Why are all kinds of writing services being allowed to advertise here?

Wait, I wasn't aware that you could recognize jokes. That's a big deal. At any rate, you can never resist commenting on every post I make. Who's stalking who?

Why are you so obsessed with me? You could just leave me alone since I'm not here to scam anybody.

LMAO! Deal. Let's see who breaks it.

I hadn't intended on making a deal, but I'll play along.

W2B has of late been whacked properly and it seems its arsenals are quickly getting depleted. It no longer has 'comrades' and students neither listens to its advice nor gives a damn about it either .

W2B, your wheel has moved full circle. You are nobody these days. I suspect even WhoIs is missing your queries.
If, I may ask you, why didn't you respond to my post where I indicted your ESLish English and argued that FW and EW_writer are better writers than you? It hurt, yeah?

I once repeat: Your English lacks liveliness and it comes out as laboured. You know the type of English that, although grammatically correct, reveals too much editing and too much care which, in essence, makes it painfully cautionary.

You don't have to edit any post here before posting: This is not an English class.
And, oh yes, what do you say about your polish origins?
We all know that immigrants to the US always attempt to sound more 'Americans' than the natives. This is what you've done for seven fu**-n years. You thought Americans students would 'love' you as their 'saviour', right?

Get this is into your skull: the students you were 'helping' way back in 2007 are now senior managers and wouldn't want anything to do with your fat a.ss. You, on the other hand, continue to roam a sad forum while exhibiting horrible delusions of grandeur.

Aren't you aware that most of the students who occasionally land on this forum are young enough to be your grandchildren? And instead of offering them solid, grandmotherly advice, you only help them to 'legitimately' deceive the system?

What kind of a grandmother are you?

New advertisers:

https://essayscam.org/forum/es/unemployed-professors-help-clean-mess-4726/

https://essayscam.org/forum/es/unemployedprofessors-review-4653/

Did essayscam just accept advertising money from a company it once helped to expose as a scam?

I just re-read those threads that you offer as proof that EssayScam "once helped to expose as a scam." There is no evidence in those posts and those making the complaints seem to only be making baseless accusations. Perhaps these forum members are competitors? I will also add that I personally know two PhD's that work for the company. I have no affiliation with Unemployed Professors, but I do work on independent freelance projects with these two friends and we share experiences about working with different middlemen companies.

Perhaps you, Ed75, are one of these competitors? It seems that I have caught you making false accusations against an essay service company. Maybe you actually believed that those threads constitute proof? Then I say you really are a dolt who is no position to judge.

It seems that editor75 is finally exposed as a shill.

And why do you receive money from students knowing very well they will use your poorly written papers to cheat their universities?
Dolt75, you know one thing: you sound so fake trying to act as a self righteous pig. Your history, as evidenced by W2B posts, is literally suffocating with fraud, deception, impersonation, threats, forgery, prostitution and violence. You rank last amongst the lowest of lows. On a wickedness scale of 1 to 10, you rank 60. Your date of birth should actually be deleted from calendars. Yes, the world can do with 364 days per year. If I call you a pig, I would actually deserve being mauled by pigs for dishonouring them.

I don't even pity you; I actually pity your mother for the constant pains and regrets she undergoes when she wonders why she gave birth to a snake that faintly resembles a human.

Right, your posting hearsay is much better than my asking questions.

Here are some answers to your questions: I don't view any company as a competitor; I am an individual writer. Companies are either potential employers or ex-employers to me. I have a gut feeling that unemployedprofessors falls into the latter category, which is why I am asking questions about them. I have worked for a lot of people in this industry, and sometimes they have had different names.

Something about the site rings a bell, and it stinks, as far as I'm concerned, that they're advertising here at all-- when 8/8 of the last ads were for scams. I never claimed those threads constituted proof. I posted the threads to background my open question. I am still working on the answer myself.

Instead of going around assuming you know everything, you should try asking some questions. There are a lot of people on this forum who are exponentially more experienced in this industry than you are. If I were a noob who didn't even know enough not to promise grades, I would view that as a resource, not a series of targets for my "internet bigmouth" problem.

You are a backpedaling stooge. You expose yourself in ways that you fail to understand.

So your reasoning is that because all of the previous advertisements where scammers, then the present advert must be a scammer. You don't see the logical fallacy, do you shill75?


You are not one of these people. I certainly do consult with more experienced people in this industry and always defer to their judgment. These people also have the qualities of being kind and consistent.


Right, something does stink. It is the double standard that you apply to having suspicions about other individuals and companies. Does this mean when I'm done being a noob that I can make wild judgments based on my gut feeling?


You directly stated in the form of a rhetorical question that EssayScam helped to expose Unemployed Professors as a scam. You can be obtuse and backpedal all you like, but you can't escape this simple fact.

A stooge or a shill is a person who claims to have no affiliations or vested interests and then goes about attacking the opposition. This description perfectly fits editor75 and is much more egregious than me being a loud-mouthed noob. At worst, my postings in this forum are annoying and somewhat embarrassing.

I understand that many forum members operate under the assumption that their potential clients are mostly not aware of what is actually happening here. The clients are expected to believe that 1) they can find unbiased and un-manipulated content on a company-owned forum (website) and 2) that the forum is populated with highly experienced, trustworthy members (experts) that have no affiliations and vested/biased interests that equate to gross conflicts. Every industry in the world practices something similar to this in some sort of venue, whether it be in a forum or otherwise. This, and editor75's obvious shilling, is why he cannot be trusted.

Called a big-mouth, the Dr.'s response is to write a rambling, 2-post book of a defense. Are your essays that all over the place? Aren't you busy?

I do have more experience than you, and you should be embarrassed. The more you call something illusory obvious, the more you will continue to look foolish.

Maybe on some things, but definitely not others. Just because you're a crusty senior citizen does not mean that you are due any respect.

Bottom line: you called out a company as a scam with bad logic and no proof. Now you are trying to weasle your way out it.

Way to dance around the topic.

Something's fishy about this company and their smarmy gimmicks. You don't have proof otherwise, either... unless you can get some of those (likely illusory) friends of yours who work there to post here.

Dolt75, that's not grounds for making public accusations about scamming. You don't get to table such an accusation and then demand that somebody else proves you wrong. You sound like a friggin' politician. You started this nonsense, now back it up old man. Again, another double standard. You really are here just to mess with everybody by way of bad info.

And you're talking about smarmy gimmicks from a post on EssayScam? Give me a break. You're just pissed that you don't possess the credentials to be hired on.

Following Ed75's logic:

1) Hmmm, Ed75 sure does seem like a sketchy dude (cite all of his posts).
2) Did EssayScam just permit a post from a member (editor75) who is likely an anal rapist?
3) My gut feeling and experience says yes, he is indeed an anal rapist.
4) Nope, I don't have any proof. The burden is on the people who called out my wildly unfounded suspicions. This way I can hide being a shill.

I didn't make any accusations, and it inspired you to post your little fit of hearsay. I'm now calling on you to make that hearsay into something substantial.

And keep your Appalachian family experiences out of it, if you can.

This (post #153 of this thread) is editor75 NOT suggesting in any way that the competition might be nothing more than scammers.

I guess that's a "no" on the cavalry... again.

And again: what competition? I have no commercial purpose here.

I think I talked to these people a few years ago, and they were not what they seemed on their website. I am looking into it more, though, so I posted the above question.

This little lesson in the difference between a question and an accusation is part of a major ongoing schooling you're getting here. One would think you would act like less of a twit, with all of these free lessons you're getting.

It still remains that you made a baseless claim about scamming. You can keep driving away from this all you want, but that still remains as well as my initial questions that you refuse to answer.

It is clear that you are a shill who is here to attack anybody who dares to post or advertise in this forum. There's plenty proof for all of that, such that there is nothing more to say on the subject. If nobody can clearly see that after reading your twisted posts, then I have nothing to say that can help such folks.

You are not here for fun or some higher purpose. You are here as part of a larger scam. You are a scammer calling other people scammers. That is the sum of you activity in this forum. How's that for hearsay?

That sounds more like a jealous and deluded opinion; the hearsay was back when you were pretending to have friends.

Where's the cheese, Dr. Mom? It's here somewhere, isn't it?

In briefly vetting unemployedprofessors.com, I came across some illegal statements:

--------------------------------
"We're just transferring copyright over research that we've done, in exchange for our fee, to you. Feel free to do whatever you want with the essay - you own it."

SOURCE: unemployedprofessors.com/Faq.aspx

". . . you're not going to get caught unless you do something stupid like tell everyone that you bought an essay."
SOURCE: unemployedprofessors.com/Faq.aspx

"The brave professor thus became a mercenary - writing high quality papers for those students with better things to do and the funds that allowed him to buy tweed."

SOURCE: unemployedprofessors.com/AboutUs.aspx

"Our professors specialize across all disciplines, but they need to know what you need, or want, if they're to deliver you an A+ burger with awesome sauce."

SOURCE: unemployedprofessors.com/AboutUs.aspx
--------------------------------

It is illegal for a provider to transfer copyright of an academic work that the provider reasonably should have known may be submitted for academic credit by the receiver.

They're here, but they're just not lurking about as much as we do. They're also not all that interested in these silly arguments. One of them claimed that they're never coming back because of the constant bickering. I watched you personally give her a hard time for asking simple questions.

You're still a shill.

I don't believe you.

Who cares what you believe? Um, nobody, except for me in as much that I'm entertained by dolts. This is about you being a scamming shill, not about my contacts or what you believe (as if you have any authority). Not only that, it is clear to me that you already know enough of the facts, yet chose to maintain this silly affectation for the sake of gathering more ammo for your shilling. I'm not giving you anymore bananas.

Try commanding the respect that you think you deserve. You may be as experienced as you say, but being an åsshöle wipes that all away.

It's "any more." The more worked up you get, the more you revert to the hills. You're not a very good writer, you know.

I don't believe that you have any friends who work at unemployedprofessors. I don't believe that you will call them, or that they will post here.

As to your attributing some sort of mercenary reason for my being here, I believe that's a matter of your being unable to, as they say, see past your own chin.

Ok, weirdo. I don't believe you either.

You have the misguided notion that you not believing me has more weight than me not believing you. We're two anonymous usernames battling it out and that's all you've got ± insults?

You strike me as some mediocre guy who hasn't done much with his life. No accomplishments or anything remotely interesting. You probably think that life has screwed you one too many times. You've found a gig that kinda works out and fancy yourself an expert now that you've hit your senior years. You're still just another mediocre dude who's going nowhere, hiding behind his keyboard until his early death comes. A sad waste.

Forget about your irresponsible accusations-- they say a lot more about you than me.

I'm more concerned with whom you're irresponsibly defending.

Ok, weirdo. You're irresponsible.

You're right; I spent my first two years here irresponsibly defending a company I worked for who turned out to be stealing from their writers. The joke was on me. After that, I learned to be more careful.

That's your stupid fault, especially at your age. I have enough experience at my young age to know that I should never seriously and fully defend any company. You just don't know everything, even if you're married to the company owner. I will, however, call out folks who make blatantly bogus claims about specific issues.

Its simple. Make contact with the writers at unemployedprofessors.com and test your suspicions. They have a bidding system that allows you to directly exchange messages with the writers. Make up a fake project and ask the writers to contact you. Shît, you can make up two or three in the span of five minutes without revealing your true identity and testing whether you are getting different people who are actually writers. Again, the burden of proof is on you.

Like, for example, that I'm old? I'm in my 30s. I think I'm probably younger than you... I think that, but I don't assume it.

WB is also correct about their website-- aside from being a smarmy farce, it makes a lot of claims usually reserved for companies operating out of the sphere of the US/UK legal systems (and idiot mavericks who don't know any better). You know, like, "you want an A?," and "turn it right in." Sleazy stuff.

Know what I'm talking about?

Ok, Lothar of the essay scam people. Keep avoiding an easy way of testing your bogus claims.


The entire industry is sleazy. That is a defining characteristic. Maybe you fancy yourself a high-class hooker, but you're still polishing knobs for money. You, me, and everybody else here are in the business of helping people cheat. I say that from the perspective of having been on the other side of the fence, which is a place you've never been.

Is it illegal in Canada to offer the possibility of an 'A' or offer copyright? I don't know. I'm not a legal scholar. And I've yet to see one on this forum. I did model my own website after what I gleaned from a number of other sites. UnemployedProfessors has a relatively high profile (look it up on Google News), so I went with that. Then I came here to run the gauntlet and learn a few things. That worked perfectly as evidenced by you, WB, and Major nit picking at every little detail. Thanks, I love the free copyediting! It was like getting constructive criticism via waterboarding, but nevertheless useful.

Is unemployedprofessor.com a sleazy website? Yes, absolutely and without any doubt. But so is EssayScam and ALL of its affiliates (see Terms page). Selling academic ghostwritten works, whether for reference use or otherwise, is a sleazy activity on par with pimping, whoring, drug dealing, and racketeering. Yes, I realize that none of these are legally similar, but they do have the same sleaze value.

So, someone like yourself who engages in sleazy business is accusing another of engaging in something sleazy. Seems like something a shill would do. Again, you could easily test your assumptions, but you prefer to come off as a stooge in the protective confines of this sleazy forum.

When I post chat logs with phony service reps and the mods take the ad down the next day, it feels good to me. I'm working on this one, just like I worked on the last 7 ads. If it works out, it works out, and I'm 8/8. If not, maybe next time, and it's still a so-so average.

I don't see a customer service chat function on their website. What are you going to do? Ask to send them a book at their office in Canada, which they then have to send to a writer in the UK? Come on man, it takes less time to verify your claim than it does to have this discussion.

I like how you back pedal on the argument from moral superiority.

I like how your moral revulsion at your own profession makes you call yourself a cocksucker.

I like how it turns you on.

I find something oddly familiar about the language, tone, and witless wit of unemployedprofessors.com's copy.

Shudder to think...

...one in the stink.

Great, keep it classy. How old are you, anyway?