an Australian essay site owner and spammer scambag
Glad that you've finally faced up to what you really are :) Congrats, kiddo!
And BOY is WRT annoyed!
Not at all :) I find you rather interesting. Never came across a psycho before.
That is also defamation and a hate campaign of cyber bullying.
Cyberbullying... eh? You have really given yourself away! We really know who you are now - absobloodylutely not a shred of doubt :)
That was so frigging stupid of you :):)
While I am not sure how you define things Down Under, I highly doubt Australia is an exception to the norm.
You've made the `cyberbullying' accusation on several occasions. Do you even know what cyberbulling is? Apparently not. Being such a kind soul, I will explain it. Pay attention and you may learn something:
Cyberbullying is the deliberate and repeated engagement in hostile behaviour, as expressed through hurtful language and malicious, false clams. Often involving cyberstalking, cyberbullies target a single individual, a business entity or group of people. Its intent is to harm the target of the attacks. Harm ranges from the psychological to the economical.
Should you accuse any here of cyberbullying, you have to establish that
1) The attacks targeted you, as in your real world identity;
2) The attacks were completely unprovoked;
3) The attacks involved the propagation of false and malicious rumours and statements;
4) The attacks continued despite your having removed yourself from the forum within which they occurred
5) The alleged cyberbullies stalked and harassed you
Now, calling you a `Melissa' or refusing to believe that you are British, are not acts of cyberbullying because
1) If you are, Melissa from Australia, the claims are factual and, therefore, neither malicious nor false
2) If you are not Melissa from Australia, that means we do not know who you really are and, therefore, have not attacked you (as in your real world, legal, identity) at all. Cyberbullying is not even an issue.
3) You were the instigator of the attacks (look back to the May 2009 posts)
4) You stalked at least two forum members
5) You never made an attempt to leave the forum but, instead, whenever one of your usernames was banned, you came back with another
6) Any and all criticisms were made on the basis of verifiable and undeniable evidence: violation of copyright laws, engagement in the torte of passing off, among others. Calling you, or anyone else, out on those is not cyberbullying at all. Why? Simply because incontrovertible evidence supports the accusations as truthful.
You, on the other hand, are involved in both cyberbullying and cyberstalking.
FYI - in a formal legal setting, people are judged by real, not imaginary, laws. No judge will allow you to define cyberbullying or libel as suits you. This is the real world and in the real world you can be charged with
1) Cyberbulling
2) Cyberstalking
3) Defamation
4) Libel
5) `passing off'
6) Racism
7) Publicly supporting terrorism on numerous occasions
In both the UK and the US, all these are terribly serious. We are talking about real world laws, laws as they actually are, and not about laws as you imagine them to be.
