You're dealing with these concepts (rather then types of papers!) more in a mathematical way e.g. 2+2=4. However, you must note that there is no one universal definition/explanation for what each of these pieces stands for.
Swales is the pioneering scholar who started working on the analysis of these and other genres of research writing. You know what? It was found that research conventions vary from institutions to institutions, countries to countries, and even from disciplines to disciplines (with the same faculty).
Reading Swales can be enlightening for you so that you stop imposing your knowledge to others "as the absolute truth". There is no absolute truth in the social sciences.
I will not cite the specific publications by Swales. It's your work to find out.
If you read the criticism on research genres in connection to empiricism vs. post-empiricism debates, you'll be surprised to note that Swales left his previously held position on conformity to specific research genres.
You need to find all that out.
Mao!
PS: PLEASE NOTE THAT I WOULD EXPECT YOU TO SHOW MUTUAL RESPECT IF YOU WANT TO ARGUE RATIONALLY. I hope you'd avoid any distortions to that next time.