Rusty - stay out of that which you know nothing about. Try to get a life.
Only two others made claims against us here. They backtracked and admitted the truth.
Essaywho - you are about the only person on the face of the planet who cannot start a chargeback. You know it won't wash. Now, how about proving yourself right and posting the essay?
Facts:
1) he paid for a 3 week deadline
2) he paid for admission/application service
3) he moved the deadline up - way up
4) his order description explicitly stated that he wanted a research, not admission/ application
The writer complied and, in essence, this customer cheated the system.
The customer even cited the amount he paid INCORRECTLY.
The customer claims not to have a single shred of evidence for anything he claims. How is that even possible?
The customer - in the first post - explicitly stated that he emailed admin. When asked to post the email he sent, he backtracked and said he meant messages through the order board.
The customer claims to have tried to contact us through live chat. Had he done so, we would have been alerted had he actually left a message. He would have received a copy of the message, as would we, through the live chat provider.
The customer claims to have tried calling us. Fact is he only tried ONE tine during our off-hours. At the very least, prove me a liar on this through phone records... You can't, can you?
The customer wanted the writer to redo the entire writeup even though he had followed the originals instructions. Am sorry but we don't allow for the abuse of our writers ( as many here on this board working with us know). Our writers are not your personal slaves and you will not rob them on our watch.
The Moronic Liar claims that
1) he does not have his original order instructions
2) he emailed us (look at your first post)
3) he tried calling us
4) his own bank rejected his chargeback claim
Any who believe him is a moron.
Listen very carefully - I have been very patient but you are fast crossing the line. Think carefully before you knowingly engage in public libel.
Why can't you simply post the horrid paper? You did claim it was completely unusable and, therefore, have nothing to lose my posting it.
when not carrying WB's shield
Obsessive loser - what has WB even got to do with this issue?
crook... and not a very slick one.
Don't need to be a crook, let alone a slick one. Besides, won't ever be able to compete against you in that area ...
Go beddy-bye Rusty and start counting the sheep
s :) Best thing is that you actually used it in the context of correcting another's use of the word!