That is for Universal Research LLC at 11654 Plaza America Dr. #365
Reston VA 20190.

Maybe I can add a little bit more.

And for essaywriters.net at 1361 Icy Brook dr., Herndon, Va., 200170

Sold in 2003:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/2003SaleofIcy.jpg

great photograph

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/ICYregistered-owned.jpg

registered to:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/ICYregisteredbyFairfax.jpg

(actually they are relatives--two houses on a parcel of land)

And what about the former UK address:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAddressofEssayWriters.jpg

turns out to be the Senate House Library

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAdd-SenateHouseLibrary1.jpg

of the University of London. (must really be an old building)

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/UKAdd-SenateHouseLibrary2.jpg

Let us go to some listings:



The phone number is registered under a different person in another locality.



Hmmmm . . .and



and the phone number again is registered under the name of another person in another locality



Perhaps these persons really exist but they are not involved in all of these. Probably their names were picked and placed in documents and lists. Someone must be tampering with the listings. Why all the trouble? It is more than what is seems.

By the way, an "LLC" is not similar to "incorporated." As it now appears on a few of the websites, Universal Research LLC has "switched" to Universal Research Incorporated. Wow! like magic.

Oh well as for the more substantial evidence--let us forward all the documents to the authorities. Let the authorities put a stop to this.

The Americans are not the only ones defrauded here.

Thanks WB! I am just trying to pitch in some little help. You did a lot of research and leg work too.

I have to beg everyone's indulgence because I am not as good as you are in posting the photos :) I am sorry about that.

I just have this feeling that they do enjoy the divisiveness in our (everyone) midst now. ESL vs. non-ESL (although I agree with you and I know where you are coming from) but there is a larger picture out there.

On one hand, ESL writers are duped of their earnings. On the other, Americans are fooled and deceived. Everyone is a victim.

Just my opinion, they are making a mockery of our respective governments.

If you would check the Virginia State Corporation Commission: s0302.vita.virginia.gov/servlet/resqportal/resqportal?&rqs_custom_dir=sccci sp1

--under Corporate Inquiry Menu (not the Limited Liabilty Company Inquiry Menu) there is a corporation newly incorporated with Corp ID 0701509 yet another name-I think you get the picture.

Let us encourage the victims to file their complaints online the IC3 website.
Continue your good work and goodluck!

I am confident that something will be done.

Another one? WiseTranslations

Located at: 1800 N. Kent Street #B1 Arlington, Virginia 22209
wisetranslations/staff

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/WT.jpg

But guess what? The given address is occupied by an Engineering Office of the Plaza East Office Building! I called their phone number and it was confirmed that there is no Wise Translations entity conducting business there.

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/WT2.jpg

Not only that--Wise Translations' office phone number is: 1 703-621-7264
and which happens to be the very same US phone number of KillerContent.

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC.jpg

KillerContent and WiseTranslations share the same US phone number 1 703-621-7264 BUT THEIR OFFICES are located in DIFFERENT LOCALITIES. How can that be?

KillerContent's US Corporate Address is: 4114 Hamlin Ave. Chantilly, Virginia 20151 while that of WiseTranslations is : 1800 N. Kent Street #B1 Arlington, Virginia 22209

Yeah, different localities that is why both have different zip codes. :)

And not only that--I will tie up everything for all of you:

*We discovered that Universal Research LLC's registration before the Va State Corporation Commission is cancelled as of 31 December 2007 as it appears below:

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/LLCcancelled.jpg

*We discovered that a newly incorporated corporation (not LLC) appears in the records of Va State Corporation Commission as it appears below:

i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/URInc.jpg

(same Hamlin address)

*We also discovered that changes had been made on the website/s (other websites as well) from Universal Research LLC to Universal Research Incorporated (Limited).

BEFORE:
i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC-LLC.jpg

NOW:
i424.photobucket/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/KC.jpg

You have been lying to all our faces. If you can lie this way, you also have lied in other ways.

Only an imbecile can believe her statements, WB. Please allow me to quote part of what she said,
"So, If there is a complaint there is an investigation and if you plagiarize or have poor quality work, grammar etc, then surprise! You will not be paid for writing crap or stealing. I personally believe that these claims are likely false or that the writer simply did not fulfill their obligation to the assignment."

A. If there is a complaint? Where does the complaint originate? from essaywriters.net motu propio? or from a customer? Assuming arguendo it comes from either of the two sources, is the complaint presented to the writer? Are the issues identified so that the writer concerned can defend himself.

The answer is no.
B. Is the concerned writer given an opportunity to be heard during the 'investigation'?
The answer is no.
C. During investigation, are the issues on plagiarism, poor quality work, grammar, etc. identified?
The answer is no. There is just a sweeping accusation.
D. Who determines the 'guilt' of the concerned writer? essaywriters.net management/Quality Assurance?
The answer is yes.
E. Is the imposition of penalty/fines in accordance with its policy?
The answer is no.

The aforesaid questions above are the basic rudiments of DUE PROCESS. It is one of the pillars of a democracy. When there is an imposition of fines, it is considered punitive because you DEPRIVE the writer of what he LAWFULLY EARNED and therefore due process SHOULD be observed.

No complaint is ever presented. It is a mere claim and accusation of essaywriters.net. A sourcethat has been known not only as an entity which is profit-greedy but an entity with a track record of proven deception and lies!

Do you think that any claim or accusation proferred against a writer by this entity, is worthy of credence and belief?
Who determines 'guilt'?
Plagiarism--A software that identifies bibliographical entries as 'plagiarized'!!
Poor quality work and grammar--determined by people who cannot even construct (spoken or written) a proper sentence in English?
So finally, who determines guilt? An entity that has been known not only as an entity which is profit-greedy but an entity with a track record of proven deception and lies!It is axiomatic that in due process, the determination SHOULD be made by an independent, impartial, and fair tribunal--not one ridden by its own self-serving, self-aggrandizing, and greed-stricken motivations!

Of course, EW can issue press releases of alleged employees with PhDs and MAs and WITH adopted American names. Well, next time you do that please also attach the photocopies of the duplicate copy of the respective ITRs of these American employees with stamp-mark as 'received' by the IRS! Short of that, no one will believe anymore.

Imposition of fines--You DEPRIVE, WITHHOLD, and DELAY the receipt of fees already earned by writers. The fines are as much as or even more than the fees for the disputed order. And 'Jenna' spoke about 'stealing.' How can one steal something that already belongs to him! If there is anyone that steals, it is the entity that you are a part of.

Due proces exists in Ukraine. Walter Prochorenko, a well-known international business executive once wrote about Ukraine's observance of due process, "We have seen court decisions made even before the losing party was notified that a case was being heard. We have seen cases where the winning party presented no documents, no proof, no real witnesses, nothing, and still won. This is all while the losing party presented stacks of documents and even official witnesses. Due process of law in Ukraine has much to be desired. We have seen cases where there is official evidence of document falsification and yet the judges disregard such evidence." (ukraine-today.com/business/practical_guide/guide.htm)

Now, why does that NOT surprise me.

'On ne trompe point en bien'--We never deceive for a good purpose.

FRAUD is defined as trickery, an intentional perversion of truth in order to induce another to part with something of value.

Would you have parted with your money in payment of a paper, the source of which you do not know or that it is operated by people from Ukraine but hides such fact? Would you have parted with your services as a writer had you truly known that you are hired by someone so far away, such fact covered and shrouded by lies? Knowing that one may no longer have a legal recourse because the entity has no oversight body and is unregulated?

To all the writers who are reading this, make your choice. After reading and researching on your own and knowing all of this--would you still want to perpetuate fraud further?

Well of course for EW, comments against its profit-oriented agenda can easily be shrugged off as comments coming from COMPETITORS. But I do find that manner of thinking as delusional.

The American-owned and the other foreign-owned essay entities which are legitimately created and legitimately managed/operated although not free from flaws, violations, and mistakes, are NOT your competitors because they conduct business on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. A level playing field where all of them fairly compete with each other based on the legal rudiments of fair competition--where government regulation and oversight agencies exist to afford a venue as a means to vindicate and redress the trampled rights of their employees, the consumers, and their writers.

You see, "You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time."

Yes a good laugh! It must be the season . . It claims to be based in America but failed to specify an address. Perhaps, the owner has yet to receive a tutorial session from the owner of SuperiorPapers and its affiliates :-/

Domain Dossier:
Domain Name: SUPREMEESSAYS.COM
Registrar: ACTIVE REGISTRAR, INC.
Whois Server: whois.activeregistrar
Referral URL: activeregistrar.com
Name Server: NS100.WHBDNS
Name Server: NS101.WHBDNS
Status: ok
Updated Date: 01-sep-2008
Creation Date: 02-jul-2008
Expiration Date: 02-jul-2009
Registration Service Provided By: Active-Domain LLC
Contact: active-domain.com

Domain Name: supremeessays.com
Expiry Date: 02-Jul-2009
Creation Date: 02-Jul-2008

Registrant Name: Pavlo
Registrant Company: supremeessays.com
Registrant Email Address: infoessays@gmail
Registrant Address: Mashunobudivna
Registrant City: Kiev
Registrant State/Region/Province: AL
Registrant Postal Code: 33000
Registrant Country: UA
Registrant Tel No: +380.
Registrant Fax No:

I think he has not yet mastered the art of deception. He needs to be mentored by the master.

BTW, WB there is another pressreleasepoint.com/bestessayscom-gives-holiday-treat-outstanding-employe es-2008 - PR article written by a press contact with address at Morgan street, Bonifay, Fl 32425
There is no Morgan street in Bonifay. There is one in Queens, NY. Don't these people research anymore?

I think the Law School is located in a different campus--University of San Diego School of Law
The press release may be referring to San Diego City College. Please note, the City College's website contains its own sdcity.edu/pressrelease/default.asp - Press Releases and Media Stories for the entire school year 2008. I do not see any event covered by the City College's press releases or media stories which may be considered remotely similar to a 'freelance training seminar' referred to in the PR article of bestessays dated 23 December 2008.

Please note further that - siva-ph1.jobstreet.com/_profile/previewProfile.asp?advertiser_id= 36030 -writers.ph[DND*] which is a part of Uniwork, Inc., [/url]has an in-house group of writers as well as other staff who may have been assigned to write the press releases (which may also explain the writing style used in a few of the PR articles).

There were advertisements posted by the company for various positions:

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - Customer support representative - customer Relations representative

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - customer relations agent

callcenterjobs.grabeh.com/category/uniwork-inc - support representative

resumepromo.com/view.php?company_id=4591 - web developers

And recently (22 December 2008)

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - customer relations agent/customer service representative

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - sales representatives/account representatives

jobsdb.com.ph/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork+Inc.%22 - web copywriter -

jobsdb.com.my/PH/EN/V6/JS/JobSearch/JobSearch.asp?PN=JobListing&C ompanies=% 22Uniwork%2C+Inc.%22 (advert also in)

And in bestjobsindia.in/bt-empd-uniwork.htm - India

bestjobs.ph/bt-empd-uniwork1577.htm- also,

getafreelancer.com/users/680800.html - SEO link builder for internet marketing

linkedin.com/in/cherylestorgio - Some of the employees have also skills in writing articles, content and blogs

To all these websites, stop trying to fool the public and the consumers. By flooding the web with these PR articles, a perspicacious person would only arrive at a foul conclusion.

Another theobserver.ca/Community/NewsDisplay.aspx?c=10028 - press release this time from essaywriters.net[DND*]

She wrote: "Since essaywriters.net[DND*] is serious in their pledge of delivering service that exceeds expectation, the hiring will be no less than the standard of previous hiring. Among the requirements are MA diploma in History, extensive experience in writing and ability to communicate well.

The company is limiting the opportunity only those who are native speakers of English language. That is, only American and Europeans are able to submit their resumes. Otherwise, it will only be removed from the application bank.

The ruling of European-American Exclusivity in hiring is not to demean other races but to strictly implement the demands of clients. According to research, some problems causing closure of several companies operating in this niche is rooted on the professors' effortless detection of Eastern thought."

So are we saying that during the previous hiring there were no ESLs hired? (And I am not arguing in terms of inferior and sub-quality ESLs or qualified and superior ESL writers. I am just arguing from a point of fact, ESL as against EFL). Don't we have posters here who have admitted that they are writers for essaywriters.net[DND*] and are ESLs?

If ESL writers now are already avoiding Essaywriters because of the numerous complaints of non-payment and/or delay in the payment of their fees, how in world can Essaywriters attract Americans and Europeans in applying as writers when there is no forex to speak of. The only reason why ESLs who live in India, Pakistan and the Philippines apply as writers before was because they can exchange/convert the fees in USD into their own currency at a higher rate.

The problems causing closure of several companies operating in the same niche (and believe me, this does not need research!) is due to the observance and use of the very same practices which Essaywriters and its group have been employing.

Hey, ESLs of essaywriters.net[DND*] you are not 'needed' anymore. Do not feel bad, it should come to you as good news. They got tired of exploiting you.

Essaywriters can you please get someone better to write your PR materials. This one obviously contradicts herself.

It is hog wash.

San Diego City College TAKING POSITIVE ACTION AGAINST THE UNTRUTHFUL FABRICATED STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE PR ARTICLE OF bestessays.com[DND*]

Please recall a PR article entitled "San Diego City College concluded freelance writing seminar" was written for the benefit of bestessays.com[DND*] and was released on 23 December 2008, part of which I reproduce herein verbatim"

"The participants - mostly writers and recent graduates - learned a great deal about the benefits of writing travel articles. Another speaker was a professor from Sacramento who wrote film reviews and other lifestyle articles. She encouraged the participants not to limit their writing to topics that interest them, as it was the only way to be a freelance writer for a long time. The other highlight of the seminar was on essay writing. Two magazine writers shared their insights about some of their published essays. It gave the participants a hint on what topics to write about. A refresher course on essay writing was included in the program. At the end of the seminar, San Diego College acknowledged the valuable partnership of bestessays.com[DND*] by helping promote the site to the participants."

As appearing per link: malebits.com/article24912.html

And shown in these webscreen shots:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/SDCC_1.jpg

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/SDCC_2.jpg

San Diego City College President, Terence J. Burgess, Ph.D. wrote (after bringing the issue to his attention) and hereunder reproduced verbatim:

"Please be assured that San Diego City College does not endorse the use of term paper mills. I am referring your email to our district legal department with a request that they contact bestessays.com[DND*] and demand that references to City College be removed. Thank you for bringing this to my attention."

And as shown in the webscreen shot:

i424.photobucket.com/albums/pp328/busted_fraud101/San_Diego_City_college.jp g

Nothing personal, bestessays.com[DND*]. I just do not like the way you, your ghost PR writers and other affiliates MISLEAD AND LIE to the public. Is the above not one of THE MATERIAL, SUBSTANTIAL AND DIRECT EVIDENCE to prove an alleged FALSE ADVERTISING as defined and prohibited by the Lanham Act, the Consumer Protection Act and other pertinent and related laws?

It is only ONE OF THE MANY EVIDENCE that is in my possession. All of which "had been used and will be used LEGALLY."

I join the others here in CONDEMNING YOUR ACTS ALLEGED TO MISLEAD, FOOL, LIE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE CONSUMERS/PUBLIC.

I join the legitimate companies/LLCs and other entities (lawfully engaged in the business of essay writing, research and consulting) in CONDEMNING YOUR ACTS ALLEGED TO BE CONSTITUTING FALSE ADVERTISING AND FURTHER, WHEN TAKEN WITH THE OTHER EVIDENCE AS ONE ALLEGEDLY CONSTITUTING FALSE COMPETITION AND DECEPTION within the purview of the provisions of the Lanham Act, the Consumer Protection Act and other related laws.

I am very much aware of the steps that you would take or have taken to 'silence' me like the way you have tried to destroy others here by sending your 'cohorts' and by casting malice in the intentions of the other members.

Rest assured that I do not have any spectre in my closet.

@ MAK
Re:Quality Results Ltd
is a PLC

Company No. 05693852
Date of Incorporation: 01/02/2006
Name & Registered Office:
QUALITY RESULTS LTD
WINTON HOUSE, WINTON SQUARE
BASINGSTOKE
HAMPSHIRE
RG21 8EN

Former Office Address:(30 Apr 2007)
UNIT 150, IMPERIAL COURT
EXCHANGE STREET EAST
LIVERPOOL
L2 3AB
transferred to:(21 May 2007)
24 FINNS BUSINESS PARK
MILL LANE CRONDALL
FARNHAM
SURREY GU10 5RX

While,
Anagram Ltd --no such company registered. But there are:
Anagram Web solutions Ltd.
Anagram Text Solutions Ltd.
Anagram Systems Ltd.
Anagram Production Services Ltd.
Anagram People Ltd.
etc
There are about 20 registered under Anagram.

If we can be certain that it is Quality Results Ltd. we can easily secure a list of its members as of 2 January 2007.

I am just trying to help MAK. I am also bothered by this exploitation of writers.

@ MAK

Here is a link for: newyork.bbb.org/wwwroot/SitePage.aspx?site=24&id=fd1f73b4-7f3b-4e64-abd1-a9c7e26bba38

It does not have the authority to act in behalf of consumers/customers. It can only seek to resolve problems without litigation.

@MAK
You are welcome!

@Serene
You can perhaps write about your or your friend's experience in other websites for writers. I think it is high time that freelance writers have their own union/collective organisation, albeit there is the National Writers Union--for writers working in U.S. markets.

There are blogs I came across: writers beware blog; poewar or write articles about it; and write a press release (there are pr websites-you can google search that).

If the Ukrainian-owned websites can issue press releases containing lies, what is there to fear when you speak of the truth.
If this man threatens legal action then call his bluff. There is this legal strategy: if you and the other wronged writers cannot file a case against your opponent then solicit the legal action to be filed by him. You are spared then from the costs of filing fees. The other writers now who were vicitmised can come out and join the force in repelling his cause of action and in ferreting the truth.

Besides what will he file--defamation? Truth is a defence in a defamation lawsuit.

@serene
Now I do understand better your plight. But do not lose hope, we will get justice.
Are we saying that the writers are actually employees? I asked this because majority of the essay writing websites consider their writers as mere agents and not employees.

Personally, I do not know much of the background of Project1stClass, if you be kind enough to give me a few details through the email feature of this site or if you feel uncomfortable doing that, you can give me a background here at the forum. I may be able to "pull something out" of a few leads.

Academia-research? allegedly an affiliate of masterpapers. Most of the respective(U.S.) state laws on corporations and LLCs contain clear provisions on resident agent and being physically present within the state where they conduct business/and are registered or incorporated. I have my reservations about the physical presence of masterpapers business in N.Y.

By the way Serene, I am not affiliated with any essay writing websites.
Rest assured that something is being done. 'Moving mountains' can be a difficult task but let us hope :)


Anyone who brings forth a case will not be sure of anything--there are no guarantees of success but if party litigants keep their faith on the credibility of their evidence then there is a great fighting chance. Moreover, there are a thousand and one ways to "attack." ;)

Happy New Year to Everyone! Have a wonderful new year serene!

I skimmed through the earlier (older) posts. I shall look forward to the 4th or so then.

@MAK

Happy New Year!
Great New Year's Resolution! Should you need help, I am just around :)

By the way, I read the terms of work (TOW)--the writers and researchers are not considered employees. Under UK law, they are deemed 'workers.'

I quote verbatim: 'you do not have tax and National Insurance deducted from what is probably called a payment or fee rather than wages (though some workers do have deductions)'

I also have been reading about the conditons of visa for international students. I would need to know a few details to be able to apply the law i.e., period of course (6 months or over 6 months), etc.

@Serene--Please do not let this Richardson guy scare all of you--it is a mere scare tactic that he has been employing because you are not so clear on your rights and privileges.

project1stclass.com is unregistered and was a refunded domain on 6 Februrary 2007.

The domain dossier of dissertationsandassignments revealed that its Administrative Contact and its Registrant are NOT AVAILABLE.

@MAK here are the links:

https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/stclassprojects-projectstclass-qualityresult-370/
https://essayscam.org/forum/es/stclassprojects-qualityresultsltd-28/

I would agree with one of the members at that time--bring a money claim online and in addition a petition with the IWF.
By bringing individual money claims online before moneyclaim.gov.uk/csmco/index.jsp - Her Majesty's Court Service Money Claim per writer duped by this Richardson, these writers will be able to recover what has not been paid to them in terms of fees for the projects/orders which they have accomplished. The HMCS Money Claim Online only requires that the individual who makes the claim must be certain of the amount he is claiming. There are ways in collating evidence before one files his claim, I would suggest that those who would prefer taking this legal recourse to apprise themselves of the guidelines of the website and the procedure. The website offers very good suggestions on how to prepare a money claim.

Finally, I would suggest that all the affected writers file this claim (individually) but if possible within the same day or week with their complaints specifying (in each of their complaints/claims) that this Richardson has been unlawfully withholding what should be paid to writers as a usual practice in the conduct of his business.

Should there be questions anent how to prepare the complaint, you may email the customerservice.mcol@hmcourts-service.gsi.gov.uk--(customer service) or call their numbers as indicated at the website.

Should there be further inquiries and issues, MAK and I are here to help out. We need to look out for each other--getting back what you have rightfully worked for is ONE thing but for me, the most important step would be to alert the authorities that this has been going on so that others would no longer be further victimised. There is "force" in numbers--singly or individually, may not create the impact.

This Richardson has been allegedly identified to be a citizen and a resident of Greece and therefor, he is not in UK. The companies identified operating these websites including dissertationsandassignments are all PLCs or private limited companies which means that the monetary liabilities against the companies are to a certain extent the liabilities of the members thereof.

But we need to be certain that when each of you were deprived of your fees, it was this Richardson who was operating and managing the respective website/s where you rendered your services as a writer. It looks like at different points/period of time there may have been changes in management.

Another important issue that we need to be certain of, are the provisions of the Terms of Work (TOW)--there is a provision there that requires the writers to bring any issue relating to their services or "work" before the management thereafter, before an Arbitration body. We need to analyse whether the emails of Richardson (not his true name) are sufficient bases for not exhausting the remedies as provided in the TOW.

After the aggrieved writers have filed their claims online, you may desire to print or save all of them (including your supporting evidence) and attach it as evidence to the complaint before the IWF. This way--all of your respective statements and supporting evidence are also incorporated and included in the complaint/petition before the IWF. It saves our time to be drafting each complaint for each authoritative body.

It is so easy to register a PLC in UK because there are firms doing business there similar to eastbiz.com (U.S. counterpart) relative to electronic filings. The U.S. counterpart--eastbiz.com has been clearly discussed and explained by WB in his/her earlier posts. I have personally investigated/inquired about certain (essay writing websites) "companies" which have been allegedly engaged in these unscrupulous practices.

There is no self organised group or body of freelance writers solely for freelance writers to protect themselves against these practices and I feel that all of you need to start thinking about it. This forum can be a start to organise. It does not matter whether you do freelance writing as a full time work or as a part time work to augment your allowance or matriculation. All of you still render service as a writer.

There is FORCE in numbers. Sometimes, you feel ashamed if you were duped of a small amount of let us say, 50 or 80 USD as fees. The initial reaction is, "it is relatively a small claim, so why do I need to even complain about it." BUT, how many are there similar to you with a "50 USD or 80 USD" fees who have not been paid--there is a multiplier effect. Altogether, if you do not complain or make your voice be heard--YOUR INDIFFERENCE, if I may say so--create an environment to pave a good way to dupe other writers in the future. If you go through the posts anent this Richardson, it dates back to 2006--and now we have another/or a series of complaints again. One would think, if the the previous incidents were justly brought forth and resolved--this matter NOW, would not have transpired anymore. Shall we wait for 1 or 2 years more, to ACT?

There is FORCE in numbers; singly or individually, it may not create an impact.
You/We are a major part in this industry so you/we need to be responsible to shape and mold it so that it can be an industry where injustice can no longer prevail.

The website/persons concerned, as soon as they hear about this--may offer payment of what was owed or your fees--I would suggest that you still file your complaints because should you accept settlement at this early point, there still is a great risk that incidents of abuse and injustice similar to this would still occur to the other writers in the future.

I am not here to advance the interests of any essay writing website or company nor discriminate against a few companies/websites. My offer for help and assitance does not come with strings attached nor do I proclaim to be an expert. I am only here to help out and suggest direction or various methods that you are still at liberty to accept or refuse.

It really is TIME to do something about all of these.

@MAK

There is a danger that if we become too general and broad--the petition before the IWF and the money claim to be filed online before the HMCS may be dismissed or denied on certain legal grounds. MAK, we do not only need evidence--we need to draft the individual complaints and refer to each evidence that each respective aggrieved writer has. After filing it before the HMCS, then a copy can be saved and forwarded to IWF--all of each of said complaints as evidence to the general petition.

Here is my suggestion:
1. No offence meant to WB (as I am aware of her efforts to expose the scams and the injustice), I would strongly suggest that SERENE be made the '"facilitator." Serene is one of the aggrieved writers who used to write for the entity/entities managed by P. Richardson. She has inside information which none of us may know of and the other writers similarly situated would feel more comfortable because Serene IS one of them. WB is quite "controversial" considering that some of the members here have been trying to associate her with another essay writing website (not that I believe it) but the "move" to vindicate the rights of the aggrieved writers may be read and interpreted to be tainted by "other" considerations.

2. Everyone make the call and appeal (including Serene) to forward all evidence to be attached with each of the aggrieved writers email to Serene. Each of the email should contain a summary of their personal and material allegations/statements relative to their OWN experience while writing for the entity/entities managed by P. Richardson.

Let me stress, OWN because any allegation outside of the personal experience of the aggrieved writer would be stricken out as hearsay.

3. For Serene to collate all evidence and statements of all these writers including herself as complainants. Let us designate a cut off deadline specified in our appeal and call for evidence--as 28 February 2009.

4. Serene will then prepare a general email to you and me: The GENERAL EMAIL shall contain all the material allegations of each writer including the summary of what appears in each of the evidence of this writer. The email need not attach each of the evidence as it may contain the name of the writer.

For example:

"Dear MAK and Voir,
Complainant A:
1. She applied at Project1st class on 01 June 2006 and was accepted on 15 June 2006;
2. After working for 6 months, on 18 December 2006 and while writing the order no. 2345--she received and email from P. Richardson to the effect that: (here Serene copies and pastes the body of the evidence).

AND SO FORTH . . ."

After preparing this for each: Serene, you may send it via email--using the email feature of this forum--by sending it to each of us-MAK and I.

5. Then you and I MAK can coordinate with each other through the email feature of this forum/site. I am sure that the owner/Admin of this site would even welcome such an idea as he or she would be truly accomplishing the very purporse for which this forum was created--to help those who had been duped by the unscrupulous essay writing websites.

We coordinate the drafting of each of the complaint for each complainant and after finalisation, we post separetely here. For example: we finalise complaint for complainant A --you and I post here at the forum our assent and agreement to the final form for complaint A by saying " serene, we agree on the final form of the drafted complaint A for complainant A--" (we would not post the complaint here)then you and I (separately) send through the email feature of this site, the complaint for A to serene. In this case, we also not only protect the identities of each of the complaining writer and our identities but also the integrity of this "process."

6. We follow #5 until we finally accomplish and finalise the last complaint. We both need to apprise ourselves of the guidelines for collating evidence and drafting complaints for money claim under HMCS website.

7. As soon as the last draft of complaint is sent (by you and myself separately)to serene through the email feature of this forum/site, Serene sends individually the draft complaint for each of the complainant--to each and respective email addresses of the complainants. WITH a date specified to be the date when each of them would file their individual complaints before the HMCS website.

8. Each of this complaining writers who just have sent their individual complaints online HMCS will save the filing number designating their complaint including their respective complaints (saving this by using web screenshots (keyboard of their pc) and designating the saved web screenshots with their names, for example: Serene Harris A; Serene Harris B (if the complaint web screen shots of the complaint consists in 2 webscreen shots); otherwise, Serene Harris A. This shall be attached to their email to be sent to Serene. Their email shall contain for example: "Serene, Please find attached web screen shots of my complaint before the HMCS filed on ____ and designated by filing number/case no./ whatever no. HMCS assigned to the complaint. Please file before the IWF."

9. Since both us already know the extent of each of the writers' complaints--we can both coordinate about writing the petition. I would suggest you take the lead role in doing this because you are more knowledgeable in IWF petitions.

10. As soon as we both finalise the draft of the petition, we signify our assent here at the forum. Then you and I separately send via email feature of this site the final form of the petition. With the specified details as to where Serene would file this.

11. Serene now will copy and paste the petition we both drafted and underneath the same, she shall type all the names of the petitioners--or the complaining writers. Before sending this, she shall attach the webscreen shots of all the complaining writers.

12. Then we all wait and pray.

I know how cumbersome it is but there is no other way of doing it--taking into consideration the following important elements: a) protecting the identities of the complainants; b) protecting our own identities; c) protecting and safeguarding the INTEGRITY of the entire process; and d) and seeing the realisation of the basic purpose of this website, that is to help those writers who had been taken advantage of by unscrupulous essay writing websites.

The process herein outlined may be used by the others who may also improve and "fine tune" other details in the future. This is a BIG small step to clean the industry and vindicate the rights of the aggrieved writers.

MAK, if you have any suggestions, modification, etc. please feel free to let us all know.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * *
Let me take this opportunity to make the first call:
TO ALL THE WRITERS OF ENTITIES MANAGED/OPERATED BY A CERTAIN PETER RICHARDSON:
May we ask you to forward all your statements/summary of what transpired during your "work" as a writer for P.R. Please cite all the details like you are telling a story to someone who has to hear it for the first time. Please include dates, i.e. when you applied; when you were accepted as a writer; orders you took(details such as Order no., titles, etc.) Be truthful and do not exaggerate.

It is suggested that you follow the above summary, the way I posted my message--include everything to the smallest detail.
Please do not be hesitant and scared. Assert your rights. Please show that the writers are not a bunch of cry-babies who are merely satisfied in posting their experiences in this forum. Take positive action. Be responsible to rid the industry of these unscrupulous essay writing websites. What have we got to lose! If we keep silent . . .this practice will go on for years and years--vicitimising not only ourselves but also our friends and others. Make the first small but difficult step.

TRUTH will always prevail.
Please send all of your summaries and attached evidence to Serene. Thereafter, check you mail regularly for the final draft of your respective complaints and further instructions. Please do not worry the lapse of time or prescription, your complaint no matter how remote in time it is--IS VERY IMPORTANT because it establishes A PRACTICE DONE TO ALMOST EVERY WRITER.

Have a good day!

@Serene
I read about Tarangita and the previous posts made abt P.R. You may not have written for P.R. but you were accepted and only decided not to write for him later on. You have a friend who was allegedly duped by P.R.--that is sufficient to establish 'interest' and affiliation (past) in helping out other past writers who are similarly situated with your victimised friend (Perhaps, you can use the email feature of this forum to contact those writers based on their previous posts here).

I am referring to 'interest' to help out other writers who had been affiliated with P.R. just like yourself and your friend. I was not referring to 'interest' in filing your own complaint as you may not have sustained any "injury" pecuniary or otherwise.

WB is not/was not affiliated with any of the websites managed/operated by P.R. so the other writers who may have been victimised by P.R. may feel a certain hesitancy in coordinating with WB. But personally, I have no opposition to his/her helping out. Then again, I think that what I personally feel and think may not be controlling at this moment. We have to think or speculate about how the duped writers of P.R. may feel.

Besides, whatever evidence WB had unearthed about this P.R. guy or will unearth, will be included in the complaints. Moreover, I think everyone will fully agree that WB will be a good contact person doing whatever we are doing anent the Ukrainian essay writing websites. I and perhaps, MAK are willing to pitch in also with a similar move to be initiated by WB. She has greatly contributed in producing and bringing forth evidence against the fraud of the essay writing websites. Her contribution cannot be paralleled.

You have posted your email address here, thus duped writers of P.R. who are not members of this forum may send their summaries straight to you. I am not sure if WB has posted his/her email address here. Nevertheless, you may if you please, coordinate with WB but for purposes of this task--MAK and I will coordinate with you. Nothing personal, I am just trying to simplify--points of origin/source and contact.

And by the way, the proposed flow of how complaints can be brought forth to proper authorities is not intended solely for P.R. complaints. It may used by others for other essay writing websites.

I am sure there are quite a number of writers duped of their fees by P.R. websites--some may not even be members of this forum while some may have thought that the fees deprived of them may be minimal as not being worth complaining about. For me, just 2 writers who allege being duped of their fees is FORCE IN NUMBERS already. I am encouraging everyone, whether members of this forum or not--bring forth your summaries and send it to serene.

Let me underscore the fact that we have the following purposes in doing this:
a) To claim the fees that the complaining writers were allegedly duped/ or the fees which were unlawfully withheld; AND/OR,
b) To establish a pattern or a regular business practice of the P.R. managed/operated essay writing websites in taking advantage of its writers.

So regardless of prescription (which you may think) or length of time, the (ancient) duped writers may be able also to help out the writers who were recently deprived of their fees. Please help us out.

Serene, thanks for the compliment.

AND, if WB is being identified as one affiliated with a U.S. essay writing website as against the identified fraudulent Ukrainian websites : Let me reiterate to everyone what I earlier posted in another thread:

The American-owned and the other foreign-owned essay entities which are legitimately created and legitimately managed/operated although not free from flaws, violations, and mistakes are NOT your competitors because they conduct business on a LEVEL PLAYING FIELD. A level playing field where all of them fairly compete with each other based on the legal rudiments of fair competition--where government regulation and oversight agencies exist to afford a venue as a means to vindicate and redress the trampled rights of their employees, the consumers and their writers.

@WB
Perhaps it is also time to do the same for those victimised by the other essay writing websites/Ukrainian websites, etc.
We can file a complaint before
a) the State of Virginia anent those websites that claim to be located in that state;
b) the State of New York anent websites that claim to be located in that state; and so forth.
And since you are a consumer advocate, WB:
c) the FTC.

The above complaints, if filed with the above authorities will ADD to the other complaints which I "personally know" about.

FINALLY, there may be people who would venture on threatening us for whatever we are doing here: Please be informed that--
a) we are not doing something ILLEGAL here;
b) MAK and I, and the others are NOT COLLECTING ANY FEES FOR ANY HELP THAT WE EXTEND TO EVERYONE; and,
c) we are just EXERCISING OUR RIGHTS TO VINDICATE AND SEEK REDRESS.

So please, do not allow them to threaten you anymore.

You are entitled to your own lay opinions. But you see, the nationality of corporations and LLCs are not determined by the nationality of the individual incorporators/members. They are determined by law.

Now, as determined by law and reflected in their appropriate incorporation/registration before the proper state or federal government body, these entities still need to comply with legal requirements regularly while their respective corporations or LLCs are in existence.

So, I believe that you are both not privy to the compliance and therefore you cannot accurately and with certainty, conclude that it is genuine and in faithful compliance with the law.

Your conclusions are merely based on your limited experiences with the entity (This is a statement of fact and not intended to belittle your personal conclusions). If both of you feel that your rights are not injured in any way, then we are all happy for you. But it does not mean that others' rights are not violated.

You cannot DENY the other group consisting of those writers like you and who were deprived of what lawfully they should receive, as NON EXISTENT.


IT DOES MATTER, sorry to oppose you on that. We live in a society of laws. Laws exist to put order in the society and afford a safeguard to protect the general public against abuse. It affords a means to seek redress for those rights which were injured. It encourages businesses to flourish and prosper based on guidelines which the law sets forth for compliance.

You see, we do not live in an ideal society where, as you said "as long as writers are paid and customers get what they paid for" BECAUSE IT NEVER HAPPENED/IS NEVER HAPPENING THAT WAY.

So if you want to deny the existence of non-payment of fees to writers and low quality of products from certain essay writing websites--then, it is your prerogative to live your writing career in a LIE.

But no can deny that your other contributions have been a great help to enlighten others. So please help us out--perhaps not with this P.R. issue but with the other websites.

Let me take this opportunity to say that you are doing a good job, WB. Thanks!

@WB

Thank you.
In general, I made the "offence" (outside of this forum) already so their attacks would be most likely a "defence." I do not intend to "fight" in this arena.

My posts containing facts are based on evidence and the provisions of pertinent laws which anyone can readily check and confirm with due diligence.
Documentary evidence including the video you posted (also at youtube) as well as a few of the documentary evidence I posted can only be DISPUTED by the same degree of credible evidence and not by mere personal assertions of individuals.

BUT NO ONE was able to controvert them despite the lapse of considerable time.
Any intelligent member here or any reader of the posts for that matter, would just simply take out personal attacks and focus on the amount and nature of evidence posted and easily they can be CONVINCED of the truth and credibility of the evidence.

Again, my gratitude for your concern. I have been "scared all my life" and attacked a number of times, but based on my experience--Truth always prevailed.

As what I have posted in another thread, you have been attacked by these unscrupulous people as one allegedly affiliated with a U.S. essay writing website.

My answer to that is: So what? Assuming, that is so--you are merely "leveling the playing field" because the truth is, some of the other essay writing websites are engaging in an alleged "unfair competiton."

They take in ESL writers whether they be qualified or unqualified. They rake in profit by selling their services at a very low price. They do not pay their ESL writers (qualified or not). And when they leave, they take in more ESLs.There is an apparent lack of regulation of standards and an apparent lack of a machinery for these ESL writers to collect the fees which they were unlawfully deprived. All together, with these alleged fraudulent websites engaging in this practice, consistently and regularly--they destroy the name of the industry. They fool the American, Australian and UK public/consumers who avail of the services as to the source of the product or service including the competency of their writers. Now, it seems that the labels of "scams, low and poor quality, deceptive, lies" are attached to the reputation of the essay writing industry.

If I were the owner of a legitimately organised, created and incorporated/registered and legitimately managed and operated company/LLC primarily devoted to essay writing--I would be disgusted! Of course, there may be flaws and violations committed by these legitimate companies and LLCs BUT it is not a reason for these fraudulent websites to engage in unfair competion and false advertising. Allow the proper authorities and the courts punish the legitimate companies and allow the market forces to freely shape the industry.

It is a basic economic principle that is why unfair competition and false advertising are PROHIBITED BY LAWS. Therefore, anyone who would desire to raise the issue of RACISM, please rethink your arguments. I am not against ESL writers writing for legitimate essay writing companies because I know with an environment of fair competition, the industry would in no time, rid and purge itself of the unqualified ESL writers.

But no can deny ...
*no one. Sorry about the mistake.

I agree with you WB, that you pose a threat to them.


The essay writing websites which have been subject of (your) investigation, about which writers complained for not having been paid of their lawful fees and were discussed in this forum.


Perhaps, it may be an effective method but single and most? I would disagree. For me, the best and most effective is to prove violations of the provisions of the law.


Not really, there are a thousand and one ways to do it legally.
We talk of two aspects here:
a) preventing harm to writers--PROACTIVE; and
b) redress and vindication of those who allege to have been victimised (writers or customers/those who availed of the services of these websites but were allegedly short changed)--REACTIVE.

I would not subscribe to calling it "revenge" it is a mere retaliation. When there is retaliation, one opens himself to being sued for damages. Perhaps, only a difference of terminologies or semantics.

Personally, I would not want to be "playing their games." I call mine --applying the law and seeking justice.
My opinion, the "backlinks method" is good after writing about one's experience to the proper authorities. Then writing to the sites for the backlink removal would not be interpreted as profit oriented--or interference in business. There is a civil offence for unlawful interference with contract between parties. If I were the owner of the website allowing backlinks, I would think after receipt of a writer's email of complaint: "why complain here? Have you notified the proper authorities?"

Please allow me to discuss a little bit more:
The players in the industry relative to this issue of scams are:
a) owner/LLC/company of the essay writing website which is alleged to be fraudulent; (alleged to be not paying their writer/s despite considerable efforts to thresh out with them the issues or after resolving the issues, the writer/s feel that his/their rights were violated; alleged deception of consumers, etc.);

b) consumer/s-those who alleged to be short changed;
c) writer/s--(whether ESL qualified or not; EFL whether qualified or not); and
d) government--(state or federal and government intrumentalities and bodies).

Of the four: we only would expect 2 players to be aggrieved who may exercise their prerogative to bring forth a complaint (of a past injury--reactive), the consumer and the writer/s.

a) The consumer--very few if none at all, would want to bring a complaint even if they have been short changed because of the "weakness" of their position/situation. They cannot allege that they got an "F" because they presented in the university a written work of another and passed the same as theirs. They would immediately be expelled. The most that they can do is not avail of the pertinent website and post his/their experience on the web in forums, etc. which completely assures him/their anonymity of identity.

b) the writer/s--a group with members having different values and personalities.
b1) the indifferent writer--in the final stretch, he would not exert any energy to vindicate his rights or desire to collect the fees which were unlawfully withheld;

b2) the uninformed or misguided--those who believe that their position/situation is weak such as our international students in UK. This group includes also those who, albeit would like to demand for the fees owing but do not know of how to seek redress and vindicate their rights;

b3) Past victims who by reason of the length of time were discouraged to bring forth their opposition or complaint because of the apparent lack of "built-in mechanism or procedure" to seek redress.

b4) bold vicitms--those who would want to bring forth their complaints whatever would result out of their decision.

We seek to target b2, b3 and b4, by providing guidance in informing them that their misconceptions are misplaced. For instance, international students being "workers" as defined under UK law is not within the ambit of the visa conditions and therefore, they can bring forth their complaints without fear of being adjudged to have violated their visa conditions (but this will have to be addressed on a case to case basis because there are visas with clear prohibitions against work such as those with 6-month duration); by providing them a machinery or a mechanism to seek vindication of their rights. The b3--by encouraging them to relate their past experiences without assuring them of being able to secure the fees which had not been paid, but by informing them that they would be able to help others who had been recently victimised and helping others who may in the future--be vicitimised; that is by establishing the regular but alleged unlawful business practices of the pertinent website. The b4, by providing guidance and machinery/mechanism to bring forth their complaints.

Once the proposed procedure/mechanism is established and in place--others will follow suit. Later on, these writers will no longer need MAK, me or anyone--they will take the initiative. At the same time, these unscrupulous websites will slow down in committing these alleged injustices because there is already a built in procedure to expose them. And finally, regardless of the result of this FIRST move now, we are able to let the authorities officially know that these practices occur. Thus, the "reactive" serves as "proactive" as well.

Again, we are not assuring any aggrieved writer that he would receive the fees to which he is entitled to BUT we are able to inform the proper authorities. What have we got to lose? If the writers are fainthearted now to act then we can conclude that they are not worth fighting for and that their fate is something they truly deserved.

I am here because I still believe they are worth fighting for--which is also the very reason why you are here WB, MAK, Serene and others. We do no need a thousand of victimised writers--we only need two for starters. The future of this industry depends on these writers because we cannot expect the consumers to complain even if they have been victimised. Please mobilise, organise and show all of them that writers can no longer be exploited!

I would expect that complaints will be pouring. I would also expect that not all of these are legitimately from aggrieved writers but a few may be from the unscrupulous websites. MAK and I would know and we are at liberty to refuse to include it in our drafts.

I would suggest that you read my post again. You missed the point. First, allow me to correct your misimpression--I am not the owner of the legitimate companies or company so your use of the possessive pronoun "your" is misplaced. Second, do you not think that your question is based on a premise that is a fallacy of logic?

You are asking me to compare two values which are totally different, a fallacy. And if I may say, was not within the meaning of what I have posted, remotely or otherwise. You are asking me to compare the number of "customers who are serviced by your legitimate companies go unsatisfied vis a vis the customers who go unsatisfied by the the so called inferior companies"--Two values: legitimate companies and inferior companies. To the first group, legitimacy is determined by law. To the second group, inferiority is determined by accepted performance-based determinants.

One is legitmacy and the other is performance. There is no connection between both values. The existence of one value does not assure the existence of the other.


Suit yourself. The content of my post referred to the free interplay of market forces in an environment of fair competition.


Are we not engaging in another fallacy of logic? I was not generalising, you are.
I was referring to legitimate companies who would desire to hire ESL writers in a free market. I did not refer to hiring the ESLs over the EFLs. Now if you feel that ALL (you made the generalisation) EFLs are superior in the English language and if you own an essay writing website or company, you are totally at liberty to hire them over the ESLs. I have no qualms about it.

So if you would please excuse me, I have quite a number of things that beg my attention. I would rather not engage in a debate of mere generalised opinions between EFLs over ESLs anent the English language. You are entitled to your opinion. But, try to comprehend the thrust of my earlier post first.

Finally, if I may express my opinion: I think the issue is NOT one of EFLs vs. ESLs. The issue is one of deception--when a few websites claim to only hire ALL EFLs with Masters and PhDs but which in truth is NOT. Stated otherwise, I have no problem about legitimate companies hiring ESLs provided they do not mislead the public by claiming that ALL THEIR WRITERS ARE EFLs WITH MAs and PhDs. Therefore even without saying, I have gargantuan problems with illegitimate entities that hire ESLs (and exploit them by not paying their fees) and would mislead the public by claiming that ALL THEIR WRITERS ARE EFLs WITH MAs and PhDs.

Let us not try to muddle my post with issues not germane with my premise. Let us also not to try to divide the alleged victimised writers between EFLs and ESLs. I am very much aware of divide et impera of Machiavelli.

There is no rush, Serene. It is all right :)

The height of impertinence and insolence!

All hail WB! All hail to those who exert tirelessly their efforts, their time and use their own personal resources just so others may know of the TRUTH.

The path and climb WB, I and others have taken is long, difficult and rocky BUT if we join hands to ferret truth, we will all succeed--FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CONSUMERS/PUBLIC including the DUPED WRITERS.

My gratitude to WB and others, your efforts did not go unrecognised.

I truly understand what you have just related to this forum. This is the same sentiment of the other writers. The writers write for these entities in the hope of augmenting their income. There is nothing revolting about one's desire to will the best for his own or his family's life.

It is this very intent that some of these entities exploit and make 'use' of. I can only hope the best for you, that is for you to receive everything, in full and without any unjustifiable delay that which you have worked so hard for.

Should you feel later on that your rights have been trampled on, you are most welcome here to express your disgust and anger.

What others here seek is to lessen the risks, if not eradicate altogether the risks that ALL writers would have to face everyday in their writing careers with these entities.

Personally (and I am sure this goes with the others too), I/we am/are not here to condemn the writers who had become victims--they have suffered enough of having to face the-everyday-fear of not receiving their fees at all or with undue delay based on greed but sugar-coated with some flimsy excuse to withhold payment. I/we am/are not here to laugh at those writers who had become victims after refusing to heed our advice and warnings because I/we understand that part of human nature--that some people would rather experience things for themselves in order to believe.

I/we am/are here to be happy for those who may have justly received their fees and we can only hope that they would not suffer the same plight as most of the other writers here.

I/we am/are here in the fervent hope of enkindling and awakening that part of human nature--of compassion for others and of a universally accepted principle-- that there are times and instances when WE cannot just live for ourselves alone because to a certain extent, we need to look out for each other so that the industry where we seek to find that 'extra' for ourselves and our families can maintain and preserve its integrity. Towards this end and as a consequence thereof, we can assure ourselves that there would be a constant flow and payment of the fees, we have lawfully and justly earned.

WB, your hyper link which refers to this link https://essayscam.org/forum/wc/revenge-essaywriters-818/ is actually about "How to get revenge on essaywriters.net[DND*]" it does not refer to the issue and proposed procedure on the alleged acts of P.R. found in this thread https://essayscam.org/forum/es/projectstclass-peter-richardson-808/2/ and entitled "Project1stclass, Peter Richardson."

Anyway, perhaps I did not understand the connection, then my apology.

Let me just reiterate that immediately writing to websites (and may I quote you) "Tell your story--including an account of your personal experience and EVIDENCE from this forum--and the site owners will REMOVE the backlinks!" can be construed as tortious interference with a contractual relationship in cases where these backlinks are paid or rented because they are considered proprietary interests. An act of another which unlawfully interferes with the enjoyment of personal property is a tort for which an action shall lie.


The proposed procedure appearing in the thread https://essayscam.org/forum/es/projectstclass-peter-richardson-808/ refers to fees which lawfully were earned but with finality--allegedly withheld from the writers by the LLC concerned.

It does not refer to the delivery of substandard product nor the failure to make any delivery at all. Please further note that the idea of HMCS came from a member, Dylan with his post to that effect found at https://essayscam.org/forum/es/stclassprojects-qualityresultsltd-28/.


The name of the entity was mentioned by member, MAK in his post dated 30 December 2008, 10:12 am, as Anagram Ltd or Quality Results Ltd. I personally verified from the Companies House the registration of these entities in UK.

Thus, the jurisdictional issue which you raised has been amply satisfied.


Please do not preempt what the aggrieved writers may have in their possession as evidence. No one is privy to their evidence yet.


I would have to disagree with you. The USER GUIDE for HMCSspecifies the following conditions in bringing forth a complaint for the money claims:
(quoted verbatim in part)
" claim may be started using Money Claim Online if it meets all the following conditions -
(1) the only remedy claimed is a specified amount of money -
(a) less than £100,000 (excluding any interest or costs claimed); and
(b) in sterling;"

Therefore the amount involved in the money claim is less than £100,000or £99,999.99 and NOT as you claimed "for amounts under £1000."

Anent costs for bringing forth a complaint--the USER MANUAL specifies the following:
(quoted verbatim in part)
"Where this practice direction provides for a fee to be paid electronically, it may be paid by -
(1) credit card;
(2) debit card; or
(3) any other method which the Court Service may permit.
3.2A step may only be taken using Money Claim Online on payment of the prescribed fee. The County Court Fees Order 1999 provides that parties may, in certain circumstances, be exempt from payment of fees, or may be entitled to apply for fees to be remitted or reduced.The Court Service website contains guidance as to when this entitlement arises. A claimant who wishes to claim exemption from payment of fees, or to apply for remission or reduction of fees, may not use Money Claim Online and should issue his claim at a court office."

I have requested the HMCS to forward to me the instances where complainants are exempted from the payment of filing fees.


Again I have to disagree. It is not based on self employment. Have you read the LLC's TOW? I believe not.

I will quote the information from the UK Government website relative to definitions of the terms "employee," "worker," and "self-employed" as:

"Employee
The majority of people in work are employees. You're classed as an employee if you're working under a contract of employment. A contract need not be in writing - it exists when you and your employer agree terms and conditions of employment. It can also be implied from your actions and those of the person you are working for. Your contract will normally set out what you're expected to do. You'll usually be expected to do the work yourself - ie you can't send someone else to do your work for you.

Worker
This is a broader category than 'employees' but normally excludes those who are self-employed. A worker is any individual who works for an employer, whether under a contract of employment, or any other contract where an individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services. Workers are entitled to core employment rights and protections. The following groups of people are likely to be workers but not employees: most agency workers

short term casual workers
some freelancers
Self-employed
If you're self-employed, you do not have a contract of employment with an employer. You're more likely to be contracted to provide services over a certain period of time for a fee and be in business in your own right. You'll also pay your own tax and National Insurance Contributions (NIC).

You do not have employment rights as such if you're self-employed since you are your own boss and can therefore decide, for example, how much to charge for your work and how much holiday to give yourself. You do have some legal protection."

worksmart.org.uk/rights/i_work_through_an_agency_am_i - Another source of information:

"You are likely to be a worker if:

your employer only offers work as it is available, and you are hired to complete a task rather than attend between set hours
you can decide when you will work, and turn down work when offered
you can send someone else to do the work in your place if you want
you provide your own tools and equipment.
you do not have tax and National Insurance deducted from what is probably called a payment or fee rather than wages(though some workers do have deductions)."

(underscoring supplied)


Do you know that there is a CUT-OFF for those who need not declare their fees/income? Do you know the amount of the CUT-OFF? I guess not.


Perhaps because the writers are exempt from doing so.


Have you read the contents of a student visa? The basic conditions for a Tier 4?
I believe not.

BUT I DID--AND NOT ONLY that I personally spoke with officers of the UK Home Office, both from Immigration and the UK Border Agency. So, I feel that I know what I am doing. Besides, I have full faith that these aggrieved writers are intelligent enough to read and comprehend everything before deciding to make a "go" of their respective complaints.

I am wondering what motivated you to think and feel the way you do. If I would "listen" to what you are saying--I would feel that you sound like a "P.R." But of course, perhaps you are merely expressing your deep fears and concern for the aggrieved writers.





Cause of action is determined by the material allegations of actual and real facts. There is always peculiar element for every aggrieved writer in relation to his SOLE case/complaint. It cannot be determined by speculations, conjectures, or genalisations. Each complaint contains factual narration of events that transpired and NOT merely based on doubts or inkling. Short of any recital of facts sent to me and MAK (who identified himself to be a solicitor), any comment is a mere speculation or a call to discourage and preempt the aggrieved to seek redress.

And if were an aggrieved writer, I would just allow these people to kick me around--then I will whimper like a dog in one corner and tell myself, 'charge everything to experience.' Who cares about the rest of potential victims, I should not give a hoot.

But you see, I am not.

Generally, if there are not too many complaints, then perhaps some are truly just mere 'propaganda' but that does not detract from the fact that there were alleged violations of pertinent laws for which investigations of ALL are necessary.

By the way, I sent emails to WB and to this forum about a request to take web screen shots of the article in another thread. I have yet to receive a reply. Be that as it may, it is all right WB and Mod. I have sufficiently addressed the request. Thanks anyway. I have taken major steps already and I will be taking a few more till my adieu. Then I will watch.

Aggrieved writers,
These people capitalise and exploit your weaknesses both in terms of the lack of a built-in procedure to redress your grievances and vindicate your rights and the lack of sufficient knowledge of the rights and privileges granted to you by law.

They try to mislead you and threaten you with your fears which are based on your very own erroneous assumption of the weakness of your position.

It is your choice and prerogative to assert your rights or feel like 'losers' the rest of your life. Time to make a stand, time to 'put your foot down' or whimper in one corner.

Illegality is determined by a final judgment issued by the court after hearing.I am sure the aggrieved writers only have their ownexperiences to relate and not the sites' illegal activities. Perhaps, you are more in a position to relate to the backlink providers about these illegal activities.

Encouraging the aggrieved writers to relate the sites' illegal activities not within their own personal knowledge would imperil them. However, I am confident that since you were the one who initiated this, you would be magnanimous and charitable enough to extend support in their legal strife.

Your post: "Without backlinks, their sites will fall lower in Google and other search engines, which means less business and fewer orders."

Reputation? Is this what this whole thing is about? Preservation of reputation and destruction of reputation? I must be in the wrong place. I thought people are here to relate their experiences, to inform, to warn and to discuss constructively the recommended courses of action that the aggrieved parties can obtain and opt for so that they can get JUSTICE--so that a repetition of unjust acts can be eradicated or discouraged.

I do not subscribe to TOPPLING DOWN businesses whether legitimately or illegitmately created; whether operating and managing under legitimate or unlawful business practices using UNORTHODOX ways (my opinion). I do not have any proprietary interests in any of them.


Nothing wrong--but must be couched on proper terms and done in good faith. Otherwise, there may be negative results. I recall a case where there was a stoppage of a site that sought to inform. Well, both parties were not able to enforce their default judgments considering that there was no treaty between the countries of which they are nationals.

But again, your recommended action on backlinks relate to essaywriters.net and its affiliates and NOT about the issue being discussed here involving a UK site.


Please, save it. But thanks anyway. I do not prefer being a recipient of other people's 'charities.'


A little prudence, won't hurt. I am sure you know that cases can be thrown out based on small jurisdictional issues.


Thank you for your suggestion but you see, it is my prerogative not to do so since the discussion was not limited to the request for information on exemptions.


You lengthily discussed and critiqued the proposed procedure which is intended for this specific UK site and NOT intended for MOST companies. I am sure you know that a case is analysed and studied based on its details, its evidence and its specific facts so that a procedure and a legal strategy can be adopted to "tailor-fit" for the case. The earlier posts included a link on the TOW (evidence) of this specific UK site. Therefore, the proposed procedure was adopted BASED ON and drafted in the LIGHT OF the facts and evidence preliminarily obtaining in the case. (PRELIMINARILY--because statements of the aggrieved writers and their respective evidence ARE YET TO BE SUBMITTED,that is why the procedure is referred to as PROPOSED). However, your discussion and critique was couched on general terms using MOST companies EXCEPT THE SPECIFIC UK site which is the object of the proposed procedure. I did not refer to Academic Knowledge--the first time I heard of it--my interest is centered on the issue being discussed. Moreover, your assertion that most of these writers are employed on a freelance basis negates your earlier assertion


that these writers are self employed because the industry is based on self employment. Self employment is different from employed on a freelance basis.

Please refer to the legal definitions of the terms.
"Worker
This is a broader category than 'employees' but normally excludes those who are self-employed. A worker is any individual who works for an employer, whether under a contract of employment, or any other contract where an individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services. Workers are entitled to core employment rights and protections. The following groups of people are likely to be workers but not employees: most agency workers

short term casual workers
some freelancers
Self-employed
If you're self-employed, you do not have a contract of employment with an employer. You're more likely to be contracted to provide services over a certain period of time for a fee and be in business in your own right."


I did already yesterday.


I am sure you feel that way. I respect your feelings. I and perhaps MAK, would agree that I or MAK and I am/are not here to engage in "grandstanding" (I am not saying that you are) nor engage in a contest that seeks to measure knowledge. I am also not here to correct other members' grammar because I know that I am not perfect myself. I do not engage in critiquing other's proposition unless I can advance and suggest another (not necessarily a better) recommendation but definitely not just whimpering in one corner. It is part of good taste (my opinion).

"Humility is the sure evidence of Christian virtues. Without it, we retain all our faults still, and they are only covered over with pride, which hides them from other men's observation, and sometimes from our own too-- François, Duc De La Rochefoucauld."


Please let me repeat myself: The proposed procedure is directed/intended for aggrieved writers of the specific UK site. It was never intendedfor those who avail the services of the essay writing website/customers.

I am very much aware of the reluctance of students and those who avail the services of these websites. In fact, my earlier posts addressed this matter specifically: My Post of 04 January 2009, 1:33 am:

"a) The consumer--very few if none at all, would want to bring a complaint even if they have been short changed because of the "weakness" of their position/situation. They cannot allege that they got an "F" because they presented in the university a written work of another and passed the same as theirs. They would immediately be expelled.The most that they can do is not avail of the pertinent website and post his/their experience on the web in forums, etc. which completely assures him/their anonymity of identity."

This I believe in: I do not want to engage in comments and discussions regarding anyone's proposition on how to deal with the aggrieved writers plight especially if it comes from one who is only motivated in good faith, to help and assist others UNLESS, I also can come up with an equally constructive and plausible suggestion. I respect people's efforts in advancing their proposals.

I am a "builder' not a "destroyer." And I do "walk my talk."
So, if you would excuse me now--I need to continue "the walk" and less of "the talk" and then I will watch.

Goodluck and more power to this site for unparalleled assistance to others! I think it is the only remaining site dealing with essay writing practices.

aged 69 to 73 years old


age: early 30s

Shall I say more? I guess not--not here.

This is just for the information of everyone. I am not taking any sides in this "fight."


Dimitry Ivanovich Golubov was apprehended by the Ukrainian police (in Ukraine). He was charged before the the Central District of California in 2006 for a number of cyber crimes including credit card fraud.

Thus, legal action is feasible. If we do not uphold our laws, how would we expect others? If we use means outside that provided by the law, we may open ourselves to possible lawsuits as well--then we become no better than the alleged criminals we abhor, who violated our laws with impunity.

@exwriter

Suit yourself. The "spotlight" is on you. I do not really care much.


The amount of claim contained in the complaint determines if it should be filed before the HMCS. Jurisdiction defines the limits or territory within which authority may be exercised.

Thus,
When HCMS specified: "claim may be started using Money Claim Online if it meets all the following conditions: a) less than £100,000 (excluding any interest or costs claimed); x x x" It refers to the limits of its authority. A complaint containing a money claim let us say for, £1M would not fall within its authority. It is a matter of jurisdiction. Jurisprudence is another thing.

BUT, then again--go ahead, suit yourself. You are entitled to what you believe in.


Are you not bent on helping others? when you youself had been victimised as you have claimed?
Can you not even lift a finger to advance some constructive way/plan of addressing the alleged unjust practices?
Will you just repeat to every victimised writer here who complains, "charge it to experience and bear the loss, find a better company"? Has it not even crossed your mind that these writers with sufficient intelligence may have already have thought of what you have been repeatedly saying and yet would still like to pursue and take action?

So let us just allow the alleged unjust business practices to flourish and for the victimised writers to bear their loss. After all their experiences can highlight the 'legitimate' companies.

Of your 110 posts, you never even ventured on trying to think of a legal way to assist these people being a brilliant, well-respected and much revered barrister that you are?

I only have to stay a few days consistently to get the entire picture of everything here. I surely enjoy watching. People come and go with complaints and stories of fraud and injustice but not a SINGLE SOUL was ever assisted or given any sufficient direction towards collecting a SINGLE DIME (not referring to the site).


And (among other means) making use of the aggrieved writers' actual experiences to accomplish such an end. Thanks for the clarification.

@exwriter do not bother me with your posts. I do not intend to dignify them with replies.

I can see that very well. Good luck!

Now, back to a part of my real work and watch "how the wheels of justice grind."
I surely enjoyed all of this.

I missed something!


YES of course! And this "legal action" that you want to be rammed down in people's throats is-----


otherwise stated, People-- writers get kicked around, feel the pain, bear the loss and whimper like a dog in one corner! That is very helpful!


Were you not taught in law school never to apply generalisations unless you have the actual evidence and recital of facts?

It is very clear that you sought to discourage victims to take action--you sought to preempt and block a proposed procedure that sought to secure justice for the victimised writers by making your general assumptions and applying them on YOUR OWN speculations and conjectures.





Give it up.


Sorry but the only thing "big" that I see is your HEAD.


Very frustrating! Why do I keep looking for legs from snakes!

@exwriter do not bother me with your posts. I do not intend to dignify them with replies--a task that I find very frustrating.

Oh! Now, I am disappointed.

You just posted in another thread: essayscam.org/forum/wc/legal-recourse-writing-companies-fail-pay-writers-824/#msg11152 "My eyes are wide open."

Do you not want to find out at whose instance the prosecution was brought? It is a simple equation: who brings prosecution (remember I used the word 'charge') in Ca or the U.S. for that matter?

There was NO BILL to speak of.

Goodluck to you, WB!

For those who were truly vicitimised, assert your rights. There are a thousand and one ways to do it legally. Some people are not creative enough to think of ways to truly help others (I am not referring to you WB). As to the 'whys' I would prefer not to venture on that because it concerns motivation, affiliation, interest, preference, etc.

Years passed and it is the same old song that we sing. Perhaps, it was made to be that way.

Now, more work to do. Is it time to put people behind bars? (rhetorical).

Of course you DID help! A lot if I may say. . .

exwriter:
the bet form of action would be to discontinue working for the company once there has been a problem receiving payment and put your losses down to experience, or don't start working for these companies in the first place. Learn from the experience of others and try to find companies that will pay for your time and efforts.


I am sure you do know how to read theDisclaimer:
3. All posts are anonymous unless the poster decides to reveal his or her personal details.

It is my prerogative whether to divulge my personal details. Of course, I am quite sure that you will again THROW YOUR WEIGHT AROUND like an insecure threatened brat.


I do not have the penchant to ASS-UME like you do--because it is all plastered here at the site.


And you discourage the victims because there were two people who wanted to help them for free. Such MAGNANIMITY!


Thanks for your candidness.
I do not live my life miserably--that is REAL.


Misplaced conclusion. Read the premise, I am sure you have diligently studied logic.And who said we were collecting money.

My POST: 03 Jan. 2009, 8:24 pm.

"b) MAK and I, and the others are NOT COLLECTING ANY FEES FOR ANY HELP THAT WE EXTEND TO EVERYONE"

How many times do I have to post 'history'? The problem with you is you keep on grandstanding without even trying to apprise yourself of the ACTUAL FACTS. And when it is pointed out to you--you throw your tantrums. Do you 'fight' in court even without knowing the background of the case?


Talking about yourself. People will just have to read the posts. If you were (that is an IF) my lawyer, I would want to go straight to the guillotine to spare myself of all the agony of your mistakes and haughtiness.


Sure, your actual experience in court and WITHOUT ACTUAL RECITAL OF FACTS AND ACTUAL EVIDENCE.
I agree, I have little knowledge perhaps even a lack of knowledge IN APPEARING BEFORE THE COURT WITHOUT EVIDENCE AND ACTUAL RECITAL OF FACTS OF A CLIENT AND PROSECUTING/DEFENDING BASED ON "I suspect that, I doubt, I suspect, potential legal action!"

I give that to you--You are an EXPERT on that.


It is none of your business. What is it to you anyway. Your concern? Mind your own business.


Lecture time Folks! I am sure you wanted to be a teacher when you were little. Folks, see how bossy and how haughty brilliance can ever be!


And what? Give you another ocassion for grandstanding again. Content yourself with one stage.


If you were the judge, you would have to inhibit yourself for pre-judging the case. See how biased you are? There is no evidence yet, no recital of facts by each complainant/claimant--the procedure is a proposal--and here you are throwing your useless weight around--prejudging doomsday when no one has even started at all!

You are just ENVIOUSbecause people can have the luxury of extending free services to help others!
Who are you protecting?


Let me refresh your memory:


This is basic in law school! I think you are the one confused.


I am not competing. See how threatened you are? Life for you is always a competition--always wanting to outprove everyone.Perhaps, it is time to grow up!


We were discussing until you appeared and decided to grandstand. We were still planning, thinking aloud--no evidence, no facts yet, no complainants yet!READ! "I would suggest that those who would prefer taking this legal recourse to apprise themselves of the guidelines of the website and the procedure. . .Should there be further inquiries and issues, MAK and I are here to help out."

Then you came . . with your 'you will never make it' attitude[/b[b]]! Such audacity, when you cannot even get the preliminary facts appearing in the previous posts STRAIGHT.

You posted the TOW of Academic Knowledge when the TOW of Project1stClasshad been posted previously; the application of the procedure to the customers when the proposed procedure was intended for the writersand was stated very clearly; your confusion between self-employed and freelancerswhen I have pasted the information from a Government source, etc.

You DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO READ AND APPRISE YOURSELF of the background but easily and conveniently--you CONCLUDED EVERYTHING WITH your 'you-will-never make-it-attitude.'

Misinforming?
READ! "I would suggest that those who would prefer taking this legal recourse to apprise themselves of the guidelines of the website and the procedure. . .Should there be further inquiries and issues, MAK and I are here to help out."

What the hell do you think these writers are?! Stupid people who do not know how to understand, read and comprehend?!

If there is anyone who is MISINFORMED IT IS YOU! You failed to INFORM YOURSELF OF THE BACKGROUND, THE PRELIMINARY FACTS AND THE STAGE OF DISCUSSION!and, PREMATURELY YOU PREEMPTED EVERYTHING!


and you are a barrister? Further, I shall sayeth naught!

Signs of Insecurity
Defensiveness
An insecure person cannot handle criticism. They're not open to hearing about ways they might improve. If they disagree with the criticism, they try to argue because they're not happy with who they are.

Read all the posts platered here.

Can't Enjoy Silence
They fill every void with meaningless chatter, almost to avoid having to reflect on themselves. The unfortunate consequence is the annoyance of everyone around them, who secretly look for an escape.

do not bother me with your posts. I do not intend to dignify them with replies--a task that I find very frustrating.

Self-Promoting
Insecure people tend to talk about themselves constantly, as if they feel like they have to prove themselves. Self-promotion is paramount to over-compensation for doubt.


Bullying
Insecure people feel threatened by others, and one way to cope with this is to try and squash them. The most threatening person of all to an insecure person is a secure person, because they can sense their power.


Overly Authoritative
Insecure people tend to compensate for their lack of confidence by taking out their frustrations on others.


Overly Competitive


Materialistic
An insecure person does need to show off.


EX-cessive use of !!!! --calm down and balance your emotions. Your emotional immaturity can be easily detected.

NOW, Go to HELL and ROT!

Funny. I hope you can keep that sense of humor for a long time. Some people find it endearing :)

magnanimity

Check the dictionary--it's the CORRECT SPELLING. Perhaps, YOU ARE NOT USED TO SEEING AND READING THE WORD.


A total LIE or HYPOCRISY? Everyone can see how you are.


What is it to you?! Be content with what you are paid for discouraging the writers to vindicate their rights!


You are pathetic!It was used to signify painful death which is better than to experience the AGONY of your mistakes and haughtiness!
Now, is there still a need to spell it out for you?


Sure you are warning POTENTIAL LITIGANTS because there is a need to protect not the potential litigant.

WHO are you protecting?


You really are DISPLAYING YOUR IGNORANCE. Defensiveness? When I clearly said I will NOT DIVULGE MY PERSONAL DETAILS. That is not defensiveness!
I am not defending anything--I AM MERELY EXERCISING MY PREROGATIVE!
You really are one INSECURE THREATENED BRAT.

If they disagree with the criticism, they try to argue because they're not happy with who they are.
They fill every void with meaningless chatter, almost to avoid having to reflect on themselves.


Come up with something ORIGINAL!


Assess what!? when there is no case, no evidence yet, no complainant yet, no recital of facts yet--PREMATURE PREEMPTION! WHO are you protecting?!

And give an opinion on the likelihood of the success of that case?

and you are a barrister?


I am sure you will be paid by those you protect.


Calm down because your arguments are all scattered.
An assertion is a mere declaration. Substantial evidence is more than a mere scintilla of evidence. So, if we have less of a mere scintilla of evidence it will not prevail over a MERE ASSERTION which the courts usually consider self-serving.

COME ON! Clearly another case of your-----

"


You are just destroying yourself here. Better go back to work, you need to pay your bills.
I am no longer going to reply to your posts because I feel sorry for you right now. I would only be destroying you further.


Because of people like you, PREMATURELY PREEMPTING WITH A YOU-WILL-NEVER-MAKE-IT ATTITUDE . . . . . . . . WHY? everyone has an idea now.

You are just destroying yourself here. Better go back to work, you need to pay your bills.
I am no longer going to reply to your posts because I feel sorry for you right now. I would only be destroying you further.

We were discussing and you threw your worthless weight around, over proving, over compensating, insulting, arrogantly GRANDSTANDING and attacking me!
I EXCUSED MYSELF SEVERAL TIMES but you persisted in your INSULTS AND ATTACKS.
I only returned the FAVOR!Trying to be 'meek and humble' now WILL NOT DETRACT FROM YOUR ARROGANCE AND YOUR PERSONAL INSULTS EARLIER.


Denial is the weakest defence.



Yes, you are a writer.


PREMATURELY PROTECTING--when there is no evidence yet, no complainants yet, no recital of facts yet--BY GRANDSTANDING, ATTACKING AND INSULTING ME! Prejudging doomsday when [b]no one has even started at all![/b]You DID NOT EVEN BOTHER TO READ AND APPRISE YOURSELF of the background but easily and conveniently--you CONCLUDED EVERYTHING WITH your 'you-will-never make-it-attitude.'

You failed to INFORM YOURSELF OF THE BACKGROUND, THE PRELIMINARY FACTS AND THE STAGE OF DISCUSSION!and, PREMATURELY YOU PREEMPTED EVERYTHING!



Stop benchmarking.


Do you still NOT GET "THE DRIFT" shall I spell it out for you?I DO NOT WANT TO HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU--I FIND YOU DISGUSTING, ARROGANT, HAUGHTY, INSECURE PIECE OF EXISTENCE!


MY POST:


NOT PAYING ~ NEED TO PAY

a matter of comprehension. . .


You do not scare me at all.


From arrogance and haughtiness, now threats and bullying tactics. You can ask anyone you please--the hell I care.


Coming from someone with comprehension problems of basic terms. You see, your overuseof that manifests your insecurity.


THEREyou go . . .that is what you have wanted all along. You should not have wasted my time.


My time is well spent doing that among other things, WB. All of you have limited knowledge of what really is 'out' there.

I am sure that--that PIECE OF EXISTENCE WHO I FIND DISGUSTINGLY DREADFULwill twist this post and infuse malice like the way he did in this post:

"I kind of got the impression from the posts of Voir that he/she is hoping to cash on the hard work you have put into exposing the fraudulent sites, and then tries to establish him/herself as a kind of redeeming angel"

This is BUT A SHALLOW, SUPERFICIAL and MALICIOUS PERVERSION OF TRUTH. I do not hope or intend to cash on the hard work of anyone because (and I am saying this with all humility) the hard work, the expense, and the risks that I have taken may be more than what anyone here (forum) has taken considering that my objectives are far broader than those stated in this site.

I will personally deal with himafter I finish what I need to do. I will make him EAT, MINCE, CHEW and CHOKE ON EVERY INSULTING AND MALICIOUS WORD HE SAID.

Oh please, do not take it as something personal or as a challenge to youor to the others who seek to expose the fraud and the scam here at the forum. It was not meant that way therefore there is no need to defend your turf as I have no intentionof being a part of it.

IT was meant to allude to the factual and evidentiary considerations that may define the entire extent of the criminalitywhich may be in the possession of international OR national law enforcement agencies like the INTERPOL.


Whatever malicious allusions and imputations that--the member I referred to earlier may have brought to sway, mold and shape your thinking and perhaps of a few others here about me, is evidently the very essence of what I abhor and loathe about what he (that member) sought to accomplish. This will be dealt with in due time.

Now, let me leave you in your turf. No one is challenging your unparalleled contributions and efforts but please be mindful of the fact that there are others, officially or otherwise who also in their own small way, contribute resources and information. No single person or organisation has the monopoly of knowledge or resources.


Now, you know how it feels
to be accused of that BECAUSE you accused FIRST.


I was merely describing a NATURAL REACTION that anyone who FINDS himself in my position would feel.

]


/forum/ot/site-fraudulent-others-825/ - selective memory
Inconsistent.

Pardon my intrusion WB and eastside.

I think the site you were referring to was formerly *********.org Some or majority of the contents appearing on the former site are rehashed in this new site of scamessays.

Domain dossier verification shows that the first site's IP address is :74.220.194.233
with a net range: NetRange: 74.220.192.0 - 74.220.223.255 while the second site has an IP address of 74.220.219.56 with the same Net Range as the first which is: 74.220.192.0 - 74.220.223.255

Bravo WB! Good Luck.

Changing their address does not exculpate them from their previous violations/liabilities. I think the 'shake down' has started :)

They provide virtual offices :) virtualoffices.regus.com/products/mailbox-plus.htm - mailbox plus
2 businesses listed for 1222.yippie.biz/va/reston/ - Suite 100