Hello 'DND2012'

I review writer's work for WritePass. I just wanted to comment on your remarks, as I feel they might give a less than impartial impression of the company. I've been working for them for 3 years, starting (like you) as an essay writer, and I've stayed with them because I like the way they work and I like the people who run it. I've worked for agencies I'd never touch again with a bargepole as well.

WritePass have a review process which is designed to give clients a good service. I didn't like it when it was introduced - as a writer I felt it was just another hoop to jump through before getting paid. Quite frankly it hurt my pride to have to revise work. But it's there for a reason - so the client doesn't get ripped off.

The problem with the work you submitted was that it just wasn't of an acceptable standard. There were many grammatical mistakes, and insufficient references. The aims and objectives were unclear (in a dissertation this is really important), your arguments weak and your logic in places faulty or poorly thought-out. Finally, the structure was inappropriate, with sections of the literature review placed in the methodology (for example). If you were a client who had paid good money for a decent piece of work, would you be happy to get something substandard? I know I wouldn't.