For the 100000th time, you lie about your connection to this industry.
Yeah, that's what I knew you'd state. The problem, MORON, is that even if your silly accusation were true, it would make NO DIFFERENCE. Why? I don't lie, that's why. I prove every substantive claim about every site/company/writer about which I post. Why don't you quote the substantive claims that I have made about ANY site/company/writer that are untrue. Why can't you do that, Jethro?
Why is that so difficult for you?I posted my point of view
WRONG. If you are going to make that serious claim, you have to prove it. If you have "read" such things here, why can't you quote them? I'll tell you why: you know that if you quote them (if they exist), I will proceed to prove-with evidence-exactly how and why you are wrong/lying. It's the same story with all of you liars and charlatans. Put up or shut up.
amnateeb:
On the other hand, if someone says that the one has been scammed by any other site, you guys do not want any evidence regarding that.
You got that perfect right. Isnt it strange?
What site? Be specific, please. You seem to forget that I have already conducted extensive investigations of every major company in the industry. The majority of major sites are owned by only a dozen or so companies. I have studied them all, in great depth, for years. I know which are fraudulent and which are not. Unless I read something in a post that I
know from personal experience and investigations to be untrue, I usually do not get involved-there's no need. I'm not going to waste my time or forum space by posting "Yes, I confirm" in response to every valid claim posted in this forum. It's as simple as that.
Now, Stu4 is associated with a fraudulent company from Ukraine. When someone posts a complaint about one of his ripoff sites, for example, I am quickly able to judge whether or not it's valid because I have:
* placed TEST ORDERS with every major company to personally experience how honest and fair they are with customers (especially regarding rewrites and refunds)
* created a "writer account" with every major company in order to personally experience their systems, payment schedules/forms, support staff, native language, location, hiring practices, standards, honesty in writer vs. customer scenarios, etc.
* visited and photographed/video recorded their purported "business addresses" all around the country
* spoken on the phone with state/federal agency representatives to confirm the fraudulent/fake nature of certain companies' corporate documents
* studied countless legal documents and court records involving companies and their owners
* acquired the public, criminal records of site owners
* spoken on the phone with the landlords of buildings in which certain companies have falsely claimed to have offices
* uncovered the real names, addresses, phone numbers, and foreign locations of site/company owners who falsely claim to be "American"
* etc., etc., etc.
Of course, the morons who attack me
already know that I am armed with all of this information and evidence, which is why they
NEVER answer my challenge to quote a single one of the "lies" that they claim I have posted. If I am such a "liar," it shouldn't be very difficult to quote one of my lies, should it? After all, I have posted 8,221 times since April of 2007. The best way to prove me to be a liar is to quote at least one of my lies, isn't it?