I Got Scammed by Custom Writings.

The only thing i know is that our customers rate our service well.

Another thing i know that YOU have been fired in june for breaking our policies.

And your strong belief that you were the last good writer that we ever had is pathetic.

The whole universe rotates around you Pheelyks, ain't it? :) You were writing well but you are the MOST ILL-MANERED and un-disciplinned writer in all our history, congratulations. You place is in the zoo, trust me.

Wow, that sounds like a challenge. Would you like to confirm that challenge?

Cybermediaboy, (Eugene)

I am referring to your post in this thread. It is number 54. You state that 8.5 out of 10 papers get a quality score. But when I was dealing with your staffers, they stated that the company's papers are never to be used as stand alone documents. They are only to be used as a tool in completing a paper. So, why would you brag about your papers if they are not meant to be the final product?

As for a refund, are you sincerely going to refund it? I started my request for a refund about two months ago. I have got nowhere with this. You, the owner of the company, as stated in this open forum that you will refund my money. Will you live up to it? If not, I will still pursue my alternate course of action.

Steve

I am true to my word, thus I must make an update. After a few months of going back and forth, and interaction from Eugene, I did receive a full refund from Custom Writings. The paper that I received a D on did hurt my overall grade in the course, thus I will probably never use any writing service again. I want to thank Eugene for delivering what he said he would do.

Steve,

I'm sorry you had a bad experience with your paper. However, if you decide to have another paper typed, drafts are also good to request if your assignment is not a rushed one. Also, constant communication truly makes a significant difference. I hope that you have better luck next time.

-Nichole

People who break forum rules by posting their email addresses often end up on every SPAM list known to members and visitors alike.

We should care about this because? Exactly. We have no time for pretenders and liars here. If you were really attending such a university, then you would have known that these universities have ways of spotting a paid essay a mile away. You would have known that you can't buy an essay and pass it on. You gota bad paper and had to deal with the consequences. Hand lesson learned even for someone who did not attend a true Ivy League university.

When someone says that an essay is fully plagiarized, that does not leave much room for low level English writing. I mean, a fully plagiarized essay means the witter did not write a single word in the presentation. Rather, he just did an inaccurate cut and paste of previously published papers. There is a difference between lousy editing skills ( cut and paste method) and unacceptable English writing ( low-level English). While neither clarifications earns the unskilled writer a pass, it is important for the student to differentiate as the errors are of different basis and degrees. Neither is excusable, but, I believe that lousy editing is more forgivable than lousy writing.

"Fully plagiarized" and "low-level" English are hardly mutually exclusive, because I've seen plenty of terrible essays that exhibited both extensive plagiarism and horrible ESL writing in the same essay. First, "fully plagiarized" doesn't necessarily mean that literally every single word was plagiarized; in fact, that's very uncommon, because even when writing is nothing more than plagiarized work, the writer (whether a paid writer or a student) typically does still add some original sentences in between plagiarized passages. Other times, they make minor changes to the plagiarized material, whether in an attempt to tailor it to the topic or in a failed attempt to make the plagiarism less obvious. If an essay consists of large chunks of plagiarized material connected by a little bit of original verbiage, I'd still consider that "fully plagiarized" even if "substantially plagiarized" or "almost fully plagiarized" would be a more accurate description. Second, and more to the point, I've also seen essays that were substantially plagiarized or essentially "fully plagiarized" and that also exhibited bad ESL writing simultaneously. That can happen anytime the writer plagiarizes from old published academic essays that were originally written in bad ESL English or anytime an ESL writer plagiarizes from better sources but adds in some of his own changes and/or writing in between all of the plagiarized material.