EW_writer 21 | 1981 ☆☆☆
Oct 08, 2010 | #41
The vast majority of the significant evidence that I have posted in this forum had NEVER appeared anywhere online previously.
Blah.. blah... BLAH. Name a site already! ^_____^ LOL!!! You haven't? You can't? CNN reported on cheating and DID NOT focus on sites being scams. You've been contacted by news agencies? Right... you're talking about the CNN dude who sent almost everyone emails asking for information. You contributed to the CNN report? Riiiiiight.. was that before or after you wrote John McCain his speech for the primaries? Sheeeesh... The sad part is, EVEN IF all of this was true and you did somehow contribute to the CNN report, it still DOES NOT PROVE that your contributions are critical to proving scams in this industry. Heck, the site that CNN featured isn't even a scam site.
Btw, so how's the legal research doing? STILL can't find anything to say against my position regarding writers' culpability? Maybe you ought to run for public office, get a seat in congress, and then try and have the Lanham Act revised. YOU ARE SUCH A LOSER! >.<


