Review of Pheelyks the writer - not the best quality paper!

Like most of you, I too was in desperate need of getting an essay done, and after being deceived by bestessays.com[DND*] and MyWritingExperts.com, I landed here looking for a legit website or a writer who could do my essay. I read numerous threads here, and finally decided to contact Mr.FreelanceWriter because I was so impressed by his posts. I would have definitely given my essay to him, but unfortunately his charge was way over my budget, and I had to settle for a writer called Pheelyks, who contacted me on his own and charged me $120 for a 1500-word essay. I was quite impressed by his emails, and with him, I could pay in two installments. I paid $50 to him through PayPal and within two days, he sent me an intro, which, I won't lie, was pretty impressive. I read through the intro and pointed out a few parts for him to improvise, but Pheelyks, being too proud of his own writing style, sent me this email "You do not even know what the essay needs. I do not have the time to improvise every line just because you want them to. The lines make sense, and that's it". I understood immediately that he is not exactly the guy who would bother to fulfill the customer's needs, but I thought to myself that it's fair enough because I can make those slight changes myself. So I paid the remaining $70 and asked him to complete the essay.

That's when the moron showed his true colours. He sent me a pile load of crap! All he did was paraphrase my study guide, not to mention that the citation styles were improper and inconsistent, and the essay reached no conclusion whatsoever! He wrote complex lines, with some uncommon words (which is fine) but none of the paragraphs made any point. I was very disappointed after reading it, but since I have the chance of resubmitting my work after the first draft is marked, I decided to turn it in just to check if it was really as bad. Besides, I would have been relieved if I could get done with it, because I am too busy with my dissertation paper right now. Anyway, my professor returned the paper to me today with a final score of 56% and her comment was "By now, you should know how to reach conclusions. You did not answer the question. You only touched various issues on the surface without making any point" - Exactly as I had predicted. I wrote to Pheelyks rather rudely, and in response he called me an a**-hole and said that I didn't know what I wanted. I mean WTF is his problem? Doesn't he know the meaning of professionalism? I really don't have the energy to deal with him anymore. I will get my essay done somehow, but people please stay away from this *******! He is a big-talker, but when it comes to work, he is as ****** as the Ukrainian sites. I shouldn't have ordered to him just for saving money. If only I had asked Freelance Writer or Helen from GraduateWriter to write the essay for me, I am sure I could have passed it up by now :(

It's better to wait for P to respond to your post to see what actually is the issue after both the parties are on the stage.

This is very serious! Pheelys respond please, your ass is, once again, in the line!

I am copying certain sentences used by Pheelyks. I have no idea what he meant, probably because I am so dumb. That's what Pheelyks will probably write in his defence. But people, please tell me if he has done a good job or not. I do not have any rivalry with Pheelyks, nor am I ever going to enter this business. I just wanted to share my experience with people who are looking for good writers for writing their essays..

Anyway, here are some marvellous lines from Pheelyks:

"Science ought to advance, then, by the making of observations, then by development of falsifiable hypotheses, and then experimental (or observational) attempts to falsify these hypotheses or prove them to be wrong/inadequate."

"Revolutions are often invisible, and only fully observable and definable after the fact, with the scientific community(ies) involved necessarily entirely aware of the implications of such revolutions when they occur."

:) If you love to pay him, go ahead to pay, you got a very good chance to experience the ass pain . I am wondering why every single post complain of Pheelyks all tell the same story. How come He can use same strategy to earn his money every time? Admirable......

I don't blame Pheelyks. He didn't cheat me or anything. He charged me $120 and I paid him the full amount. Maybe he did give effort in completing my essay. The bottomline is he is not a good writer, but sadly he doesn't know that. He thinks very high of himself. But all you people out there, don't get him to write your essay. If you do, then an F is waiting for you :S

I don't blame Pheelyks, even he didn't provide me a qualify essay. I read it and know it immediately that will be F if I turn it in, so I was smart enough at this point and throw it to the trash can. I keep telling student don't use him write your assignment. But, if nobody sent him assignment, where he can make money? But if you sent him money, you get your class failed unless you just give him money without ask anything back. What should you do? pick him or not pick him? But his charge rate is pretty high, even higher than my best writer. I don't know why. May be people like buy expensive stuff and he knows that?

Speechless, evidence of pheelyks' horrible job. Waste money, Waste time, and Full of sh*******

Let's see what the folks at Monash University have to say before leaping to any conclusions, shall we?

How come you are so "smart"? did you think he will really use that? I tell you, students prefer lose money than fail a class. Money is really nothing you ****head !

You as ass**** fake writer, You don't know what's important thing in this world. You got money is true, but all your writing will just go to only ONE place, that's------- A Big Trash Can!

He claims to have already turned it in, dipsh.

Hahaha this is the funniest unprofessionalism I have ever seen. Because I started this thread, dear old Pheelyks emailed to Monash University intending to get me caught of plagiarism. But dear you don't konw that I am only using the Monash University study guide. I have nothing to do with Monash University.

Then it shouldn't be a problem, should it?

I think it's interesting that in order to "prove" how bad my writing is you had to alter the sentences you "quoted." I'm not sure what your angle is, but you have yet to point out any actual example of my "bad" writing.

Unfortunately I did turn it in because I was in a rush, but it upsets me to see that he even emailed a school to get me caught of plagiarism. Thankfully, he doesn't know which school I go to.

Oh, and here's the actual emails between us regarding the problems you had with the intro:

Me to you:
Comments like "this sentence isn't impressive enough" don't really tell me anything--do you simply not understand the sentence, or do you not like what it says?

As far as the title is concerned, William Harvey and Charles Darwin serve as the bookends for the development of the theories of generation during the modern era, and are explicitly mentioned in the study guide yo uploaded. They are very important to the research question and will have to be mentioned in the paper in order to adequately address the topic.

The lack of references and arguments in the introduction is also something pretty standard to most research papers--the introduction contains very general facts required as the foundation of later arguments and more specific facts, which will of course be references.

To be honest, it seems to me like you are somewhat confused as to what the research question is and what the paper is addressing, and that you are bothered by sentences you don't understand. If you have more complete instructions for the paper than you provided me with now would be a good time to send them, but what I've completed directly addresses the question you sent, using the reference material you provided.

Your reply:
By saying the sentence is not impressive enough, I meant that you can paraphrase it and make it sound better. Of course, I understood what you were tyring to say, but just because a sentence make sense doesn't necessarily mean that it sounds good, right?

Regarding the mention of William Harvey and Charles Darwin, I like your reasoning behind it. So go ahead with your title.

I have no complains about the introduction containing general facts. That is exactly how an intro should be. The intro you gave me is perfect. But our lecturer asks for references even in the intro, and I can't do anything about it. That's why you need to cite certain lines.

My Reply to that:
The fact that you think certain sentences would sound better paraphrased is completely subjective and not something I can do much about--I'm certainly not going to be willing to go through the final five page paper and change individual sentences simply because you don't like how they sound. They are clear and correct; if you feel you can write them better, I'm not sure what you're paying me for. I don't mean to sound rude, but you're not really giving me anything to work with. "I think they could sound better" doesn't tell me what you think is wrong with them.

and finally:
Put citations where I have mentioned in the intro. Include the page number from the study guide (that's the important part). I am getting this assignment done by you because I have my dissertation to complete. Anyway, just do your work. I will make the payment in a bit.

Not the complete lack of any actual explanation/examples, which continues up to this point.

Go ahead Pheelyks. I really don't have the time to read your modified stories. You have proved yourself well enough.

Thanks Buddy, forget about Pheelyks, A big Stop Warning sign.

If you don't go there, how do you know he REALLY emailed the university...?

Pheelyks just sent me a threat mail saying that I will caught for plagiarism, blah blah blah!

So, how do you know he's not just blowing smoke up your @$$?

So we all learnt a lesson today. If you're not satisfied with Pheelyk's work, and if you write about that on this public forum, he is likely to email your school and get you caught of plagiarism. So are you people willing to take risk? Don't you think it's better to publicly boycott this writer? Who's with me here? What do you have to say to that Pheelyks?

You are not the first one, I am not the first one either, there have tons of same story if you do the search in this forum. But the story still get repeat everyday, that's how he make his money.

Once again - possible smoke up @$$?


Isn't that a risk you should be willing to take when you hire someone to write your essays for you, especially considering that it's a perfect example of academic dishonesty and is

most likely against your university's honor code?


You may call him unethical and unprofessional, but I say you're a hypocrite. Learn to do your own work, and you wouldn't have to deal with @$$holes like him.

true that. lesson learnt. but some people need writers for other legit reasons, and they shouldn'e be victimised by Pheelyks..

I agree. If Pheelyks or another freelance writer were scamming students who paid him to write magazine articles or website content, I would completely change my tune. But that doesn't seem to be the case here. He's been hired countless times to write essays. Essays that students turn in to their professors as their OWN work. He's not the only unethical one around here, but at least he's not a hypocrite.

So he violated the rules and was sending you SPAM? I told numerous times - he and FreelanceStyle are here only to w*0re their poor quality service to unsuspected students who as you can see are then sorry for dealing with them.


Start a chargeback with your credit card company; don't waste your time dealing with the a$$hole.


You are now COMPLETELY DISCREDITED. Students now know this:

Dealing with Pheelyks are unhappy? Go cry elsewhere coz your money is lost. If you complain Pheelyks will report you to your university for cheating.

I have spent quite a lot of time carefully reading the arguments from both the parties. Without taking anybody's side, I would be honest to put my evaluation of the entire situation precisely below.

First of all, I must say that the essay is fairly cohesive and flows logically from A to Z. I don't agree with your statement (or your professor's) that the essay does NOT have a conclusion. It does.

Secondly, it covers the three theoreticians/philosophers fairly well, and critically includes the "voice" of the writer.

Now, I have also been thinking what went wrong that resulted in this heat and break of communication between the two of them. Reading the emails above has the answer.

If Biscuit's emails are read and critically analyzed, it is VERY clear that this person failed to really communicate to Pheelyks what HE ACTUALLY WANTED P to do with the sentences.

This irritated P and should really have because he did a pretty good job. Additionally, the tone of Biscuit in the email is not like a client but that of a master - commanding P to do this and that. This is shameful.

I will not comment on the later part in which P reacted by emailing here and there.

Now the last and final word.

To my shallow understanding, the entire problem lies (NOT WITH THE ESSAY or CONCLUSION) but with the writing level. Perhaps, Biscuit wanted to ask P to simplify the use of words, break down longer sentences into smaller ones so that it may suit his own level (because he had already decided to turn in the same paper). P didn't get him so didn't do it.

That's all from my side.

Not true. If you post altered quotes and make false claims about me/my work, however, and if you boast about breaking the law by turning in my work as your own, that's another story.

Here's Biscuit's latest email to me:

"So how do you plan to put an end to this dispute? You have disagreed to refund back my money. Now, you know you've shown great unprofessionalism on the forum, and I can go on and on about your bad service. Now, sadly this is your profession. And when so much is said about someone, whether true or false, it will be your loss to lose all those potential customers, don't you think? Now tell me how you wish to settle this, or do you want the battle to continue?"

Basically, he's acknowledging that he's hoping to get a refund simply by threatening to continue lying. He also thinks we're engaged in some sort of battle, which is sad because he lost this "battle" hours ago.

Pheelyks modified our email exchanges and made me come off as a complete ***** while he portrayed himself as a fine gentleman ready to provide service. Anyway, initially I was being nice. I even praised his work, but then he started calling me names like *******, illiterate, go read the book, etc. That's when I started being rude, but I still tolerated all that because I had already paid. But then he started threatening me that he would get me caught. That's pretty weird, right? Now, I want a refund. How do I get that? Can anyone suggest?


Oh my! Looks like you can go to any extent to prove yourself Pheelyks! What else have you got? Don't you think people now know what sort of a writer you are?

I have put my evaluation of the first part. It has all the answers from my side. I don't think you should request a refund - you did get an originally written paper that you (unethically) submitted verbatim.

Most probably, it was your turning in the same paper that put your professor thinking you did not do it. So think about it once again.

Screenshots coming up, you lying fu*-.

That's what I was thinking.


Wait for the screenshots. Don't go anywhere.

First round of relevant emails:

• 
  1st
  
• 
  2nd
  
• 
  3rd
  
• 
  4th
  

And the conclusion:

• 
  5th
  
• 
  6th
  
• 
  7th
  

Basically you are the incompetent, non professional and totally discredited writer in the whole academic writing industry.

The problem, stu4, is that I actually have evidence to back up my claims, whereas you just keep making the same empty claims time and time again.

Your claim are sum of the word < basically >. It is YOUR (MIS)interpreting of the fact.

I seriously have no idea what you're trying to say here.

Lack of basic education and thinking skill. Wikipedia can help.

From the screenshots I can conclude that it was not initially P who started using the swear words first, it was Biscuit. This surely was the breakdown. I don't understand how the Study Guide can have so much information to be turned into a full length essay.

This doesn't convince me. If the study guide had this much information, why did you pay him Biscuit?

I am sure you failed to clearly tell him that you wanted him to use lighter words. I can also see that P tried to cooperate with you quite professionally. Anyone can see that. Perhaps, you became too angry to settle things down.

As both of you are at daggers drawn, I don't think any settlement is possible. Additionally, to quote from P "Why did you pay him the second time if you didn't like what he wrote in the first part?"

Actually, it's your lack of English skills. How are my "claim" the "sum of the word basically"? What is[/] the sum of the rod "basically"? How can a single word--or any single term--have a "sum"? [i]What is my misinterpreting of the fact? What fact? None of these things are clear in your "sentence."


The study guide contains at least 150 pages (those 150 pages were sent to me; there is actually more to the study guide that I wasn't sent and that wasn't relevant). It's actually a full course reader that Biscuit (and therefore I) referred to as a "study guide." It contains all pertinent information, even describing and raising the question analyzed in the paper (i.e. Popper, Kuhn, and how their theories relate to theories of generation).

The instructions Biscuit sent also say that the study guide must be used and properly referenced, and that any additional sources used must also be referenced; it does not say that other sources must be used. Biscuit did request that additional sources be used in an early email, and I did overlook this initially; this mistake was easily corrected.


I'm not at daggers drawn--my daggers have already been thrown. Biscuit has been strangely silent after proof of his lying went up; he knows he's been exposed. His refund request through PayPal was denied and the case has been closed, the work he altered quotes from is available in its original form (with several typos I failed to catch initially and did not alter before posting here), and our emails (also with typos) are available for anyone to peruse. He loses, plain and simple.