that one wasn't funny the first time. anyway, there's no need to bump. the Custom Research Help complaint threads keep coming...

uh-huh...

oh, sorry, Meo. I didn't realize that this was such a seriously serious thread for you. why don't you bring us back on track, and wax philosophical about "big people" again?

FW, the master of the boring churn, strikes again. hey Jughead, you're lucky that the prospective customers reading that dross are dumb as rocks. it's as if Charles Dickens time-traveled, but somehow, the experience lobotomized him.

FW's customers know value when they see it: you get a paragraph for the price of a sentence.

pheelyks hen pang, suo yi, ta mei you yi ge nu peng you.

ta re ta de mu quin, ke shi hen bu xin.

ta jiu shi zai zhe ge di fang, hen tao yan. dui bu xi ta.

rub the pride and willful ignorance from your eyes, Meo, and maybe my phrases will appear less opaque to you. failing that, take some ******* Berlitz lessons. there's nothing more annoying than a know-nothing who acts like a know-it-all.

creep city.

tick, tock.

again, my bank is fine, thanks. I write papers as a side thing. I'm glad you clowns are so concerned. it's sweet.


haha, how many years ago did you first say this to yourself? omfg, pheelyks... it just occurred to me. you're waiting to get published, aren't you?

pheelyks, don't you take time off? you spend your health and the best years of your life writing homework for kids, and now you're doing WB's.

given some recent customer complaints here, I'm not surprised that you only did half of it.

speak English, Meo. do you mean you think I'm going off-topic?


like this?


WB, I agree! I don't think you did your homework, though. if you had, you'd know that propaganda has at its center a kernel of truth, whereas misinformation is more like a smokescreen. you're welcome.

it's interesting that you use the word "propaganda" instead of "misinformation," WB. now, off to dictionary.com with you.

speaking of which, despite the industry-wide dearth of the winter dry season, my cash flow is okay. thanks for your concern, trash.

hahahahaha, nice thread you unhelpful ass. keep it up! btw, you are the only female I've ever heard name-drop Brock Lesnar. rot in hell, you ET scumbag liar.

before you answer your own question next time, Meo, you might wait for it to be answered. the answer is: they paid. and as for caliber and prestige, I think you may be in the wrong industry to be throwing those terms around competitively... or are you? that is, do you have anything productive to add to this thread?


the same goes for you, WB. haven't you traditionally maintained a denial of being a writer in this industry? this thread is for writers to post their experiences with different companies.

[Moved from]:

companies that pay writers

I know there are a lot of writers on here. for as long as this stays up, I think people should talk about which companies we have written for (and been paid by). let's also feel free to name names and ignore the nancy bs about not referring to companies by names.

it's a messed up industry, and I think writers should use this forum as a way to tell what's what, based on the evidence of our collective experiences.

it's simple-- do they pay? do they pay, but steal? do they just steal?

for example:

academia-research.com pays, but steals
essaywriters.net pays, but steals
academon.com pays
thepensters.com never got an order

+

??

nom nom I'm a little nom late; let me at em!

• 
  chunk_goonies_web.jp.jpg
  

the more money we come across
the more problems we see

a fool and his money will always part.

yep.

here we have our second and third object lessons in projection. will anyone ever learn?

let's see, AR is one. umm... help me out here with the "several."


lol. it seems a little dramatic, but whatever you say.


creepy is as creepy does.

ffs, pheelyks, keep up. the cyber-stalker comment was a specific reference to WB, as shown by the prefix-ellipses linking my post to his. if that's not obvious enough, the fact that the post starts with "says the," should clue you in.

time to get up and do some calisthenics. get the blood going to your brain.

you have been a bit too interested in me lately (remember when you threw down on me with no provocation across multiple threads?), but you haven't upped it to trying to mess with my living, or making empty threats about tracking me down.

anyway, I understand your confusion. the generic insult I put out was a call to all butt-hurt, vendetta-obsessed loonies... to WB, it was a clarion call. to you, maybe a little less so.

I don't know, pheelyks... now that I think about it, it might apply to you, too.

... says the creepy wannabe cyber-stalker.

yes, it's a place of open discussion, WB, and when I throw out a generic insult in it, you usually come running.

it's one of my favorite parts of posting.

oh, was I talking to you, WB? I guess so... you responded pretty quickly.

I've been saying "butt-hurt" since high school, btw... what, did you think Chunk had the copyright on that one?

academon.com is a quality company that has also been known to ignore the shrill shrieks of butt-hurt, vendetta-obsessed lunatics.

drop out before you get thrown out

maybe you were trying to make a joke, but what you were doing was insulting, not entertaining.

pheelyks, the rational poet! well, if coming in cold on 3 different, unrelated threads and randomly attacking someone doesn't equal a sucker punch, what does it equal? a cry for attention? a sign that you need to get a hobby? if you have an alternative explanation, I'd love to hear it.

WB, welcome back to over-eaters anonymous. when you're done hobnobbing, can we get back to how exactly your Borat comment to Rafaella wasn't a taunt?

you disrupted my goings-on with WB and Meo with cheap shots in multiple threads, for no discernible reason. I had no argument with you here, so you'll have to forgive me if I can't dredge one up right now to explain your weird behavior.

isn't it the busiest time of the year? don't you have anything better to do?

let's see... I don't know how much of a fighter you are, fatty, but in my IRL experience, 99% of sissies start their fights with a sucker-punch out of nowhere.

thanks for your interest; let me know if there's anything else you need explained.

it's just a metaphor, tiger.

well, if you're right, Pheelyks, and my opinion means nothing, you should probably just ignore my posts, then, and stop picking random sissy-fights with me in multiple threads.

is Pheelyks WB's sock-puppet?

Pheelyks, not content with answering questions I specifically ask WB, has now upped his game to jumping in front of insults.

no, that's an inappropriate, mistimed, and misdirected taunt. you're a joke.

next time, say, "no ice."

you're Meo's defender? lol-- truly.


again, lol. really, who needs standup on Youtube? thanks for saving me some bandwidth, WB.



it's like tee-ball. give me something difficult.

How does the future of freelance writing looks like? <-- like that