Lavinia 4 | 495 ☆☆ Freelance Writer
Sep 27, 2007 | #161
are you kidding? lol.
if julie was offended by anything i wrote she can let me know and we can talk about it. to my knowledge, we disagreed but it didn't get personal. if i offended her, she's demonstrated that she is quite capable of expressing that herself. she and i will commence our debate once she provides evidence for her end.
with you, i remained relatively civil even while pointing out the error of your arguments. i didn't call you pathetically stupid, i called your arguments that. and they were. i think you need to learn to distinguish between criticizing an individual and criticizing an argument.
bottom line: you tried to use fallacies that you clearly do not understand as a means of discrediting my response to Joey and it blew up in your face because I actually know quite a bit about comm. theory and can see that you know very little. pointing out that you don't know much about fallacies isn't a personal attack and shouldn't be construed as such. i don't know much about baking a turkey, i don't pretend to, and i wouldn't be insulted if you or anyone else pointed it out. so stop posing and you can avoid this embarassing unpleasantness.
this has nothing to do with greed unless you mean greed on your end. you picked this fight with me, not the other way around. i criticized joey's sexist rhetoric and you decided to attack me. could it be that you decided to defend joey because you and he have similar views about working for fraudulent companies? hmmm...
i'm not even going to engage your claims about the provision of quality work by fraudulent sites. that's not what our latest exchange was about. you only mention it now because you want to create a smokescreen to cover your retreat. no one is buying it.
if julie was offended by anything i wrote she can let me know and we can talk about it. to my knowledge, we disagreed but it didn't get personal. if i offended her, she's demonstrated that she is quite capable of expressing that herself. she and i will commence our debate once she provides evidence for her end.
with you, i remained relatively civil even while pointing out the error of your arguments. i didn't call you pathetically stupid, i called your arguments that. and they were. i think you need to learn to distinguish between criticizing an individual and criticizing an argument.
bottom line: you tried to use fallacies that you clearly do not understand as a means of discrediting my response to Joey and it blew up in your face because I actually know quite a bit about comm. theory and can see that you know very little. pointing out that you don't know much about fallacies isn't a personal attack and shouldn't be construed as such. i don't know much about baking a turkey, i don't pretend to, and i wouldn't be insulted if you or anyone else pointed it out. so stop posing and you can avoid this embarassing unpleasantness.
this has nothing to do with greed unless you mean greed on your end. you picked this fight with me, not the other way around. i criticized joey's sexist rhetoric and you decided to attack me. could it be that you decided to defend joey because you and he have similar views about working for fraudulent companies? hmmm...
i'm not even going to engage your claims about the provision of quality work by fraudulent sites. that's not what our latest exchange was about. you only mention it now because you want to create a smokescreen to cover your retreat. no one is buying it.
