so you did fail then ha ha. thought it might be too tough for you, and now you spend time discrediting these courses by encouraging students to cheat- you must be so proud of yourself.

How come your not still pursuing the solicitor route since passing your FILEX? there has to b more money in legal work then the job you are doing, believe me I speak from experience.

It's your lack of qualifications tha amuse me most jennifer lol

because I like adding fuel to the fire here is the experience a forum had with devereaux and deloitte where one of the employees threatening the forum claimd to be a barrister which was refuted by the bar council

forums.writersweekly.com/viewtopic.php?t=3717

Maybe they are ALL barristers in that company. Maybe the bar council are actually the owners of this company (I think not)

There is no point in revealing the brief where a fine of 300% was added as this matter was already taken up with the quality department who replied by saying that I should be grateful that they were still allowing me to write for them since the customer was so disappointed with the essay. Yes I was so grateful I quit.

Glad your looking forward to hearing from the bar council since I was on the phone to them today and have just responded to an email from them directing them to your site. I'll keep everyone on here posted once they respond to me latest communication.

I do note that she said she did the LPC she didn't say she passed the course though did she. Maybe that is what is at the root of her problems. Maybe that is why she supports the company undermining the BVC and LPC qualification by allowing students to cheat. Could be she feels she is paying the course directors back by assisting students to pass using someone else's work!!

I agree. The contract is full of veiled threats and penalties. I also found that working for this company was very stressful and feared any email from the quality department even though many times it was awarding me a bonus for scoring highly on my work. The very sight of quality emails had me taking a deep breath before opening in case the customer had complained and I was getting fined or made to do further work on the piece.

Since leaving I am so much more relaxed and can open my emails without trembling.

whitegrim - my granddaughter can probably write better than you and she's only 9 months old lol

I note you did not respond to my post with regard to the BVC rules and regulations breach. You asked for how this is a breach and I have provided you with the answer so what do you have to say to that?

If this is so WHY do the company fine writers 300% when a complaint is received for example an essay that was paying £80 and the writer was fined £240. Yeah of course the company lost that amount (not).

As regards the order number we ALL know that a writer can be identified by an order number so therefore disclosing this would let you know who I am and I have seen from personal experience how you treated another writer that attempted to expose your scams.

So you spent over £4000 on LPC and THEN opted to become a legal executive on half the pay of a solicitor mmm that makes sense. :)

What so you can identify which writer I used to be and then make veiled threats against me for SUPPOSEDLY defaming your company (like you once did to another writer) I don't think so.

If WB or the other posters on here who are GENUINELY trying to stop scam companies like you want any further info on this order I will gladly supply by private message.

I am not in the habit of making assertions I cannot prove, and am also acutely aware that each writer is identifiable by the briefs they have written. I think I will kindly retain my anonymity thank you very much as I have seen the way your company operates when anyone dares to challenge their empire.

My friend has a copy of professional standards for barristers as well as a copy of the rules and regulations from one of the law schools in London which clearly states that students must not seek any assistance from either fellow students, lecturers or any other writing service when doing their assignments. I remember when he was doing his course that 4 students were expelled from law school for working on a project together and another was expelled for getting his father who was a qualified barrister to give him assistance. By encouraging students to get assistance in this way you are encouraging them to break the code as well as the law school regulations. Model answers are not supplied for students on the BVC though examples of opinions are to be found in the text books issued to the students. Students have to rely on adaptation of the examples in the textbooks in order to write their opinion.

My friend was appalled that students were asking for someone to write their opinion for them.

I agree, I think his reasoning was to alert the law schools to the fact that students are approaching essay writing sites to get their opinions written. I have just spoken to him and as a member of the bar council he agrees that they should be made aware of this unethical practice and he will do his utmost to draw their attention to the post you highlighted.

I have a friend who is a BVC graduate who used to write for this company who was asked to write a BVC opinion but flatly refused as this is a breach of the professional ethics code. He sent the request to all the law schools in the UK that run BVC courses so that they would know so that they could try to determine who the individual was that was trying to cheat in this way. No idea whether any of the law schools managed to track down the individual but at least they were made aware of this.

Since I no longer work for any company I doubt that I can be regarded as promoting anyone. I USED to work for the company Jennifer is promoting UNTIL they started ripping me off. This is a fact I can prove. Jennifer should not be allowed to promote her rip off company anymore then anyone else on here end of story!!

And Jennifer does know so much about law doesn't she (not) after all she is FILEX qualified (like that makes a scrap of difference). Guess she couldn't quite cut it to do the LPC or BVC so sold herself short as a legal executive.

Since this site is for opinions only she would struggle to bring a defamation suit as the posters are anonymous as are the site owners.

UKessays might not lie about their location like other sites but they still exploit students and writers alike. When I worked for them I was asked several times to become a staff writer but that would entail being forced to write on any essay they cared to throw in my direction regardless of whether I had the resources or the capability of doing these. Naturally - having some morals- I declined. I was also allowed to bid on topics for which I had no qualification just by sending an email saying that I had done essays of this kind before. In fact I once sent them a sample of my work that was actually written by another family member and they never queried it one iota. So much for quality control.

This company is no better then those who declare false addresses. They treat their writers like rubbish and charge exorbitant fines for work that is either late or does not meet the grade. I know of one writer for this company that was fined 3 x the price they were being paid for the essay because the customer kept demanding amendments to the extent that the writer refused to do any further amendments as the requests were for things that had not been originally requested in the initial brief. When the writer refused to amend further the company fined them 3 x the price of the brief. No wonder Barclay drives a lambo!!

In the particular case I am referring to the quality control department wrote to me saying that the customer had been in contact with you and stated that they had submitted the essay to their university and DID not get the grade that they expected. The quality control department stated that the work was of adequate quality but because the customer had complained they had agreed to refund the money AND then fined ME 3 x the amount I was being paid for the work. Nice scam if you can get away with it, which is EXACTLY why i quit.

But your company ACTUALLY encourages customers to hand this in as their own work. You fine writers whose work DOES NOT get the student the grade they wanted. I know this from experience. Would you care to explain why you do this IF, as your site states, students are told to use these as guidelines only?

I used to write for this company. To say that customers do not use this as their own work or if they do the company does not know that they do is a fallacy. If this were the case how come the quality control departments contact writers when customers have complained saying that the work did not receive the mark they expected and then the writer gets fined for supposedly submitting a piece of work that failed to score over 59%.

If the customer used the work as a guideline only then the score they receive is down to them alone. They can only assert the work did not get the score expected AND the writer is to blame IF they submitted the work WITHOUT making ANY alterations.

They OBVIOUSLY know that the customers submit this as their own OTHERWISE why do they make the writer GUARANTEE that the work IS to that standard and WHY do they fine the writer when the customer states that they did not get the mark they requested in their order.

Before Jennifer starts accusing me of having an axe to grind because I was dismissed I will put the record straight by letting you all know that I chose to leave I was not made to leave the company.