Placed an order for 15 pages with a research writer helper - the situation room

I placed an order for 15 pages with a research writing helpers. Unfortunately things went wrong because the writer took the topic into a direction that's very irrelevant to the original one. They admitted the mistake and sent me to another writer. The new one made it worse and wrote a paper that lacked the basics of the academic writing. I refused the work.

Now the company is refusing to send my money back, saying that they cannot force the writer to refund the money back. Is that possible?

I need help please
Thank you

Hello, we have investigated the above-stated allegations and here's the true story. We hope the customer will make a new post and confirm that everything listed below is true (otherwise we may be forced to post additional information rebutting the libelous statements). We also hope this example will show students that Research Writer Helper is very serious about customer satisfaction.

1. Fifteen pages were written, then fifteen more were written when the client expressed dissatisfaction with the work.

2. The paper involved the study of pragmatics with a focus on the work of Walt Whitman, and the customer said he did not like the way it was done.

3. Then the customer had rejected the work of two writers, he was referred to a third writer.

4. When the customer was still not satisfied with the work, he admitted that he just did not have time for his program and that he would have to continue it next year. This is fine, but if the customer "does not have time" does that mean the writers should be denied their pay for more than 30 pages they have written?

5. As a compromise, the writers suggested a refund of $280+ even though service had been rendered 100% (30 pages written after 30 pages had been paid).

6. This refund of $280+ WAS processed even though there is no good reason the customer should receive money back after the service was rendered.

Unfortunately, we haven't heard from the client yet. Here is an update (a correspondence between the client and one of our writers). It indicates the real reason (besides the one described above) why the client claims he didn't like the writer's work: the project took a direction of genre theory and the client was unfamiliar with genre theory.

As the replies suggest, the customer was treated very fairly and Research Helper did its best (and will continue doing its best) to satisfy the client's needs.

----------

From: Client
To: Writer

Dear Writer
I really appreciate that. I have just asked James to show me a better way of sending the money for the second chapter. I want to focus on the literature review and we will discuss the first chapter later. In the meantime ,I have noticed that you used a framework developed from genre theory. Frankly speaking , I know nothing about this theory. I know genre and I remember i did one paper in my MA in literary forms . The point is how much this theory is linked to pragmatics and to what we are supposed to do in the theses . I read a lot about pragmatics , but honestly I never read about this. Do you have time to explain that to me .

Thank you
Mohammad

----------

<writer 1> wrote:

Hi,
Sure, longer is always better for something like this. 25 pages was merely a ballpark, but I'd be willing to do as many as you feel necessary. I changed the title to give us a more specific target for discussion, especially since Whitman was known for believing his poetry to be similar in value to the Bible. I don't intend it to be a spiritual discussion whatsoever, but it would give us a lot of room to pick out specific instances of language and how he chose to use certain elements. We can; however, completely change that if you don't like this idea. If we change it though, we will need to find something else within the language of Whitman to discuss, if only to avoid a thesis that is too generalized. But truly, I'm open to any changes you want to make, so don't worry there. And you're absolutely right about Whitman's own comments in the Leaves of Grass introduction, that will be very useful in Chapter 2 and even into Chapter 4 of the thesis.

Best,
Writer 1

----------

Client wrote:

Good evening Writer 1,
Actually I have not discussed that with her. But I prefer to have it
a bit longer .let's say thirty pages with thirty references . By the
way , can I ask about the changes on the title ? Spiritual
Meditations ? don't you think that such addition might affect the
overall plan of the theses ? Another point . I think it is important
and I referred to it in my sample work . Whitman has a sort of
language theory and it's clearly stated in his prose introductions to
Leaves of Grass or in other prose pieces . You could see what I have
written in this regard.
Thank you
Mohammed

----------

<writer 1> wrote:

Hi there,
Usually the length of the chapters are determined by your adviser, but if you have open guidelines, I'd say that 25 pages would be a solid length. And for sources, I'd suggest 30, maybe more. For the actual literature review, I'd like to find what others have written about the linguistics of poetry, and tie that into what Whitman has done. It'll also focus on analyzing Whitman's themes by reviewing criticism and commentary on "Leaves of Grass." The following chapters will break that down even more, going deeper into the linguistic frameworks for analysis. Really, this has become quite an interesting topic for me, so I appreciate working on it with you.

Best,
Writer 1

----------

Client wrote:

Dear Writer 1
I really appreciate what you have done. Thank you very much. I want
you to have a good sleep before thinking tomorrow of the second
chapter .Do you have any recommendations ? How long a literature
review should be ? how many work to be consulted ? any idea about the
direction(s) the literature review will take ?
Please share these things with me . For sure you will have the
payment tomorrow. Hopefully James will agree on the plan I suggested
(installments )
Thank you

----------

<writer> wrote:

Hi,
I've attached the completed order. I used some of your previous discussion, as you did have some clever insights into the topic. I added a thesis outline at the end of the paper (right before the Works Consulted page) to give you an idea for the direction of the whole thesis. We'll stick with your original plan to conduct the research in a pragmatic manner, utilizing a linguistic framework. Chapter 2 will be a complete literature review, and will focus on linguistic perspectives as well as a complete analysis of Whitman's poetry. We'll focus on how Whitman uses language to promote his ideologies and I'll create a corpus for an actual language analysis (which will be used mainly in Chapter 4).

Best,
Writer

So you guyz will be paying him the refund???

Dear Sir
I believe you know what it means to tell part of a story. Is it appropriate use the conversations without my consent? What I am going to tell below will show what kind of people research helpers are .

1. The two (15 pages) you mentioned are about the same thing : the introductory chapter . [b]This is my original order "

subject:

A Pragmatic Study to Walt Whitman's Leaves of Grass

pages: 15
sources: 20
citation: MLA
level: PhD
instructions: The 15 pages are the introductory chapter.

What I received was "A Pragmatic Study of Walt Whitman's Spiritual Meditations in Leaves of Grass". And this is a very big difference. I told both Writer 1 (the writer and James about it > Here are some of the points I raised and needed explanation before proceeding to the next chapter. These are some of them:1. The title has been changed without consultation. Adding spiritual meditations will take the work to a different direction and other conclusions. Better not to do it.

2. There is nothing about pragmatics in the first chapter. Not a single book consulted is about pragmatics. The only references in the text about pragmatics (PP12, 13) are broad and old books that were authored in the seventies and eighties of the last century.

3. The study, as she said, was not born as you said (I Quote "Subjective opinion causes many artists to receive unfair or harsh judgment "P.5). There is a believe that pragmatics could helpful in clarifying things in the interpretation of Whitman. Various approaches have been used, political, social, religious, and sexual, among many, to interpret Whitman. It seems that the room is spacious enough for other interpretations. "You are using Pragmatics for this end. Focus on that "She said

4. Genre theory is something different. It is not very connected.

5. She repeated linguistic framework very often. Is the study about linguistics or pragmatics? The theoretical background lacks theory!"

6. Two only of the research questions are valid (1&4).

7. The terms defined in the chapter have nothing to do with the subject of the study. It seems that we need only pragmatic terms. It is not the scope of the study to deal with romanticism, allegory, symbolism, spiritual meditations

8. Limitations of the study are about what to include and what to exclude. Are we going to use all pragmatic theories or we are going to limit or confine ourselves to a number of them. For example we might say that we are using only speech acts theory .Or we are confining ourselves to 1855 edition of Leaves of Grass and so on.

9. Talking about quantitative and qualitative phases without saying what they are.

One mistake I did and I admit : I trust untrustable people. Immediately after receiving the chapter from Writer,even without carefully reading it, I transferred another $564 for the first part of CHAPTER TWO:LITERATURE REVIEW.

For revising CHAPTER ONE they asked for $218, and I refused to pay anything because it was not my mistake.It was theirs, or at least the writer's and they admitted it .In her revision of the topic she again wrote something irrelevant to my original topic. The title was the same as mine but the content was about "The full scope of the study will address the application of pragmatics to interpret the poetry of Whitman, with a strong focus on using the lyric form to highlight poetic devices and the lyric form of the language used and their semantic and semiotic effects." She did that despite the fact that I had sent her a list of books and I wanted her to do something similar.Again I refused the work because "I am sorry to say that Writer 1 is not a pragmatics-oriented writer .Please ask Writer 1 not to proceed with chapter two . If a writer well versed in pragmatics is not available , please cancel my order and send me my money. I really feel sorry for that because the revision I received is only very slightly different from the first one. Instead of genre theory , for example , I have now lyric form which is again taking the study off track. Writer 1 keeps talking about linguistic framework , without stating what does she mean by that. She talks about linguistic pragmatics as having another pragmatics. She now , in her research questions, added semiotics and semantics to the analysis without saying why .Look at her books-consulted list , there only a couple of important references in pragmatics. I think she is very well in Whitman but not in pragmatics," and James said in his JUNE 24 e-mail" see see exactly what you mean and I agree. I already suspected this a few days ago, but since she felt confident I had to give her the opportunity to do it again. I was impressed when I read the email you wrote to her. Even under the (frustrating) circumstances you responded to her with kindness.

Some customers are not so kind even when things are going well, and to be honest. I feel very, very good about setting you up with a free rewrite by a different writer.

I don't know how to say this clearly... today I have two complications, and in one of them the customer be being very unfair to the writer. In your situation we owe you an apology and a rewrite, and I will arrange that immediately.

If you have any other concern, let me know and I'll be available to respond quickly. There is nothing you need to do at this time, because I'm taking care of everything.

Thanks, sincerely, thank you for being kind to the writer even under these circumstances.
And in another e-mail ( same day ) he said " Yes, actually, the first comment Writer 1 made about this was: "I love Whitman, and this project is one I'll certainly enjoy." So, she was involved because of Walt Whitman, and maybe her linguistics knowledge made her feel that she was ready for a pragmatics paper.

So now we have "experimented" with getting a revision from her, and we see that it's best for you to work with a different writer. As with all things, people who do not understand a subject may not understand that they don't understand. : )

Within 12-24 hours I'll put you in contact with another writer and bring them up to speed about the events that have taken place. I'm making your email message visible to a few of them so they can see how compassionately (and patiently!) you responded to the situation.

You'll hear from me again soon, thanks, "

Anew writer was assigned to fix CHAPTER ONE. His name was Writer 2 and he was according to James "Hello, this is a confirmation for your new writer to be Writer 2, one of the people I admire most. (June 25) and Writer 2 wrote (June 25) " It is great to be working with you! Please be assured that I will do my utmost to ensure that you are pleased with the project. I have assisted

clients on well over 100 PhD dissertations. I hope that by sending you an
outline of any chapters prior to my working on them, the paper will better
meet your needs."

I was worried about time and did not want to repeat the previous experience, thus I wrote to Writer 2 on June (30)"

Dear Writer 2

I am sorry for being late. I have been very busy because of the Summer Semester and some family affairs. The Outline looks OK ,but I need you to open the chapter with a broad review of the studies that led to the appearance of paragmatics , then to enter into pragmatics. Execuse me what do you mean by Tautologies & Contradictions . Sorry for the question because I could not trace them in the references I have .I want you to conclude this part by talking about literary pragmatics. Please try to focus more on pragmatics and less on whitman because the study is not a literary approach , whitman is merely the background against which the pragmatic analysis develops . Please try to use reference after 2000, unless necessary , better to be after 2005-2010 . These are the conditions of the supervisor . I do recommend you go through :A pragmatic Approach to Pintersque Drama & Pragmatic approaches to Shakespeare's play , I think that we need somehow to follow them so that not to go off track, One more thing Please I want you to make a decision regarding which edition of Leaves of Grass we are going to cover by the study . In whitman's section consider how the poet looks at language and I think there are more than one book about this topic.

Please Writer 2 keep me informed. "

ONE IMPORTANT THING : I ALWAYS APPRECIATED AND THANKED MY WRITERS FOR THEIR HELP, NO MATTER WHETHER IT IS OK OR NOT AND I AM PAYING MONEY. EVEN NOW I APPRECIATE WHAT THEY DID.

I received the FIRST CHAPTER from Writer 2 on JUNE 6 ." We still owe you 15 pages. Would you like me to proceed with CHAPTER 2? I
can have this done by Friday, July 12. Just let me know.

Thanks,

Writer 2

Immediately I asked Writer 2 to stop.I wrote an e-mail on July 20 why I asked him to stop "

Dear Sirs,

One expert says that "doctoral students need to be told that most examiners start marking from the back of the script. Just as cooks are judged by their ingredients and implements, we judge doctoral students by the calibre of their sources. The moment examiners see incomplete references or find that key theorists in the topic are absent, they worry."

I myself followed this piece of advice. I discovered the following differences, and unfortunately they are many. (Please compare the list below to the one provided by Writer 2).

The list lacks the key theorist in both domains of the study: Pragmatics and Whitman. How can a person who does not know the leading experts in both fields develop the theoretical framework in the literature review chapter? Usually this chapter constitutes almost one third of the thesis and falls into more than 60 pages. A background section in chapter one aims to orient the readers and grasp their attention. It should short, outline the broad field of study and then lead into the focus of the research problem. Please read what Writer 2 has written and tell me:does it do any of these? I find the in-text citations very irrelevant and weird. For example, does the first line need citation? Every three or four lines you have a citation. Go to the chapter you will find this in almost every single page: a couple of lines followed by a reference, and the following sentence(s) are not quite linked.

The methodology section disappeared from the introduction, whereas the theoretical framework, which has nothing to do with the title of the section, is repeated in the operational definitions of terms. The introduction did not clearly state why we have chosen Leaves of Grass or what characterizes Whitman's poetry and makes it suitable for a pragmatic approach. The only references to Whitman and his Leaves of Grass came in page 4 ,which practically says nothing , and in page 10, which cited the same references used elsewhere. What's the connection between (Sbisa, 2011) and Leaves of Grass last edition? Can you tell me? Or (Aijmer, 2011) and Whitman's poetry? Is it a matter of putting a reference here and there? What about the trust I put in the writer? The objectives are repeated in the questions and the thesis structure disappeared.

Unfortunately, the chapter lacks the coherence necessary to make it convincing and forward-going.

I feel uncomfortable about the situation and would like to repeat the questions: do you have a writer capable of writing about pragmatics with a solid background about PhD thesis? Yes, I will carry on, and I assume he/she knows what to put in each section: what to write in the background, theoretical background , the objectives, methodology and so on. He is an expert and knows what relevant material to be put in each section. Otherwise I would like to apologize and request you to send me back my money. I really do not have time for another writer to try his luck with me.

Please do I a favor: would just focus on these questions? I am late because I do not have time for long e-mails. I work from 8 mornings to 10 evening to make a living. I apologize for not having time to read or write long e-mails.

Thank you for your time and attention
Mohammed

References (Please compare with Writer 2's)

Aijmer, K. (Ed.). Contrastive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Allott, N. Key terms in pragmatics. London: Continuum.

Bublitz, W. Jucker, A. Schneider, K. (Eds.). Handbook of pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Green, G. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Grice, H. P. 'Logic and Conversation', in Cole, P. & Morgan, J. (eds.) Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press.

Jakobson, R. Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics, in Thomas Sebeok (Ed.) Style in language, New-York: Simon & Schuster

Leech, G. Principles of Pragmatics, London: Longman.

Locher, M. A., & Graham, S. L. (Eds.). Interpersonal pragmatics. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Ostman, J. & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). Pragmatics in Practice. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Sbisa, M. & Ostman, J. & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). Philosophical perspectives for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Silverstein, M. Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description, in Meaning and Anthropology, Basso and Selby, Eds. New York: Harper & Row

Zienkowski, J. Ostman, J. & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

And I asked them to send me the page number of the reference used by the writer .They have not , simply because the writer just put any reference anywhere.

I requested a full refund for the part that has not been started by any of the two writer 1 and writer2. And I thought of giving 30% of the first $ 564 to be given to them because James suggested in his e-mail (Aug.5)" I'll say that I would request a 50% refund for the part of the work that has been completed and a 100% refund for the part that has not been completed. "

This is the whole story.

I have a second part for this story. Before concluding I wonder why James was insisting on me to call him

It is really unfortunate that a company like Research Helpers who describe themselves as big and experienced company tell lies for $ 800 only. To answer your lies (I feel sorry to use the word)

1. Your writers failed to stick to original plan of the thesis. The first took it the way she liked by first talking about meditations and genre analysis and then about lyric form and the second writer submitted a paper that missed many things , the simplest of all was lacking the ability to differentiate between an author and an editor of a book. (PLEASE SEE ABOVE mohd55 #6). Both writers failed in writing the same chapter i.e chapter one ( 15 pages).

2.I did not say I did not like THE WAY IT WAS DONE as you claimed. I SAID THAT BOTH WRITERS WROTE PAPERS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH THE ORIGINAL TOPIC. They were very irrelevant to the topic and I can put the two papers .

3. A third writer was suggested , but I said PLEASE ASK HIM WHETHER HE WELL VERSED IN PRAGMATICS AND WHITMAN. Simply because I did not want to repeat the same experience.

4.First could you tell why people approach you as a company ? At least some of them do not have enough time to write. I am not different. Two you were the reason for me thinking to quit the program. You know why. I put my order in May and I was supposed to put two chapters by August. Your writers failed to submit something acceptable , not even the minimum or a skeleton of a chapter (ONLY ONE CHAPTER ). Since MAY and I have been fighting to get one chapter and eventually I ended up with nothing.

5. What service that have been rendered 100% ? Both failed to write 15 pages . I was hopeful that I was dealing with serious, honest and people of trust ,that's why I committed the mistake of sending money for the first part of chapter two before finishing chapter one. Have you written a word in chapter two?

6. I believe that a Company like Research Helper should not be trusted after what they have done with me and after twisting the truth.
PLEASE HELP ME TO EXPOSE THEM
THANK YOU

NEXT TIME I WILL PUT ALL CONVERSATION PLUS THE PAPERS SUBMITTED BY WRITERS just to see what kind of a company Research Helpers are.

This post will show that Research Helpers incurred a loss to ensure the customer was treated very fairly.

Here is an example of a message sent from the company:

Dear Client,

I'm sorry to get a message like this from you. As you know, 15 pages were written and then rewritten. When you still were not satisfied, a third writer was asked to help. You already have caused us to incur a loss, and I do not agree with the suggestions that the writers failed to provide high quality material. Every analysis shows that the work you received was exactly what it was supposed to be.

Let me be completely clear: I will proceed exactly as you suggest. If you insist that some additional amount of money must be sent to you I will inform the writers so they can begin an authorship procedure to keep their rights to the work, and I will recommend that they be asked to give up more of their pay so we can be absolutely certain that you were treated fairly. I will not oppose you if you insist on challenging their pay.

Are you 100% certain you want to push for more money? I am at your service, please call me. I need to know exactly how much more money you are demanding from them, and I'll advocate for you after we discuss some matters over the phone.

I sense that your position keeps you too busy to focus on your graduate program right now. When you are ready to proceed, you can move gradually toward the goal but you cannot expect perfection at the outset. As a Director of Quality Assurance I think you probably know that the first 15 pages of a 200-page piece of work will not reflect the quality of the complete product. This was just the first step. You have been given an enormous amount of time from many of us, and now you are supposed to give us your opinions so that we can make improvements based on your preference and send you a final product that is exactly what you want it to be. It is very unusual for a customer to expect perfection right away and ask for so much money to be returned.

If you call me and tell me exactly how much more money you must receive in order to be satisfied, I can probably arrange it. However, the writers are independent contractors, not employees. I cannot control what they do. If I challenge their pay successfully they may attempt to collect it from you directly. This is a decision that should not be made lightly. Also, regardless of whether or not you push for more money, I think it is unlikely that any of the writers would risk working for you again in the future.

I look forward to resolving this for you in the best possible way, and a phone call is necessary so we can discuss the details of this situation.

Regards,

Customer Support, Research Editor Help

Here is an example of a message sent from the customer:

Good Afternoon

I am late.Sorry. I have been on one week leave.

Thank you for your kind e-mail.

I've received nothing from Mike.

I do appreciate what the writers have done, particularly Writer 1. But I think 50% is too much. I was thinking of 30% .

Better to stop here and I request you to kindly cancel the order.

I am really for sorry for reaching this end.Hopefully I will come back to you.

I am not very sure about my study.I have two options :quit or change the topic. Both are difficult .

I am pleased to chat with you. I thank you and your staff for everything you have done. May be it was a matter of luck. Myself , may be ,unlucky for not continuing with you

Thank you again.

Wait a minute. So you're suggesting you were trying to submit the paper AS YOUR OWN FOR AN ACADEMIC GRADE? Is it really allowed at the University?

Since you're supposedly a "DIRECTOR OF QUALITY ASSURANCE" - do you allow your students to buy model papers and submit them for a grade too? I'm confused. These days some universities are very progressive in their approaches to academic dishonesty, but it's hard to believe they would completely ignore the fact that some students may violate the terms of essay services and try to submit the example papers as their own. I hope from now on they stop working with you because it's clear it was your goal to cheat the system (and yourself).

Dear Research Helpers

I wonder why you insist on speaking on the phone. Is there anything you want to hide ? My story is very simple : have sent you money for a piece of the work that none has written a word of it . We argue on the first part ( the first 15 pages). have you discussed the points I raised with your Professional writers? If any body write anything and he is given money for that ,then it is your problem ,not mine ? The points are not simple . The first writer changes the whole direction of the thesis and the second wrote something irrelevant to the topic. I believe that it is your responsibility to talk to them and correct things not to give them money. If you are generous ,this is your problem and you should give them from your money ,not mine.

It is very simple
Thank you

Why don't you post the papers so that native English speakers could judge their quality?

Sometimes people contact us when they are not even serious about their degree programs. They just need a "partner in argument" because they want to argue with someone.

Arguments via email can go on for a long time, but one good phone conversation between honest people can lead quickly to understanding and reconciliation.

You say one of the writers, "changed the whole direction of the thesis," but this cannot be true because they were writing original material. They needed to establish a direction for what they would write for you in adherence to your instructions, and this aspect of academic writing always includes a process of exploration.

You say "no one has written a word of it" but of course we have written and rewritten large amounts of material for you. Maybe you will post the material in this forum and other people can judge it.

I hope you will post it without making any changes to it.

Two different writers have tried to help you, so the model writing will reflect two different styles. Any professional writer will take an approach that reflects her/his style and knowledge.

If you post the material our writers sent to you we will check to see if it has been changed at all. If you make changes to misrepresent the quality, we will assume you do not mind if we post the real version of the model writing we provided.

Regards,

Research Helpers

There are native speakers in this industry?

Yes; mostly Swahili language speakers :

Dear Sir
1. Reason is reason whether on the phone or in an e-mail. The only difference is that in the second we leave behind evidences of the commitments we made.

2 . About your first writer I am quoting you below "
" Maybe I can reduce the cost, because I will hold her responsible for saying "I must have gone off the mark by focusing on Whitman's spiritual meditations." She acknowledged responsibility by typing this.

I made myself very clear about the direction of the thesis . Below is one of my e-mails"

But before accepting or refusing an offer I request you to go through the following references ( among many dealing with Pragmatics. You might have others) and compare them to the work submitted by Writer 1:

Leech : Principles of Pragmatics
Levinson :Pragmatics
Yule : Pragmatics
Ionescu : A Pragmatic Approach to Pinteresque Drama
Rudanko : Pragmatic Approaches to Shakespeare

In addition to the titles I mentioned to Writer 1 in my last e-mail. There is no guessing . We have tools ( pragmatics) and we use them to interpret a work ( in my case it is Whitman's Leaves of Grass). Sometimes , due to space restriction or applicability , we use some , not all , of these tools . A specialist in Pragmatics immediately figures out what to do . There is room for guessing .At all. It is quite clear where the study is heading . We believe that Pragmatics as a tool will be more useful in interpreting Whitman. It is not the first time that Pragmatics is used to interpret literature . May be the first time in poetry, and Whitman in particular.

You wanted to say that I failed to provide enough instruction. No . I did not have to do that . Everything is clear. Go back to my modal writing that I had forwarded before we started . There was nothing about spiritual meditations or genre theory , and they have nothing with the original plan of the study.

Thank you"

3. It was you who recommended Writer 2 because he is very professional and ( talking about Writer 1 "( Quoting you )
(I see see exactly what you mean and I agree. I already suspected this a few days ago, but since she felt confident I had to give her the opportunity to do it again. I was impressed when I read the email you wrote to her. Even under the (frustrating) circumstances you responded to her with kindness.

Some customers are not so kind even when things are going well, and to be honest. I feel very, very good about setting you up with a free rewrite by a different writer.

I don't know how to say this clearly... today I have two complications, and in one of them the customer be being very unfair to the writer. In your situation we owe you an apology and a rewrite, and I will arrange that immediately.

If you have any other concern, let me know and I'll be available to respond quickly. There is nothing you need to do at this time, because I'm taking care of everything.

Thanks, sincerely, thank you for being kind to the writer even under these circumstances.
James"

Another e-mail from you about Writer 1
Yes, actually, the first comment Writer 1 made about this was: "I love Whitman, and this project is one I'll certainly enjoy." So, she was involved because of Walt Whitman, and maybe her linguistics knowledge made her feel that she was ready for a pragmatics paper.

So now we have "experimented" with getting a revision from her, and we see that it's best for you to work with a different writer. As with all things, people who do not understand a subject may not understand that they don't understand. : )

Within 12-24 hours I'll put you in contact with another writer and bring them up to speed about the events that have taken place. I'm making your email message visible to a few of them so they can see how compassionately (and patiently!) you responded to the situation.

You'll hear from me again soon, thanks, "

About the second writer I am giving below on example, it is the tiniest mistake by him, and I told you about it and you did nothing, though I made it very clear in my order MLA Citation: ( the first is by the Research Helper professional writer . The second is the correct citation)

Zienkowski, J. Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Zienkowski, J. Ostman, J. & Verschueren, J. (Eds.)Discursive pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

Sbisa, M. (2011). Philosophical perspectives for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.
Sbisa, M. & Ostman, J. & Verschueren, J. (Eds.). Philosophical perspectives for pragmatics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Pub. Co.

By the way , out of the 15 references listed 8 were wrong. If it was one or two I would say it was a mistake . If it was 8 in 80 I was say no problem. But 8 out of 15 and none apologized for them, it is a problem. A professional writer should be very careful about these tiny things.

POST everything you like, you have all conversations exchanged between us.
Thank you for your time and attention

You have shown that Research Helpers care about their customers. We worked very hard trying to satisfy you before you started being unreasonable and abusive to the writers. We wish you well, and you can feel free to keep advertising for us in this thread.

Dear readers......Beware of Research Helpers because of this ....

1.This is how Research Papers entraps customers,by telling lies (Quotes from your website)

And when a customer tells the fact about your PROFESSIONAL WRITERS ,you just steal his money and start twisting facts.

2. This is another lie by you. This is a joke. They never follow this.

3. A third lie.

The best online company in stealing $ 800 from a customer .

Please everybody do not believe what they tell because it is not true and they have taken my money .
Thank you

Again, why don't you post the papers so that qualified writers (not ESL speakers like you) can judge their quality?

As far as I can tell, a couple of writers revised your paper, free of charge, so they followed their terms. For me, you are a confused 'student' who tries to rip off honest writers like me. I had a 'pleasure' to deal with clients like you in the past and you follow their script - order a paper, then cancel the order AFTER it was completed, and demand a refund (despite the fact the order met the specified requirements).

That's becoming an increasingly common issue these days. Perhaps more scams are training the students to act clever as well. :-p

According to plagiarism.org "giving incorrect information about the source of a quotation" is considered plagiarism. (See plagiarism/plagiarism-101/what-is-plagiarism).

According to the same source "Plagiarism can also be considered a felony under certain state and federal laws."

I told Research Helpers, who claim on their website that they "offer a money back guarantee" and "they do not condone plagiarism") about a similar case, what Writer 2 did in his paper and James said that it is arguable and tried to mislead me by saying irrelevant material to the case. I think he does not mind his writers plagiarize. This explains his saying that he paid the writer i.e. rewarded him for something Research Helpers claims "they do not condone". I suggest they say we condone all forms of plagiarism and we encourage our writers to do that. No problem because we got the money from the customers.

Now I ask him to provide me with page numbers of the references Writer 2 used in his ( because the article was submitted with no page number of the books cited ) and if the numbers are correct and the material quoted are there , I will stop this and will not ask for a refund.

Thank you

Now you make up a story about plagiarism? Seriously? The company should sue you for libel and they would easily win.

Jason152
Sindraalan

posted:

mohd 55 instead of writing your stories why dont you kust go for a chargeback....

Again I ask Research Helpers to provide the page number of the references Writer 2 used in his article to compare them with original.
I do not know how many times I've asked the service to do that .They cannot because they know the truth. I seriously challenge them.

I request you to delete my ID inf. that I accidentally posted and the info/pic. posted by others.
Thank you