Gotten a 15/35 from Prescott Papers..... my review...

I know PrescottPapers are a trustworthy essay writing service... but is my lecturer being a *********** it wrongly?/ or is this work really worth 15/35.

this essay was a heavyweight one and i expected to ace that... im most probably screwed already.

i am def lost.. as i have another assignment ongoing by them and i need to seriously ace it 35++/45 by them.

Hello Sean,

We've sent you a follow up email regarding your messages to us. Here's a quick response here for your convenience.

Thanks for your feedback. We understand that this project is important to you.

With regards to your provided feedback, we would be glad to take any of that into account moving forward. As you have asked, yes, evaluation of reports is largely subjective. All work provided is high quality. An elevator's preferences and biases may mean that a project that is of good quality differs from their idea of what they would like in the report. Another factor is that there may be in-course concepts that were discussed in the course that may not have been explicitly in the original instructions that were being looked for in that review. Much of the feedback in the screenshots [provided to Prescott Papers by email regarding this project] is highly subjective. If you would like us to edit the project based on the feedback provided and to modify the work, that can be done for you to make it better fit with the elevator's preferences.

Also noticed that the overall project was part of larger group work / work that was submitted to us by the client. There are various modules/sub-modules and questions from the project as part of this overall evaluation that may have been later edited or done by other parties. Looking through internal Prescott Papers records, the original order is for only sections of the larger project.

Prescott Papers and the other writing services on this forum work for our clients directly and submit work for your approval, which was received, "it is well received, extremely satisfied with the piece of work done! Looking forward to see the outcome of the accounting assignment :)" No service can or should guarantee that any third party will like a given piece of work due to the subjective nature of writing services, which is why we aim to please clients directly, which was achieved, rather than writing for third parties who are not our clients.

For anything else that we can help with, feel free to get in touch.

I thought only escalators had preferences and biases ...

Ha ha -- *evaluator's

This Prescott Papers outfit is comical. I found a negative review on another site a couple of days ago, but now they deleted it and only left comments. This is all you need to know about the outfit. The deleted review is below:

I placed an order with Prescott Papers for a 6 page paper (1500 words) about two weeks before my deadline. The paper required the use of 8 academic readings chosen by my professor and 2 academic sources of the writer's choosing. During the ordering process I clearly stated the importance of this paper as it would determine whether I would be able to graduate this semester.

I was very impressed and satisfied when I received the paper back within 5 days. The writer had followed the instructions that I had provided. The paper was well written. There were minor grammar errors here and there but I didn't mind fixing them. Overall, I was pleased with the service. However, that opinion quickly changed!

The university I attend requires that all papers be submitted through a program (TurnItIn) that determines whether or not there is plagerisim within a paper. On the Prescott Papers webpage it is clearly stated that they have a 100% plagiarism-free guarantee. Therefore, I was not worried about submitting the paper to this program. About two days after submitting the paper, I received an email from my professor stating that 15% of my paper was plagiarized, anything at 5% or below is okay. In the email my professor sent me a copy that highlighted everything that had been plagiarized. I googled every sentence (one by one) that was marked, most of them had been paraphrased from other sources but the writer had not provided a citation. However, the writer's main infraction occurred when they used 2 direct quotes without using any quotation marks or a citation.

In the email my professor also stated that I would have to go in front of the student board to determine what disciplinary action would be taken as the university has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism. I immediately contacted Prescott Papers to let them know about the situation. In my email to them I described in detail the infractions that occurred. I also mentioned that the main reason I decided to go through with my order was because they guarantee their writing is 100% plagiarism free.

Prescott Papers emailed me back in a timely manner but the responses I received, in my opinion, were ridiculous. We had a number of emails back and forth. The conversation mainly pertained to them telling me that I should try talking to my professor (which I had already done and I stated that), I was told to state that it was an oversight, and not to worry because student boards try to help students. Never once did I received an apology!

The student board found me guilty of plagiarism. My punishment was receiving 0% on the paper that was worth 50% of my grade. Even though I had held an A prior to the paper, I still failed the course. Needless to say I will not be graduating this semester.

That review still exists. It was merged into a master review thread available here:reddit.

Hey Comic, you think students are stupid? You didnt merge anything - you created an image screenshot so the review isn't picked up by google. Stop clowning around will ya.

Hi,

Decisions related to that forum are done to best work with clients who use that forum as opposed to for SEO purposes. The merged thread that was created has allowed the clients in question to better communicate with support regarding their concerns. You can see that the client concerns in question have been addressed and resolved appropriately, which was facilitated through that new master thread.

Those reviews are still equally able to rank in Google. In reality, the client comments are even more visible in this new thread. The merged thread, which is indexed by Google, is a master thread, which means that it has more ability to trend on Reddit. Threads that trend have increased potential for rank in Google and also have increased visibility.

If we were going to censor the threads, we would have just removed them with no comment whereas you can see that our support team has included copies of the relevant comments and also offered timely resolution of client concerns.

If there is anything else that I can help with or answer for you, feel free to follow up here.

Best,
Prescott Papers Support