LOL! Nice try, a**hole. I'm not a thief. Oh wait.. are you referring to my "stealing" jobs from American writers like yourself because I offer more affordable services? That's called competition, loser. Now go back to sucking that egg.

That's my point. IMO, you can't call a thief a professional (despite the usage of the term in some popular Hollywood movies) and do justice to the word since it lacks that "badge of honor" bit that I was talking about.

Prove it. ^_^ I'm done? Haha.. nothing can be farther from the truth (except maybe, you). We're here to stay. Competent, affordable, and discreet ESL writers are here to stay and customers are happy for the alternative that we provide.

There you go again throwing numbers that you can't back up. :p Word of advice: don't dabble in "general statistics" when you can't even get through simple 'rithmetic. You just make yourself look utterly stupid.

Doesn't change the fact that you still have a


No matter how much you try to malign foreign companies in general with your tireless propaganda, it won't work. I've said it once and I'll say it again, loser: we're here to stay. Competent, affordable, and discreet ESL writers are here to stay and customers are happy for the alternative that we provide.

So the real debate is, what is the best definition for "profession"? IMO, a profession is a socially recognized occupation. That is, it is a job that society acknowledges to be of value. This is what separates the word from others such as "expertise" or "specialization" and defines its similarity with the words "vocation" and even "calling" (although there are of course other aspects of the word "profession" that sets it apart from the last other two words mentioned). A "profession" sort of carries a badge of honor with it. While I'm very happy about how much I earn from being a homework writer, I don't think I'd be proud to tell my friends and coworkers where I get my extra cash. That's my take on the matter.

Screw you. ^_^ You're free to defend yourself on in the thread quoted. I'm not about to muddle this thread for your pleasure. ^_^


and I respect that assessment (if you were referring to me as that "other side"). It's just sad that some other people on your side are incapable of airing out opinions without attempting to ridicule.

I hope that works out for you, moron.


Oh please, we all do the same thing. This is once again a demonstration of WB's futile attempt at discrediting foreign writers who write for foreign sites despite knowing about allegations against such sites by calling them criminals. Go suck on an egg.

I already posted the link, idiot.


What is this retarded compulsion of yours to mention OR every time you need someone to back you up.. Do you... oops. :P Hahaha!

Once again: essay ninja was responding to remarks made against his/her site and responded only once to said remarks (which by common sense is against the very idea of "spam").

What the fu*- is wrong with having a neighbor who's a shaman, dog? :p You just reek of bigotry.


I bought mine writing essays for students as well. What's your point?


I can't believe how gullible you are. >.<

ROFLMAO! You're a nutcase. Even if you don't deserve that first award (and you do), you most definitely deserve the second one. :D

Somebody ought to school you in the difference between a lie and a mistake. I admitted to a wrong choice of words and clarified my position.


Nope, she did not. My points on why the post is not spam still stand:

essay ninja was responding to remarks made against his/her site and responded only once to said remarks (which by common sense is against the very idea of "spam"). The offer of employment wasn't even directly stated and in my opinion was not the intention of the post.

Amen.

Stupid dolt. I didn't "steal" anything from you. I got the image from the same site you got yours. This goes to show how quickly WB jumps to conclusions in her attempts to discredit and defame other posters.


Oh please..

And that's just from less than a week ago.


Hate to burst your proverbial bubble (not :p) but your "forum spam" still does not fit essay ninja's post. Essay ninja was responding to remarks made against his/her site and responded only once to said remarks (which by common sense is against the very idea of "spam"). If we consider the post spam, then we should consider any post that attempts to clarify a company's location as spam. Had enough?

So what? Do we have a "dibs" policy on images or something? o.O


You deserve another award then:

• 
  Gotcha
  

Their latest bulletins are enough to make any writer (competent or otherwise) cringe. These people just don't get it. Their writers are their assets. A-S-S-E-T-S. The fu**-n "T" is there for a darned good reason.

By the way WB, you are much more deserving of one of these. :)

• 
  ^_^
  

Hey, that's a nice issue for discussion. Marketing considerations aside, can we really consider what we do, "professional" writing?

Nope, I don't think that the quoted post is spam.

I still think essay ninja is funny though. ^_^

Just proves my point that much more. :)

Anything yet? ^_^

Very true.

Cool. I take it back then. You are definitely not a hypocrite. I'm sorry I called you one.

Ok. So you're really out of the homework writing business? If so then I take it back.

I think I've heard Michelangelo from the old TMNT cartoon use the term. >.<


You're not with them anymore? >.<

I'm sure they don't mean it.


Ok, we're good then. I only said you were a hypocrite because you were suggesting that homework writers form some sort of union in another thread. I hope you got where I was coming from with my comment.


Good luck with that, really. I agree that they do monitor this forum but do inform us once you're able to make ew pay for what you're still owed (and much more if possible). Frankly, I believe that withholding your payments just because you quit is downright crappy.

Above we see WB's version of a rebuttal. Short, sweet, and completely moronic. :D


Hey.. goodnight. Or should I say, good morning? It should be like early morning in the U.S. by now. Either you're nocturnal or .... :P

Nope, you didn't. I was able to show clients that they shouldn't listen to your scare tactics and that's the entire point.


Oh c'mon.. you're not honestly going to try that again, are you? Every time you ask to be backed up by the other, much more decent members of this forum, you just get even more humiliated. Can't you accept the fact that while they may agree with you on matters that suit their interests, they won't back you up when it comes to matters of your interest? You're their b**-h, they're not yours. :P

Oh sure... you "clubbed" me real well with your counterarguments above. Look at all the evidence and reasoning present in those two numbers that you gave. Like... WOW. ROFLMAO! Take a hike, mike. When it comes to the issues that matter, the quote above clearly shows how little evidence you can really dish out.

Wrong, you lose.

Whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

See how that's working for me? I don't even need to waste my time reading your responses anymore. :) Clients who come here will read the statement above and know for a fact that all the legal b*llst that you use to generate propaganda against foreign sites mean nothing. What matters to them are quality and price and they should let no one bully them into thinking otherwise.

Err.. no, I made a mistake and I owned up to it. I know that's a very foreign concept to you but hey, at least you have those eggs to suck on, right? It's actually funny how you try to blow up my mistake and make it seem like it proves any of my contentions false. ^_^


Dude, I'm not doing it for you. I figured that the only way to get my message across is to keep repeating my statement so that every new poster can easily read it. It also allows me to kick your sorry a** over and over again without exerting significant effort. So once again:

Whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

Then the above post was a mistake. I should have said multiple versions of the same issue. My mistake, sure but it doesn't change a thing. There are still:


and I still say that:

Whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

Who's LMAO-ing now? :p

Never said they were, idiot.

And once again:

Whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

No you shut up, haha!

Nyuknyuknyuk. ^____^

Doesn't this imply that I would gladly try out ********* if I was offered to do so? :P You must be sucking your egg the wrong way again or something. :)

There you go, meathead (not you, OR).

For the umpteenth time: whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

I see. I actually wasn't aware that writers who terminate their accounts don't get paid anymore. Thanks for the tip though. >.< Were you aware of it at the time that you terminated yours? Hey rusty, did you terminate your account when you quit ew? Were you left unpaid any amount aside from the fines that you received?


Dude again, I don't mean to offend you in my replies. I have virtually no contempt for any other poster here aside from WB. So what do you intend to do now? Quit writing homework for students entirely or attempt to get yourself hired by *********? Hey, please do. If you get in, tell me how you did it so that I can give it a shot as well, if only to find out if the grass truly is greener on the other side (something I'm beginning to doubt based on the posts of those claiming to be American writers on this message board). ^_^

I've said it once and I'll say it again:

There are multiple versions of that same court case written all over the internet. Whether or not one person or another claims which of the versions is true is irrelevant in as far as the purpose of this forum for clients who visit here is concerned. In that regard, I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of the use of pretend-lawyer skills to dissuade them from ordering from foreign companies and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

WritersBeware is not an agent of *********. nyuknyuknyuk....

Because it's irrelevant to my argument that people who come here complaining about getting fired/excessively fined by ew usually deserve it... duh.. :D

You can pretend to be a lawyer all you want, WB. :p Like I said before there are multiple versions of that same court case written all over the internet. Plus, were the freelance writers of ***** (are they an essay mill in the first place) pursued by the law? Heck no.

I think that I'm fairly confident that what few clients visit here are aware of how you use your pretend-lawyer skills and are unaffected by it. That's good enough for me. :)

Darn, you're thick. It's not about whether or not you've "bashed EW victims more than supported them" but that by bashing many of those who come here claiming "I are got fined" or "I is fired, ew is a scamming," you're proving my point that in general, those who come here complaining about getting booted/fined by ew deserved it.

I gotta go now so I won't be able to 'splain this to you again. Here's wishing your ol' noggin' the the best. ^_^

That's what WB resorts to when she has nothing to counter an argument with. Once again: