Non-Plagiarized-TermPapers.com

WB: any info on non-plagiarized.com? I have been trying to gather information on them, but using regular net research, I end up in circles. On their site, they link to the following addresses , and I can't understand a legitimate business linking to competitors:

perfecttermpapers.com
writingservicescompany.com
top-term-paper-sites.com
nonplagiarizedessays.co.uk
papersonline.us
freeessays123.com
onlineessays.com
essaytoday.com
ghostpapers.com
newavessays.com
with-honors.com
abtermpapers.com
custom-essay.net

I have taken screenshots of the misspellings on their site, and got the Google surface view of the building they are supposedly in. Something strange indeed.

That's not a valid URL. I think I know which site you mean, but please clarify.

non-plagiarized-termpapers.com

that'd be it

Upon information and belief, the same people are and/or have been associated with the following sites (and others that I do not feel compelled to divulge at this time):

100percentcustomtermpapers.com
justediting.com
non-plagiarized-termpapers.com
nonplagiarizedessays.co.uk
perfecttermpapers.com
rightstats.com
termpapergenie.com
thesispapers.com
top-term-paper-sites.com

Over the years, the owners and/or associates have used the following names and addresses (or variants thereof) somewhat interchangeably across the individual registration/ownership information files of each of the aforementioned sites:

Zainab Ali
PO BOX 12437
DHA
Karachi, Sind 00000
PK
9221-5876767
kbhutto@gmail

--------------------------------------------

Right Solution
Zaheer Dodhia
M2, 1/C, 35th Comm Street, Pha
DHA
Karachi, Sind 00000
PK
9221-5876036
dodhia@cyber.net.pk

--------------------------------------------

Massom Ali
23 Korongi
Karachi, Sind 00000
PK
9221-4323398
masoom@rightstats.com

--------------------------------------------

Zaheer Dodhia
ZeeDee's
920 West Irving Park Road Unit # 101
Besenville, IL 60106
1800-2100233 (FAX) 509-752-1488
dodhia@cyber.net.pk

--------------------------------------------

Jason Sims
1023 Shouth Lane
Bombay, none 00000
IN
91-20-657654
info@termpapergenie.com

--------------------------------------------

Chad Rosen
400 Linden Ave.
Rockville, CT 06608
US
203-549-7240
chad@100percentcustomtermpapers.com

--------------------------------------------

Susanna Varzi
540 Fifth Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089
US
(408) 349-5673
cheap_papers@hotmail
domain@termpapergenie.com

--------------------------------------------

Sue Pinson
765 6th Ave
NYC, NY 21547
US
215-334-6641
sc@perfecttermpapers.com

Oops, I forgot papersinn.com.

Dodhia, Zaheer dodhia@cyber.net.pk
M2, 1/C, 35th Comm Street, Pha
DHA
Karachi, Sind 00000
PK
9221-5876036

papersinn.com
Ali, Zulfiqar info@papersinn.com
Karachi
Karachi, Sind 00000
PK
215-334-0987

So, who'd like to know exactly how rightstats.com is relevant?

??! how

They own, operate, and/or exert control over rightstats.com, which is a site that provides free "visitor statistics" to webmasters. In order for the free tracking service to work properly, each webmaster must place a small logo (containing javascript tracking code) on his/her home page (and whichever other pages that he/she wishes to track).

So, what's the rub? Well, almost certainly unbeknownst to each webmaster, there is a hidden hyperlink to one of the paper sites inside of each logo. This enables the paper sites to receive hundreds of undeserved backlinks.

Lol. That was the exact case when EssayFraud tried to extort links from other website owners. And that was your idea, Jason.

You're a moron. I'm still waiting for you to post evidence that you promised months ago. Remember how you vowed to prove your claims by posting evidence here? LMAO, what happened, crook?

Do you need evidence that I know you are Jason?

Everyone: WB's name is Jason, not "Amy", "Michelle", or "any female name."

Other evidence will be presented at due time.

Thanks for the heads up. Have always been rather wary of this link-exchange business.


None of the serious members are interested in who you think WB is. We are not interested who who she is but in what she has to say and reveal.

I somewhat sympathise with you Stu4 - you were exposed, after all.

Hey, stewy, put up or shut up. Post the proof. You've been promising "at due time" for months. I already know how/where you get your "evidence."

By the way, get the hell out of this thread.

I remember Eugene/cybermediaboy saying the same thing. So, you two are together? :)

Stu4 - we do not care; we really do not give a fig. WB is Jason, WB is Sara, WB is Amy, WB is the man on the moon. Bottom line - does this member expose scammers? Yes. Does this member provide evidence? Yes.

Another thing - what makes you assume that any would believe your so-called evidence? Clean up your act; run an honest operation for, at least, a couple of years and then come back. We might (just might) believe you then. But the bottom line will stay the same - exposes scammers; rips you guys to shreds. That's what we care about, boysie.

Three more:

acceptedpapers.com
literaturepapers.com
urgenttermpapers.com

Sims, Raju support@AcceptedPapers.com
68-C, Jackson St,
LA, CA 90216
US
433-334-3377

--------------------------------------------

bradley, April info@urgenttermpapers.com
39 Franklin St
Leumeah, NSW ---
AU
61-9-6598712

--------------------------------------------

[NOTE: For years, literaturepapers.com has had the same registration/ownership information as urgenttermpapers.com.]

Six more:

a2ztermpapers.com
anonymousresearch.com
bplusessay.com
essays-4u.com
swaptermpapers.com
termsnpapers.com

This brings the total to 17:

100percentcustomtermpapers.com
a2ztermpapers.com
acceptedpapers.com
anonymousresearch.com
bplusessay.com
essays-4u.com
justediting.com
literaturepapers.com
non-plagiarized-termpapers.com
papersinn.com
perfecttermpapers.com
rightstats.com
swaptermpapers.com
termpapergenie.com
termsnpapers.com
top-term-paper-sites.com
urgenttermpapers.com

Thanks WB.

I asked about this site in particular because of their claimm of using 100% American writers, in addition to their address being stated on their site at

Writing Services Company

47-47 36th Street
Suite # 10313
Long Island City, NY 1110 (last digit cut off)

Using Google Streetview, the building looks like a run down heap. Whois lists Susanne Varzi in Sunnydale, CA (whom you listed) as owner of the site, which got my attention. Also the fact that they claim to have been around since 1996.

Also, their "sample" paper leaves much to be desired:

Term Paper on Hate Speech on College Campuses

Introduction

As colleges struggle to handle the various differences their students and faculty embody, the problem of "hate speech" has become a focal point of educational erudition and policy-making. In the most deliberate and alarming cases, hate speech is projected to degrade or disgrace those at whom it is directed, usually colored people, gays, lesbians, the physically or mentally challenged, and women, regardless of their sexual orientation, race, religion or ability. Less disturbing examples include insensitive or careless comments, jokes, and other expressions that are painful to those to whom they are directed, regardless of the intent of the person by whom they are spoken or written.

Notice the use of "colored people", a term which is pretty much frowned upon in acedemia, especially in the U.S. Would a master's degree holder use such a description in a collegiate level essay?

Just bringing them up due to their claims of using only American writers, which I find rather hard to believe.

That address is completely bogus, of course. It is a forwarding address.

myusabox.com/About.aspx

thanks for the info. I just learned something new from the screenshot you posted. What a money making racket that is, using NY addresses to present themselves as legitimate American companies.

"People of color," however, is now considered an appropriate and even preferable term, for whatever reason....

AsianWriter and all other QUALIFIED ESL writers whose dilligence and hard work have earned them a place in this industry, none of what I am about to say is directed towards you at all (this sentence is horribly convoluted).

I really don't understand how, and why, barely literate ESL scammers are allowed to register companies in the US and UK. Our governments are enabling their fraud. These people are hopelessly incapable of providing the service they sell. They are wholeheartedly committed to the fraudulent misrepresentation of their writers' skills, the quality of their service and themselves (as in who they really are). Customers do not receive anything close to what they were promised and, accordingly, paid for; more writers than not are denied their rightful due. The consequences are that the entire industry is labelled `dishonest,' and all of us are denounced as scammers. Even worse, we often get lumped together with the scam companies and the illiterate wannabes who have forced their way into this industry.

Any company whose webcopy spouts horrid English should be trashed.
Any company which hires any writer without checking their academic qualifications, should be exposed.
ESL applicants should be double-checked (the good ones will sail through and the bad ones will be tossed aside)

And, you know what? It is a big deal when a company lies about its home country/nationality. It really is.

Two words: tax revenue. Not that this makes it right, and of course when evidence of fraud becomes great enough the companies and their websites are shut down (as in the case of xact).

No harm done.


Absolutely! At first, I joined this forum out of curiosity. I stayed because I saw all these unqualified ESLs passing themselves off as writers. I have always been peeved by the presence of these "fakes" who have made Qualified ESLs go through hoops just to land a decent writing job.

The industry should work to make sure they hire only qualified people ESLs or otherwise. It is the mandate of any company to protect their clients from sub-standard products or services. Not protecting the client, to me, is unlawful. I feel that it is even more unlawful than lying about who they are. If they provide quality service, then they wouldn't need to lie. Clients deserve the best. Depriving them of what they pay for is calloused and criminal! It's tantamount to theft!

that is true. But the wording "colored people" is considered outdated in American English.

nathraq

The term "colored people" is not only outdated, its generally considered to be pejorative.

Pheelyks, I suspect the rationale that determines "people of color" to be acceptable and "colored people" to be offensive has to do with the implications inherent in the choice of word order. "Colored people" emphasizes the word "colored" by its status in phrase pole-position. "People of color" seems to me to emphasize that the person in question is first and foremost homo sapiens sapiens and second a person of a particular race. I'd be interested to know your thoughts on that (unless I'm veering a bit too far off topic).

I had assumed that it was more simple than that. "Colored" on its own had been (and is still, in some regions, I would imagine) used explicitly as a pejorative, and adding the word "people" doesn't negate that. "People of color" also refers to anyone who is not "white," I believe--many Hispanics, Native Americans, and many Asians as well. A lot of postcolonial theory is built on observations that all people of color were marginalized--not just African-Americans.

Pheelyks: Interesting point. However, I would hesitate to use "person of color" for someone of Asian decent. Following your argument, though, it would be perfectly justified. I'm going to ponder. Thanks for your well-considered reply.

I ordered a paper from them 2 weeks ago. They took my money through a company called SWREG, but never delivered the paper. SWREG sent them an email asking them to refund me. I received an email from someone without a name "support manager" who asked me to direct concerns to their website, which I have done about 6 times. I also left many voice mails.

Tomorrow I'm calling my credit card company. This company is a fraud!
All Beware!!!

The name of the company and it's url alone is enough to warrant distrust. No company should make such unfounded claims that they would make ita guarantee by using it as a company name. With all of these affiliated sites attached to it, one can be assured of one thing, the owner isa criminal, the site is nothing but a data T channel, and students will be blackmailed whenever possible. students that trust any of these companies for any reason can only be considered an idiot.

I can only assume that the names associated with this and its affiliate websites have gone into a different business direction as of now. The mentioned website in this post has been taken offline. All traces of the website, be it cached or information located in other review sites have been scrubbed. This leads me to believe that something negative and big happened within the business circle. Due to the number of owners, taking a site down usually means the partners had a falling out and investments had to be returned. In such cases, taking down the website becomes an option when no current partner wants to buy out the others. This is the most likely scenario that happened in this case. The owners had nothing positive going for them from the very start.

I know nothing about the company, but it's ludicrous to consider its name to be an "unfounded claim" or a "guarantee" of anything.

@FreelanceWriter
Cite seems to have been making comments based on made up facts, unresearched claims, and, in some instances, the need to promote something. So the comments from this person tend to on the less than authoritative side. I tend to simply ignore the comments of this person since there does not seem to be an ounce of sense to the posts made by this person at least half of the time. I am being generous with the "at least half" claim.