Tsk tsk.... sidetracking what? The question was if I made the comment about Free Research Paper's hiring practices as a response to a debate and not because I was "bitter" about anything. I DID. The posts from the thread in question that you provided a link to (thanks!) show that I did, you WBlundering idiot. ^___^

A grudge? o.O On Free Research Paper? Just because they don't hire "foreigners"? O.O????

Did your momma toss you one too many times when you were a baby or something?

I don't have grudges against companies that never cheated me, much less against companies that I was never a part of. >.< I ignored the other posts since they have no relevance on the topic of whether or not I posted about FRP's hiring practices as a rebuttal in a debate.

Clearly, your generous contribution of the link to the actual thread shows that my post WAS a rebuttal in a debate. Thanks, WBlunder. ^___^

Thank you for providing the link. Now here's the ACTUAL CONTEXT of the following post:


... that you so selectively quoted. ^__^

The post was a response to a post by OxbridgeResearchers


AND by WBull#hit


Plus, my actual post clearly stated that I was responding to a debate.

There is no reason for me to "want to prove that (you're) incorrect." I know you are. If you want to prove to anyone here that you aren't, go ahead and find the posts. ^___^

Just more WBul##hit from WBoring trying to hide her latest WBlunder. ^_^

Sigh... now you're being desperate. Remember, the argument that you were defending was:


There are two things that are going against you here. The word "ALL," and the stupidity of actually placing "Literally" before it. ^___________^

Oh, but it's so cute how you try to bring up statistical principles into a discussion.. like an infant trying to say her first word. ^______^ "Stataaa... stataa..."

Hahaha!!!!

Awwww... more excuses from this forum's BIGGEST LOSER. ^____^

*Yaaaaaawwwnnnnnn* You're willing to accept my statement regarding actually posting about FRP's hiring practices but not my statement regarding why I made the post (which has nothing to do about being frustrated). How retarded is that? ^_^

sigh.. so which among these posts have to do with my personal money issues?

You just keep coming back for more, WB. ^____^

WBOOOOOOORING... ^____^

WBLUNDERRRRRRRRR.... ^_____^

Yes, as a rebuttal to your claim that Free Research Paper does hire competent writers from the 3rd World. Post the link already so that everyone can see, Wblunder. ^___^

I claimed nothing.. you did:


WBoooooooring. ^____^


Oh, so that's what you admitting that you were wrong looks like. LOL!!! I just wanted to make it clear that I have made not 1, but a whole bunch of posts in this forum that have nothing to do with you, and I have made many that you cannot disagree with.

I never applied and frankly, based on info that I obtained from one FRP writer just recently, the rates that FRP offers are the same as those offered by some of the companies that I currently work for. Oh, but by all means, link the post here (as I am too busy to do so myself) so that people can see that what you call a "whine" was actually a rebuttal that I made against your statement about FRP's hiring practices.

Wow.. more WBull. Why am I not surprised?


In which of my posts did I berate anyone because of their geographical location/race? Please don't try to make it seem that my posts and positions are similar to yours. It's creepy.

So... do you still want to deny that you were WRONG about the statement below?

Sigh... the usual WBu# hit. ^_^

...which makes it alright for you to be rude to clients of the companies that you work for. I totally have nothing against that. You can be rude to clients who post here complaining about the treatment that they received from FRP's system all you want. ^__^ I'm sure that they'll appreciate that (the clients and Free Research Paper).

^_^

Sigh... you just keep coming back for more.


https://essayscam.org/forum/es/amons-2176/


Uvocorp account Up for sale


Kenyan Writers

So which of these other posts do you disagree with? ^______^

Nope.. When they ask me why I think you do it (and a couple of them have), I tell them that abnormal psychology really isn't one of my strong points. Hah!!! ^_____^

Because sometimes, it's fun to point out the painfully obvious, Momma hen. ^_^

Errr....


What was that about putting stuff to rest?

LOL!!! Really, the only reasons that I can come up with regarding why Free Research Paper would still have you around after all of your counterproductive antics are that you own the company or that you're sleeping with (EEEYUCK!!!!) whoever owns it.

I rest my case. ^_^

I'd say that at this point, you have two options. You either wait a while and then post that your experience with Amon was positive or you stop posting with this new username altogether and just hope that some idiot of a client would contact you to ask about your experience. Neither is likely to work. Have a nice day. ^_^

..in much the same way as Mr. Capone might have communicated to his "clients" in the day to stay quiet about their "business relationship," or else.

Nice try, but I think you'd find it quite difficult to convince anyone in this forum that the post below....


...is a well-meaning warning and not a menacing threat. ^___^

LOL!!! Out of all the seemingly harmless posts that you've made, this was the only post that you really intended to make, wasn't it?

This is what other writers think about Amon:




^______^

Oh, and thanks for your message asking if I can help you out on a freelance writing project. Sadly but respectfully, I decline. :p

Awww.. so now how people say things in forums are "facts" to you? Pathetic little WBi... True, FW was frank but his post was helpful. My guess is that it at least made the client realize that "hey... maybe I was being too rash, this guy who works for the company says that I will definitely get my money back,"

How about your response? Did you give the client any assurance that he'll get his money back (which was simply what he was after)? No. Instead, you called him a liar and shoved a threat to his face.


What the FK is that, WBozo? C'mon.. please enlighten us why you think the quote above is more helpful and less threatening than FW's post.

...something that I also pointed out much earlier, in the very same thread that WB linked to.

This "helpful" post:


was responded to in kind by this post:


Obviously, WB was "helpful" to somewriter BEFORE somewriter became "helpful" to WBull. ^_^

Anyone who doesn't understand that is just plain retarded. ^____^

FW's response was straightforward and informative. Your response was unhelpful and menacing. Wonder why the client lashed out at you but not at FW? Maybe if you didn't butt in like a PROTECTIVE MOTHER HEN this issue would have ended with FW's statement and Azul quietly waiting for his refund.

Really FRP, is it worth it to keep WB around? You'd be much more popular if you just kick her sorry a** out. ^__^ Then again...

While I have no interest in participating in the quasi-metaphysical debate about the movement of data on the internet (LOL!!!!), I do have this to contribute:


WB's "HELPFUL" information:


The exchange of a few legit sites, which pay writers.

Very helpful indeed. ^_________________^

I think the client is just anxious about getting his money back. If he was treated less as a company detractor and more as a disgruntled client, it is likely that he'd be praising Free Research Paper's writers (FW and pheelyks) for their assistance as opposed to cursing its shameless promoter (WBuls-i*).

That said, I agree that if an order would take too much effort for too few pages, it's not worth doing. I also believe that FRP will give Azul a full refund since the order was never delivered. If PRP doesn't, then Azul has the right to complain.


Right on.


Right... and give the 1001 losers who prowl this site the opportunity to blackmail Azul for using a term paper mill. ^__^ Hey.. if YOU truly feel that YOU'RE being honest, how about telling us YOUR real name? :p

Yes, it is. If you write crappy papers you're not supposed to get paid.

I'm not really so sure about that. Some people will believe anything especially if the price is ridiculously low enough. Also, I don't think that "solution" is smart enough to come up with anything sufficiently complicated to pass the scrutiny of this forum's members. If he tries, he'd be exposed just like that other loser from a while back.

There's also a chat where WB uncovered that the support personnel either did not know that the owner's Ukrainian or was lying about it.

Anyone who would like to infer upon whether or not this company is to be trusted based on the information given above are free to do so (you'd be morons of course, but hey.. don't let that stop you ^_^).

I think that nobody is questioning this in as far as your definition of native speaker as pointed out by smirk is concerned.

Saying that your grammar is off because you're blind is playing the disability card.

Which was precisely what happened. ^_^ However instead of simply owning up to his faults and moving on, Zandermus decided to play the disability card.

I think that it's really more like "let's pick on Zandermus because he's trying to sound competent by picking on another poster who has substandard writing skills despite having substandard writing skills of his own."

^_____^

Sorry, but Timone speaks much better English than eric85 writes.

Heck, even Poombah can do better. >.<

Preposterous! Nurture beats nature any day. LOL!!!

Seriously though, your English sucks. Do you disagree?

Gosh, you're seeing issues where there are none. I never said that I knew that there weren't any who read and cited their papers properly. I just shared my experience with my clients.

But honestly, the day I see an actual paper on say "Comparing Participative and Directive Leadership Styles" with a reference that reads something like:

Grant, L. (2011). Comparing Participative and Directive Leadership Styles. Bob's Essays.

I'm going to laugh my head off. ^___^

Almost two years ago, I did attempt to defend the position that no student spends hundreds of dollars on a model paper and doesn't use it. However, I conceded already conceded that argument during that time and changed my position to "most" instead of all.


I still do. However, is this the same as claiming that "all students cheat"? No. It is a statement of disbelief, not an argument. So editor75 is correct that currently, nobody (except maybe one of the Kenyans) is arguing that all students cheat.

I posted that opinion almost two years ago and at the resolution of that matter (almost two years ago) I had already conceded to changing my position to "most" instead of "all."


No, I did not.



But if you want to get technical with it, poor evidence is just as bad or even worse than no evidence where the application of statistics is concerned. Attend any basic seminar or 101 class on statistics and you'll hear the same thing. Poor evidence can lead decision makers to make wrong inferences which may have disastrous outcomes. However, this is not the case for this scenario that we have. There is OVERWHELMING evidence of students submitting papers for credit based on the posts of students on this message board alone.

Also, I think that nobody in his/her right mind would side with your implied claim that most students use the papers that they purchase "properly."