About Grading Papers..

O.o You're hopeless. Don't answer the question if you can't, ok? Again, no one is forcing you.

WB isn't the one contacting other forum members asking for information about you. Meanwhile, this is what I received from you on June 15th from your "mistersnailxx@xxxxxxx" email addy.

Yeah, what a coward. The clueless also accuses me of hacking his email accounts because I know-with his unwitting assistance-what his username is at acdm.


Hey, FW, I'm sure that you already realize this, but you're under no obligation to hide his email address. He took it upon himself to contact you (and then publicly insult you numerous times), thereby willingly compromising any expectation of privacy. Mind sharing?

You, the American Bustard, are flooded with incestuous disposition. Indeed your brother is your father. Also your brother-father is your bed partner also. Now you currently sleep with three of your brother. Disgusting WB, you have already fallen down from your place. Go and be ****** by your brothers.

WB is a *****.

right-- after WB hacked into my AD account, I sent probably 10 emails to everyone I had ever talked to on the boards, asking who WB was. some people were helpful, while other do--s remained silent, waiting to use my appeal for help as a weapon against me. I even found a few colleagues.


still drooling for for my personal info-- you're going to need a bib.

Thanks for playing right into my trap yet again. I just wanted to let you bury yourself a bit further before I slapped you across the face with that dead fish.

Remember when you were spamming your acdm referral link all over this forum and I warned you to stop? Well, your acdm username was attached to the end of that URL!

LMAO!

"WB hacked my email account!"
"WB hacked my acdm account!"

You, sir, are a world-class idiot.

Hi, WB, your English expression is really good. You should write stories and novels. But I think those literature will only be for the Chocolate-cream readers, as your language is so chatty.

oh, that sucks!

Trust me, I didn't hide it out of any consideration for him; I didn't want to post it to advertise it for him, since I'd like nothing more than to be able to post my email here publicly for students. As you know, I can't send it via PMs because I lost that privilege many months ago for offering my services via PMs, but you're welcome to the information through email or PMs if my outgoing PMs are ever restored. What is "ACDM"? Surely, he can't be an academon writer, right?

Understood.


Unfortunately, yes.

any press is good press!

While I firmly believe that no one is paid to post on this forum, let's examine the logic of this statement as if it were true:

-people are paid to post on a privately hosted website
-I (Fracturegang) disagree with what these people post on this privately hosted website
-I will kick out the employees of this privately hosted website, rather than starting my own privately hosted website or going to a different privately hosted website where these views aren't paid for by the owner

Good luck with that.

Also, why do the owners of this privately hosted website allow your views to be posted here when they are obviously in opposition to the "employees" of the owners?

Mod! Mawd!! Mawwwwd!!! Mawwwwwwwd!!!! Mawwwwwwwww.........!! Maaaaaaa..........Mama......gim'me the feeder. I wanna suck it. Nasty Indian WB.

Phyleeks is the ghost -of WB- that always appears on the spot whenever WB feels threatened by me.

I'm "threatened" by you like I'm "threatened" by an average bowel movement.

As for pheelyks, I'm sure that he simply laughs at you like everyone-and I do mean EVERYONE-else.

if they're teaching at an English language university, their English should be impeccable. you know that professors write journal articles, don't you?

Wow!

Your attempt at humor failed. Failed misreably!

I would like to believe so. They are, after all, the exact audience that the papers we write are meant for. Their evaluation of the content, relevance, and sources reflects the ability of the writer to go a good job. Why? It isn't easy to please these professors. They find any excuse to deduct a point or two from the paper that, if the student did not request revisions for upon submission, satisfied the academic requirements or personal requirements of the student. Now, while there are really some professors who just cannot be satisfied, they normally do not take it out on the written paper. They just feel the student / writer can still do better. So that indicates a potential or room for improvement on the writer's side. Writer's never stop learning and the grade, as a method of evaluation for the writer skills, will reflect the additional training that the writer needs to further improve his skills.

Usually, I have no way of knowing whether my clients actually submit my work as their own, because they don't tell me and I don't ask. It's none of business, anyway, because they own anything that they pay me to write. Sometimes, they do let me know, either in an email thanking me or whenever they order their subsequent projects; and a few have even mentioned the grades that they received for my work in various threads right on this forum. Assuming that a client does choose to submit work from a writer for a grade, the writer is still always in the exact same position as every other student in that class, except with the added disadvantage of not having actually been in the course. For ordinary undergraduate courses, that hardly matters; but sometimes, professors specifically want to see their lecture points regurgitated in essays and/or on exams, which makes it much harder for someone outside the course to satisfy those professors. Usually, if professors grade papers objectively and fairly along a bell curve, just about anything I write will fall into the 80th or 90th percentile, at least, even in difficult courses. On the other hand, if the grader tears apart the work of his students, either because he perceives that as being his "role" or just because he's a miserable person who takes pleasure in it, he can also find some excuses to rip apart my work, as well.

I believe that the question posed is incorrect. The question should be if the educators consider the papers written as valid evaluations of subject knowledge. Since I know that there are several ways that the professors and teachers actually grade the amount of knowledge that a student has learned in class, I do not believe that they use the essays or research papers as the sole basis of what they have learned in class. The papers are used, if we consider academic writing, as the basis of knowledge evaluation more than anything else. The research papers provide the professor with a sense of what the student has learned in class, as it translates to the way the lessons are reflected in the academic paper.