... a Senior Writer is nothing but the punching bag of the company. He takes the abuse because the company keeps him employed with a regular supply of "request" orders, which may or may not come his actual regular clients. The Senior Writer should not be envied because he is the one who gets unfairly fined the most because he gets paid the most too.
This all complete nonsense. In any kind of traditional employment situation, the designation "Senior" (anything) denotes either more time (i.e. seniority) on the job or is an earned title based on performance, or some combination of both. Either way, it's almost always associated with higher pay, more perks, greater flexibility and autonomy (not less), and various other advantages, not wuith reduced flexibility or increased abuse of any kind.
In non-traditional industries, such as this one, it likely means much less, but would still only be associated with
increased appreciation by the company, not less appreciation and/or (especially) any kind of abuse or disregard, as announced by the above post. Most likely, it means priority access to the most desirable projects (not decreased flexibility to decline undesirable projects), and would only inspire
greater loyalty, on the part of the company, as it relates to having the writer's back against inappropriate, obnoxious, and unreasonable hyper-demanding clients, and not a decrease in the company's regard for, loyalty to, or protection of the writer from unfair demands. The people who run any company would really have to be fools to treat senior employees
worse than junior employees, because the former have the most experience, do the best work, and represent greater productivity and value to the company than their junior counterparts.