Does this site do oxymoron(ism)?

Evening All,

Apologies for the unusual title. I stumbled on the site by chance, and am as frustrated as I am relieved. No names mentioned, but an essay site that looked the real deal i found online then checked out here appears to be a complete scam. That's my relief.

My frustration however has been the lack of any decent reviews of the plethora of sites that reside within the field of academic writing.

There appears to be plenty of flammatory and negative comments, but nothing that makes me as a potential client want to initiate contact.

So, I ask, without breaking the site rules which require respect:

Are the sites that are listed on 'Essaynews' verifiable as delivering what they offer?
Where can I at the very least find good news on a particular company?
Has anyone actually had anything written that has enabled them to achieve a decent grade by any 3rd party writing service?

Thanks for any help.
ps - Scammers please don't bother replying, it's quite easy to spot...!

That's because the purpose of this site is to uncover scams, not to promote or endorse legit sites.


Those sites paid for the ad space. The listings have no bearing whatsoever on their legitimacy.

Some legitimate members here believe you are paid poster/anchor too :). It's hard to deny their opinions.

Really? Name them.


Hey, good job posting more of your completely off-topic, irrelevant nonsense. You are an absolute moron who hasn't posted a shred of evidence-EVER.

Morning WB

Well that's a fair enough response though one could question why a site that actively exposes scams would allow adverts that are not validated?

As a suggestion, would it be worthwhile opening a forum that allows users to share positive experiences?

Thanks

LW

please don't feed the troll.

Actually, RustyWriter, "trolls" are utterly useless flamers who have no knowledge and contribute absolutely nothing useful or constructive to a forum. That's a perfect description of you, pal.

Now ain't THAT an oxymoron? ^_^ By allegedly uncovering scam sites, a message board inadvertently promotes sites that are claimed to not be scam sites.

______________________________________________________________________

False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.

- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)

Completely out of context, of course . . . . That's EW_liar's specialty.


That is absolutely true. What EW_liar is suggesting is laughable and utterly absurd.

Here's what EW_liar believes:

1. A person creates a Web site.

2. The person advertises one or more imaginary products.

3. The person misrepresents the supposed qualities of one of those imaginary products.

4. The person never sells one of the imaginary products.

5. The person can be charged with a crime.

That is what EW_liar claims. Is her assertion complete nonsense? Yep.

Nice try but once again, you're just mashing together true and false statements to make you seem believable. In order for one to be charged with false advertising, there must be a complaint. I doubt that there would be any complaints against say.. websites that claim to sell live unicorns. However, websites that claim to sell termpapers written by people with PhDs is another matter. If that website falsely advertises, its competition can sue it for false advertising REGARDLESS of whether the website was actually able to sell anything. THAT is what the Lanham Act is all about, Miss Pretend-Lawyer.

Hahaha!!! You have been completely humiliated in an issue that you handpicked and now you can't handle the b**-hslapping that comes with losing. YOU ARE PATHETIC.

People can see the full details of WB getting utterly humiliated from the link below: essayscam.org/forum/gt/substantive-issues-essay-industry-1943/ [Substantive issues in the essay industry]


Anyone who reads that thread would see that all WB proved was that I am in fact a native English speaking writer who wanted to hide my identity by posing as an exceptionally qualified ESL writer. Did WB's "expose" adversely affect my credibility as a writer? Heck no, it even improved it. Did WB's "expose" prove that I have broken any laws? On the contrary, it actually proved that EVEN IF I advertised myself as an American writer, I'm not breaking any laws since hey, I am from the U.S. of A.

WB is a washed up loser who has been proven to exhibit levels of stupidity that ought to be considered illegal in civilized societies. She is a pretend-lawyer who has gotten her a** kicked far too many times for ANY of her opinions to be taken seriously. Her tactic is to expose some sites that are already known scams, so that she can sneak in unsubstantiated opinions every now and then. Despicable.


It's not a suggestion, it's the law:

§ 43 (15 U.S.C. §1125). False designations of origin; false description or representation
(a) (1) Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which--

(A) is likely to causeconfusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person, or

(B) in commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person's goods, services, or commercial activities, shall be liable in a civil action by any person who believes that he or she is or is likely to be damaged bysuch act.

law.uconn.edu/homes/swilf/ip/statutes/lanham43.htm

What happened to all your claims over the YEARS about your filthy employer, essaywriters.net, not being guilty of any crimes and all of its wrong-doing, deception, and false advertising about its writers' qualifications "not mattering"? LMAO! Sucker. What's up with all of the contradictions and flip-flopping since I exposed your pathetic lies? By the way, you didn't lie to "protect your identity," as usernames in this forum are already completely anonymous. Nice excuse, though. You LIED for YEARS about being an ESL writer because you couldn't legitimately refute ANY of my claims about the average, ESL writer in the industry. You have since openly AGREED with my assessment after I left you with NO CHOICE but to do so in light of my "expose." ;)


Oh, but what happened to this?


I suppose that your own legal assertion does not apply to YOU for having falsely advertised YOURSELF as an ESL writer for YEARS, negatively affecting the prospective economic advantage of the legitimate, American companies that hire only native English-speaking writers? I thought you weren't guilty of any wrong-doing? Whoops!


Name the sites that have been exposed as scams without any involvement from me. I can name DOZENS of sites that I have personally exposed and show examples of my evidence-based contributions. Put up or shut up, EW_liar.

I'll address the liar's "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

Dufus, did I ever claim that EW wasn't legally liable for anything? I claimed that it didn't matter for clients and writers in this industry and that EW would probably never get prosecuted anyway, but I never said that EW wasn't violating any laws. I did say however that EW's writers (past or present) are absolutely without any legal liability for EW's actions.


Nice try, but that debate ended when you said and I quote:


One, it's not an assertion, it's fact. Two, you can't make the argument above without FIRST admitting to all of your stupidity regarding false advertising laws. DO THAT FIRST, and then I'll give you an answer that will just HUMILIATE you all over again. ^________________^


Oh, please there are plenty. For example, can you honestly claim that Peter Richardson would not have been exposed as a scam if it wasn't for you? Give me a break. :p

WB is a washed up loser who has been proven to exhibit levels of stupidity that ought to be considered illegal in civilized societies. She is a pretend-lawyer who has gotten her a** kicked far too many times for ANY of her opinions to be taken seriously.


HAHAHAHAHA!!!! We'll be waiting, dbag.

it's a shame that no one in town likes you, and you have to live under the bridge. maybe it's because you're so crazy and unhappy. anyway, troll supreme, here is what you do.

1. get in months-long flame wars with anyone foolish or masochistic enough to put up with your dull, repetitive playground ranting

2. set up straw men

3. make appeals to imaginary authority (both your own and the mod's)

4. post scans of Yuri's speeding tickets (this will surely bring down EW... just wait)

5. pretend to cyber-stalk people

6. attack newbies

it's embarrassing, WB, because now you've proven yourself a closet troll... so, you're going to be the last one to know. once you've faced it, I hear there's a certain happiness in acceptance... good luck on your journey.

Hey... it's a hobby. >.<


ROFLMAO!!!

let me guess-- you also like crack cocaine, and putting storks in bottles.

Never tried drugs.. that stork thing sounds interesting though. :P

Hey

EW
Rusty
WB
(in alphabetical order)

Thanks for jacking the thread.

FWIW, and its not worth a lot quite frankly, WB does appear to present their opinions and views with evidence to back up their claim.

Rusty appears to argue about just anything WB says.
EW appears to be american.

LW

My first post was a valid comment on the topic.


Can I help it if WB can't stand seeing her ridiculous statements flashed as my signature? :P

Is that all you've got-ONE person? (By the way, "Peter Richardson" is not a Web site, Margie.)


As you can see, ludwig, I responded to your post with answers and assistance. Then, as always, the resident fraudsters and liars (stu4, EW_writer, and rustyironchains) began personally attacking me. Why? They can't stand it when I reveal the ugly facts and realities about their employers. Of course, they'll offer some other reasons for attacking me


Thank you. Like all other visitors, you're smart enough to recognize which members are here to help protect people from fraud and which members are here solely to attack the members who offer such help because it hurts their bottom lines. EW_writer openly admitted in an older thread that the only reason why she is a member of this forum is to personally attack me. Reading her posting history will tell you all that you need to know about her personal agenda, the main goals of which are to attack me as a means of protecting her foreign employers' dirty operations.

you're right! I misread the title, and thought you were talking about "moronism"...


for your 1st question, experience is reality. if you don't trust a site, make a small order first-- 2 or 3 pages. it's like testing the waters.

2nd question-- there is still plenty of good news on essayscam.org. I post awesome things my bosses do, as well as the "ugly things" the troll claims I hold back. generally, the awesome things get deleted.

3rd question-- oh, hell yes. and when that happens, the customer usually becomes a loyal source of income. I don't want to brag, but I should have a couple of complete degrees by now, because of this. then again, not all writers even aim for As-- some customers want it dumbed down, so their professor doesn't catch them up on some silver dollar vocab word.


you're right-- like many others, I joined this forum not just to answer questions (based on my own experience), but to try and force WB to account for some of their garbage (based on public records and Google maps). I don't appreciate companies being called frauds unjustly, even when they aren't my employers... and when they are my employers, and the only thing they're guilty of is being located outside of the US, I want to defend them. I don't appreciate trolls, either, or give them quarter on websites that claim to be devoted to the industry in which I operate.

LOL!!! There are so many others but thank you for agreeing to my first example. Now it's my turn. Tell me, what website do you think would not have been uncovered as a scam if it wasn't for you and why?


ROFLMAO!!! We're all still waiting, dips-i*. ^____^

Well, that makes perfect sense, as you are definitely a moron (as well as a proven liar and embarrassingly clueless dolt).


FAIL. You have accomplished zilch, pal. I have absolutely pummeled you every time you have attempted to challenge my statements. Do I really need to recount all of your asinine assertions, lies, and false claims based on sheer ignorance?


1. I didn't state that I agree with you. Sorry.

2. I didn't state that I did not contribute to the Richardson investigations.

3. I never stated that I started EVERY investigation and posted EVERY bit of evidence about EVERY site/company. That's literally impossible, which is obvious to any sane person. I think that it's funny how you try to make it seem as though it represnets some sort of shortcoming on my part.

4. YOU claimed (i.e., LIED) that I have NEVER posted original evidence about ANY site/company or originally established the fraudulent nature of any site/company. That is an outright lie, and you damn well know it. A quick glance at my thread-posting history proves that you are a lying schmuck (but everyone already knows that).

5. If there are "many others," why can't you name a couple (you know, significant sites that actually matter in the industry)?

Nice try but no, that's not what I claimed. I said:


Which means that you and your evidences are not crucial to the exposure of scams in this industry.


Ticktock, loser.. ticktock. ^__________^

___________________________________________________________________

False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.

- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)

I'll reply when I have a bit of time to review the case law, LIAR. I'm sure that you don't mind . . . .

LMAO!!! You do that, you big sack of FAILURE. ^___^


Bet you're going to say that you'll be doing extensive research before you answer this question too. :p

PATHETIC.

LMAO!

You're the one who works PEANUTS for fraudulent essay sites.

You're the one who needs to grovel for extra work through this forum, in direct violation of forum rules.

You're one who comes here to desperately plead for a particular site to come back online because you need money that badly! (Sad, so very sad . . . .)

You're the one who STALKS me in literally every thread and desperately attempts to discredit me with personal nonsense because you just can't stand the fact that I repeatedly post the absolute TRUTH about your fraudulent employer's dirty and downright illegal practices.

You're the one who fraudulently posed as an "ESL writer" for YEARS because you could not legitimately refute my claims about the average, ESL writer in the essay industry. (You now use the pathetic excuse that you lied only to "protect your identity," which is complete horse__. Usernames in this forum are-and always have been-completely anonymous. You lied because you couldn't take me in a fair fight, you cowardly scoundrel.)

You're the one who has defended-and made excuses for-your employer's blatant misrepresentation and false advertising for YEARS.

It's quite clear that you are the failure, not only in this forum, but in life.


No problem. I have provided the most in-depth, revealing evidence against each and every one of the following sites:

academia-research.com
academicwritinghelp.com
bestdissertation.com
bestessays.com
besttermpaper.com
custom-writing.org
customwritings.com
essaybrunch
essaywriters.net
manyessays.com
masterpapers.com
mastersessay.com
mightystudents.com
plagiarismdetect.com
plagiarismsearch.com
rushessay.com
superiorpapers.com
supremeessays.com
termpaperstar.com
ukessaywriting.co.uk
usatermpapers.com
writers.ph

Those are just the sites about which I started dedicated threads. I have also posted first-time, original evidence of fraud against DOZENS of other sites/companies.

Hey, if $15-$60/page is peanuts then yes, I work for peanuts. ^_^


I don't "grovel" for work. Can I help it if people who visit this board and see how often and how well I own you take a liking to me and hire me for their projects?


Oh please, plead? Really? Let's see some quotes, loser.


You deserve it and you HAVE been discredited multiple times. Don't you get it? Being in this constant state of denial can't be good for your mental health. ^_____^


This claim is fine to me:


I got nothing to say against that. ^_^


There you go again trying to avoid answering a very direct question. I wasn't asking you to enumerate which sites you've accumulated "evidences" against. I was asking you which site do you think would not have been exposed as a scam if it wasn't for your actions. Can't you even name a single site that fits that description? PITIFUL.


Nobody's buying it, loser. You've humiliated yourself far too many times for people to take your crap seriously. You've shown blatant stupidity on matters ranging from business and management to law. You've shown over and over again that the only thing you're really good for is citing errors in spelling and grammar; you're a glorified spelling and grammar checker who's hell bent on staying credible in order to lure unsuspecting newcomers away from the competition. Sorry, that ain't happening anymore. You're done.

You're asking a question that can't be answered, and you know it. I posted the ORIGINAL evidence that PROVED and SOLIDIFIED their reputation as fraudulent. Period. Go ahead and try to prove otherwise. Show me older sources of the information that I posted in those threads. Hurry up!


Here you go again with the gutless, underhanded insinuations. What "competition"? I have stated countless times that I do not write essays and I do not work for any essay companies. Stop being a classless b**-h and post your proof to the contrary.

a lot of those companies WB listed aren't even scams. some are scams, and are still raking it in. others are in a perpetual state of self-destruction-- all independent of WB's dedicated threads. maybe you should try stepping up your game a little, WB, so that you're not such a laughing stock.

You're all claim and no substance. How about you show that you have a pair and NAME the sites that you claim are "not scams"? Afraid that I will slap you in the face with the evidence? Yeah, you are. Coward.

Nice try. See here's where you try to take credit without taking responsibility and once again FAIL miserably. You can't PROVE that your actions were critical to proving any site as a scam. Period.

Furthermore, rusty is right. Many of the sites you mentioned aren't even scams. Your continued existence in this forum depends on your ability to look like a scam-buster so that you can influence visitors' decisions when choosing between competing "legitimate" homework writing sites.


Sure you have. You've been trying to sell that s-i* for years now. Tell me, has anyone ever actually bought it?
__________________________________________________________________

[b]EW_writer being exposed as a native English writer with a graduate degree from an American university.

False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.

- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)

What you do not seem to understand-ya proven liar and con artist-is that it is YOUR burden to prove your ignorant, baseless claims against me. I don't have to PROVE or JUSTIFY my assertion that I do not write essays for students or work for any essay companies. Where's your proof? How about we keep it really simple, hah? Quote a single one of my 6,000+ posts in which I have recommended a company. Oh, that's right-you can't do that, either. My bad for asking.


This coming from the lying scam-defender who just demanded that I prove a negative:


Sorry, but I can't prove what would NOT have happened. Buy a vowel, and then a clue.


Just like RustyWriter, EW_liar didn't name a single one the "many sites" because she knows perfectly well that I will beat her silly with the evidence.

Sure you don't, but at the same time, I don't have to believe that you don't write or own a particular company. I'm FREE to believe what I want to believe and to express that belief to others. In the same way, you can't stop me or other people from believing that you do have vested interests in what you're doing. You can't force us to ignore our common sense, which is telling us that you're not just in this out of the goodness of your heart.


Wow.. a grammatical technicality as a rebuttal against a reasonable challenge. That's WB for you. I have made my point very clear. Your actions are not essential to the exposure of sites as scams. Sure, you do present new evidences, but the strongest evidences come from writers and clients who relate their experiences about getting scammed. Once again, it's not about location or nationality. Heck, it's not even about false advertising. If a site is falsely advertising itself, then those who feel like it should mount legal cases against the owners of such sites. That shouldn't stop people from availing or continuing to avail of such sites' services if they are satisfied with what they get.


Yeah, right. EW and AR both fit into the category of sites which are not scams because they do hire writers that provide quality products. If they advertisely falsely, then they should be sued, but that shouldn't stop people from buying if they want to. I don't mind telling people that buying from either site is a hit or miss activity.

it's true-- EW and AR, while shady, aren't scams.

WB still doesn't know what a scam is. sometimes definitions are so cut and dry; it's easier to understand examples.

here, WB, let me help. a couple of years ago, I worked for a company in Manhattan. I got paid to make false promises. customers came into the office, and I took their money. when they left, I didn't help them, and I got paid anyway. these people paid for absolutely nothing. it was fun for a while, despite bad karma and high stress. it was a scam.

at AR, which is definitely not an American company, I write essays. people have instructions and set the price they're willing to pay. I get paid to write real essays. customers download my essays, and if they're not happy about them, they moan and complain, and I have to write them a free revision. I get paid to help them. they pay for essays, and that's what they get. it's fun, despite bad karma and occasional fines. it's not a scam.

do you understand?

Wrong. Your demand was/is a joke. You can't ask me to prove what would NOT have happened if I had never posted my ORIGINAL evidence in this forum. Wake up. End of story.


Right, because struggling college students can easily afford the monetary burdens of retaining attorneys and filing lawsuits. They also have the worldliness and plenty of free time to do so. Oh, and I almost forgot: they would just love to reveal that they used an essay site, no matter how properly and ethically.



Do you guys understand the definitions of "many"? List the "many" sites, please.


Well, I already knew that you are a filthy liar and shameless criminal with absolutely no moral compass, but thank you for putting it in writing.

Are you AR's only writer? If not, your assertion about AR is irrelevant. Not everything is about you, criminal.

this makes no sense at all! how does anything I wrote suggest that I think I'm their only writer? I just wrote how they treat me as a writer. I assume they treat other writers the same way. many AR writers with good feedback make premium... are you implying that they would want to shoot themselves in the foot by scamming customers?

face it, WB, even though they are "only two" companies and not "many," as you suggest, they are glaring exceptions that don't belong on your list... and probably the tip of the iceberg! AR and EW are on the list for some reason... they're not scams. own up to something, for once, and then, maybe you can tell us why you're profiling these companies.

I was talking about such sites' competition, you ninny.


WRONG. I asked you to claim the significance of your evidence in proving even one site as a scam. It is perfectly reasonable to ask if in the absence of your evidence, a site would still have been exposed. This case is true for Peter Richardson's sites (which I believe, are more than a few), and I bet that if I actually spent time to document the forum's activity over the last few years it would become too obvious that NONE of the evidences you've presented have actually been CRITICAL in proving any site as a scam.


Hmmm... how many sites do EW and AR allegedly have in total? Wasn't it you who mentioned that both companies have a plethora of websites? Do we have to list those sites? I'm sure that you can do that for us. Oh wait.. you have. Here you go, loser.

2-pay-secure.com
911essay.com
beckfamilies.com
bestbuyessay.com
bestessays.com
besttermpaper.com
dissertationsexperts.com
essaywriters.net
killer-content.com
resumesexperts.com
resumesplanet.com
rushessay.com
superiorpapers.com
universalresearch.net
wisetranslations.com

"Many" enough for you?

_________________________________________________________________________

False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.

- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)

Sounds like a challenge . . . . Do you really want me to go there?

There she goes again with the bold threats. Sheesh.. when are you going to get that your act is OLD. Nobody's afraid of you. The days when the only people who disagree with you are those who can't even put a decent sentence in the English language together ended YEARS ago.

Btw, so how's the legal research doing? STILL can't find anything to say against my position regarding writers' culpability? Maybe you ought to run for public office, get a seat in congress, and then try and have the Lanham Act revised. YOU ARE SUCH A LOSER! >.<

Nice try. To avoid your intentional confusion as a means of leaving yourself a way out, try being specific next time.


NEWSFLASH: I don't care about getting credit for anything. However, that you continue to post your propaganda against me in this forum every day is more than enough proof that, deep down, you KNOW that the truthful information and verifiable evidence that I post in this forum threatens your bottom line and your employer's ability to engage in fraudulent activities unchecked. Sorry. :(

The vast majority of the significant evidence that I have posted in this forum had NEVER appeared anywhere online previously. Not a single customer on the planet had access to that information before I posted it here (let alone knew how/where to find it or even that it was necessary to find at all because they did not REALIZE that your filthy employer was lying to them). Since my original postings in this forum to warn customers about your employer's fraudulent practices, numerous other people and news outlets have posted articles validating my claims, including [cnn.com/video/#/video/us/2009/09/04/costello.outsourcing.homework.cnn] - CNN (start listening closely at the 1:50-mark)! I communicated with Ms. Costello and gave her a few leads that she investigated and reported on in the video. I have also been directly contacted by many other news agencies requesting interviews and additional information.

Alas, I could go on and on about how I have provided original evidence that has helped to protect literally countless people and sparked further investigation elsewhere, but who cares? That's just as irrelevant as the majority of your smoke screening posts. This is just one more in a very long line of failed attempts to distract people from the evidence that I post.