since academon is a legitimate US company (and an arm of SNR, right?), you'd better get busy closing my account. you wouldn't want to look like a liar. it's been 4 years since you first made that threat, btw. thanks for this opportunity to remind you.

as for you, Pheelyks, put down the Cinnabon and pay attention: in addition to being an insecure, miseducated, entitled-acting cheeseball, you're a professional accessory. apparently you're a little too dense to see the meaning, but don't dismiss it as empty. professional accessory turned informant= you help people cheat, and then squeal on them.

no thanks-- I'm think going to stick around for a while.


my reference was to this very thread, idiot. clean your eyes out.

now that your eyes are clear, pop ESL quiz! it's one question, and the cateogry is "word families."

1. Mr. Smith has _____; his family is very sad, because now he is _____.

A. died/died
B. died/dead
C. dead/dead
D. dead/died

good luck, MeowCon. think of it as a practice test for the ones keeping you from writing for legitimate UK and US companies.


set all the self-important standards you want. at the end of the day, you're not even a writer. you're a professional accessory turned occasional informant-- the lowest of the low.

I see it as a reminder that you are a tattle-tale snitch. this customer should have been given a partial refund and forgotten. it was your choice to threaten their very direction in life with a click of your potato-chip-grease-smeared mouse.


+1

Pheelyks, shame on you, you self-righteous, greedy rat.

this is a good idea.


I was getting so tired of Pheelyks bragging about how much money he makes. this reminiscing about the poet's barista days is a refreshing change of pace. tell me, lunchbox, did you report the coffee house to the board of health, or were they nice to you? how many pastries did you have to steal, just to get by?

service with a smile...

really, WB, if I had said something like "the idiot who made empty threats about my academic account," I could understand with just responding to me, as if I had addressed you as, "WB." for example, I distantly remember you accusing me of "repeatedly posting" my "personal information" about said academic account (you have yet to post proof), and thus, I can respond to your taunt as if I were named. in this thread, though, notice that I simply leave it open to any Essay agent to respond.

this response could have been handled by so many other people who aren't covert about their relationship with Essay on this forum. in fact, that's what I expected. and yet, there you are, WB, proudly and brazenly waving yet another red herring about something I supposedly did years ago, which you've never proven, and which has nothing to do with the current thread. anyway, thanks for reminding me of the academic thing (still paying), and highlighting the implicit connections between you and Essay on what is now a joke of an anonymous forum.

btw, why can't Essay handle its customer service overflow? don't they have phones? don't they have live chat? WB, you should be paid for your efforts here... it's every other thread, lately.

this is correct; I didn't mean to imply that you are acting as customer service.


this is to whom I was referring.

I can see your mistake, th63, because I didn't name anyone specifically.

it's sort of a shame that this is going on in what appears to be a neutral scam-busting site, but what the $$##... welcome to Best's quasi-customer service center. order number, please?

maybe after 8500 posts, one becomes moderator automatically.

even so, no is is going to be stupid enough to be bullied into giving their order # on an anonymous forum. I'd like to bump this thread from time to time, to show that it hasn't been deleted.

calm down, stop screaming, and post a link.

you should also realize this: my argument was that you started this thread with an ad hominem attack. you insulted me and told me to provide proof. I did. it doesn't matter whether you "defeated" Klosegoal's argument or not; you still led off this thread with an ad hominem, which I have proven. I'm just curious, given your tendency to bay for proof, if you have any yourself. cheers!

there is no defending a logical fallacy, WB. you asked me to point it out, and I did. there's nothing left to say. all you're doing is digging a deeper hole.

meanwhile, in your confusion and anger, please let your fingers approximate even more unhappy cackling. it's like very distant (and so much the more pleasant for its distance!) music to me.

here's your first post-- an ad hominem attack. no substance, no proof, and no relation to the thread. and, there goes your absolute.


I was just observing how uncomfortable your laughter seemed, as it was captialized and replacing a cogent response. your laughter does indeed have connotations, based on its context (it's often inappropriate).

I judge your inappropriate, barking-mad LMAOs at insults directed against you as little clues, though, so please, don't get self-conscious.

yes, I see that unhappiness comment opened up some of that uncomfortable, creepy laughter of yours. as to your playground babbling, you might as well have your fingers stuck in your ears. it doesn't really matter that I can prove you opened with a logical fallacy in this very thread. monkey see no evil, monkey hear no evil. now, if you could only shut that disgusting trench.

I will! and you enjoy your unhappiness, your logical fallacies, and your false absolutes, you weird, angry mongoloid.

hey, WB... are you sure I was referring to you? anyway, it's too little, too late. might I add, too obnoxious, and too crazy.

low posts + good press for a non-Dissertation company= enough "proof" for essayscam's resident idiot and guard-dog that someone is a spammer

low posts + good press for Term Paper Fast= deafening silence

you tell him, Pheelyks. wait, what? oh, sorry; you were referring to me.

the squealer and his champion.

oh there was soda, all right, and it was all over the upholstery. it's probably because you still have trouble operating your fat baby fingers, Socrates.

Acme Paper Industry Auto Mechanics

Oil change... $100
soda spilled on dashboard... -$25
Detailing.... free because of soda

Have a nice day

The Pheelyks Pit Service Center

Oil change... $70
soda spilled on dashboard... free
Brake lines cut... free because of complaining about soda

Go fu*- yourself

that's right, WB, Pheelyks potentially ruined a customer's life. I'm sorry that you're embarrassed, but I'm glad that you understand.

as for you, Meo, you're one to talk about jumping into a conversation. I know that in your mind, you probably see yourself joining your heroes in battle. in reality, you're responding very late, with a personal attack, in a thread in which you've said nothing relevant. so let me offer you this chance, Meo, to look like you're responding, late, but on-topic. what do you think of the practice of reporting problem customers to their universities? feel free to take the time to check your response for idiomatic usage, and thanks in advance for the comic relief.

shame on you, lazy squealer. if it were extortion, it would be better. that's the worst part. the way you tell it, it's just you, being a dick for revenge.

move on. or, if you up the stakes to that level, where you're potentially going to ruin the customer's life, at least extort them first, because you're already going all the way.

how does it feel to be responsible for the potential ruin of another's life, for no good reason except your petty revenge?

stu didn't "challenge you to a debate," you hand-puppet. he just called out your lack of education. and what I'm "pissy" (what a girly word to use... did you get that from your wife, along with the health insurance?) about is that you squealed on your customer to their university. you can repeat, "you didn't read the thread," all you want, cry-baby. I read the thread. you're no victim.

sometimes customers behave poorly, and demand refunds. you give them a refund and move on. you don't rat them out, and get them thrown out of school. just the click of your pudgy fingers was all it took-- I bet if you had had to walk or ride a bike to the actual university, you wouldn't have done it. creep. informant.

I was told by AR admin when I worked for them that AR's owners are located in Kiev, though I believe the company has operations in SE Asia and the US, as well. that's neither shameless nor racist. I know you enjoy your delusions, though, WB, so have fun looking like a crazy person.

stop trying to change the subject, squealer. and while you're shooting down conjecture, how about your conjecture that you didn't ruin that student's life?

you don't have a high road to take anymore, vigilante. you've burned that bridge.

take a step back, WB, and appreciate the view. you want to appear as a smart scam-buster here, right? not a crazy person?

#1 you squealed like the pig you are on a customer, and reported them to their university. whether the customer was annoying or not, you dealt with them like a vindictive, immature, tattling little sissy.

#2 no company, or other independent writer, should ever do this to a customer. it's basically the only ethical convenant there is in this cess-pit of an industry, and it is something to cling to.

#3 you're a fat-ass, lazy, badly-educated, sarcastic, smarmy pr*ck, and you write like one.

what are you, a parrot? stop using WB's logical fallacy to attempt to defend your indefensible action of ratting out a client to their university, you stupid ass. and enjoy your slide... if this really is the first client you've squealed on.

a company would have sent this customer on their way with a partial refund, just to get rid of them. in the extreme, or to make an example, they maybe would have sent the customer a few letters from a lawyer... at worst. a company would not have gone ape-s-i*, informed on them to their university, and ruined their life. you've set a precedent as an irresponsible loose cannon, and what's really annoying is that you seem to feel entitled about it. I feel sorry for you, as well as anyone who has to read your thick-headed posts.

haha. a red herring within a red herring. what do you think, two wrongs make a right?


fact: you squealed on a client to their university. there is no excuse. there is no justification.


you twee, sarcastic, barely-literate tub of lard. I understand that logic takes a while to sink through that blubber around your occiput. no matter how much of a contradictory pain in the ass your customer was, they were entitled to what any company would have given them... not to be stabbed in the back and ruined by a vindictive, trifling, rogue idiot. I hope you get that, eventually.

AR is a nest of crooks. they very well may not pay you. you won't have any redress, either, since they're in Kiev, and no one knows where their US call center is. I think it's in NYC, personally, just because of the 646 number.

of course I read the thread, you rat. you informant. you tattle-tale p. I'm sorry I did, too; your BS excuses make me sick.

sure, whatever you want to call it. you squealed. that you've justified it just makes it more likely you'll do it again.

WB's red herring stinks, as I've noted. I'm not going to respond to any moralist tangents it inspires.

as for what you do with companies, of course I'm not suggesting you'd attempt to squeal on them-- what put that thought in your head, I have no idea. maybe you're squeal-happy.

what I was suggesting is based on the next ET customer who rubs you wrong. if, by chance, you get their info (a database password from an email, tmi in an order description, etc.)... well, who knows?

and that's right, WB, the company eats the loss-- as it should, and as Pheelyks should have.

trust me, it's a slippery slope. good luck.

oh, and thanks for going on record with your tacit approval of Pheelyks squealing to a university on his own customer, WB. I guess you won't mind if he starts going after ET customers... depending on the circumstances. right?

you're a rat and a squealer. the fact that I used to be a thief is just another of WBS's red herrings. whatever ethics exist in this industry come down to the fact that the writer is there to help the customer... not ruin them.

there's a big difference between being a thief and being a rat.

and while you're acting self-righteous, WB, what do you think of the practice of outing customers to their universities? not exactly company policy, is it? or is it?

well, turd, you really went above and beyond. you've found a passive-aggressive, ultimately self-defeating solution to a problem any ethical writer or company would have dealt with by issuing a partial refund and moving on. congrats again. you really do go out of your way to be an unhelpful dick.

and so, I'd like to thank the mod for turning this into a thread. unfortunately, as I mentioned, I don't have a lot of faith in the search-function literacy of the fools who stray here to be poached by slumming ET writers.

so you didn't just call the school directly-- you did threaten the customer. thanks for clearing that up.