EssayScam ForumEssayScam.org
Unanswered      
  
Forum / General Talk   % width   132 posts

Does this site do oxymoron(ism)?



EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 08, 2010 | #41
The vast majority of the significant evidence that I have posted in this forum had NEVER appeared anywhere online previously.

Blah.. blah... BLAH. Name a site already! ^_____^ LOL!!! You haven't? You can't? CNN reported on cheating and DID NOT focus on sites being scams. You've been contacted by news agencies? Right... you're talking about the CNN dude who sent almost everyone emails asking for information. You contributed to the CNN report? Riiiiiight.. was that before or after you wrote John McCain his speech for the primaries? Sheeeesh... The sad part is, EVEN IF all of this was true and you did somehow contribute to the CNN report, it still DOES NOT PROVE that your contributions are critical to proving scams in this industry. Heck, the site that CNN featured isn't even a scam site.

Btw, so how's the legal research doing? STILL can't find anything to say against my position regarding writers' culpability? Maybe you ought to run for public office, get a seat in congress, and then try and have the Lanham Act revised. YOU ARE SUCH A LOSER! >.<
WritersBeware  
Oct 08, 2010 | #42
Hey, EW_w*0re, why can't you get it through your thick skull that I don't care about you or what you think? You're a complete joke, con-artist, liar, and criminal.

Have a nice day.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 08, 2010 | #43
ROFLMAO!!!! Once again, backed in a corner and left utterly defenseless, WB resorts to that all too familiar tactic: ignoring the argument, throwing in a couple of unsubstantiated/refuted accusations and simply claiming that she doesn't care.

You don't care what I think? THEN SHUT UP. ^_^ Wasn't it you who bravely said and I quote:

I'll address the "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

???

Is it my fault that you are utterly incapable of following through on your statements? No, it's yours.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #44
Sounds like a challenge . . . . Do you really want me to go there?

sounds like you're "challenged..." and if by "there," you're referring to Google, you should start with one of those free online dictionaries.
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #45
Hey, Rusty, keep scraping up those peanut shells from your fraudulent employer in Ukraine, you talentless, pathetic, tiny man who can't get a job with any of the legit, American companies in the industry because they don't hire KNOWN CRIMINALS.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #46
more baseless claims, from a cornered rat. will it make you feel better to try to get my IRL identity? will that fill the void, WB? --because this isn't working.

your fraudulent employer

customers make a purchase; AR supplies the essays on time. if the customer's satisfied, great. if not, they get free revisions. then, if everything turns out OK, the writers get paid. what's fraudulent about that? I'm still confused.

btw, did you see my original question? -- here it is again:

AR and EW are on the list for some reason... they're not scams. own up to something, for once, and then, maybe you can tell us why you're profiling these companies.

WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #47
btw, did you see my original question? -- here it is again:

No problem, criminal.

Following are just of few of the disgusting practices employed by essaywriters.net and academia-research.com, companies that RustyCriminal and EW_liar laughably claim are "not fraudulent." Read each thread carefully and study my evidence. Ignore the two propagandists who work for essaywriters.net and academia-research.com. The evidence speaks for itself.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #48
customers make a purchase; AR supplies the essays on time. if the customer's satisfied, great. if not, they get free revisions. then, if everything turns out OK, the writers get paid. what's fraudulent about that? I'm still confused.

...and, still confused. I didn't ask for a lot of your crappy accusations about fake addresses in link form, you dolt. I asked what was fraudulent about what I just mentioned.

if you can't answer, don't. it's not an invitation to have an OCD episode.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #49
Ignore the two propagandists who work for essaywriters.net and academia-research.com.

One, I currently don't work for either company (although if ever I hit a shortage of orders, I may try AR). Two, you're crazy. Remember when you asked us to mention sites that weren't scams yet were included in your list and rust and I both mentioned EW and AR? You're response to that was:

Do you guys understand the definitions of "many"? List the "many" sites, please.

After rusty pointed out that:

face it, WB, even though they are "only two" companies and not "many," as you suggest, they are glaring exceptions that don't belong on your list... and probably the tip of the iceberg! AR and EW are on the list for some reason... they're not scams. own up to something, for once, and then, maybe you can tell us why you're profiling these companies.

and I further added that:

Hmmm... how many sites do EW and AR allegedly have in total? Wasn't it you who mentioned that both companies have a plethora of websites? Do we have to list those sites?

You go back to your mudslinging tactics. Did you forget to take your meds again?

Oh and before I forget:

How's the legal research doing? STILL can't find anything to say against my position regarding writers' culpability? Maybe you ought to run for public office, get a seat in congress, and then try and have the Lanham Act revised. YOU ARE SUCH A LOSER! >.<

____________________________________________________________________
Days since pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware made the statement below: 4

I'll address the "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #50
I'll address the "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

How retarded are you? I stated that I will respond on my schedule, after I am able to review the existing case law. I don't jump at your every whim. In fact, I literally would not piss on you if you were on fire.

...and, still confused. I didn't ask for a lot of your crappy accusations about fake addresses in link form, you dolt. I asked what was fraudulent about what I just mentioned.

Read the threads carefully, ya desperate, moronic criminal. Oh, and by the way, I didn't post the links for YOUR benefit. I don't give a damn if you live or die, criminal.

EW_writer:
Hmmm... how many sites do EW and AR allegedly have in total? Wasn't it you who mentioned that both companies have a plethora of websites? Do we have to list those sites?

Read the threads, you incompetent piece of criminal trash. ALL of Universal Research's fraudulent sites are listed in one or more of those threads. Don't pretend that I did not include them. Each and every one is fraudulent, and I can easily prove it (I already have, actually). In fact, WRT also posted a list.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #51
I stated that I will respond on my schedule, after I am able to review the existing case law. I don't jump at your every whim.

Excuses, EXCUSES. Spent hours trying to find something no matter how obscure that you can mount against my argument? I understand that you're frustrated and I understand that you may think that I'm rushing you but HEY, you put the rush UPON YOURSELF when you said:

I'll address the "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

I don't think that 4 days counts as "shortly" in anyone's book.

Don't pretend that I did not include them.

You little fool. You really NEED to enroll in some English comprehension classes. I wasn't asking you to list the sites, you dumb oaf. Sorry, but I will not explain what I meant again since I'm pretty sure that everyone who has half a brain understood what my post meant.

_______________________________________________________________
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #52
STFU, you filthy, lying, criminal essay-w*0re.

Whhhaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy!

Name ALL the sites that you claim are NOT fraudulent. Put up or shut up. Get it?
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #53
Whhhaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyy!

YIKES!!!! She just flipped twice over. Somebody get some Prozac and shove em down her throat (or up her a**) before she picks up an uzi and heads for the nearest foreign essay site patronizing campus!! OH My Gawd.. SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!!

Name ALL the sites that you claim are NOT fraudulent.

Being liable for false advertising charges and being a scam are two very different things. EW and AR may someday find themselves in court because of that, unfair labor practices and some other s-i* (like yeah, selling QUALITY HOMEWORK TO STUDENTS), but THEY ARE NOT SCAMS. Get that through that misshapen mass you call a brain.
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #54
Name the sites, coward.

Any site that deceives, misrepresents, robs customers of their right to make informed purchasing decisions, and obtains business under false pretenses is a SCAM.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #55
Name the sites,

Didn't I just say EW and AR?

Any site that is able to provide clients with products that they are satisfied with is NOT A SCAM. Get that through that misshapen mass you call a brain.

_________________________________________________________________
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #56
Any site that is able to provide clients with products that they are satisfied with is NOT A SCAM.

LMAO! Translation: "It's perfectly OK for a company to deceive, lie, and misrepresent, as long as I think that all of the purportedly thousands of writers at essaywriters.net and academia-research.com from Ukraine provide top-notch, professional writing in the English language. Customers' rights, desires, and opinions don't mean jack. WE make the rules. WE determine what's right and wrong. WE decide what's good for customers. WE determine what's legal and illegal. Consumer protection laws do not apply to us."

Any site that deceives, misrepresents, robs customers of their right to make informed purchasing decisions, and obtains business under false pretenses is a SCAM.

PERIOD.

Didn't I just say EW and AR?

Sorry, coward. First of all, the letters "EW" and "AR" are not Web sites. Secondly, the Web sites that those abbreviations apparently represent are NOT the consumer-end sites that directly defraud customers. Name the consumer-end sites that are "not scams," and I will be more than happy to outline-in great detail-exactly how and why they are scams.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #57
Secondly, the Web sites that those abbreviations apparently represent are NOT the consumer-end sites that directly defraud customers.

I already posted EW's supposed consumer-based websites in the previous page, imbecile. Here, see for yourself. Do you have any more stupid rebuttals?

"It's perfectly OK for a company to deceive, lie, and misrepresent"

Nice try. Once again, you're trying to associate employers' bad practices with the caliber of writers that are employed by the company. It's fact that both EW and AR have some exceptionally talented writers. Customers who are able to find such writers stick with them for their entire academic career. Many of these customers are aware of the questionable practices of EW's consumer-end sites, yet they continue to patronize such sites anyway. Why? Simply because such sites DO DELIVER QUALITY PRODUCTS. In this shady industry where both clients and writers wish to remain absolutely anonymous, receiving quality products and getting paid for writing them are the ONLY THINGS THAT MATTER.

_____________________________________________________________________
False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.


- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #58
Hmmm... how many sites do EW and AR allegedly have in total?

Well, I'm not surprised that you simply stole a partial list of Universal Research-owned domains that I posted. What you obviously don't know, scamming retard, is that 2-pay-secure.com, beckfamilies.com, killer-content.com, resumesexperts.com, resumesplanet.com, universalresearch.net, and wisetranslations.com are either not essay sites or no longer exist. This irrefutably proves just how utterly clueless and careless you are. Hey, I have a great idea! Why don't you make some bulls-i* claims about sites that Universal Research hasn't even registered yet? Those claims would be just as relevant and accurate as the mindless tripe that you posted here already.

Translation:

EW_writer as a drug dealer:
"It's OK to sell crack as long as some customers give acceptable feedback and come back for more."

sfbfsb
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #59
Well, I'm not surprised that you simply stole a partial list of Universal Research-owned domains that I posted.

LOL!!! Are you THAT DESPERATE? You expect me to scourge the web for all of EW's sites? You're just DYING to pin something on me that you'd even settle for something as childish as this? YOU ARE TRULY PATHETIC. You posted those websites first, you ninny. I didn't steal them, I acknowledged that I got them from you and that you were the one who posted them. My point has NOTHING TO DO with those sites actually being active or not at the moment, and EVERYONE BUT YOU KNOWS THAT.

"It's OK to sell crack as long as some customers give acceptable feedback and come back for more."

If by "crack" you mean high quality essays and other academic projects, then yes, that's precisely how I feel about it. You got a problem with that?

______________________________________________________________________
False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.


- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #60
f by "crack" you mean high quality essays and other academic projects

No, by "crack," I mean barely legible garbage written by completely incompetent, unqualified, ESL writers blindly hired by essaywriters.net and academic-research.com strictly because they are willing to work for peanuts in comparison to legitimate, qualified writers in the US. Undue profit over law, ethics, and morality . . . .

This irrefutably proves just how utterly clueless and careless you are.

My obvious point is that you make claims that you pull completely out of your ass, with no knowledge of the facts or acknowledgment of reality. You're so desperate to protect your fraudulent employers that you blindly refute any claims against them. Pathetic.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 09, 2010 | #61
I mean barely legible garbage written by completely incompetent, unqualified, ESL writers

WHAT?!? So you're telling me that you do not even have the guts to claim that you write better than people who you allege to be "completely incompetent, unqualified, ESL writers"?

2. I've never claimed to be better than AR's premium writers.

LMAO!!!! PATHETIC. ^___________________^ And before you type anything, please note that ANY STATEMENT other than a well substantiated claim that you do write better than AR's premium writers won't be worth s-i*.

You're so desperate to protect your fraudulent employers that you blindly refute any claims against them. Pathetic.

You're messed up. One, I don't work for AR or EW, not anymore in the case of EW anyway. Two, I have openly acknowledged many of EW's faults in the past. Three, I don't care if customers order from ANY OF EW's customer-end sites or not. See? YOU LOSE AGAIN.

ROFLMAO!!!
_____________________________________________________________________
False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.

- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)
WritersBeware  
Oct 09, 2010 | #62
Sorry, but I won't entertain your completely off-topic, personal nonsense. People are free to judge my writing skills and form their own opinions. Unlike you, I'm not here to w*0e my skills, so I don't really care what people think. That's your hangup, Margie.

My obvious point is that you make claims that you pull completely out of your ass, with no knowledge of the facts or acknowledgment of reality. You're so desperate to protect your fraudulent employers that you blindly refute any claims against them. Pathetic.

Three, I don't care if customers order from ANY OF EW's customer-end sites or not.

Name the sites or shut up.
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 10, 2010 | #63
Sorry, but I won't entertain your completely off-topic, personal nonsense.

Hah.. you wish it was nonsense. You can't even claim that you're better than AR's writers and yet you have the gall to insult them? Sheesh... >.<

Name the sites or shut up.

I already named the sites. You say the list isn't complete, then feel free to add to it. I really don't care, it really DOESN'T MATTER. What does matter is that you have proven your stupidity time and time again in this forum. You can tout your evidences of false advertising all you want, no one's listening anymore. They know what you have to say and they know that it's not what really matters to them. Oh, and no matter how many more dummy accounts you plan to make to make it seem otherwise, the actual prospective clients who visit this forum would know better. You're done, WritersBeware. Game over.

so I don't really care what people think.

If this was true, you wouldn't have responded to the first post that I made on this thread, LIAR.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #64
Hah.. you wish it was nonsense. You can't even claim that you're better than AR's writers and yet you have the gall to insult them? Sheesh... >.<

As much as you are so very desperate for me to make a personal assertion about my writing skills in relation to any AR writers, I will not do so. Darn.

Oh, and no matter how many more dummy accounts you plan to make to make it seem otherwise

LMAO! Tell me-what "dummy" account did I make so far, EW_liar?

If this was true

"If this were true . . . ." Geez, lady, that's English 101 material.

Funny-you're the only one trying to make my personal skills an issue because you want to distract from your essaywriters.net's scams.
rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Oct 10, 2010 | #65
Being liable for false advertising charges and being a scam are two very different things.

yes!

Customers' rights, desires, and opinions don't mean jack.

actually, AR's whole premium promotion system is based on customer feedback. customers also get unlimited free revisions if they're not satisfied.

In this shady industry where both clients and writers wish to remain absolutely anonymous, receiving quality products and getting paid for writing them are the ONLY THINGS THAT MATTER.

yep-yep.

EW_writer:
If this was true

"If this were true

for an annoying snoot, you sure don't know what "scam" means.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #66
you sure don't know what "scam" means

Really?

scam
a confidence game or other fraudulent scheme, esp. for making a quick profit
a stratagem for gain
to deceive someone

SOURCE: dictionary.reference.com/browse/scam

Rusty Writer, why do you insist on repeatedly proving that my nickname for you is spot-on?

Any site that deceives, misrepresents, robs customers of their right to make informed purchasing decisions, spits on consumer-protection laws, and/or obtains business under false pretenses is a SCAM.

rustyironchains  12 | 696 ☆☆  
Oct 10, 2010 | #67
1. customer orders paper

2. company delivers paper

3. customer is happy, or

4. customer gets free revisions until they're happy, or

5. customer gets a refund

how is this a scam again? I'm really not getting it.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #68
1. customer orders paper

. . . based on betrayed trust, misrepresentation, false promises, and outright lies . . . .

2. company delivers paper

. . . often riddled with grammatical mistakes, pidgin English, and cultural disconnections that are rampant in the writings of the average, ESL writer in the American essay industry . . . .

3. customer is happy

. . . ONLY because he/she was lucky enough to randomly receive one of the few qualified writers in AR's ranks, the customer is not qualified enough to recognize the glaring mistakes, the customer does not have time to deal with a re-write, or the customer does not want to stir up trouble out of fear of reprisal by the company . . . .

4. customer gets free revisions until they're happy

. . . that's IF the customer even recognizes the low quality of the writing that has been delivered to him/her; after all, we're talking about customers who are stupid, speak English as a second language, or are too busy to closely proofread the product . . . . The owners of the scam company can afford-if absolutely necessary-to pay a more qualified writer to re-write the paper IF a customer complains because the company pays the unqualified, ESL writers PEANUTS originally. AR depends on the fact that most customers will ultimately not ask for a re-write due to not being qualified enough to recognize the glaring mistakes in the first place, not having the time to deal with a re-write, or not wanting to stir up trouble out of fear of reprisal by the company. Customers are sold a bill of goods under false pretenses; they are falsely led to believe that the "professional" writing will be perfect the first time.

5. customer gets a refund

LMAO! Really? AR gives 100% refunds for crappy product each and every time, hah? Any proof?
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 10, 2010 | #69
As much as you are so very desperate for me to make a personal assertion about my writing skills in relation to any AR writers, I will not do so. Darn.

Oh, I don't want you to. ^_^ I'm not "desperate" for you to make a personal assertion because while you're busy not doing so, people are seeing how silly it is for you to berate writers who you cannot even claim to match in skill.

LMAO! Tell me-what "dummy" account did I make so far, EW_liar?

Oh? I thought you didn't care what I thought? ^___________________^

"If this were true . . . ."

LOL!!! Thank you for proving to all of us once again that when you cannot engage an argument or answer a question, you resort to nitpicking spelling and grammar. See, I don't mind admitting that I do make occasional writing mistakes when I'm not being paid to write. You on the other hand, are an entirely different animal. Typos are not errors, right? ROFLMAO!!!

______________________________________________________________________
False advertisement is a crime only when a customer actually buys something

fervent, unrelenting, years-long, public support/defense of a belief-in writing-constitutes action in the eyes of the law.


- from the mad imaginings of pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware (2010)

Days since pretend-lawyer, WritersBeware made the statement below: 5

I'll address the "legal quotes" when I return shortly.

WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #70
Oh, I don't want you to. ^_^ I'm not "desperate" for you to make a personal assertion because while you're busy not doing so.

1. Irrelevant.

2. I will not allow you to distract.

3. I'm sorry that my calculated decision to not enable you to derail bothers you so much, Margaret.

Oh? I thought you didn't care what I thought? ^___________________^

What you think means absolutely nothing to me. What you falsely claim in public is an entirely different matter. Now, prove that you are not a filthy liar (oh, wait, that ship sailed long ago) by revealing the other usernames that you claim me to have created. Why can't you validate your accusations, LIAR?
EW_writer  21 | 1981 ☆☆☆  
Oct 10, 2010 | #71
3. I'm sorry that my calculated decision to not enable you to derail bothers you so much

Wow.. you certainly have an English comprehension problem. I'll say it one more time, just for you:

Oh, I don't want you to (assert that you write better than AR's premium writers). ^_^ I'm not "desperate" for you to make a personal assertion because while you're busy not doing so, people are seeing how silly it is for you to berate writers who you cannot even claim to match in skill.

What you think means absolutely nothing to me. What you falsely claim in public is an entirely different matter.

Did I accuse you of anything? My.. my.. my... did you take that Prozac like your doctor asked you to? I think that you have vested interests in posting on this forum, I think that you have more than one account in this forum, I think that you're a crappy writer with perfect grammar but absolutely no talent. I think that you suck. Do I need to humor you with evidence on each of these thoughts, heck no.

I claimed that your statement regarding false advertising laws is in direct contradiction to U.S. legal norms. That is a claim and I backed it up with facts. Have you disproved that claim yet? No. I claimed that you are wrong about essaybay's business model. Were you able to prove otherwise, no. Do you get the difference now, LOSER?
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #72
I claimed that your statement regarding false advertising laws is in direct contradiction to U.S. legal norms. That is a claim and I backed it up with facts. Have you disproved that claim yet? No.

YES, using your evidence.

uses in commerce

sfbdf dg

YOU LOSE.

By the way, your constant begging for help is pathetic.
stu4  21 | 856 ☆☆   Observer
Oct 10, 2010 | #73
often riddled with grammatical mistakes, pidgin English, and cultural disconnections that are rampant in the writings of the average, ESL writer in the American essay industry . . . .

I'm a bit surprised because you also hire ESL writers:

we will hire an ESL writer [*********]

*********.com/employment.html

I know you changed this page after I pointed you do also hire ESL writers. The word 'occassionally' doesn't change the fact that 'the biggest and oldest American essay website' uses the services of foreign ESLers whose first language is not English. I wonder why you don't mention this little fact on other pages that your unsuspected clients may visit.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #74
we will hire an ESL writer

1. Why are you so obsessed with that site?

2. I do not own, write for, or work for that site.

3. I never bring up that site's name-ever.

4. I have stated countless times that I have no problem with QUALIFIED, ESL writers.

5. You intentionally misquoted the site. Here's the entire quote:

Native language must be English!
(The nature of our service and obligation to our clients demand that we not hire any freelance writer who fails to demonstrate absolute, flawless command of both the English language and Western culture. Occasionally, we will hire an ESL writer who thoroughly demonstrates to us such an absolute, flawless command of both the English language and Western culture that his or her final drafts are completely indistinguishable from the final drafts of our best, native writers.)


Be gone, mo-ron.
stu4  21 | 856 ☆☆   Observer
Oct 10, 2010 | #75
1. Why are you so obsessed with that site?

You are obsessed with EssayWriters or BestEssays, to name a few. Why are you obsessed with these sites? If you can be, others can be too, no?

2. I do not own, write for, or work for that site.

Jason, this is totally inaccurate.

5. You intentionally misquoted the site. Here's the entire quote:

But are you qualified to judge an ESL writer's abilities to write? You hate them by default, you mock them, you offend them. Maybe if it was not for your prejudice you would hire even more ESL writers? Try to learn more about their culture and don't try to pass on the garbage culture you come from, maybe it will be beneficial to you and writers after all.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #76
You are obsessed with EssayWriters or BestEssays, to name a few.

I am "obsessed" with uncovering verifiable FRAUD and protecting innocent people from becoming the next victims of your scam sites, essaywriters.net and bestessays.com. Nobody has ever posted any sort of evidence that the site you reference engages in any type of fraud or misrepresentation whatsoever.

Jason, this is totally inaccurate.

LMAO! Why can't you provide any evidence to support your asinine accusation, Yuri?

But are you qualified to judge an ESL writer's abilities to write? You hate them by default, you mock them, you offend them.

Unbelievable . . . . You are a clueless tool.

Advice for new and/or ESL writers looking for work

"ESL Spotlight" company #1: oodoc.com & writrs.com of France

"ESL Spotlight" company #2: uppsatser.se & essays.se of Sweden

I have also stated probably 500 times that I have no problem whatsoever with qualified, ESL writers.

Why do you have such a problem with me calling a spade a spade? Would it have anything to do with your hiring practices, Yuri?
stu4  21 | 856 ☆☆   Observer
Oct 10, 2010 | #77
I have also stated probably 500 times that I have no problem whatsoever with qualified, ESL writers.

Since ESL writer can be "completely indistinguishable" from a native writer [we both agree on that] then we can also agree that there are MANY native writers who are not qualified to write essays because their knowledge and skills are way below the level of some ESL writers.

For you the fact someone is a 'native writer' equals 'high quality', which is nonsense. There are probably more native writers who would fail a simple English grammar test than ESL writers would do.
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #78
For you the fact someone is a 'native writer' equals 'high quality', which is nonsense.

FAIL. Quote, please.

There are probably more native writers who would fail a simple English grammar test than ESL writers would do.

That is absolute crap. So, is it also your position that there are more USL (Ukrainian as a Second Language) writers who are qualified to write professionally in the Ukrainian language than there are native Ukrainian-speaking writers who are qualified to write professionally in the Ukrainian language?
stu4  21 | 856 ☆☆   Observer
Oct 10, 2010 | #79
English is a global language. Like numbers are understood and used globally. Do you understand:

2+5=7?

If you do, you must have attended Ukrainian primary school because they taught it in class?
WritersBeware  
Oct 10, 2010 | #80
Hahahahha, you're a joke. Math has been coined a "global"-if not "universal"-language because mathematical computations can not be tainted by geographical location, language barriers, cultural differences, or bias. Numbers are numbers. The same is absolutely NOT true for the spoken/written word, language learning, or language instruction.




Forum / General Talk / Does this site do oxymoron(ism)?