The frauds are now trying to impersonate me!

faves/users/writersbeware

How pathetic. They made this account so that they can claim that I own a certain competitor's site.

Well, at least I know that I am really hurting their dirty business. Actually, I already knew that, but thanks for the confirmation, bags!

:)

Now I understand how the rumour started!

WB - do you now that I have an old email from Sean (masterpapers) where he states (I inserted xxxx in some parts):

From: Sean
Sent: 25 December 2006 05:20 PM
To: xxxxxxx
Subject: Essayfraud

Dear xxxx,

First of all Merry Christmas!

Yes we are aware of this web-site and have several ideas about who owns it (WB?). Yes, we know that they are using black PR as the method of fighting their competition, but we are better than those people and if we were to respond to them in would mean that first of all we are afraid of them, which is not true, and thus any posts that will come from our side with us saying: "This is a lie" will make it seem as we are trying to find ways to find an excuse, thus we simply prefer to ignore any posts or comments that appear on the web-sites in the internet.

By reading attentively through the Essay Fraud's web-site you can easily see that the main purpose of that website is to promote one of the web-sites while discredit the others, why do you think you cannot find any information regarding who is running it and other information, also you yourself can see that all of the positive posts are being removed, and if they indeed were an independent web-site, do you think that they would care about how good or how bad the comment was?

But the fact is, that we know how we operate our business, and you as our writer know the same, yes of course sometimes there are some problems, but who does not have them?

There is one issue that I would like to discuss with you. I have been informed by our affiliate that you have pending app. xxxx dollars in compensations, which is to be transferred via WU, however we would like to offer you the Wire Transfer method, which will allow you to receive your compensation directly to your bank account within 3 days and with fees as low as $10/transaction.

I have tried to call you in order to discuss this matter, but was unable to reach you, so please get back to me asap, and also if you can please provide me with your telephone number, as I've been told that you have moved back to the UK.

All the best.

Sincerely,

xxxx


When i asked what WB meant, I was told that it was the initials of a competitor from Eastern Europe but could not disclose the name? (I have that email as well)

It's not a coincidence that the morons who come here to accuse me and other members of owning this forum AND the defunct Essay Fraudalso accuse me of being a "Russian national." Sean (yeah, I'm sure that's his real name) communicated that precise nonsense to you. If he had any proof AT ALL, he would have shown it to you. The SAME people from the SAME, ripoff companies from Ukraine have been posting the SAME, false accusations against me for years. The fact that none of it is true is why they do not come here to confront me directly. They know that I will easily prove them to be liars (even more than I already have) for all of the world to read.

Although, I must state that the date of the email (December 25, 2006) precedes my sign-up date (April 19, 2007) with this forum.

Sean is Lescha or Lesya - I forgot his real name but have it in a chat transcript somewhere on my computer. I think it'll be pretty accurate if one refers to him as Sean the leech (Lescha).


So, they are behind the rumor? That shows you are doing a good job.

Keep it up WB!

What WB's intentions truly were for all the pointless whistleblowing that went on here in the past shall remain a mystery. Whether she owned a site or not, or if she was part owner in this forum is relevant. The username though, carries a negative reputation as a troublemaker in most circles that I have joined, just to get to knowthe history of the person. The profile name is memorable, not iconic, for all the wrong reasons. If I were WB, I would be ashamed that most people remember me with spite and disgust.

Healthy competition means using black propaganda sometimes. Discrediting one another is how competition promotes wally. Rumors about companies are what helps each improve their services. Is impersonation part of the game? In some instances, yes. Social media fake accounts abound. So too, does fake websites. These serve purposes for the people that created them. This is a new type of identity fraud. The problem related to the of filing charges lies in the difficulty of tracing the source. Finger pointing is one thing. Proving the accusations based on "he said, she said", that is Inadmissible in court. Which is probably why nothing happened beyond an online squabble between parties.

Actually, black propaganda is the antithesis of "healthy" competition: in fact, it's about as good an example as there is of
unhealthy competition. The same goes for discrediting competitors with false rumors.

When I first signed up here in 2008, there were 3 other writers who were my strongest competition for the best (and most) projects at the same essay company: ResearchPro, Pheelyks, and ProfessorVerb and I competed for the same projects on the company boards and here, for direct clients. None of us ever disparaged another. We protected one another's unseen assignment-board requests at the company so that nobody else could steal those requests off the boards before whomever they were intended for saw them. We backed one another up in emergencies, and we referred private clients to one another in our respective specialties. If one of us sent a regular client to another writer because we couldn't squeeze in one project and, subsequently, that client came back to the referred writer instead of to his/her regular writer, we asked the client whether or not he/she had offered it to the first writer already; and/or we checked with one another before taking more work from one another's regular clients. When someone here who was in a beef with Pheelyks created a thread entitled "Pheelyks Versus Freelance Writer: A comparative analysis" https://essayscam.org/forum/es/pheelyks-versus-freelance-writer-comparative-analysis-3051/ , I could have simply kept my mouth shut while he absorbed as much damage as possible and let as many of his potential clients get steered straight over to me. It would have been free advertising for me in a way that I'd never have been allowed to post on my own behalf. Instead, I immediately posted in that thread and explained that I knew Phyleeks as a writer and that he was comparable to me and that I knew what someone else had posted about him in still another thread couldn't possibly be true because I knew that he didn't do business the way that person described. That, my friend, is "healthy competition," not using black propaganda or discrediting our competitors.