Opinion on academon.com?

Has anyone ordered from academon.com? I think some writers on this forum are affiliated with them, right?

I used them once a while back but that was to download a pre-written essay

Yeah, I've been writing for them for years. Totally legit company. As with any company, your satisfaction may vary depending on what writer takes your order.

I've known BestEssays.com for years. Totally legit company. As with any company, your satisfaction may vary depending on what writer takes your order.

Seriously? You can't do any better than copying someone else's post and simply changing the company name to your own fraudulent, ESL/plagiarizing service?

Customers, here's the original passage: academon.com?

It was FreelanceWriter, an honest member of this forum, talking about a completely different company. Stu4 is a site owner from the Ukraine who only knows how to conduct business by cheating. Best Essays is a total fraud.

Recommendations are not allowed, stooge. Look up definition or go back to school.


Regarding to full time "honest members" (WB, you, Freelancewriter) representing the interests of one company they w*0re for here, honest+member is a total oxymoron.

I didn't make any recommendations, you hypocritical dumb.


FW and I are both completely honest and forthright about the companies we work for. In fact, in the post of FW's that you copied, he acknowledges working for the site he claimed was legitimate. Why don't you do the same thing and acknowledge that you own the craptastic fraud sites you recommend?

but the other stooge you quoted did.


The rules are: NO RECOMMENDATIONS ALLOWED. It has nothing with how fraudulent you are. *Even* if you honest (truth is you're not), it sill means you CANNOT break the rules. Banning you and the other "honest" stooge is the only option. You violate the rules.

Moderator, please check their posts and ban those recidivists for violating the rules. They think that if they say "look, im honest' they can violate the rules? They stooges should be banned now.

First, his was in response to a direct question. Second, you didn't quote him, you just took his words because you know you can't write a grammatically correct recommendation for your scam essay company if your life depended on it:

The question was:

Question: "Has anyone ordered from academon.com?"

The forum TOS violator replied:

Reply: Yeah, I've been writing for them for years. Totally legit company.

The stooge posted just to spam the service, no other reasons! He did not ever ordered, but he still post to advertise. He does not reply to the "direct question". He just spam and violates the rules. He should be BANNED NOW.

Moderators please watch posts of these stooges and see how every post they do is slimy way to promote their own commercial interests.

Actually, moron, the question was:

"Has anyone ordered from academon.com? I think some writers on this forum are affiliated with them, right?"

Why do you even bother when you know how easy it is to point out your lies?

pheelkys and freelanceidiot should be banned now. they are in the gang of scamming essay writers who violate Terms of this site.

At least your boss, WB, doesnt go as low to violate the rules and advertise his site directly at any ocasion like you do.

All out of even pretend-logical arguments, the wild Ukrainian falls back to his standard defensive position of hysterical whining.

Stu, your operations have been banned in the Philippines. They are in the process of being banned in the UK. Once the UK banning gets finalized, the overwhelming precedent will be used to ban your operations in the US. Enjoy your dirty money while it lasts.

academon.com is a quality company that has also been known to ignore the shrill shrieks of butt-hurt, vendetta-obsessed lunatics.

Can't you come up with your own insults, Mr. Clueless Plagiarizer? Do you really have to steal from pheelyks?

oh, was I talking to you, WB? I guess so... you responded pretty quickly.

I've been saying "butt-hurt" since high school, btw... what, did you think Chunk had the copyright on that one?

"You guys! Stop responding to me unless I directly addressed you! Multiple conversations confuse me!"

Go get your mom to help you if you can't handle s-i* without whining.

forum (ˈfɔːrəm)

- n , pl -rums , -ra
1. a meeting or assembly for the open discussion of subjects of public interest
2. a medium for open discussion, such as a magazine
3. a public meeting place for open discussion

dictionary.reference.com/browse/forum

yes, it's a place of open discussion, WB, and when I throw out a generic insult in it, you usually come running.

it's one of my favorite parts of posting.

Virtually all of your posts are "generic" because you have no substance, knowledge, evidence, or guts.

... says the creepy wannabe cyber-stalker.

You're such a bs it's almost unbelievable for someone older than twelve. anyone who has any knowledge of your history with WB knew your comment was directed at her; pretending it was random and generic is transparently duplicitous. That's not out of character, of course, but you've had enough practice with lying to have gotten better at it by now.

I don't know, pheelyks... now that I think about it, it might apply to you, too.

You think I'm a cyber-stalker? The only person you've ever leveled that accusation at in the past is WB, and I hardly think replying to your posts here constitutes stalking. If you think it does, you're more paranoid and pathetic than I thought.

ffs, pheelyks, keep up. the cyber-stalker comment was a specific reference to WB, as shown by the prefix-ellipses linking my post to his. if that's not obvious enough, the fact that the post starts with "says the," should clue you in.

time to get up and do some calisthenics. get the blood going to your brain.

you have been a bit too interested in me lately (remember when you threw down on me with no provocation across multiple threads?), but you haven't upped it to trying to mess with my living, or making empty threats about tracking me down.

anyway, I understand your confusion. the generic insult I put out was a call to all butt-hurt, vendetta-obsessed loonies... to WB, it was a clarion call. to you, maybe a little less so.

This is a perfect example of why U.S. customers don't want any ESLs writing for them. It's not a typo either, but an example of idiomatic expression that you ESLs almost always screw up many times on every page of writing.

I don't "represent the interests of one company" here at all; I respond truthfully about any company if I have first-hand knowledge from working for them. That's also why I've never offered any opinion about any of the bad companies here, simply because I've never worked for any and only know what I've read on here about them.

It wasn't a recommendation either, just a statement of legitimacy from a current writer in response to a direct question from another forum member.

Facts:

1. You lost jobs with several different companies. In fact, at least one of those companies specifically posted about your firing and excommunication on its site.

2. I didn't threaten to track you down, liar. If I wanted to track you down, I easily could and would. I already know the sites/companies for which you've worked, your acdm username, your PayPal account, former employers and associates who hate you, etc. If you ever posed a meaningful threat to me, my family, my companies, or my assets, my attorneys would be on you like flies on s-i*.

delusion of grandeur: Delusional beliefs of possessing exaggerated power, importance, knowledge or ability. (DSM-IV-TR)

behavenet.com/capsules/path/delusionofgrandeur.htm

Delusions of Grandeur Common in Bipolar I Mania:

In short, delusions of grandeur are pretty common in type I bipolar disorder mania. (According to the above, almost 45% of bipolars in a manic episode experience it to some degree.)

You're not weird or a freak at all. You're not alone in your delusions of grandeur. Delusions of grandeur are just another thing about bipolar disorder that people don't want to talk about.

opposingviews.com/i/mania-delusions-of-grandeur-part-of-bipolar-disorder-type-i

:'(

What YOU represent is not follow clients instructions and write just to cover the word count. The instructions here are clearly in the Terms of the site. You either dont understand them or purposely avoid them because thats how easier for you.

When student needs research, you bull just to cover the page and dont follow instructions. Perfect examples are here.


The problem is you are a w*0re for only one company and you show it every time you post yoru garbage here. Violating the Terms at any occasion.


Legitimacy and you are oxy-morons. And you're the biggest moron of the two.

let's see, AR is one. umm... help me out here with the "several."


lol. it seems a little dramatic, but whatever you say.


creepy is as creepy does.

I know. That's what made the original insult not generic. Which is why I said you were being duplicitous. Read this a few times to make sure you understand it--I don't want you getting lost again.


No, I don't remember "throwing down on you." Between this, the imaginary bet you have, and the "pus being thrown at you" that you keep bragging about, you sound like a forty-year old trying to relive his frat days. That's sad.

Back to this nonsense again? You have it exactly backwards: I tried to explain in that thread that when company customers issue instructions to write only 350 or 500 words I don't second-guess their instructions based on the fact that they ordered 2 pages or 3 pages from the system. If I disregard their instructions and write a full 2 or 3 pages on those orders, I can get stuck with a rewrite to edit it down to the number of words in their instructions. It's happened to me; that's why I've learned to follow their instructions about the word count instead of assuming that they want the full number of pages they ordered from the system.

In 20 years maybe youll learn. Long way to go.

Oh, he's older than that, pheelyks.

here we have our second and third object lessons in projection. will anyone ever learn?

So, you're denying that you are over 40?

yep.

That word...I do not think it means what you think it means.

Could we have some more reviews of legit academon.com users and customers (maybe even writers) as opposed to some bozos offending each other on this forum???