his reputation (such as it is)
The only "reputation" I have here is for providing very high-quality work, turning down any projects that I cannot take with high confidence that I can do them well, for doing business honestly, and for competing only above-board, ethically, and honestly against my legitimate competitors. Unlike you, I don't resort to fabricating totally false accusations against my competitors and posting nasty insults about them, totally unprovoked, let alone stalking their posts and their websites. This is my only forum ID, which you already know, and you also know that your accusations that I am also "Noted" and "Writers Beware" are absolutely absurd. WB, in particular, used to start threads here warning students never to do business with
any writer without a website, as part of his/her perpetual efforts to steer all clients to companies like his/hers and away from all independent writers. At the time he/she created a thread characterizing all writers using AOL and other email accounts as untrustworthy, simply because we didn't have websites, he/she knew, full well, that the top 3 or 4 essay-company writers whose writing he/she was selling,
at the same time, through his/her own essay companies were all here under the exact same IDs that we used as our IDs at his/her company and that we all did our indpendent business through AOL email accounts. In fact, it was that 2009 thread that left me with no choice but to create a website for the first time, in 2010, even though I didn't really think I needed one, otherwise. But the point is, simply, that it's absurd to imagine that any freelance writer would ever create threads like those, because they would only underine our efforts to get more freelance work. Every person who has commented about my work, including both customers and other writers, is a genuine forum member to whom I have no connection; and that can be confirmed by using the messaging system to contact them directly, as well as by contacting this forum's Admin by email.
I referred elsewhere to the photograph strategically placed on his website by Professional Services which is straight out of thinkstock now called iStock.
That's a really clever strategy for argument, there: When I
do respond directly to your false accusations point by point, you completely ignore the substance of those direct responses, and you suggest that either I have OCD or you congratulate yourself for "touching a nerve" simply because I responded directly to each of your false accusations. If I ignore any of your accusations or implications, such as your silly comment about the photos on my website, because it's just too stupid to bother dignifying, you repeat it elsewhere and imply that I
should have responded to it. The fact of the matter is that I wouldn't ever expect any person looking at my website to imagine, even for a second, that the photo to which you referred is actually supposed to be me. Obviously, I simply chose from whatever stock photos Intuit provided, because I'm not trying to convince anybody that I create websites for a living. Do I also need to "disclose" that the other photos on my site aren't really my actual customers sitting in front of their laptops or my actual colleagues sitting around a conference table?
