MasterPapers LLC (MasterPapers.com & Academia-Research.com) - Fake Address

Someone made a great video and posted it on YouTube back in February. They called the property management company at 41 State Street, Albany, New York and asked them if there was a Master Papers located there. It is pretty funny because the property manager is like "Never heard of them, that is a lawyer's office."

It is kind of hard for anyone to take them serious on the claim that they are located in New York after hearing this call.

youtube.com/watch?v=8JTH7cgTMGE - Click here to watch the MasterPapers video

Did you have to send them your passport details and card details to verify it before you could recieve your essay?? Just wondering coz i have been asked to do so

yeah they do that just to ensure identity. it's actually not a bad company for buyers.

Sorry, but that's false. Read the mountain of evidence in this forum.

academia-research.com is an essay mill that delivers essays to customers, and pays its writers. as a customer, there is the off chance, as with anywhere else, that you will get a **** writer-- if this happens, and you complain, the company does offer refunds. as a writer, there is the off chance, as with anywhere else, that you will get a **** administrator-- AR is notorious for its random and aggressive punishments. if this happens, and you go over their head, the company usually reduces or cancels the fine. academia-research.com is not going to win any management awards, but they are not a fraud or scam-- they offer a service for a fee, and have many satisfied customers. they have been in business for several years.

there are those on these posts who will lambast companies without ever working for, or ordering from, them. before you believe people like WB, ask yourself what they are basing their information on: is it the complex nature of actual experience, or is it a biased and simplified distillation of second-hand news? WB's Chicken Little histrionics about "Ukrainian scams" are where they belong-- an anonymous, unchecked message board with no empirical value.

if you want facts, you need to get up, go out, and collect them. having worked for AR for several years, I can tell you this: they are not perfect, but they are certainly not a fraud or a scam. it's a fee for service enterprise; you receive a product, and you have full rights to refund.

Gee, I'm so surprised that RustyWriter is once again promoting a site for which he works and in which he has a direct, monetary interest.


Who would like to school the liar this time? WRT? Pheelyks? Freelancewriter? AsianWriter? It's getting a bit tedious for me. We all have access to the mountain of evidence, after all.

I have been with them since 2005 - stopped writing for them approximately 2 years ago.
1) they have a handful of good writers and hundreds of others who should not be allowed to write
2) I know a lot more about academia-research than most any here, including who they really are - real names and everything
3) academia-research is not honest and any who even assume that they refund customers (even when the work is plagiarised), are mistaken. They fine the writer up to 300% and keep the customer's money

4) do you know that you receive about 20% of their take on orders which come through customessays? max 33% on those which come through masterpapers, etc.

Bad writers - stay with them as you won't find employment with any decent company.
Good ones - get out, really get out. How about asking their former admin/management people like Frederick A., Colleen, Jessica #1, etc about who and what these people are all about?

By the way - I do not have a grudge against them and was never fined except once (erroneously) and it was immediately removed.

One question - how many of you are getting your so-called bonuses?

Do you know why Paypal removed them?

To defend these people means that you do not know them.

Good writers - what are they paying you? $20 (rarely) during the high season? Do you only pick up their 10-13$ orders? Peanuts! They get 3-5 times as much and any good site pays much more.

Get out and don't be afraid of doing so.

By the way - do you know that your work is resold? What do you get out of it or do you even know?

You are true WRT......we are getting really less for the work we are doing through these sites......

any site will naturally keep a large percentage of the profit, because you are doing nothing to get customers, process payments, do the webpage, etc. most writers accept this, because it is a saturated market in which to start your own service.

academia-research.com has competitive rates as a contractor, especially during the busy season, but their scale for rush orders is very imperfect. in my case, although I do dislike that they fine, and find their management approach occassionally inappropriate, I have never seen any of these claimed 300% fines-- people may be confusing them with essaywriters.net. I have never personally been fined more than $15 on an order by AR. also, I have received $ bonuses. and, Paypal didn't remove them. I think overall, we can perhaps agree that every writer has a different experience. objectively, it would seem that someone not currently employed by the company, may know less about their current policies.


this is a disturbing and perhaps somewhat telling misuse of the present perfect

Still with them and they are forever assigning me orders - I reject them. I deactivate my account, they reactivate ... on and on and on. So, have been with them since 2005 and still with them, despite my refusing their assignments and deactivating my account. Clear now?


So ... you are one of the good ones. They want to hang on to you. Probably Sean's doing. None of that means that they do not implement 300% fines ... they do.


Why assume that I am not with them? I said I stopped writing for them but said nothing about being out of the loop.

Rusty - no need to get personal.


Yes it did. They can only process Paypal via SWreg.

OK, like I said, everyone gets a different spin from management, I'm sure. I wasn't being personal; I realize that I have to assume things. thanks for filling in the blanks; at least someone else here actually posts about their own real-world experience.

Coward, I'm still waiting for you to prove any of your false accusations against me. Why is it so difficult for you to step up to the plate and be a man? Either admit that your accusations are false or provide evidence. Your spineless jabs are weak, very weak.

Do you make knowingly false accusations in the papers that you write, too?

I love it. "someone here," or "someone else here..." no name mentioned... and WB comes running.

unfortunately, WB, we have no evidence that you have any real-world experiences. perhaps if you could post a few links to threads where you "prove" some.

Don't play stupid, as difficult as that may be for you. Everyone knows perfectly well that you are referring to me. Virtually every slimy, cowardly attack that you post in this forum is directed at me.


Physically visiting each of their advertised addresses is not a "real world" experience? That-alone-is a lot more "real" than your virtual experiences, pal.

Posing as a customer to ask if I can commit copyright infringement and academic fraud and being told, "Yes, of course," is not a real world experience?

Having Western Union payment records from certainly well before you began being their paid, American puppet (and well before they began removing the sender's name and location) does not constitute "real world experience"?

Sender: Dmitriy Alekseenko, Ukraine.
Sender: Yuriy Ostashevskiy, Ukraine.
Sender: Volodimir Vitchenko, Ukraine.

RustyWriter, I will always beat you in any argument. Why? Truth and the law are on my side, that's why.

Instead of posting more of your smokescreening quips, why don't you just post the evidence that I "stole" anything from you or somehow "backdated" posts?

exactly! well put...

An automated process. SWreg gets 2.9%.


All the webpages were posted as webcopy orders at $5-6 per 500 words. As for web development, all done in-house (their own company).


The percentage paid out to writers decreases where rush orders are concerned. If writers are getting 1/3 on standard orders, they get less on rush orders.

Customessays.co.uk, customers order a minimum of 4 pages (even if they require just 1).
Standard delivery time (5 days), PhD level, first class = £475($760).

Let's say the customer states that despite the 4 page order (minimum allowed by the system), only 2 pages are required - the order shows up on academia-research as 2 pages, CPP $20, Total = $40. So, the company keeps $720 :)

Supposing that the customer wants all 4 pages, the company decreases the writer's payout to about $15 (often less), the total being $60 max. The company keeps $700.

If it is a standard order, 2:2 (budget grade) = £216 ($345).
Customer wants all 4 pages, writer receives $8-12 CPP.

The point is, writers are not really paid 1/3 (that is the absolute maximum). It is often much less than that.

Standard editing orders, 5 days, minimum order £88. Maximum academia-research CPP is $6 but generally $3.

I was right with you, right up to here... it's always the last little bit, isn't it. when you should have just stfu...

you obviously haven't worked for AR in years, if you think this is avg CPP, and that now that you have let this slip, I somewhat doubt the veracity of your story that AR is somehow knocking down your door and begging you to write for them. you obviously have no idea what average CPP is on the site; maybe these figures were accurate 5 years ago... maybe...

let's get with the new millenium.

presently, AR CPP maximum is $16-20 (technical/rush), but generally $7. these figures are based on my eyeballs, looking at current orders-- if you are still a member, WRT, you should maybe check out current orders before posting inaccurate CPP figures.

more facts and eyeballs, people. fewer screenshots, stalkings, and hindsight biases.

good night... and good luck.

Rusty, you do realize that you have zero credibility, right? Literally EVERYTHING that you have claimed has been proven false. You still haven't had the guts to back up your accusations against me, personally. For goodness' sake, you don't even have the facts about your own employers, yet you don't hesitate to post false information as if it were factual. I (and others) have had to correct your blatantly false assertions about both myessays and masterpapers. I doubt that I am alone in believing that you should STFU.

Pls read:


You have a serious problem with facts. Academia-research's editing orders go for 15-20? Wow. You really know nothing.

As I said, why is this personal?


Did I not say that?



If from its `British' sites; 7 if from its `US' sites.


And you replied:


OK - point out one editing order which (at any time) proves I am a liar.

If they pay you


for editing orders - do not ever leave them. None will beat their CPP. Could it be that you misread and, as usual, flew off the handle and made it personal again?


No $5 orders on the board now?

Do you have any idea how much they got paid for that `highly lucrative' CPP $11 order up there? It was placed through one of their GBP-based sites.

take it easy. it would have helped if you had included "editing orders" and "maximum CPP" in the same sentence-- but now you've made everything very clear.

I did get a couple of $8-$12 CPP editing jobs from AR, but they were in the minority.

personally, I do not beat my head against the brick wall of what I could have been paid. "if only the company had no overhead, and the customers just appeared, I could be making 100% of that!" it's unrealistic. AR seems competitive with other companies, if not a bit better, and they actually send payments... they are, of course, imperfect, but there are certainly worse examples out there.

Certainly.


Only with respect to standard orders coming through their $-based sites. Where rush orders and their GBP-based sites are concerned, writers receive about 15% of the total, sometimes less. Furthermore, while customers pay more for MA and PhD level orders, the writers do not receive more. The percentage allotted to writers decreases.


I was clear:



Agreed but, why compare with the worst out there? How about comparing with the average?


Me?

yes; you!

Rusty clearly has a comprehension problem.

the problem is that your lackey is even less legible than you are, lunatic outsider.

Anyone who reads this thread from start to finish can easily determine that you are a clueless dolt.

I'd be surprised if you can get dressed without assistance.

Any fool would have understood the meaning of this: still with them but stopped writing.


Fools would have known that the reference was, clearly, to editing orders. All the more so since I had earlier written:




You responded with a barrage of insults and then saw it fit to tell me to take it easy. Then you write this:


So, what on earth is your problem?

Your rebel without a cause act is senseless. So is your `existentialist poet in black' act. Most of us grew out of our Sartre/Camus/Beckett phase.

Now - how about your actually staying on topic and contesting my info, if you can?

I could not agree more

OK; I hate to play the grammarian, but if you insist--

"I have been writing for X for 5 years," by the use of the present perfect tense, implies explicitly that you are still working for them-- this is why the present perfect is sometimes called the "continuous."

when you combine this with "... but I no longer work for them," suggesting a past action that is complete rather than continuous, your sentence becomes nonsense.

"I have been working for X for 5 years, but I no longer work for them--" grammatically sloppy, confusing garbage.

I'm sure it's clear to you-- you wrote it.

of course, you made it clear later that you are under some sort of siege by AR, who are begging you to continue working for them... that's fine. I might mention here, though, that in the midst of this situation, you don't appear to be able to access AR's "available orders" to give any specific examples.

"Standard editing orders, 5 days, minimum order £88. Maximum academia-research CPP is $6 but generally $3."

as to the clarity of this choice passage... the first non-sentence seems to be talking about the subject of "Standard editing orders" (if one can guess the subject of a non-sentence); the subject of the 2nd sentence is "Maximum AR CPP..." and no mention is made of editing. you expect the reader to assume that the subject of both of these sentences is the same... it's reaching, once again, and sloppy.

comprehension, wtf. the problem here is that you are as clear as mud, and have your head up your *** about it. my guess-- that's exactly why AR fired you.


that would be you, and 2 or 3 other freaks who would actually do this-- pop. 3.

have you sought help for your OCD yet?

This is what I wrote. Don't paraphrase to suit your purposes.

Yes - do not `play the grammarian' as your posts are sloppy, at best.

Can't access their current orders? You really don't use your `eyeballs,' do you? I mentioned two of the orders up there, yesterday. The law one, Suchinder with his never-ending excuses for not delivering the work. Would that be you?

One of the only good writers they have (still writing for them) is Vange. Definitely not you :)

As for firing me, please pass this along to them - I deactivated my account for the upteenth time yesterday. Tell them not to reactivate it, please. They know who I am.

I like that you have the guts to refer to `non sentences.'

Do they know that you resell the papers they paid you for? I'll be sure to pas it along to Lescha (someone's real name).

how did you know my name?

jk.

welcome to the madhouse-- a bunch of paranoid, jabbering losers, pulling their delusional strings...

Lesha? Can't you read English? Said `someone,' not you.

another tattle-tale brat in WB's sandbox.

Another obnoxious, contentious poster :)

As soon as you are proven wrong, you get personal. Why? Is it so difficult for you to simply move on? You misread and misunderstood and, as is your habit, flew off the handle. Instead of moving on, you go on and on and on.

You accuse others of misquoting - how about this:



Problem #1: You deliberately misquoted me. Why? Besides, any fool and his mother would have understood that it means I am still on their books. Do you not have the comprehension abilities of a fool?

Problem #2:


Never said anything about `begging.' Mentioned that I deactivate and they reactivate. I guess you like putting words in people's mouths.
Problem #3:




Either you don't know how to read or do not have access to the site.

Drop the act as it is really old. Is Meursault your role model, by any chance? Or do you alternate between him and James Dean?

You remind me of Camus' description of Sartre after they had their falling out :)

James Dean rules! everyone loves James Dean. you are really coming with your top game, huh?

No, not worth the effort. This is nursery school stuff. I think we'll be entering the `nananaanah,' tongue pointing, my daddy's stronger than your daddy stage soon ...

Has RustyWriter ever made a single, substantive claim that is has been proven correct?

Hey, RustyWriter, are you still claiming that your employer, myessays, doesn't provide custom writing services?

Are you still claiming that I "stole" my information from you?

Are you still claiming that I am somehow "backdating" posts?

How is it that I-a person who you claim is an "outsider"-have more "inside" information about your own employers than you do?

the words "substantive" and "proven" become great facades the second you get anywhere near them. please stop using these words.


no-- I admitted I was wrong. I guess admitting you're wrong is an unfamiliar concept for you-- apparently it went right under your radar.

More shallow quips from RustyWriter . . . .

Rusty (a.k.a., "FluffMaster"), do you use similar quips to eat away at the word-count of your unsuspecting customers' papers? Based on your posting habits here, and utter incapability to provide even the most basic research data or factual information to substantiate any of your assertions, I presume such to be the case.

research data-- on what, a message board post? you're insane!