The best online research materials are the ones that the students themselves provide to the writer.
Negative. A writer with thousands of academic projects under his belt is
much better at finding appropriate source material than his clients; that's one of the reasons they hire a professional writer.
It is only logical that they provide as much reference materials as they can since their professors have required reading for the lessons.
Negative. Sometimes, students do provide some source material, but much more often, they provide me with absolutely nothing besides the assignment prompt. If there's something unusually specific about the sources required for a project, I'll ask for them, but that happens quite rarely.
As such, the student is constrained to use the class references.
Rarely. In my experience, only about 10% of projects limit sources to course materials. In fact, the most common direction that I've encountered in 20 years of doing this is project specs that say students
may use their textbooks but that the project specifically requires several sources
in addition to the course textbook.
Professors also warn the students beforehand about websites, news sources, and other online references that are unacceptable in terms of verified information.
Students often
need that kind of instruction because, otherwise, they'll typically use Wikipedia and other totally inappropriate source material that they find online. When students do provide source material, about half the time, it's exactly that: either Wiki stuff or simply the first few things that popped up when they spent 5 minutes Googling keywords from their assignments. I definitely don't need any "help" finding source material from students who just received instructions from their professors about how to identify academically-appropriate sources last week for the first time in their lives.
Ask the student to provide the materials to avoid confusion and to ensure the academic integrity of the paper, as far as the professor is concerned.
Negative. This only
adds confusion and wastes time. I don't need any help from students finding high-quality sources
or (especially) making sure that my work meets the expected standard of academic integrity.
If you are asked to write a paper using your own sources, then make sure to have the student approve the materials and websites you have decided to use first.
OMG. Absolutely not. The
last thing that any highly-experienced and very busy writer needs is to pause on every project, waiting for each client to "approve" the sources I'm using in between the research phase and the writing phase. Occasionally, this is required by the professor, and if the source list is due much earlier than the project, there might be an extra charge for that, simply because it means that I have to spend time on the project long before I actually sit down to write it a week or three later. Whether or not there's a charge for that depends on several factors, including the project type and length and the deadline; but if it's not charged, that's just a courtesy, especially if it's a project that I'd ordinarily research and write all in one sitting.
The last thing a writer wants to do is revise a paper due to a problematic information source.
If the original project specs require specific criteria for sources (e.g. publication years, peer-reviewed journals, primary sources, etc.), then the client is entitled to a free revision if the sources used by the writer don't meet those criteria. However, anytime the specs don't specify or limit what sources may be used, there are no free revisions based on specs provided only after the fact. If the specs say nothing about the sources (or if the client fails to share any applicable specs in the original order), our only obligation is to use academically-appropriate sources. A revision necessitated by any mistake or omission in the original order is always charged.