GHOSTBASTER (MASTERPAPER AND HIS DOUGHTERS)

Hello All!!!

NOW I'M GOING TO OPEN YOU A HUGE-HUGE SECRET =)

ALL STUDENTS, READ THIS ARTICLE VERY CAREFUL BEFORE ORDERING ANY KIND OF PAPER!!!

ALMOST ALL THE WEBSITES THAT OFFER YOU NON PLAGIARISM PAPER WITHIN THE DEADLINE IS JUST ANOTHER SCAM COMPANY!!! DO NOT TRY TO GET AN EASY DONE PAPER. BETTER SIT DOWN AND WRITE YOUR PAPER BY YOURSELF!!!

300-500 WEB SITES THAT YOU CAN USE ARE FRAUD WEB SITES!!! ALMOST ALL OF THEM ARE BASED OR REGISTERED IN UKRAINE! UKRAINE IS REALLY GOOD COUNTRY, CAUSE HERE YOU CAN PAY TO OUR GOVERNMENT AND TO STAY OUT SIDE THE LAW... EASY WAY TO MAKE GOOD MONEY =) GOOD FOR THOSE GUYS WHO MAKE MONEY ON YOU BUT NOT GOOD FOR YOU(

OKAY, TO BEGIN WITH I WANT TO SAY THAT SOMETIMES REALLY PROFESSIONAL WORK ON YOUR PAPERS) - BUT IT HAPPENS RARELY... ALMOST ALL THE WRITERS WHO WORK ON YOUR PAPERS ARE FROM INDIA OR PAKISTAN OR ANY OTHER COUNTRIES. AMERICANS OR BRITAINS START TO WORK FOR THESE COMPANIES RARELY CAUSE THEY DO PAY SO LITTLE MONEY FOR THEIR HARD WORK...

ANOTHER THING IS VERIFICATION =) FUNNY STUFF))) REALLY) ARE U GUYS SO STUPID? WHY DO YOU SEND THEM ALL THOSE REQUIRED DOCS? IT IS ILLEGAL BTW.

ONE MORE THING: IF YOU SEE THAT YOU GOT A PIECE OF ****, WHY DON'T YOU GO TO YOUR BANK AND ASK FOR CHARGEBACK) WE LIVE IN 21 CENTURY AND NOW IT IS SO EASY TO GET YOUR MONEY BACK FOR NOT DONE WORK.

MASTERPAPERS.COM =))))) GUSH, I DONT STOP TO SURPRISE HOW STUPID ALL THEIR CUSTOMERS ARE =)

MASTERPAPER.COM (OR BETTER SAY GOVITALRESEARCH) IS THE BIGGEST SCAM COMPANY I EVER KNOW) BUT STILL THEIR BOSS MAKES 300-400 THOUSANDS OF US DOLLARS ON YOU)

HERE IS THE SHORT LIST OF ALEX WEB SITES: (NOW HE HAS ABOUT 50-70 OF THEM):

masterpaper.com
customessays.co.uk
essaycapital.co.uk
bestessays4u.com
grandresume.com
ma-dissertations.com
dissertation-servise.co.uk
paramountessay.com
thesistown.com
researchpaperwriter.com
researchstar.com

and many-many of other one...

TO MAKE A LONG STORY SHORT! DONT LET TO MAKE A FOOL OF YOU!!! BE SMART AND DO NOT TRUST YOUR FUTURE TO THESE SCAM "COMPANIES"

SINCERELY,

YOUR GHOSTBASTER

PS: IF YOU HAVE SOME QUESTIONS WRITE ME TO GHOSTBASTER@MAIL.RU

Please post all evidence that you have at your disposal. Please also turn off ALL CAPS.

By the way, his Web design site is govital.com.ua.

very interesting!

hi)
evidence?) pardon me? what kind of evidence do you need? and why should I proof anything? I've just given facts and I'm 100% sure that all that is truth) and by the way, I thougt this web site is for sharing with another students by your own experience. And I've done exactly that)

regards,
Ghostbaster

Listen, if I were trying to attack you, I wouldn't have been so polite.

Now, for anyone to be able to expand on what you posted (all of which I had already posted numerous times in this forum, anyway), you're going to have to bring some unique substance and evidence.

thanks for bringing this to everyone's attention, Ghostbaster.

Dear WriterBeware,
Sorry, but I'm not going to proof anything or to give any evedence of what I told all the students =)
I'm just going to expand my post with another fraud websites and will continue to let them know HOW does it work)

PS: dear rustyironchains,
Sure, no problem. You're very welcome)

to be sure that you're ordering your paper with a legal company ask them their registration number) those who don't have it are scam companies.

PS: you can check where the company is based just knowing their IP address) that will help you.

wikihow.com/Find-a-Website's-IP-Address

Regards,
Ghostbaster

The title of this thread could use a "relevance makeover."


That is completely false. "Registration numbers" are specific to companies in the UK (see companieshouse.gov.uk). Registration numbers are not required in the US.


That is also false. Almost all fraudulent sites employ any number of technical means to hide/disguise their geographical IP address. The most common method is to simply pay a US Web host.

WriterBeware,
Okay, if you're so smart than find out all the scam websites and show that list to poor students who are going to be cheated by some of these companies))

The only thing I wanted to show is a number of Alex websites) that's it. I'm going to post them in future. If you don't like me or my posts, you know it's your problem)

Regards,
ghostbaster

I didn't tell you not to post. However, if you're going to post:

1. don't act as if your regurgitated list of sites is new to the forum;
2. don't post false information;
3. don't post claims that you are unwilling to even attempt to prove.

It's pretty basic stuff.

WritersBeware,

Now that I actually respect you as a contributor on this forum (because I do believe that you really want to help identify the essay scammers, after reading through a lot of your replies), may I suggest trying a different approach in terms of the way that you articulate your posts? The reason that I'm saying this is because it is clear to me that you have a knack of rubbing people up the wrong way (me included, initially) - that is, either annoying people or making people angry. It appears that you have a lot of enemies on this forum and this could be avoided if you didn't come across as so direct, abrupt and hostile to new posters; maybe try to be a bit more tolerant. Can you empathise with my perspective?

Lee.

This is not the idiom you were going for.

Pheelyks,

Please refer to the following thread if you wish to discuss one's style of writing:

Just so that you're aware I wish not to engage in any kind of immature battle with you; therefore, any kind of negative and/or provocative response from you will be ignored from now on.

I'm not trying to engage in an immature battle, either, and never was. My only comments to you have been regarding your misuse of the English language in posts that were obviously meant to demonstrate your command of the same. The difference between "rubbing someone the wrong way" and "rubbing someone up" (in any way whatsoever) is not individual or stylistic. Both are idiomatic phrases that mean very different things.

I understand that you have made peace with everyone in an attempt to restore some measure of respectability to Google search results of your name/domain. My only issue with you (other than your against-the-rules advertising) was with your improper usage while you tout yourself as a master writer. You think that critiques are immature; I think that making routine mistakes in ad copy for a writing service is unprofessional. As long as we're both allowed to post on this forum, I guess we'll have to learn how to deal with each other....like, by me correcting your mistakes.

Okay, I admit that you're correct in this instance - "rubbing someone the wrong way" is the universally accepted idiom. However, in Yorkshire (England), we regularly use the colloquial term of "rubbing someone/somebody up the wrong way"; so please accept my apologies for the confusion.


Well, you're actually incorrect here pheelyks; you've misunderstood my intentions (concerning reconciling my differences with WRT and WritersBeware). I decided to "offer an olive branch", primarily because the immature battle was becoming tiresome to me. It wasn't in the least bit constructive, and the discussion descended into a retarded, toddler-esque slagging match.

I do not think that critiques are immature. However, it irritates me when individuals (who are guilty for making mistakes themselves) choose to criticise other people; this constitutes stark hypocrisy in my view. May I ask you a question, do you believe that everything that you've written in the two paragraphs is technically flawless (zero grammatical errors)? I would appreciate it if you were a little less pedantic in terms of grammatical proficiency, and concentrate more on the subjective content of my replies.

That comma shouldn't be there, and if it should be there then it needs to come before the quotation mark.


You should look up "hypocrisy."


You could argue that the last sentence of my first paragraph is not an independent clause, though this is debatable, the "name/domain" usage is informal, "you touting" could be "touting" but neither is incorrect, and my "...like," is quite colloquial. Other than that, yes.

I haven't picked on your overall sentence structure, just your misuse of certain words (like your insistence that "whom" can be sued in the subject position). You were the one that turned it into an immature battle with other posters.


I think your subjective content makes you sound greedy, opportunistic, naive, and pompous, but if you'd rather I start commenting on these subjective areas of interpretation in addition to the objective grammatical and syntactic usage issues you have, I can certainly accommodate.

Pheelyks,

Are you willing to concede that you've also made several errors in your replies? None of us are perfect, and we all make mistakes. I for one can admit to myself (and indeed everybody else) that I've made several mistakes in my life.

Please (pretty please) could you stop pointing out mistakes in my replies? At the end of the day, what may seem like a mistake to one English professor may be perfectly acceptable to another English professor. Alternatively, if you're unable to stop correcting me, at least point me to some external references to back up your assertions.

Also, may I ask what your level of education is (in English language)? Are you a writer or proofreader for example?

Can you point them out? Or do I have to explain what being ironic means?


Absolutely. What's important is how we deal with them when they are pointed out. You tried vainly defending yourself and got dragged into an immature battle on an Internet forum. I have yet to be corrected by you, but if you find a consistent error in my posts I would be happy to hear it.


Either a)stop including veiled marketing attempts in your posts shilling your services as an English writer or b)stop making mistakes


Yes, for some things, but absolutely not for others. The fact that some things are subjective does not logically imply that all things are subjective.


wsu.edu/~brians/errors/who.html


These aren't the same question at all. There are some other errors here beyond mere logic, but I don't want to overwhelm you--we'll take it one thing at a time.

Goodbye pheelyks.

Translation: I don't really have a way to counter arguments grounded in logic, and the longer this thread continues the longer it will stick around in Google search results making prospective clients think twice before hiring whom...I mean me.

I'm going to ask a question to which I would greatly appreciate a very simple answer (consisting of either the word 'yes', or the word 'no').

Shall we reconcile our differences (and engage in mutual respect for one another like adults)? It appears that you're still very bitter about the acrimonious exchange in which you and I engaged (yesterday). If the answer is no, then just say so. I'm not interested in the grammar correction or intellectual battle nonsense.

If you dislike me, I will respect your stance. If this is the case, then let's just avoid each other. I will continue to ignore your antagonistic messages.

I have no differences with you, other than an actual appreciation for the rules (such as they are) of the English language. And asking for a "yes" or "no" answer to a question that is framed with a number of completely subjective and interpretive assumptions is disingenuous, at best.


Oh, I do, but this has nothing to do with what we were discussing. Again, I
m trying to stay away from subjectivities and focus on objective reasons for correcting you.


My messages are only antagonistic if you equate criticism and logical argument with antagonism.

Thank you for clarifying your position.

I would assume that you're exceptionally bitter about the fact that I discovered a multitude of mistakes in your writings, some of which I pointed out to you (but never received a response). It's just a shame that you put so much importance on "being correct all of the time".

I've endeavoured to be polite and courteous towards you, and it's a shame that you dislike me; however, I'm sure that I can live with it.

All the best pheelyks.

Goodbye.

Really? Where?


I've responded to the few "corrections" you've attempted, but the majority of your assertions are stylistic issues rather than objective errors.


This is a highly suspect semi-colon use. I will not insist that it is absolutely incorrect, as the case could be made that "However" can be the start of an independent clause, but given your consistent problem with this piece of punctation I would avoid it until you have a greater knowledge of its proper usage.


By which you obviously mean, "I will continue to reply to any replies you make to me in a sort of knee-jerk reaction typical of desperate writers trawling for customers on this forum."

>>@MAIL.RU ?
Commonly used mail service in Russia and Ukraine.

>>>THEIR BOSS MAKES 300-400 THOUSANDS OF US DOLLARS ON YOU
Looks like you have worked with them. You know a lot and you are happy to share it with other. Those scammer didn't pay you? XD

>>>NOW I'M GOING TO OPEN YOU A HUGE-HUGE SECRET =)
I'm going to open you a huge-hude secret. Nobody here use smiley like that ")))))))))". It's very specific for russian speaking internert community.

Got any evidence to prove this? As a wide spreading claim, you should be able to prove your accusations. Otherwise, you have just libeled 500 companies. Although you did not make mention of any company in particular, any company could take offense and claim you just ruined their business. The partial listing of companies you presented further proves the libel case. Those companies could sue you and possibly get away with it too. Regardless of whether your claims are true or not, it is important to ensure that you cover yourself legally when you make such claims.

The OP was just a saber rattler and nothing more. He wanted the attention of the people at this forum, and he got it. However, his claims were never backed up by any evidence. Using "take my word for it" accusations should be ignored not only because it fails to prove the validity of the claims, but because that is the stance often taken by competitors in this business. Yes, the company he mentions has scam affiliates and its owner is well known as a criminal in the academic circles. However, students need solid evidence of these scam claims. They are dense in that way. Actually, some of them would hire a scam company and writer even when they are presented with hard evidence regarding not hiring the said company or person. I believe none of the students that lurk at this forum ever believed the OP. What do I think about his list? I'll keep that private in this case.