram and became really threatening saying he was going to report me to the Chief Executive.

I was really trembling--NOT

An example of bullying tactics. That's why I couldn't be bothered to answer your obsessive posts. You have no proof about anything on this thread. If anyone says anything you disagree with, you threaten to get them banned.

You have an opinion on everyone and everything. So can everyone else as long as it is the same as your opinion. We don't need the thought police while you are around!

I quite forgot to ask who you write for. Actually maybe I did but you chose to ignore it.
Could it be ********* or is it another company?
You profess to know alot about others but you are one of life's mysteries.

You're not worth my time. Neither you nor barely-there Law-Essay.com are of any significance.


From the Law-Essay.com home page:
Law-Essay.com has years of writing essays

FACT:
Law-Essay.com wasn't even registered until January 1, 2008.


Learn how to use the search function.

By the way, the grammar and punctuation on the home page are absolutely terrible. That's fairly pathetic for a site that was supposedly created by freelance writers.

So, to recap, we have:

1. false advertising and misrepresentation of the domain;

2. terrible grammar and punctuation.

I explained that one. The small band of writers have years of writing essays.
So the rest of your views are based on supposition.

Now when someone is sarcastic or continually evades a question I am allowed to read something into that.
So I think that there is a possibility that you COULD write for *********.

Listen, Law-Essay.com "customer," you are NEVER going to win an argument against me because I only deal in evidence and facts.

The quote, "Law-Essay.com has years of writing essays," literally means--and unquestionably communicates to customers--that the DOMAIN has provided essay-writing services for years. That's FRAUD. To avoid such a FRAUDULENT statement, the "owner" should have typed, "The founders of Law-Essay.com have years of writing essays."


Wrong. That is an old, tired, pathetic accusation that I have denied repeatedly. You already know that. This is what crooks use when they have nothing else. Guess what? They ALWAYS have nothing else because none of them can deny my FACTS and EVIDENCE. You're no different.

Oh please leave me alone then.
Funny why you go on and on and on attacking something that doesn't bother you.


I thought you were going to get me banned if I mentioned it again!
Consistency not your strong point.

Would you like some cheese with your whine?


Oh, the little baby has been biaaatch-slapped with evidence and has nothing left . . . .

I'm still deciding what's more fun--getting you banned or continuing to prove your ignorance and lack of a reasoned argument.

Now there is a challenge. You are always threatening to get people banned. I challenge you to get me banned. Let's see whether you really CAN deliver what you keep threatening!

You're boring. Same, old, tired, pointless attacks. You challenged my facts, and you LOST. Move on . . . . I am not interested in enabling you to take yet another thread off-topic, just to fuel your personal grudge.


Why? So you can then sign-up with a new username and claim that I own EssayScam.org? Nice try. I'm sure that one of the reasons that the moderator does not always take action is because of all the false accusations that will inevitably follow!

All I can do is present the evidence of the ban-worthy violation to the moderator. The decision to enforce the TOS is up to him/her.

We're all still waiting for you to post--in the proper thread--your evidence to support your baseless assertion that all American and British companies hire unqualified, ESL writers.

So you cant get me banned then lol? You are always harping on about what you CAN do so I just wanted PROOF since you are so CONSISTENT on demanding proof from others.

So as they say 'the proof of the pudding is in the eating'. IF you can get people banned then do it STARTING with me lol.


I DID NOT assert anything of the sort. I said that as an experiment I would see if they would hire such writers. My hypothesis was that I believed they might. To test this I applied to several but then have not followed up on this due to a variety of reasons. Now it is the off season I doubt any will be recruiting so I might have to wait till things pick up before I can recommence this experiment. In the scale of things this is a low priority to me as it was only a notion I was testing, and I am not really bothered what results I get in either direction, especially since this is off topic from my disertation.

IF i recommence the experiment I will post the results whatever they might be - positive or negative. If you are so interested in the results why don't you try applying you seem to have a lot of spare time on your hands.

How pathetic ARE you? Why do you keep following me everywhere I go? Your situation is disheartening.


Yet another pointless, bitter, childish, personal attack--all because because I crushed its arguments. Yawn. Come back when you have a "big girl" argument about which anyone actually gives a crap.

Oh dear don't get upset just because you cannot get me banned. I just wanted you to prove that you CAN persuade the moderator to ban people that upset you. Oh well never mind looks like I'm here to stay for a bit longer lol

Here is your gleeful post in which you claim that you will "blow [my] theory out the water that US companies will only get US writers for US students":


You purposely misquoted me there--as is your tendency--but I reference that misquote simply to PROVE that you anxiously sought to post evidence that would contradict my assertions. In attempting to prove me wrong, you hoped to present evidence that American companies lie, cheat, and steal by falsely claiming to hire only native English-speaking writers. YOU FAILED MISERABLY. Now, you're making every excuse in the book as to why/how you have ample time to harass me in this forum virtually every time I post, yet you are too busy when it comes to posting the results of your little experiment.


Liar. The following quote proves otherwise:


Your personal vendetta is clear.


That's funny, because you were so certain that I was wrong. You had such FIRE and GUMPTION prior to commencing the experiment. What happened? I'll TELL you what happened--the results did not favor your baseless claims, and you think that the issue will go away if you keep putting it off. Sorry--not going to happen.

It's funny that you have no problem posting results when doing so does not embarrass you:

I also like how you typed "IF" in all caps, to prepare us for the results that will never arrive.

FROM THE law-esay.com home page:
"The team has years of experience of writing UK law essays and are equipped with appropriate qualifications in Law"

Did you miss this?
Tut tut. Didn't fit in with your allegations did it?

LOL! Crooks often try to "cancel-out" a previous crime by pointing to a later "good." That secondary statement does NOT negate the FIRST SENTENCE of the home page, which is a blatantly deceptive misrepresentation.

Oh, and how do you explain the embarrassingly horrible grammar, spelling, and punctuation? At best, it's 8th grade-level.

Are you still claiming to be a random customer? Go ahead--insult us all!

There are NO RESULTS because I have NOT followed up on the experiment. Yes I was HOPING to show that ALL companies would hire ESL writers however I DID NOT assert that they definetely would I said as you quoted yourself


Emphasis on the word IF not WHEN. Now IF i had said WHEN I get a job that WOULD insinuate that I expected them to employ me. IF implies that I have no proof either way at present.


IF is in capitals to emphasise the fact that I was NOT asserting that I would DEFINTELY get employment but that I would post the results once the experiment had been completed. Oh and guess what I'M STILL NOT BANNED lol

You are so pathetic. I have NEVER stated that I control the banning, which you keep insinuating. I have already explained my role in a potential banning, which is limited to providing evidence to the moderator. The decision is up to him or her.

Do you not understand the extent to which I have relegated you to a hapless, impotent creature whose only remaining mode of attack against me is to "dare" me to orchestrate a banning? How sad is THAT? The more you post, the more pathetic you become. You make we want to donate to a fund in your name.

Oh yes please lol I would love a fund in my name lol


Then ask them to BAN me then lol. Bet they don't respond lol

Oh and are you still claiming not to write for *********?

You expect to have your say and that is gospel. If anyone makes a point that you can't really dispute then you attack them as "crooks".

You continue to make baseless claims that I own and supplied wording for the site.
You just cannot accept that there is a site out there which actually gives a decent and honest service and is recommended by a customer. Are you really saying that no one should order an essay from law-essay.com because you say there is a misdescription. Somewhere it says "at law-essay.com we are the writers"; you have missed the point.

Their whole ethos is that the small team write the essays and they are not a faceless organisation relying on "unknown" researchers and on line forms.

I thnk you're wasted posting comments on this site. You should go to Iraq and Afghanistan as you have the answers and solutions to everything!

Now don't throw the dummy out of your pram AGAIN....

Wow, you're truly a mess. Do you not have ANY self-respect? You're like an 8-year-old. It's clear to everyone that I have CRUSHED your false claims, and now every one of your posts revolves around your personal vendetta against me. You add no valuable or useful content to this forum.


Keep it up, and the moderator may ban you without me having to lift a finger. I am surprised that you are still here posting your usual drivel, considering that you have insulted and falsely accused the MODERATOR multiple times.

TOS:

"Anyone who feels a particular message does not convey the truth or is of slanderous nature may contact us at info@EssayScam.org.

EssayScam.org has the right to ban posters who do not abide legal or social norms and regulations.

Any post may be removed or edited without warning by forum moderators or administrators.

Posts and theories of speculative nature (as judged by the operators of this website) may be removed without warning."


TOS:

"Anyone who feels a particular message does not convey the truth or is of slanderous nature may contact us at info@EssayScam.org.

EssayScam.org has the right to ban posters who do not abide legal or social norms and regulations.

Any post may be removed or edited without warning by forum moderators or administrators.

Posts and theories of speculative nature (as judged by the operators of this website) may be removed without warning."


Really? Buried near the bottom of the "Terms & Conditions" page (law-essay/Terms--and--Conditions.php) is the following statement:

"Law-Essay accepts no responsibility or liability whatsoever for any consequences of the late delivery of its services."

Wow, now THAT is a company from which every potential customer should order right away. NOT!


Actually, it's MISREPRESENTATION.

Equally as important to any customer is the painfully apparent lack of writing skills. If Law-Essay.com writers don't use proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, and sentence structure on the Law-Essay.com HOME PAGE--the medium through which they are truly attempting to impress--customers could and should rightfully assume that the papers they receive will be equally or more poorly-written.

I knew you would throw your dummy out. I will stand corrected, but I do believe the above rules apply to you too.


Have you heard of force majeure?
I will give you a moment while you look it up. Your ignorance is breathtaking; you clutch at straws; classic sign of a bully.

You are so vindictive in your quest to rubbish every site apart from your little favourite, that it has become an obsession for you.

Boooooooooooring. Are you capable of showing PROOF? That's what separates me from all of the crooks and deceivers like you.

Irrefutably, you signed-up with this forum with the sole purpose of promoting Law-Essay.com, which I have proven to be incompetent in the field of professional, English language writing. You can't deny that fact (go ahead--I dare you to claim that the writing on Law-Essay.com is even remotely professional in nature), so you resort to making false accusations about my affiliations, which has absolutely NOTHING to do with the thread. Like all other deceivers upon whom I lay the smackdown, the ONLY ammo that you have against me are false accusations of affiliation! I have proven--beyond a shadow of a doubt--that I never even bring up ********* of my own accord. The only time I even mention that site is when--like now--I am defending against FALSE ACCCUSATIONS!

Your arguments are so utterly devoid of merit that you are incapable of a fact-based debate on the actual ISSUES at hand. In case you haven't noticed, about 50 deceivers before you have employed the same tactics, and all have failed. Why do you think all these crooks hate me so much and waste so much time in issuing defamatory statements about me? I PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THEY CAN'T DENY!

Oh, but guess what--I'll play your tired game for just a minute. Let's say that I were somehow affiliated with ********* or any other company. Would that make my evidence against deceptive and fraudulent sites any less valid and verifiable? No. Therefore, you are beating a dead horse that never won a race when it was alive. Either way, your argument is pointless. I am doing a public service. If a company doesn't employ false advertising or fraudulent business practices that I can prove, it won't have anything to fear from me.

Let this be a lesson to all essay site owners who decide to break the rules of this forum by promoting their site. You can bet your bottom dollar that I will vet the site and report any evidence of fraud or misrepresentation.

You can prove absolutely nothing because you rely on supposition.

The fact that you think you have taught me a lesson is laughable. Remember I ordered the essay but then you refuse to accept that fact.

You would label a site as "fraudulent" if it had one little spelling mistake if it suits your purpose. In my opinion a fraudulent site is one that doesn't produce a decent essay or indeed an essay at all and takes your money knowing it cannot deliver the service OR, makes out it is based in one country when in fact it is based in another.

You then look for something else to criticise; the grammar on the site is apparently not professional. Your biased opinion yet again. You also refuse to accept that as law-essay.com comprise the writers, the statement that the writers have years of experience is not negated by the earlier reference to law-essay.com. I imagine that if you went through every website with a fine tooth comb you would find little "things" that would offend you. Law-essay.com should feel honoured that you have invested so much time in their site! Did you ever bother to google force majeure?

I would just like to reiterate that my essay from law-essay.com was fine.
This thread has got out of hand because of a know it all who actually is nothing more than an egotist with an ulterior motive. What that motive is we can only speculate (a bit like you've been doing).

Really? Does that mean you are denying my assertion that the Law-Essay.com home page contains terrible grammar and punctuation? Yes or no.


Nonsense. Please post the proof. (You won't, because the proof doesn't exist.) Let me break it down for you. If a site that purports to operate a PROFESSIONAL WRITING COMPANY can't string together a decent sentence, that means:

a. the site is an outright scam, designed to fool customers into placing orders for "custom writing," but actually delivers stolen papers from the Internet;

OR

b. the site is actually operated by ESL deceivers in other countries who falsely claim to be American, British, or Canadian in order to gain the trust and business of American, British, or Canadian customers under false pretenses; such ESL deceivers don't even realize how terrible their Web copy appears because English is not their first language;

OR

c. the owners of the site honestly believe that they are "professional writers," but their Web copy proves otherwise.

Whether the situation for a given site involves scenario a, b, or c, the public deserves the truth.


Ah, so now you're claiming that the existence of poor grammar and punctuation is an OPINION? Would you like me to highlight, line-by-line, every eighth grade-level mistake on the Law-Essay.com home page? Yes or no. (Thereafter, the public can judge the merits of my "opinion.")


Well, of course you would. I expect nothing lesson from you, even AFTER you are well aware that doing so is in direct violation of the TOS. You couldn't wait to promote that error-ridden site in other threads, as well:

Bottom line, gordon--you can keep typing whatever baseless nonsense you wish. The facts and evidence will always be on my side. The more false accusations you type, and the more you engage in personal attacks, the worse things will get for Law-Essay.com in the course of me defending myself.

Since WB is so interested in grammar and punctuation I decided to look at some of the sample essays offered on ********* with a view of determining how good the writers there might be.

This particular sample is absolutely riddled with grammatical errors

*********.com/sample1b.html

Considering this is offered as a sample of the writers work it hardly instils a customer with confidence that the work will be of sufficient standard. You would think that the sample essays would be of excellent quality so as to convicnce a customer to want to use their services.