EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Forum / Writing Careers   % width   32 posts

Patronized by ESL and EFL writers - Thanks Guys For Helping Me Out!


ukranianexpert  2 | 5  
Jul 04, 2009 | #1
I was satisfied when I posed as 'Ukranianexpert' and laboured all through to produce a horrible piece of post and did manage to elicit some responses with varying degrees of perspectives. Truth be told, I am undertaking a Masters dissertation(Linguistics) and I had posed in an attempt to obtain data for my thesis(I have done so in several forums and I must thank those who contributed for helping me with my research).

Patronized WriterThe gist of my thesis is that the internet is producing a variety of written English that is syntactically equivalent to spoken English and thus influenced by the cultural sphere inhabited by the user of this interesting variety of English.

Crucially though, I'd want to assume that this site is patronized by both ESL and EFL persons with strategic interests in writing and buying 'custom written' essays. However, one thing that struck me is an ongoing war of posts between ESL and EFL posters with the former being maligned for 'cheating' customers and, generally, providing poor services -specifically through deployment of sub-standard English.

Well, as an English teacher in China(though I am currently in California for my masters), I must emphasise that English as a language is very dynamic and context specific especially when it comes to specific socio-cultural ecosystems.

The notion of Standard English language is quite absurd as, literally and practically, there is nothing like standard English(Crystal 1997?). As a native citizen of UK, I have had the privilege of interacting-both orally and textually- with varieties of English language and a key observation I have made is that English and culture are inseparable; For example, a speaker from, say, Nigeria will communicate the same point as a speaker from India BUT use completely different linguistic devices to communicate.

Well, it is no doubt that EFL and ESL who acquired English language at the critical level(roughly age 9 as per my research) can speak/writer better English than ESL who acquired the language only later in life. Hence, to me it'd appear quite an uphill task for ESL who have only interacted with the Language sporadically to research and produce quality writing. HOWEVER, that doesn't mean that an ESL cannot produce a quality piece of writing- it does happen but must be fuelled by extensive interaction with the language in both oral and written contexts. Practice perfects.

I am also dismayed that students' laziness has fueled a big industry where custom papers are sold for 'research purposes' but I'd bet my life that no student can spend upwards of $500 for a paper and fails to hand it in as his/her own.

All in all, I thank all who contributed to my posts and...wait----a rule for researching and using internet data states that one can use data from any website provided that such data is a) publicly archived b) doesn't expose the identity of the author and c) there is no any rule on the website stating that data cannot be used without permission of the publisher.

So guys cheer up!
Mary Williams
WritersBeware  
Jul 04, 2009 | #2
BUT use completely different linguistic devices to communicate.

Likely, neither person's use of the English language would be acceptable to the average, paying, EFL consumer who has been falsely guaranteed a "native English-speaking" writer.

I am also dismayed that students' laziness has fuelled a big industry where custom papers are sold for 'research purposes'.

Congratulations-you're dead. Multiple forms of proof have already been posted in this forum.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #3
all you did was sound inauthentic, racist, totally transparent, and a little bit amusing. no one bought it (except maybe WB).
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #4
ROFLMAO!
WritersBeware  
Jul 05, 2009 | #5
except maybe WB

If you believe that I believed it to be genuine, you REALLY need help.

"ROFLMAO!"
OxbridgeResearchers  5 | 722 ☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #6
If you believe that I believed it to be genuine

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you the first to call it?
WritersBeware  
Jul 05, 2009 | #7
I can't recall, but I was the first to play it up.
OxbridgeResearchers  5 | 722 ☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #8
WB - this forum has been shot to hell! The lunatics, led by Fundi the Clown, have taken over the asylum :)
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #9
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you the first to call it?

WB never called it. On the contrary, she took it for a horse even when everyone was already screaming that it was a donkey, if you get my drift.
OxbridgeResearchers  5 | 722 ☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #10
everyone was already screaming that it was a donkey

But you've got to admit UE was a scream! Especially the part about farming. It was all very chacha-esque ...
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 05, 2009 | #11
Didn't really read much of what he wrote. >.<
WritersBeware  
Jul 05, 2009 | #12
Anyone who actually believes that I did not immediately recognize it as a farcical reality-check for certain, unqualified, ESL writers is a complete idiot. I'm sorry that my participation was too "real" for your small minds.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Jul 07, 2009 | #13
a pretend-Ukrainian to WB is like chum to a shark.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 07, 2009 | #14
I challenge anyone to read the thread where the ukranianexpert pretended to be a Ukrainian writer and proclaim that WB did indeed choose to see through the deception instead of relishing in it.
WritersBeware  
Jul 07, 2009 | #15
IGNORE.

LOL!
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 07, 2009 | #16
What a pathetic attempt at a save. Nobody is taking on the challenge because anyone who does would just make a fool out o' himself/herself. You were very transparent in your statements and it's pretty obvious to everyone that you (and only you) took ukranianexpert's story hook, line, and sinker. :p
WritersBeware  
Jul 07, 2009 | #17
Please stop attempting to start a fight with me. I have no inclination to entertain your incessant childishness. I can only assume that if you had not WH--ED your inconsequential projects (against forum rules, as usual), you would not have had the reason or opportunity to MISUNDERSTAND my post.

For the umpteenth time, stop trying to create confrontation and problems where there are none.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 07, 2009 | #18
Please stop attempting to start a fight with me. I have no inclination to entertain your incessant childishness.

Wow... these statements mix as well as nitrogen and glycerin. :D

I'm not starting a fight. I'm just pointing out what is obvious to rusty and to all the other people who have read your reactions in ukranianexpert's first thread.

oh and btw, you should check out that thread where you claimed that I misunderstood you. I think you'd see that even in that thread, nobody believes you.
undertow2  4 | 97  
Jul 08, 2009 | #20
Multiple forms of proof have already been posted in this forum.

I have to agree with UE, and I've seen no proof on this forum to the contrary.
WritersBeware  
Jul 08, 2009 | #21
"stop calling me names, *******!"

Hey, Rusty, you think that you're really clever, don't you? If you want to challenge me in ANY sort of way, feel free. If not, shut up.

II've seen no proof on this forum to the contrary.

essayscam.org/forum/wc/countdown-till-close-down-ever-happen-1074/2/#msg15531

essayscam.org/forum/wc/countdown-till-close-down-ever-happen-1074/3/#msg15567

essayscam.org/forum/wc/countdown-till-close-down-ever-happen-1074/4/#msg15801

"[Ms. Cohea] says she wasn't planning to turn in the paper as her own; instead, she says, she was only going to use it to get ideas."

chronicle.com/free/v55/i28/28a00102.htm
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #22
challenge you? where are we, Medieval Times?
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #24
Tarararaaaaaaaaan... tararaaaaaaan *tumbleweed tumbles*


Do these pass off as proof to you, undertow?

Hey, Rusty, you think that you're really clever, don't you? If you want to challenge me in ANY sort of way, feel free. If not, shut up.

For a self-proclaimed reformed citizen, you sure know how to make newcomers feel welcome. :D
WritersBeware  
Jul 08, 2009 | #25
Give me a break, EW. That character has been posting his little pot-shots ever since he signed-up. I simply told him to step up to the plate and challenge me in an adult-like debate instead of conducting himself like a child.

Do these pass off as proof to you, undertow?

Did you claim that "all students who buy papers use them to cheat"? YEP! Did I prove you wrong? YEP!

Did you claim that "all complaining members of this board are cheaters"? YEP! Did I prove you wrong? Yep!

Did I EVER state that "all students who buy papers use them honestly"? NOPE!

I have posted irrefutable proof that your bold assertions are incorrect. There is nothing more to discuss on the matter.
OxbridgeResearchers  5 | 722 ☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #26
One of my steadiest clients - past 3 years - never ever submits the papers as her own. She uses them as a model to write her paper (she uses the sources I cite, however, to save time). Several of the clients I have dealt with over the years do not submit the work as their own. Of course, some do. Point is that it is impossible to generalise at all ...
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #27
Hey, Rusty, you think that you're really clever, don't you? If you want to challenge me in ANY sort of way, feel free. If not, shut up.

Like a what? :D

If you've proven me so wrong, then why do you seen so worried about my question to undertow? :p

Oh, and btw:

you should check out that thread where you claimed that I misunderstood you. I think you'd see that even in that thread, nobody believes you.

No comment huh? Haha! :p
WritersBeware  
Jul 08, 2009 | #28
If you've proven me so wrong, then why do you seen so worried about my question to undertow? :p

Not worried AT ALL. I'm just tired of you dredging up already-defeated arguments, and I am certainly not the only one.

I know for a fact that certain members of this forum agreed-via PM-to publicly "side" with you (i.e., type "no," despite feeling otherwise) under the condition that you would cease your childish attacks. Not surprisingly, you couldn't honor that agreement.

Enjoy your "support."
OxbridgeResearchers  5 | 722 ☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #29
EW and WB - do not drag me into this ... I like the two of you and actually believe that
1) this constant bickering looks very bad
2) that it is doing nobody any good

To all ESL writers, including EW - WB has repeadly stated that she is not against good ESL writers, ok? So let's not generalise

Now - I though the purpose of this forum wasto expose scam companies. the fact is that everyone jumps all over the place when anyone does.

Ukranian companies like EW and AR are scammers - is that in dispute? Besides evidence posted, don't many of us here have our own experiences?

How about this: let's focus on the topic and not the person.

In EW's defense - he is not a fraudster and he really is a good writer
In WB's defense - the fact isthat she does post the truth and backs it up through external sources ... so what in the hell is wrong with that.

I learnt a great deal from this forum - from the experiences of its members and, yes, the EVIDENCE posted here. Over the past weeks, however, all most of us have seen is ZERO. I definitely contributed to that by engaging with a certain member but I think that it is time to move ahead ... bring the forum back to its true purpose.

Exposing scammers works for both writers and customers ... so, why on earth should any turn this into a personal issue?

Today - an extremely clear-headed person who contacted me through this forum (new member) gave me some very good advise. Basically, we are making ourselves look very very bad - try to see what is going on here from the point of view of students? If I were them, I'd run screaming ... we are supposed to be professionals here; professionals whom students trust ...

In our capacity as professionals whose interests are best served by a clean industry image:
1) yes ... we should call out the mediocre ESL writers, as well as the poorer native writers. They have no place in this profession and they reflect badly on all of us.

2) of course scammers have to be exposed and, hopefully, driven out altogether.

Touchy subjects - ESL and fraudulent companies ... however, the good ESL writers should never take this personally, just as the legits should not be bothered by the exposition of their fraudulent competitors ...

For the record ... remember the sudden splurge of positive posts about ...? Repeatedly denied it, being absolutely sure that had no role in it. Hated all of you for not believing it ... but really started thinking. Guess what? Found out that you guys were right -the posts had been instigated by an insider (now outsider). What I am saying here is that this forum is damn good and, from a personal perspective, terribly helpful. So ... let's keep it that way. Cleaning up the industry by, at least, helping students and writers avoid the scammers, is in all of our interests ...
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #30
I know for a fact that certain members of this forum agreed-via PM-to publicly "side" with you (i.e., type "no," despite feeling otherwise) under the condition that you would cease your childish attacks.

There was no such condition discussed. I asked a simple question and politely requested that the people involved answer honestly, which they did. If they wish to contest these statements, they are free to do so out in the open so that I can post evidence that say otherwise as well and REALLY make this forum interesting. :D

Ukranian companies like EW and AR are scammers - is that in dispute? Besides evidence posted, don't many of us here have our own experiences?

How about this: let's focus on the topic and not the person.

See there's the problem. You have me and a few other folks here who actually work for and get paid promptly by essaywriters.net and you got rusty who is so far satisfied with AR. If you label the companies that we work for as worthless scams, what does that say about us? Frankly, I think essaywriters.net is unfair in many of its practices and should improve and develop into a better company, but I certainly refuse to call it an outright scam because they do pay me on time, all the time. You can criticize EW and AR's employment and customer service policies and practices but generalizing negatively about their writing output is an insult to all of the competent writers here who work for them.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #31
WB, I am willing to concede that you are the master debater.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Jul 08, 2009 | #32
I like the two of you and actually believe that
1) this constant bickering looks very bad

Actually, I think it's the constant bickering that gets me the extra clients who hire me through this message board, although I'm not doing it for that purpose. >.<




Forum / Writing Careers / Patronized by ESL and EFL writers - Thanks Guys For Helping Me Out!