MasterPapers' Office:79 Munroe Ln. Topsham is a PRIVATE RESIDENCE! Read results of investigation

The Articles of Organization of MasterPapers LLC was approved by the Special Deputy Secretary of State (N.Y.), Division of Corporations on 18 September 2006 as a domestic limited liability company. Copy of this appears in their web site but I am attaching a link herein below for your guidance

masterpapers.com/images/certifi...b14ebd7402666ab

This was filed for MasterPapers.com by Registered Agents Ltd DE through Janet M. Caruccio. Please refer to pages 6 and 7 of the link above. She signed this document as organizer in accordance with the NY Limited Liability Company Act and the Uniform Limited Liability Company Law. Please refer to links below for the pertinent laws,

llc-reporter.com/28.htm
dos.state.ny.us/CORP/llccorp.html

The filing and processing of these documents were made on the 24-hour-expedite processing as provided for by the NY rules for filings. This is reflected on Page 6 bottom middle part of the Articles.

Anent the issue about the address stated in the Articles of Organization, i.e.

41 State Street
Suite 106
Albany, New York 12207

which appears in page 5 of the link for the Articles is the address of the process agent with web site colbyservice.

As proof that the address belongs to the process agent, the link here is provided by BBB.org as follows: search.buffalo.bbb.org/codbrep.html...9410&cons=y

From this you can see that the attorneys services company, Colby Attorney Services has for its principal contact: Ms. Ruth A. Dennehey-the very same person who notarized the documents and the same person who acknowledged it before the County Clerk of Court, Thomas G. Clingan-please see page 9 of the Articles and page 3; (2nd)Apostille or page 7.

Of course, all the above was complied with in accordance with the provisions of the law. Whether the corporate officers of MasterPapers LLC appeared personally during the filing and processing of the Articles -your guess is as good as mine. However, if you go through the links for the registered agent and the process agent-documents for filing can be done by transmittal through fax machines and such other modes.

Now, we tie one loose end here---the office address appearing in the web site of MasterPapers.com which is
79 Munroe Lane
Topsham, ME 04086

I found this link Re: vertical sites/Topsham, Maine property listing for tax purposes as of 18 August 2006:

topshammaine.com/vertical/Sites...06DCA554%7D.PDF

Please refer to page 48 , 10the entry from the top---bearing entry

Entry No. RO5A-002-79
2656 B2624P299
2657
This is registered under the name of Chad Jacobson.

I ran a phone number look up using the reverse address 79 Munroe Lane Topsham, ME 0408 using whitepages.com and the phone number listed in that address is registered under the same name above as appearing in the property listing.

I would want to post the link here of the lookup but I would like to give respect to the privacy of the owner. Anyone of you who would want to do your own look up, you are at liberty to do so. You may ask why I posted the link for property listing-well, these are taken from public documents.

Finally, you may ask what I did with the phone number. I called and the man/owner who answered the phone call informed me that the address 79 Munroe is a private residence. He told me how upset he is for the unauthorized use of his address. He wished me luck in my investigation.

Where do we go from here?

The law requires the LLC's office address to be specified in the documents filed before the Division of Corporations, NY. One question comes to mind-why did MasterPapers LLC fail to include that document in the Articles of Organization which it placed in their web site. I leave you to make your own conclusions.

BUT ONE THING IS CERTAIN: MasterPapers specified an address on its web site which is a private residence-a place where it DOES NOT CONDUCT ITS OPERATIONS AND BUSINESS. Why the deception??

One may ask-what about the phone number on the web site of MasterPapers.com-it is a US phone number. I agree but there is such a thing as Voice over internet program.

For those who feel aggrieved in anyway-make the law work for you. There may be violations of the provisions of the Limited Liability Company Act-ask the authorities, inform them of how your rights were allegedly injured.

I am providing this link for contact of Division of Corporations New York

dos.state.ny.us/corp/contact.html

nota bene: I have taken screen shots of the pertinent documents and contents of links, just in case.

LOL. This guy has personally stated that MasterPapers.com is "deceptive" and personally proved that MasterPapers.com uses a FRAUDULENT business address. Now, this "impartial investigator" wants to change his story and DEFEND MasterPapers simply because he can't stand agreeing with me. Paperchasefraud's credibility is now void.

Before you go viewing any of Amy's statements as credible I suggest you follow the bellow link and read the ENTIRE thread so you can see what sort of prejudice loon she is. Don't be like Amy before passing judgement; do your research as any professional writer would do.

paperchasefraud, excellent research. Any chance you could find a way to private message me here or on another forum? I'd like to talk to you about a project I'm musing... perhaps, we could join forces...

Yes, please DO read that entire thread. Pay particular focus to post #383: essayscam.org/forum/wc/essaywriters-content-gurus-inside-truth-94/7/

You really are one pathetic character, 'amy'! Do you know the difference between an interrogative and a declarative sentence? Obviously, you do not.
I quote myself, "why the deception?" an interrogative--I was hoping to see proof that you truly are what you claim to be--a self professed investigator who is capable of being exhaustive and impartial.

But you are not!
I included in the subject post the links for both federal and state laws on limited liability companies--the answer is just right at the tip of your nose. There is a succinct legal provision on process/registered agent.

Your conclusion about what I wrote is based on your biased assessment--obviously, you DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE PROVISIONS OF LAWS WHICH I INCLUDED(PER links cited)

The answer to my interrogative sentence lies in those links which you DID NOT EVEN CARE TO READ. You simply AND readily clung to your own 'tainted' interpretation. It was rather a good test but you didnt pass at all.

Another point I wish to make: on the section here RE: Content Gurus, you cited the very same Report on MP using a link to the other message forum--but the report is actually here in this forum already ---long before you made an issue at Content Gurus section--and YOU CALL YOURSELF EXHAUSTIVE. Borrowing your own words---'that makes me LOL'

You conclude that my credibility is now 'void' Void is a term used on documents and documentary evidence. . .
hmmmmmmm my credibility is intact--yours has been destroyed. You failed to even make an initial step to read the contents of the link. Exhaustiveness is one of the many traits a good investigator should have.

You have already been spoon-fed--and you didnt even bother to read the contents.
TERMS OF USE:
offensive content:
"is excessively violent, incites violence, threatens violence, or contains harassing content or hate speech;
is unfair or deceptive under the consumer protection laws of any jurisdiction, including chain letters and pyramid schemes;
is defamatory or violates a person's privacy;
creates a risk to a person's safety or health, creates a risk to public safety or health, compromises national security, or interferes with a investigation by law enforcement;

improperly exposes trade secrets or other confidential or proprietary information of another person;
is intended to assist others in defeating technical copyright protections;
clearly infringes on another person's trade or service mark, patent, or other property right; "
Choose your pick.
I would NO LONGER OBLIGE TO FURTHER DIGNIFY by commenting on your comments. I do not engage on street-level fighting.

You do not serve the purpose for which you have been engaged. I will look forward to see you in court.

Wow Amy, looks like somebody needs to pack THEIR bags. I'll take your apology now.

paperchasefraud: FU
rat289: FU

rat289 + paperchasefraud = EssayWriters.net cronies

Stevie Wonder can see that.

Losers.

Vulgarity and name calling is the hallmark of someone who has run out of excuses! Checkmate!

Yeah, I don't think so. I have all the evidence in the world to back up my claims. If you'd like to test me in a court of law, BRING IT!

Well then... lets put our evidence to the test... contact me and we'll work out an arragnement and post the results here... I have money, I'll cover all the expenses... Hell I even have a friend who used to be a comon-pleas judge. A couple of law students and we're set. I may even be able to get you paid... I have connections at Case Western Law School, this would make one hell of paper for them... up to you.. just click on my name and select "contact member"... and we're off and running.

Rat, it is her way of life--the street level fighting. Anyone who reads all her posts would end up having that conclusion.

It is all commercial black propaganda.

I'm done dealing with you directly, EssayWriters.net stooge.

Yeah I agree. I sent ya an email... by the way my email addy is the same for my IM...

paperchasefraud, you're just mad because you're ESL, and my statements hurt your little feelings because you took them the wrong way. What a baby.

LOL. You need help. Serious help. Move on to the next site you want to call crooks so I can check into them and prove you wrong again... or maybe this time your guess will be right and we'll be on the same side.


More evidence against Amy. She claims she isn't prejudice but she admits her statements are hurtful... hmmmmm

"because you took them the wrong way"

Learn how to read.

You tell us to learn how to read? BIG LOL when the contents of the legal links I cited, you failed to read.

Goodluck to you and I hope you can still keep a 'shirt on the back'--pecuniary and punitive damages can be worth a lot.

I say again--BRING IT, punk!

There is NO BASIS for trying to associate me with essaywriters.net[DND*] EXCEPT IN YOUR MUDDLED MIND.

You started a post--your post #341 at essaywriters.net[DND*] Content Gurus

There's a member at essayfraud ("paperchasefraud") who has the legal knowledge to tear apart EssayWriters' bogus incorporation claims. He did just that to MasterPapers, which also happens to be based in Ukraine.

essayfraud/forum/index.php?showforum=4

I replied with a rebuttal:3:42pm Apr 13, 07 | Post #348 at essaywriters.net Content Gurus

I quote "REBUTTAL
"There's a member at essayfraud ("paperchasefraud") who has the legal knowledge to tear apart EssayWriters' bogus incorporation claims. He did just that to MasterPapers, which also happens to be based in Ukraine."

AMAZING!!! How matters are so twisted to suit people's vested interests and affiliations, rather prejudices.

I will spell it out for everybody-the incorporation and registration of the Articles of Organization of MasterPapers is DULY approved by the Division of Corporations of NY.The very link provided there shows that MP is duly registered

appsext8.dos.state.ny.us/corp_public/corpsearch.entity_search_entry
and as copied and pasted here:
NYS Department of StateDivision of Corporations
Search Results
________________________________________
Only one entity was found.
Entity Name
MASTERPAPERS LLC

I attached links of the Articles of MP and the pertinent Federal and State Laws to explain perhaps the seeming confusion of that forum and of yourself as to the addresses stated therein.

The first address that stated is
41 State Street
Suite 106
Albany, New York 12207

This happens to be the office of the process agent as appearing in the Articles and in the links provided, i.e. Colby Service, BBB.org

And I quote myself, "all the above was complied WITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW."

https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/essaywriters-content-gurus-inside-truth-94/8/
----------------------------------------------------- ---
And my reply to your quoted comment here
Quoting: Amy1978, Post #2
"LOL. This guy has personally stated that MasterPapers.com is "deceptive" and personally proved that MasterPapers.com uses a FRAUDULENT business address. Now, this "impartial investigator" wants to change his story and DEFEND MasterPapers simply because he can't stand agreeing with me. Paperchasefraud's credibility is now void."

My reply in post 6 hereof:


You really are one pathetic character, 'amy'! Do you know the difference between an interrogative and a declarative sentence? Obviously, you do not.
I quote myself, "why the deception?" an interrogative--I was hoping to see proof that you truly are what you claim to be--a self professed investigator who is capable of being exhaustive and impartial.

But you are not!
I included in the subject post the links for both federal and state laws on limited liability companies--the answer is just right at the tip of your nose. There is a succinct legal provision on process/registered agent.

Your conclusion about what I wrote is based on your biased assessment--obviously, you DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO READ THE PROVISIONS OF LAWS WHICH I INCLUDED(PER links cited)

The answer to my interrogative sentence lies in those links which you DID NOT EVEN CARE TO READ. You simply AND readily clung to your own 'tainted' interpretation. It was rather a good test but you didnt pass at all.

Another point I wish to make: on the section here RE: Content Gurus, you cited the very same Report on MP using a link to the other message forum--but the report is actually here in this forum already ---long before you made an issue at Content Gurus section--and YOU CALL YOURSELF EXHAUSTIVE. Borrowing your own words---'that makes me LOL'

You conclude that my credibility is now 'void' Void is a term used on documents and documentary evidence. . .
hmmmmmmm my credibility is intact--yours has been destroyed. You failed to even make an initial step to read the contents of the link. Exhaustiveness is one of the many traits a good investigator should have.

You have already been spoon-fed--and you didnt even bother to read the contents.

NOW, ARE you not reading BEYOND WHAT WAS WRITTEN--IT was about the APPROVED ARTICLES of MASTERPAPERS AND YOUR 'TAINTED' INFORMATION. Where in heaven's name did you get essaywriters.net[DND*]? And you ask us to learn how to read? YOU TWIST INFORMATION TO SUIT YOUR OWN PERSONAL INTERESTS.

From the start, IT WAS YOU WHO ASSOCIATED ME WITH IT by your post #341 at Essaywriters Content Gurus.

You lost your credibility--by your own fault. Now that I have established who you are and what you do--

PERIOD.
You want to twist some more information--to suit yourself and your interests? You are just a big waste of people's time. Goodluck.

your post 'amy'

post #341 at essaywriters.net Content Gurus

There's a member at essayfraud ("paperchasefraud") who has the legal knowledge to tear apart EssayWriters' bogus incorporation claims. He did just that to MasterPapers, which also happens to be based in Ukraine.

You present a witness and now, you discredit that witness? and by using another essay company? Who is credible now?

With you, your world seems to have been reduced to two factions only. BUT there is the wide-middle consisting of independent minded and objective people who are NOT content with 'tainted' information rammed down their throats by yourself and by others. Anyone who seems to oppose the faction you are affiliated to is subject to your baseless and unwarranted suspicions

All these issues have been taken on a different level already.
Bye!

Hello again, moron.

Are you mentally deficient? When did I EVER claim that EssayWriters and MasterPapers are the same entity? NEVER. I simply stated that you had shown PROOF that MasterPapers is "deceptive" (your own word) and uses the PERSONAL HOME of a man in the state of Maines as their FAKE business address. Do you now DENY your own evidence? Are you now reversing your own statements simply because you cannot STAND to agree with me? Is MasterPapers.com a deceptive company in ANY manner? Yes or no answer, please.

I then stated that you could probably conduct the same type of research on essaywriters.net to uncover their deception, but, seeing that you are obviously a diehard FAN of essaywriters.net, I doubt you will. After all, your pathetic need to constantly attack me personally has proven more important. Impartial, you are not.

The only thing you've "established" is that you're a jealous J-A.

Tell your story to the proper authorities.

To everyone, HENCEFORTH, everything that is published, written, or any email bearing that name should not directly or indirectly be attributable to me.

LOL, I thought so.

There is nothing wrong with being a J-A AMY! what is it now and why dont you think that donkey's are intelligent animals? This is another comment like the one in your letter about go milk a goat and close the door behind you and the other one. I used to think that you must be hapopoy to be always laughing all the time but now i see that your laughter when it is like this it is black an your being nasty again. I used to like you Amy bu npw I don't know what to think about it all. Please tell me its not true and that you are nice.

Again, the real question is, what was done with said evidence ? Was a winning case brought forth based on it Did the homeowners file suit? Unused evidence may be considered more fake than useless by most people. Students' don't care about these things so let's put an end to all these whistleblowing. Nobody cares! If the address owners, the legitimate owners, let it slice, then so should everyone else. Remember, this evidence has nothing to do with a student's bottom line.

Students who have a tendency to knitpick when it comes to services in relation to expenses will always appreciate extra info to consider when hiring services. The information allows them to make decision based on the nitty guilty of the company reputation. Whether they choose the information or not is nobody's business The only entity affected will be the company that won't get the business.

Every writer who works for an essay company and every independent writer who has succeeded in establishing a freelance writing business works from a private residence. I believe that all of the administrative staff of every legitimate essay company also work from their private residences and that the actual street addresses of all legitimate essay companies are either the private residences of their owners or Post Office boxes or commercial mailbox rental facilities. It's typically only the scam companies that try so hard to create the totally false impression that they operate from traditional commercial office spaces with "teams" of writers and other fulltime employees working out of their "offices."